• 検索結果がありません。

Sae x Sae x 1: 1. {x (i) 0 0 }N i=1 (x (i) 0 0 p(x 0) ) 2. = 1,, T a d (a) i (i = 1,, N) I, II I. v (i) II. x (i) 1 = f (x (i) 1 1, v(i) (b) i (i = 1,

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Sae x Sae x 1: 1. {x (i) 0 0 }N i=1 (x (i) 0 0 p(x 0) ) 2. = 1,, T a d (a) i (i = 1,, N) I, II I. v (i) II. x (i) 1 = f (x (i) 1 1, v(i) (b) i (i = 1,"

Copied!
27
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

Loading

参照

関連したドキュメント

The system evolves from its initial state without being further affected by diffusion until the next pulse appears; Δx i x i nτ − x i nτ, and x i nτ represents the density

Chaudhuri, “An EOQ model with ramp type demand rate, time dependent deterioration rate, unit production cost and shortages,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol..

We prove a continuous embedding that allows us to obtain a boundary trace imbedding result for anisotropic Musielak-Orlicz spaces, which we then apply to obtain an existence result

Prove that the dynamical system generated by equation (5.17) possesses a global attractor , where is the set of stationary solutions to problem (5.17).. Prove that there exists

Let σ be a unimodular Pisot substitution which satisfies the super coincidence condition and let X and {X i } i∈A be the associated atomic surfaces.. With help of this dual map one

In Section 3 we collect and prove the remaining facts, which we need to show that (X, Φ) 7→ ⊕ i,j H Φ i (X, WΩ j X ) is a weak cohomology theory with supports in the sense of

The orthogonality test using S t−1 (Table 14), M ER t−2 (Table 15), P P I t−1 (Table 16), IP I t−2 (Table 17) and all the variables (Table 18) shows that we cannot reject the

A compact set in the phase space is said to be an inertial set inertial set inertial set inertial set (or a fractal exponential attractor) if it is positively invariant ,