• 検索結果がありません。

It is well known that the WFPP holds for Banach spaces with certain geomet- rical properties

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "It is well known that the WFPP holds for Banach spaces with certain geomet- rical properties"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

EVA MAR´IA MAZCU ˜N ´AN-NAVARRO Received 19 November 2001

We consider the modulus ofu-convexity of a Banach space introduced by Ji Gao (1996) and we improve a sufficient condition for the fixed-point property (FPP) given by this author. We also give a sufficient condition for normal structure in terms of the modulus ofu-convexity.

LetXbe a Banach space and letCbe a nonempty subset ofX. A mappingT: CCis said to benonexpansivewhenever

TxT yxy (1) for allx, yC. A Banach spaceX has theweak fixed-point property (WFPP) (resp.,fixed-point property(FPP)) if for each nonempty weakly compact convex (resp., bounded, closed, and convex) setCXand each nonexpansive mapping T:CC, there is an elementxCsuch thatT(x)=x.

It is well known that the WFPP holds for Banach spaces with certain geomet- rical properties. Among such properties, weak normal structure is, maybe, the most widely studied (see [5, Chapter 3.2]). In order to give sufficient conditions for the WFPP or weak normal structure, different moduli of convexity of Banach spaces have been introduced by several authors (see [5, Chapter 4.5]).

At the origin of these moduli is the classical modulus of convexity introduced by J. A. Clarkson in 1936 to define uniformly convex spaces. It is the function δ: [0,2][0,1] given by

δ(ε)=inf

1 x+y

2

:x, yBX,xyε. (2)

Copyright©2003 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis 2003:1 (2003) 49–54 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 47H10, 46B20 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1085337503204127

(2)

The related characteristic of convexity is the number

ε0(X)=supε >0 :δ(ε)=0. (3) It is well known (see [5, Theorem 5.12, page 122]) that Banach spaces, with ε0(X)<1, are superreflexive and enjoy a uniform normal structure and hence the FPP.

On the other hand, uniformly nonsquare Banach spaces (i.e., Banach spaces withε0(X)<2) are superreflexive [4], but it remains unknown if the FPP holds for these spaces. Nevertheless, there are several partial results which guarantee the FPP for uniformly nonsquare Banach spaces with some additional properties such as the property WORTH, introduced in [6] by Sims as follows: a Banach space has the property WORTH provided that for every weakly null sequence (xn) inXand anyxX,

lim infn→∞ xn+xxnx=0. (4) In [7] the same author proved the following theorem.

Theorem 1 (Sims [7]). If X is a uniformly nonsquare Banach space with the property WORTH, thenXhas normal structure.

In this paper, we concentrate on the modulus ofu-convexity introduced in [1] by Gao.

The modulus ofu-convexity of a Banach spaceXis defined by u(ε) :=inf

11

2x+y:x, ySX, f(xy)εfor some f x

, (5)

where

x:=

f X:f =1, f(x)= x

. (6)

Gao proved in [1] thatu(ε)δ(ε) for anyε[0,2] and he gave the following results.

Theorem2 (Gao [1]). LetXbe a Banach space. Ifu(1)>0, thenXis uniformly nonsquare (henceXis superreflexive).

Theorem3 (Gao [1]). For any Banach spaceX, if there exists aδ >0such that u(1/2δ)>0, thenX has a uniform normal structure, and thereforeX has the fixed-point property.

(3)

In order to give a sufficient condition for the FPP, more general than the one required in the above theorem, we need some definitions and lemmas.

Recall that a Banach spaceXis weakly nearly uniform smooth (WNUS) pro- vided that there existε(0,1) andδ >0 such that if 0< t < δand (xn) is a basic sequence inBX, then there existsk1 such thatx1+txk1 +tε.

In [2] Garc´ıa-Falset defined the coefficient R(X)=suplim inf

n→∞ xn+x, (7)

where the supremum is taken over all weak null sequences (xn) inBX and any xBX. He gave the following characterization of WNUS in terms of this coeffi- cient: a Banach spaceXis WNUS if and only if it is reflexive andR(X)<2.

The same author proved in [3] that Banach spaces with R(X)<2 have the WFPP, obtaining as a corollary that WNUS Banach spaces have the FPP.

We obtain an equivalent expression for the coefficientR(X) which will be useful later.

Lemma4. LetXbe a Banach space which is not Schur, then R(X)=suplim inf

n→∞ xn+x, (8)

where the supremum is taken over allxSX and weak null sequences(xn)with lim infn→∞xn =1.

Proof. Let λ=suplim inf

n→∞ xn+x: xn

is weakly null,lim infxn=1, xSX

. (9)

IfR(X)=1, it is evident from the lower semi-continuity of the norm that R(X)λ. Suppose thatR(X)>1. Letεbe an arbitrary scalar in (0,R(X)1).

By the definition ofR(X), we find a weakly null sequence (xn) inBXandxBX

such that

lim inf

n→∞ xn+x> R(X)ε. (10)

Ifx=0, then lim inf

n→∞ xn=lim inf

n→∞ x+xn> R(X)ε >1, (11) which is a contradiction, sox=0.

