• 検索結果がありません。

ON CERTAIN OPERATIONAL FORMULA FOR MULTIVARIABLE BASIC HYPERGEOMETRIC FUNCTIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "ON CERTAIN OPERATIONAL FORMULA FOR MULTIVARIABLE BASIC HYPERGEOMETRIC FUNCTIONS"

Copied!
14
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

ON CERTAIN OPERATIONAL FORMULA FOR MULTIVARIABLE BASIC HYPERGEOMETRIC FUNCTIONS

S. D. PUROHIT and R. K. RAINA

Abstract. In the present paper certain operational formulae involving Riemann-Liouville and Kober fractionalq-integral operators for an analytic function are derived. The usefulness of the main results are exhibited by considering some examples which also yield q-extensions of some known results for ordinary hypergeometric functions of one and more variables.

1. Introduction

Several authors have used certain fractionalq-calculus operators to obtain various operational and transformation formulae involving basic hypergeometric functions (see, for instance, [1]–[4], [7], [10]–[12]). Motivated by the interesting outcome of some of the earlier works and a possible scope for their applications in evaluation and solution of the types of q-integral equations, we further determine certain operational formulae involving the Riemann-Liouville and Kober type fractional q-integral operators.

Received January 24, 2008.

2000Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 33D70; Secondary 26A33.

Key words and phrases. Fractionalq-integral operators; Riemann-Liouville and Koberq-integral operators; mul- tivariable basic hypergeometric functions.

(2)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

Aq-analogue of the familiar Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of a functionf(x) is defined by ([1])

(1.1) Iqµ{f(x)}= 1

Γq(µ) Z x

0

(x−tq)µ−1f(t)d(t;q) (Re(µ)>0; |q|<1).

Also, in [1] the basic analogue of the Kober fractional integral operator is defined by (1.2) Iqη,µ{f(x)}=x−η−µ

Γq(µ) Z x

0

(x−tq)µ−1tηf(t)d(t;q) (Re(µ)>0; |q|<1; η∈R).

We shall make use of the following notations and definitions in the sequel.

For real or complexaand|q|<1, theq-shifted factorial is defined by

(1.3) (a;q)n=

( 1, ifn= 0 (1−a)(1−aq). . .(1−aqn−1) ifn∈N, and in terms of theq-gamma function (1.3) can be expressed as

(1.4) (qa;q)n = Γq(a+n)(1−q)n

Γq(a) , n >0,

where theq-gamma function (cf. Gasper and Rahman [3]) is given by

(1.5) Γq(a) = (q;q)

(qa;q)(1−q)a−1 = (1;q)a−1

(1−q)a−1,

(3)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

provided thata6= 0,−1,−2, . . . Further,

(1.6) (x;y)ν =xν

Y

n=0

1−(y/x)qn 1−(y/x)qν+n

=xν 1Φ0

q−ν

;q, yqν/x

.

The multiple basic hypergeometric function (cf. Srivastava and Karlsson [9]) is defined by

(1.7)

ΦA:BC:D00;...;B;...;D(n)(n)

[(a) :θ0, . . . , θ(n)] : [(b0) :φ0];. . .; [(b(n)) :φ(n)]

[(c) :ψ0, . . . , ψ(n)] : [(d0) :δ0];. . .; [(d(n)) :δ(n)] ;q, z1, . . . , zn

=

X

m1,···,mn=0 A

Q

j=1

(aj;q)m

1θ0j+...+mnθ(n)j B0

Q

j=1

(b0j;q)m

1φ0j· · ·

B(n)

Q

j=1

(b(n)j ;q)m

nφ(n)j

C

Q

j=1

(cj;q)m

1ψj0+...+mnψ(n)j D0

Q

j=1

(d0j;q)m

1δ0j· · ·

D(n)

Q

j=1

(d(n)j ;q)m

nδ(n)j

· zm11 (q;q)m1

· · · zmnn (q;q)mn

,

where the argumentsz1,· · ·, zn, and the complex parameters ( aj, j= 1, . . . , A; b(k)j , j= 1, . . . , Bj(k);

cj, j= 1, . . . , C; d(k)j , j= 1, . . . , D(k)j ; k= 1, . . . , n (primes), and the associated coefficients

( θ(k)j , j= 1, . . . , A; φ(k)j , j= 1, . . . , Bj(k);

ψ(k)j , j= 1, . . . , C; δ(k)j , j= 1, . . . , D(k)j k= 1, . . . , n(primes), are so constrained that the multiple series (1.7) converges.

