• 検索結果がありません。

In this research, synchronization phenomena observed from simple chaotic circuits with asymmetric coupling by nonlinear mutual inductors are investigated

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "In this research, synchronization phenomena observed from simple chaotic circuits with asymmetric coupling by nonlinear mutual inductors are investigated"

Copied!
1
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Coupled Chaotic Circuits with Nonlinear Mutual Inductors

Yuta KOMATSU Yoko UWATE Yoshifumi NISHIO (Tokushima University)

1. Introduction

Many nonlinear dynamical systems in various fields have been confirmed to exhibit chaotic oscillations. Re- cently applications of chaos to engineering systems are expected such as chaos noise generators, control of chaos, synchronization of chaos, and so on [1][2].

In this research, synchronization phenomena observed from simple chaotic circuits with asymmetric coupling by nonlinear mutual inductors are investigated.

2. Circuit Model

Figure 1 shows the circuit model. In the circuit, three identical chaotic circuits are coupled asymmetrically by nonlinear mutual inductors.

Figure 1: Circuit model.

First, we approximate the iv characteristics of the nonlinear resistor by the following function.

vd(ik) =9

rdik. (1) Further, theφ−icharacteristics of the nonlinear inductor is described as following function.

Ik= φk

L2 +

³ 1 L1 1

L2

´

k+ Φ| − |φkΦ|

2 . (2)

By changing the variables and the parameters,

t=

L1C τ , a= 8 s

rd

rC L1

, ·” = d , φk=a

L1C xk, ik=a rC

L1yk, vk=a zk, α= L1

L0, β=r rC

L1, γ= L2

L0, δ= Φ a

L1C. (3)

the circuit equations are normalized and described as

˙ x1=

1−m1m2

1−m1 P1m11−m(1−m2)

1 P2m2P3

1 +m12m1m2

˙ x2=

1−m1m2

1−m1 P2m11−m(1−m2)

1 P1m2P3

1 +m12m1m2

˙

x3= (1 +m1)P3m1(P1+P2) 1 +m12m1m2

˙

yk=α{β(Xk+yk)zkf(yk)}

˙

zk=Xk+yk (k= 1,2,3)

(4)

where

Xk= α γxk+

³ 1α

γ

´|x

k+δ| − |xkδ|

2 Pk=β(Xk+yk)zk

f(yk) =9 yk.

(5)

3. Computer Calculated Results

Figure 2 shows computer calculated result. From Fig.2, we can confirm that two chaos observed from subcircuit 1 and 2 are synchronized at in-phase. Moreover we can confirm that subcircuit 3 becomes asynchronous state.

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Figure 2: In-phase synchronization of chaos. α= 20.0. β

= 0.26. γ = 10.0. δ= 1.5. m1 = 0.2. m2 = 0.19. (1)x1

vs.z1. (2)x3 vs. z3. (3)x1 vs. x2. (4)x1 vs. x3.

4. Conclusions

In this research, we investigated quasi-synchronization phenomena observed from chaotic circuits with asymmet- ric coupling by nonlinear mutual inductors. By carrying out the computer calculations, we confirmed that various quasi-synchronization phenomena of chaos were observed.

In the future, we investigate phenomena observed from the case which four or more subcircuits are coupled asym- metrically by nonlinear mutual inductors.

References

[1] M. Wada, Y. Nishio and A. Ushida, “Analysis of Bi- furcation Phenomena in Two Chaotic Circuits Coupled by an Inductor,” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals, vol.

E80-A, no. 5, pp. 869-875, May 1997.

[2] G.O. Zhong, C.W. Wu and L.O. Chua, “Torus- Doubling Bifurcations in Four Mutually Coupled Chua’s Circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 186-193. 1998.

平成18年度電気関係学会四国支部連合大会 320

17 - 24

Figure 1 shows the circuit model. In the circuit, three identical chaotic circuits are coupled asymmetrically by nonlinear mutual inductors.

参照

関連したドキュメント

While Theorem 1.1 illustrates how variable delay can complicate solution behav- ior, we emphasize that the feedback function f in Theorem 1.1 is only nonincreasing, rather than

SINGULAR AND MAXIMAL RADON TRANSFORMS 521 Coupling this result with the uniqueness of the exponential representa- tion, we conclude that the vector fields in that representation

In the present paper the technique is much improved, and several new questions are considered, namely: the possibilityof passing to the limit b → +0 in the constructed

In the general form, the problem of description of flat pencils of met- rics (or, in other words, compatible nondegenerate local Poisson struc- tures of hydrodynamic type)

In case the reader is encountering polymer models with boundaries for the first time but can appreciate an analogy with the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP), then

In order to observe generalized projective synchronization between two identical hyper- chaotic Lorenz systems, we assume that the drive system with four state variables denoted by

A variety of methods have been introduced for the synchronization of chaotic systems which include complete synchronization, generalized synchronization, phase synchronization,

Based on the results from [7,14,15] where the bifurcation mechanism of phase synchronization is related to the bifurcations of saddle periodic orbits embedded in a chaotic attractor,