(4)

We have

xn+x=

1x

xn+x

xn+ x x

1xxn+x xn+ x

x

1x R(X)ε+x xn+ x

x

< 1x lim inf

n→∞ xn+x+x xn+ x

x

(12)

which shows that

lim inf

n→∞ xn+xlim inf

n→∞

xn+ x

x

. (13) On the other hand, if lim infxn =0, then

1x =lim inf

n→∞ x+xn

lim inf

n→∞ x+xn>1, (14) so lim infxn =0. Hence, we can write

xn+ x

x =

1lim inf

n→∞ xn x

x+ lim inf

n→∞ xn

xn

lim infn→∞xn+ x x

1lim inf

n→∞ xn+ lim inf

n→∞ xn

xn

lim infn→∞xn+ x x

1lim infxn) lim inf

n→∞

xn+ x

x + lim inf

n→∞ xn

xn

lim infn→∞xn+ x x

(15) and conclude that

lim inf

n→∞

xn+ x

x

lim inf xn

lim infn→∞xn+ x x

. (16)

(5)

We, finally, obtain from (13) and (16) that R(X)ε <lim inf

n→∞ xn+xlim inf

n→∞

xn

lim infn→∞xn+ x x

λ. (17) Sinceεwas arbitrarily small, we conclude thatR(X)λ.

The inequalityλR(X) is clear from the definitions, so the proof is complete.

Now we are in a position to prove the following theorem.

Theorem5. LetXbe a Banach space. If there existsδ >0such thatu(1δ)>0, thenR(X)<2.

Proof. Since the functionu is clearly increasing, from our hypothesis, we can findη >0 such thatu(1η)> η.

Assume thatR(X)=2. FromLemma 4, we can find a weakly null sequence (xn) such that lim infn→∞xn =1 andxSXsatisfying the inequality

lim inf

n→∞ xn+x>2(1η). (18) Consider f x. We have

1η <1=f(x)=lim

n→∞f

x xn

xn

, (19)

so there existsn01 such that for anynn0, f

x xn

xn

>1η. (20)

In consequence, by the definition of the modulusu, we must have

x+ xn

xn

2 1u(1η) (21)

for allnn0, and in consequence,

lim infn→∞ x+xn2 1u(1η)<2(1η), (22) which contradicts (18).

Therefore, our assumption is false, that is,R(X)<2, as desired.

From Theorems2,5, and the characterization of WNUS spaces given in [2], we obtain the following corollary.

(6)

Corollary6. For any Banach spaceX, if there existsδ >0such thatu(1δ)>0, thenXis WNUS, and in consequence, it has the FPP.

This corollary provides a sufficient condition for the FPP of a Banach space in terms of its modulus ofu-convexity which generalizes the one given inTheorem 3, and—according to Theorem 2—presents a family of uniformly nonsquare Banach spaces for which the FPP holds.

We do not know if the hypothesis inCorollary 6implies normal structure, but from Theorems1and2the following corollary is immediate.

Corollary7. IfXis a Banach space with the property WORTH such thatu(1)>

0, thenXhas normal structure.

Acknowledgment

The author was partially supported by Programa Sectorial de Formaci ´on de Pro- fesorado Universitario PSFPU AP98, Ministerio Educaci ´on y Cultura, Spain.

References

[1] J. Gao,Normal structure and modulus of u-convexity in Banach spaces, Function Spaces, Differential Operators and Nonlinear Analysis (Paseky nad Jizerou, 1995), Prometheus, Prague, 1996, pp. 195–199.

[2] J. Garc´ıa-Falset,Stability and fixed points for nonexpansive mappings, Houston J.

Math.20(1994), no. 3, 495–506.

[3] ,The fixed point property in Banach spaces with the NUS-property, J. Math.

Anal. Appl.215(1997), no. 2, 532–542.

[4] R. C. James,Uniformly non-square Banach spaces, Ann. of Math. (2)80(1964), 542–

550.

[5] W. A. Kirk and B. Sims (eds.),Handbook of Metric Fixed Point Theory, Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001.

[6] B. Sims,Orthogonality and fixed points of nonexpansive maps, Workshop/Minicon- ference on Functional Analysis and Optimization (Canberra, 1988), Proc. Cen- tre Math. Anal. Austral. Nat. Univ., vol. 20, Austral. Nat. Univ., Canberra, 1988, pp. 178–186.

[7] ,A class of spaces with weak normal structure, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.49 (1994), no. 3, 523–528.

Eva Mar´ıa Mazcu˜n´an-Navarro: Departamento de An´alisis Matem´atico, Facultad de Matem´aticas, Universidad de Valencia, Doctor Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain

E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Belluce and Kirk 14 also improved DeMarr’s result in 10 and proved that if C is a nonempty weakly compact convex subset of a Banach space and if C has complete normal structure,

A new existence and uniqueness theorem is given for solutions to di ff erential equations involving the Caputo fractional derivative with nonlocal initial condition in Banach spaces..

We give some equivalent conditions for the generic Fr´echet differentiability of a given Lipschitz convex function defined on a separable Banach space in terms of the properties of

Applying Theorem 2.3, Lemmas 2.7 and 2.8, we have that if D is a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and 2-uniformly smooth Banach space E, D is a

Furthermore, we prove a nonlinear mean coılvergence theorem of Baillon’s type and a weak convergence theorem of Mann’s type for generalized nonspreading mappings in a

Kato, On a new geometric constant related to the modulus of smoothness of a Banach space, Acta Math. Wang, On the James and von Neumann‐Jordan constants in

a nonlinear ergodic theorem for nonexpansive mappings on a compact and convex subset of.. a strictly convex Banach space: Let $C$ be a compact and convex subset of

Corollary 2.2 Let $E$ be a reflexive Banach space with a uniformly Gateaux differentiable norm,. $C$ a nonempty closed convex subset of $E$ which has normal structure, and