(4)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

For θ(k)j = 1 (j = 1, . . . , A), φ(k)j = 1 (j = 1, . . . , B(k)j ), ψ(k)j = 1 (j = 1, . . . , C), δ(k)j = 1 (j = 1, . . . , Dj(k)) for allk= 1, . . . , n(primes) the definition (1.7) reduces to theq-analogue of the generalized Kamp´e de F´eriet function ofnvariables given by

(1.8)

ΦA:BC:D00;...;B;...;D(n)(n)

(a) : (b0);. . .; (b(n))

(c) : (d0);. . .; (d(n)) ;q, z1, . . . , zn

=

X

m1,···,mn=0 A

Q

j=1

(aj;q)m1+...+mn B0

Q

j=1

(b0j;q)m1. . .

B(n)

Q

j=1

(b(n)j ;q)mn C

Q

j=1

(cj;q)m1+...+mn D0

Q

j=1

(d0j;q)m1. . .

D(n)

Q

j=1

(d(n)j ;q)mn

· z1m1

(q;q)m1 · · · zmnn (q;q)mn.

The generalized basic hypergeometric series (cf. Slater [7] is given by

(1.9) rΦs

a1, . . . , ar b1, . . . , bs ;q, z

=

X

n=0

(a1, . . . , ar;q)n (q, b1, . . . , bs;q)n

zn,

where, for convergence,|q|<1 and|z|<1 if r=s+ 1, and for anyzifr≤s.

The purpose of this paper is to obtain certain operational formulae involving the Riemann-Liouville and Kober type of fractionalq-integral operators of an analytic function. The applications yield examples of image formula under these above operators, thereby illustrating the usefulness of the main results.

(5)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

2. Main Results

Suppose that a functionf(z1, . . . , zn) is analytic in the domainD=D1×D2× · · · ×Dn (zi∈Di, i= 1,· · ·, n) possessing the power series expansion

(2.1) f(z1, . . . , zn) =

X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)

n

Y

i=1

zimi,

where|zi|< Ri(Ri>0,i= 1, . . . , n), andC(m1, . . . , mn) is a bounded sequence of real or complex numbers.

For an analytic functionf(z1, . . . , zn) defined by (2.1), we derive the following two operational formula involving the fractionalq-integral operators for a real variablex and complex variables z1, . . . , zn.

Theorem 1.Corresponding to the bounded sequenceC(m1, . . . , mn)let the functionf(z1, . . . , zn) be defined by (2.1), then

(2.2)

f(xk1z1, . . . , xknzn) =xαp−1

X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)

n

Y

i=1

(xkizi)mi

·

p

Y

j=1

Γqjj+M) Γqjjj+M)

,

whereRe(αjj)>0 (j = 1, . . . , p), max xk1z1

, . . . ,

xknzn

< R (R > 0), for arbitrary ki

(i= 1, . . . , n),Ωis a chain of fractionalq-calculus operators defined by (2.3) Ω =Iqµppxαp−αp−1. . . Iqµ22xα2−α1Iqµ11xα1−1,

(6)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

provided that both sides of (2.2)exist, and

(2.4) M =k1m1+. . .+knmn.

Proof. In view of (2.1) and (2.3), we obtain by replacing eachzi byxkizi (i= 1, . . . , n):

f(xk1z1, . . . , xknzn) = Ω

( X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)xM

n

Y

i=1

zimi )

.

On interchanging the order of summation and the chain of fractionalq-integral operator Ω (which is valid under the conditions given in (2.1) and in the hypothesis of Theorem1), we get

(2.5) Ω

f(xk1z1, . . . , xknzn) =

X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)

n

Y

i=1

zimiΩ xM .

Applying the fractionalq-integral formula due to Yadav and Purohit [12, p. 440, eqn. (19)]

(2.6) Iqη,µ

xν−1 = Γq(ν+η)

Γq(ν+η+µ)xν−1, (Re(ν+η)>0, |q|<1)

succesivelyptimes on the right-hand side of (2.5), we arrive at the desired result (2.2) of Theorem1.

If we setk1=. . .=kn = 1 in the Theorem1, then we obtain the following corollary:

(7)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

Corollary 1. Corresponding to the bounded sequenceC(m1, . . . , mn), let the functionf(z1, . . . , zn)be defined by (2.1), then

(2.7)

Ω{f(xz1, . . . , xzn)}=xαp−1

X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)

n

Y

i=1

(xzi)mi

·

p

Y

j=1

Γqjj+M1) Γqjjj+M1)

,

where Re(αjj) > 0 (j = 1, . . . , p), max{|xz1|, . . . ,|xzn|} < R1 (R1 > 0), Ω is defined by equation (2.3), and

(2.8) M1=m1+. . .+mn.

