• 検索結果がありません。

Quantized Contact Transformations and Pseudodifferential Operators of Infinite Order(Microlocal Analysis of Differential Equations)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Quantized Contact Transformations and Pseudodifferential Operators of Infinite Order(Microlocal Analysis of Differential Equations)"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Quantized Contact

Transformations

and

Pseudodifferential

Operators ofInfinite Order

TAKASHI AOKI

(

青木貴史

)

Department of Mathematics and Physics Kinki University

1. Introduction

In this note we establish a formula which gives quantized contact

trans-formations ofpseudodifferential operators in terms ofsymbols. A

quan-tization ofa given cont act transformation $\phi$ isan extension of$\phi$ to a ring

isomorphism $\phi_{*}$ between the rings ofpseudodifferential operators ([KS],

[M], [SKK]). We calculate the symbol of $\phi_{*}(P)$ in terms of the symbol

of an operator $P$

.

As an application of the formula,

we

define the

char-acteristic sets of pseudodifferential operators of infinite

ord.er

and show

(2)

2. Quantized Contact

Transformations

Let $\phi$ be a contact transformation defined by the following relations:

$\phi(y, \eta)=(x, \xi)$

with

$x=y+ \frac{\partial S}{\partial\xi}(y, \xi)$,

$\eta=\xi+\frac{\partial S}{\partial y}(y, \xi)$

,

where $x=(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n}),$ $\ldots$ etc., and $S$ is a holomorphic function

homo-geneous

in $\xi$ of order 1 such that $|S(y, \xi)|/|\xi|$ is very small. Let

$a$ be

an

invertible microdifferential symbol offinite order.

THEOREM 1. For every formalsymbol $P(x, \xi)$ thereis a formal

sym-$bol$ $Q(x, \xi)$ $such$ that

(1) $P(x, \xi)\circ(e^{S(x,\xi)}a(x, \xi))=(e^{S(x,\xi)}a(x, \xi))\circ Q(x, \xi)$

.

Here $0$ denotes the composition by the Leibniz-Hormande$r$ rule:

(3)

THEOREM 2. There are twoinve microdifferenti symbols

,

$B(x,$$\xi$, $()$ of order $0such$ that $P$ and $Q$ satis$fy(1)$ ifan$d$ only if

$Q(x, \xi)$

$=A\circ e^{(\partial_{\iota}+\partial_{z})\cdot\partial_{\zeta}+\partial,\cdot\partial_{\eta}}BP(z+\sigma, \xi+\eta+\theta(z+\sigma, z+y+\sigma, \xi))|_{\eta=0,(=\zeta}^{y=0,z=x}$,

where$\sigma$ is characteriz$ed$ by$\sigma(x,$$\xi,$$()=-\theta(x+\sigma(x, \xi, (), \xi, \zeta)$

an

$d$ where

$\theta,$ $\theta$ are defined by

$S(x, \xi)-S(y, \xi)=<x-y,$$\theta(x, y, \xi)>$

,

$S(x, \xi)-S(x, \zeta)=<\xi-(,$$\theta(x, \xi, \zeta)>$

.

The symbol $A$ is constructed as follows:

$(e^{\partial\cdot\partial ae}e^{-S(x,\zeta)})\circ e^{S(x,\zeta)}=A’(x, \xi)$

is an invertible microdifferential symbol of order $0$ (cf. [K], [KW]). $A$ is

the inverse symbol of$A’$

,

that is, asymbol satisfying$A\circ A‘=A’\circ A=1$

.

We can construct $B$ in a similar way by using $\theta$ and show that the

principal part of $B$ coincides with that of $A’$ modulo $\zeta-\xi$

.

Anyway,

the important fact is the following: both $A$ and $B$ are invertible and of

order $0$

.

So they do not affect the “characteristic“, which is defined in

(4)

3. Characteristic sets of pseudodifferential operators of

infinite

order

Let $P(x, \xi)$ be a symbol in the sense of [A].

DEFINITION 3. An element$x*=(x_{0}, \xi_{0})$ is $s$aid fo benon-chara$ct$eristic

with respect to $P=:P(x, \xi)$ : if there exist a conic neighborhood $\Omega$ of

$x*(inT^{*}X)$ an$d$ apositive $n$umber $r$ such that for every $\epsilon>0$, th$ere$ is

$C_{\epsilon}>0$ for which we have

$|P(x, \xi)|\geqq C_{e}e^{-\epsilon|\zeta|}$ in $\Omega\cap\{|\xi|\geqq r\}$

.

We write Char$(P)$ the $com$pliment of the

se

$t$ of all non-charact

eristic

elemen$ts$ with respect to $P$

.

Of course, if $P$ is of finite order this definition of Char$(P)$ coincides

with the usual ones. In general, we have

Char$(P)\supset Supp(\mathcal{E}^{R}/\mathcal{E}^{R}P)$

.

If$x*does$not belongto Char$(P)$,

we

may assume that $P(x, \xi)$ is written

in the form $e^{p(x,\zeta)}$ with a symbol $p(x, \xi)$ of order 1-0. By Theorem 2,

$Q(x, \xi)$

can

be written in the exponential of

some

symbol of order 1-0

(cf. [A]). Moreover, $\phi$ is given by

(5)

References

[A] T. Aoki: Calcul exponentiel des op\’erateurs microdiff\’erentiels

d’ordre infini, I, II, Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble, I:33-4 (1983), $II:36-2$

(1986).

[K] H. Kumanogo: Pseudo-differential Operators, MIT press.

[KS] M. Kashiwara and P. Schapira: Microlocal study of sheaves,

Ast\’erisque 128 (1985).

[KW] K. Kajitani and S. Wakabayashi: Microhyperbolic operators in

Geverey classes, to appear.

[M] B. Malgrange: L’involutivit\’e des caract\’eristiques des syst\‘emes

diff\’erentiels et microdiff\’erentiels, S\’eminaire BOURBAKI 1977/78, $n^{o}$

522.

[SKK] M. Sato, T. Kawai and M. Kashiwara: Microfunctions and pseudo-differential equations, Lecture Notes

in

Math.

287

(1973), 265-529.

参照

関連したドキュメント

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

Interesting results were obtained in Lie group invariance of generalized functions [8, 31, 46, 48], nonlinear hyperbolic equations with generalized function data [7, 39, 40, 42, 45,

In this paper we are interested in the solvability of a mixed type Monge-Amp`ere equation, a homology equation appearing in a normal form theory of singular vector fields and the

Sofonea, Variational and numerical analysis of a quasistatic viscoelastic problem with normal compliance, friction and damage,

In [12], as a generalization of highest weight vectors, the notion of extremal weight vectors is introduced, and it is shown that the uni- versal module generated by an extremal

In this paper, we obtain strong oscillation and non-oscillation conditions for a class of higher order differential equations in dependence on an integral behavior of its

[19, 20], and it seems to be commonly adopted now.The general background for these geometries goes back to Klein’s definition of geometry as the study of homogeneous spaces, which

In this context, the Fundamental Theorem of the Invariant Theory is proved, a notion of basis of the rings of invariants is introduced, and a generalization of Hilbert’s