Theorem 2. For the bounded sequenceC(m1, . . . , mn), let the functionf(z1, . . . , zn)be defined by (2.1), then

(2.9)

f(xk1z1, . . . , xknzn) =xβp−1

X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)

n

Y

i=1

(xkizi)mi

·

p

Y

j=1

Γqj+M) Γqj+M)

,

whereRe(αj)>0 (j = 1, . . . , p), max xk1z1

, . . . ,

xknzn

< R (R > 0), for arbitrary ki (i= 1, . . . , n),Ω is a chain of fractionalq-calculus operators defined by

(2.10) Ω=Iqβp−αpxαp−βp−1. . . Iqβ2−α2xα2−β1Iqβ1−α1xα1−1, provided that both sides of (2.9)exist, and M is given by (2.4).

(8)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

Proof. Proceeding as in Theorem1, we can write

(2.11) Ω

f(xk1z1, . . . , xknzn) =

X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)

n

Y

i=1

zimi xM .

Then applying the formula due to Agarwal [1]:

(2.12) Iqµ

xν−1 = Γq(ν)

Γq(ν+µ)xµ+ν−1, (Re(ν)>0; |q|<1)

successivelyptimes on the right-hand side of (2.11), we obtain (2.9) of Theorem2.

Fork1=. . .=kn= 1, the Theorem2 reduces to the following corollary:

Corollary 2. For the bounded sequenceC(m1, . . . , mn), let the functionf(z1, . . . , zn)be defined by (2.1), then

(2.13)

{f(xz1, . . . , xzn)}=xβp−1

X

m1,...,mn=0

C(m1, . . . , mn)

n

Y

i=1

(xzi)mi

·

p

Y

j=1

Γqj+M1) Γqj+M1)

,

whereRe(αj)>0 (j = 1, . . . , p),max{|xz1|, . . . ,|xzn|}< R1(R1>0),Ω is a chain of fractional q-calculus operators defined by equation (2.10), andM1 is given by (2.8).

(9)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

3. Applications of the Main Results

In this section, we consider some consequences and applications of the results derived in Section2.

It is interesting to observe that in view of the following limiting cases:

(3.1) lim

q→1Γq(a) = Γ(a) and lim

q→1

(qa;q)n

(1−q)n = (a)n, where

(3.2) (a)n=a(a+ 1). . .(a+n−1),

the operational formulae (2.7) of Corollary1and (2.13) of Corollary2above provide, respectively, theq-extensions of the known results due to Raina [5, p. 52, eqns. (27) and (26)].

By assigning suitable special values to the arbitrary sequenceC(m1, . . . , mn), our main results (Theorems1 and 2) can be applied to derive certain operational formulae for a basic hypergeo- metric function of several variables involving Riemann- -Liouville and Kober fractionalq-integral operators. To illustrate that we consider the following examples.

Example 1. Let us set

(3.3)

C(m1, . . . , mn) =

A

Q

j=1

(aj;q)m

1θj0+...+mnθ(n)j B0

Q

j=1

(b0j;q)m

1φ0j. . .

B(n)

Q

j=1

(b(n)j ;q)m

nφ(n)j

C

Q

j=1

(cj;q)m

1ψ0j+...+mnψ(n)j D0

Q

j=1

(d0j;q)m

1δj0. . .

D(n)

Q

j=1

(d(n)j ;q)m

nδ(n)j

· 1

(q;q)m1

. . . 1 (q;q)mn

,

(10)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

in (2.1), then in view of (1.7), Theorems1and2yield the following operational formulae involving the multivariable basic hypergeometric function:

(3.4) Ω

ΦA:BC:D00;...;B;...;D(n)(n)

[(a) :θ0, . . . , θ(n)] : [(b0) :φ0];. . .; [(b(n)) :φ(n)]

[(c) :ψ0, . . . , ψ(n)] : [(d0) :δ0];. . .; [(d(n)) :δ(n)];q, xk1z1, . . . , xknzn

=

p

Y

j=1

Γqjj) Γqjjj)

xαp−1ΦA+p:BC+p:D00;...;B;...;D(n)(n)

[(a) :θ0, . . . , θ(n)];

[(c) :ψ0, . . . , ψ(n)];

[(αpp) :k1, . . . , kn] : [(b0) :φ0];. . .; [(b(n)) :φ(n)]

[(αppp) :k1, . . . , kn] : [(d0) :δ0];. . .; [(d(n)) :δ(n)] ;q, xk1z1, . . . , xknzn

, and

(3.5)

ΦA:BC:D00;...;B;...;D(n)(n)

[(a) :θ0, . . . , θ(n)] : [(b0) :φ0];. . .; [(b(n)) :φ(n)]

[(c) :ψ0, . . . , ψ(n)] : [(d0) :δ0];. . .; [(d(n)) :δ(n)];q, xk1z1, . . . , xknzn

=

p

Y

j=1

Γqj

Γqj)

xβp−1ΦA+p:BC+p:D00;...;B;...;D(n)(n)

[(a) :θ0, . . . , θ(n)];

[(c) :ψ0, . . . , ψ(n)];

[(αp) :k1, . . . , kn] : [(b0) :φ0];. . .; [(b(n)) :φ(n)]

[(βp) :k1, . . . , kn] : [(d0) :δ0];. . .; [(d(n)) :δ(n)] ;q, xk1z1, . . . , xknzn

.

It is may be noted that forp = 1 the results (3.4) and (3.5) correspond respectively to the known results due to Yadav, Purohit and Kalla [13, p. 60, eqn. (17) and p. 70, eqn. (47)].

(11)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

Example 2. Next, if we set

(3.6) C(m1, . . . , mn) =

n

Y

j=1

j;q)mj

(q;q)mj

in (2.1), then

(3.7) f(xz1, . . . , xzn) =

n

Y

j=1 1Φ0

γj

;q, xzj

,

then the results (2.7) of Corollary 1 and (2.13) of Corollary 2 yield respectively the following operational formulae involving the basic generalized Kamp´e de F´eriet function ofnvariables (1.8)

(3.8)

n

Y

j=1 1Φ0

γj

;q, xzj

=

p

Y

j=1

Γqjj) Γqjjj)

xαp−1

Φp:1;...;1p:0;...;0

pp) :γ1;. . .;γn

ppp) : ;. . .; ;q, xz1, . . . , xzn

, and

(3.9)

n

Y

j=1 1Φ0

γj

;q, xzj

=

p

Y

j=1

Γqj) Γqj)

xβp−1

Φp:1;...;1p:0;...;0

p) :γ1;. . .;γn

p) : ;. . .; ;q, xz1, . . . , xzn

.

(12)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

Further, if we putp= 1 in (3.9) and replace α1 andβ1 by 1 +k and 1 +k+α, respectively, then we are led to the result

(3.10)

Iqα

 xk

n

Y

j=1 1Φ0

γj

;q, xzj

= Γq(1 +k) Γq(1 +k+α)xk+α Φ(n)D [1 +k:γ1;. . .;γn; 1 +k+α; q, xz1, . . . , xzn],

provided that Re(α)>0,q <1 and max{|xz1|, . . . ,|xzn|}<1, where the function Φ(n)D (·) denotes the basic Lauricella function defined by

(3.11)

Φ(n)D [a, b1, . . . , bn;c;q;z1, . . . , zn]

= X

m1,...,mn≥0

(a;q)m1+...+mn

(c;q)m1+...+mn n

Y

j=1

((bj;q)mj zjmj (q;q)mj

) ,

where for convergence|z1| <1, . . . ,|zn| < 1,|q| <1. The result (3.10) is the q-extension of the known result due to Srivastava and Goyal [8, p. 649, eqn. (3.6)] (see also Saigo and Raina [6]).

Example 3. Finally, if we set

(3.12) C(m1, . . . , mn) = (α;q)M1 (µ;q)M1

n

Y

j=1

j;q)mj

(q;q)mj

,

where as beforeM1 is given by (2.8), then (2.7) of Corollary1 and (2.13) of Corollary2yield, re- spectively the following operational formulae involving the basic Lauricella function Φ(n)D (·) defined

(13)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

by (3.11) and the basic Kamp´e de F´eriet function ofnvariables defined by (1.8)

(3.13)

Ωn

Φ(n)D [α, σ1, . . . , σn;µ;q;xz1, . . . , xzn]o

=

p

Y

j=1

Γqjj) Γqjjj)

xαp−1

Φp+1:1;...;1 p+1:0;...;0

pp), α:σ1;. . .;σn

ppp), µ: ;. . .; ;q, xz1, . . . , xzn

and

(3.14)

n

Φ(n)D [α, σ1, . . . , σn;µ;q;xz1, . . . , xzn]o

=

p

Y

j=1

Γqj) Γqj)

xβp−1

Φp+1:1;...;1 p+1:0;...;0

p), α:σ1;. . .;σn

p), µ: ;. . .; ;q, xz1, . . . , xzn

,

provided that both sides of (3.13) and (3.14) exist.

We conclude by the remark that the results established in this paper are in general forms and one can deduce several operational formulae involving the Riemann-Liouville and Kober type fractional q-integral operators associated with the basic Lauricella functions, basic Kamp´e de F´eriet function, basic Appell functions, basic Horn’s functions and basic confluent hypergeometric functions.

1. Agarwal R. P.,Certain fractionalq-integrals andq-derivatives,Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.,66(1969), 365–370.

2. Al-Salam W. A.,Some fractionalq-integrals andq-derivatives, Proc. Edin. Math. Soc.,15(1966), 135–140.

3. Gasper G. and Rahman M.,Basic Hypergeometric Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.

(14)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

4. Kalla S. L., Yadav R. K. and Purohit S. D.,On the Riemann-Liouville fractionalq-integral operator involving a basic analogue of FoxH-function, J. Frac. Cal. & Appl. Anal.,8(3)(2005), 313–322.

5. Raina R. K.,On certain formulas for the multivariable hypergeometric functions, Acta Math. Univ. Comeni- ance,64(1)(1995), 47–56.

6. Saigo M. and Raina R. K.,On the fractional calculus operator involving Gauss’s series and its application to certain statistical distributions, Rev. Tec. Ing. Univ. Zulia,14(1)(1991), 53–62.

7. Slater L. J.,Generalized Hypergeometric Functions.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London and New York, 1966.

8. Srivastava H. M. and Goyal S. P.,Fractional derivatives of theH-function of several variables, J. Math. Anal.

Appl.,112(1985), 641–651.

9. Srivastava H. M. and Karlsson P. W.,Multiple Gaussian Hypergeometric Series.John Wiley and Sons (Halsted), New York, 1985.

10. Yadav R. K. and Purohit S .D., Fractional q-derivatives and certain basic hypergeometric transformations, South East Asian J. Math. Math. Sci.,2(2)(2004), 37–46.

11. ,On fractionalq-derivatives and transformations of the generalized basic hypergeometric functions, J.

Indian Acad. Math.,28(2)(2006), 321–326.

12. ,On applications of Kober fractional q-integral operator to certain basic hypergeometric functions, J.

Rajasthan Acad. Phy. Sci.,5(4)(2006), 437–448.

13. Yadav R. K., Purohit S. D. and Kalla S. L.,Kober fractional q-integral of multiple basic hypergeometric func- tions, Algebras, Groups and Geom.,24(1)(2007), 55–74.

S. D. Purohit, Department of Basic-Sciences (Mathematics), College of Technology and Engineering, M.P. University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur-313001, India.,

e-mail:sunil a [email protected]

R. K. Raina, 10/11, Ganpati Vihar, Opposite Sector-5, Udaipur-313001, India., e-mail:rkraina [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Very recently, Tayebi-Barzegari study generalized Berwald manifold with (α, β)-metrics and showed that a Finsler manifold with (α, β)-Finsler function of sign property is a

Furthermore, the following analogue of Theorem 1.13 shows that though the constants in Theorem 1.19 are sharp, Simpson’s rule is asymptotically better than the trapezoidal

Some Hardy type inequalities on the domain in the Heisenberg group are estab- lished by using the Picone type identity and constructing suitable auxiliary functions.. Key words

We shall need other results on Riemann surfaces (for example, the Uniformization Theorem and the Riemann–Hurwitz Formula) as well as the basic theory of algebraic curves, and we

Clearly, Corollary 3.5 yields some criterions for the uniform convergence of orthogonal poly- nomial expansions on each compact interval contained in (−1, 1) (cf.. Moreover, it

Certain free systems exist for such a class if and only if the class is defined by finite disjunctions of identities where the operational symbols are interpreted as

In this work we give definitions of the notions of superior limit and inferior limit of a real distribution of n variables at a point of its domain and study some properties of

In this note we investigate the convexity of zero-balanced Gaussian hypergeometric functions and general power series with respect to Hölder means.. Key words and