• 検索結果がありません。

Common Risk Factors of Tokyo Stock Exchange Firms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Common Risk Factors of Tokyo Stock Exchange Firms"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

1996年度日本オペレーションズ。リサーチ学会 春季研究発表会

1−F−5

CommonRiskFactorsofTokyoStockExchangeFirms

KeiichiKubota,MusashiUniversity

HitoshiTakehara,UniversityofTsukuba

Abstract:OnthebasisofthefindingsinKubotaandTakehara(1995)wherewerejected

theslnglerisk CAPMspecificationsinanunCOnditionalformforJapanesenon−financial

firmslistedin thefirst sectionofTokyo StockExchanges,inthe c11rrent paper,Weem−

piricallytrytofindmimickingportfo1iosthatcanapproximatelyspanthelocallymean−

Variancee侃cientsetinthesenseofGrinblattandTitman(1987)・Then,WetraSform theseinitial1yestimatedmimickingportfbliosbasedontheprlnCipalcomponentanalysis.

Wehopethat thisportfo1ioset cangenerateinslgnifinantalphaestimates

COrreSpOndingmultiplebetassothatthisportfo1iosetcanbeusedasagOOdbenchmark POrtfo1ioset. OurorlginaldataisthemonthlyobservationsbetweenSeptember1981thro11ghJune

1993asinKubotaandTakehara(1995)andnewobservationwillbeaddedasa

Sample.Weinitial1yusecl11Steranalysistoform14portfo1iosfromthesetof41attribute POrtfolios.We,then,teStWhetherthese14baseportfolioscan approximatelyspanthe localmean−VarianCee侃cientsetofthe11niverse,Wherethreebenchmarkuniverseisused; themean−Variancee伍cientsetsformedbytheorlginal41portfo1ioset,thelargeruniverse Of71portfoliosexpandedfromtheabove41portfo1ios,andlOOportfo1iosrankedbythe sizeandthebooktopriceratiosusedinKubotaandTakehara(1995).Forthispurpose We11SetheteststatisticsgeneratedbyGibbons,RossandShanken(1987)andKandeland Stambaugh(1991)・ Then,WerunprlnCipalcomponentsanalysis,underthenon−fu11rankconditionsasis advocatedinAnderson(1958),Onthesampleof776individualsecurities.W6relyonthe result,prOVenbyGrinblattandTitman(1985),that theprincipalcomponentsanalysis CangetCOrreCtfactornumbersandfactorloadingsundertheapproximatefactorstructure definedbyChamberlainandRothchild(1983).Then,WeCOmParethese14baseportfolios and o11rfactorloadingestimatesin terms ofcorrelation strucutre sothat theinitial14

portfolioscanpOSSeSStheasymptoticconsitencyuptothedeteministiclineartranSforms.

Based on these result we conclude that the丘rst factor must be predominantly the

marketfactorwhosefindingisinparwithFamaandFrench(1993)andotherwellknown

results・However,becauseofthehighpalr−Wisecorrelationsbetweenthese14baseport− fblios,We re−traSform the orlglnal41ba5e pOrtfo1iosinto5factor models where these

portfo1iosaretranformedtoreducetheco11iniarityba5edonfurtherprlnClpalcomponent analylsis・Inthisfinalmodel,OneOfthemarketindex,TOPIX,issubstitutedforthefirst factor,andthesecondfactoristhereturndi鮎rencebetweenthelargestdecileportfo1io andthesmal1estdecileportfo1io.Similary,thethirdfactoristhereturndi鮎renceinbook toprlCeratiorankedportfolios,thefourth,thedifferenceintheleverage,andthefifth,in theearnlngStOprlCeratiosexcludingnegativeearnlngSgrOuP.Tlmsderived5mimicking factorportfolioscanrepresentcorrectfactorloadingestimatesinaprobabiitysenseupto thedeterministiclineartransformaions,aSthesehctorsarechosentobehigh1ya5SOCiated Withfactorloading丘omprlnClpalcomponentsanalysisresult.

Final1y,the robustnessofourfivefactor modelis tested against the severalsets of

COntrOIportfolio$anditisfbundthatthealphasareinslgnificantlyzeromostofthetime,

−130−

(2)

RegressionCoe伍cients

Var.

Intercept

Market Spread

(TOPIX)

Size BPR Leverage EPR

Average −0.077 0.942 0.426 −0.055 0.088 0.049

Maxim11m 3.511 1.804 1.405 1.115 1.801 1.341

Minimum −2.299 0.079 −0.616 −1.250 −1.299 −1.559

Median −0.083 0.950 0.470 −0.051 −0.104 0.066

t value

Var.

Intercept

Market Spread

(TOPIX)

Size BPR Leverage EPR

Avef魂e −0.141 7.260 3.133 −0.288■ 0.482 0.128 Ave.lfl 0.651 7.260 3.650 1.039 2.600 1.189 Maximum 2i393 14.255 10.008 3.948 10.100 4.605 Minimum −2.866 0.356 −6.569 −5.471 −7.780 −5.668 Median −0.103 7.367 3.661 −0.200 0.482 0.246 (AverageAdjustedR2=0.398,AverageDWstatistics=2.167)

Tablel:SummaryofTimeSeriesIndividualRegr?SSions

andweconcludethato11rfivefactormodelcanbeusedasagoodbenchmarkportfo1iosto betestedagainstJapanesefundswherethetimlng,informationwouldbesuppressed. References 【1】Grihblatt,M・,andS・Titman,“TheRelationbetweenMean−YarianceEfRciencyand ArbitragePricing,”Jou;nalpfBusiness60(1987)97−111. 【2]KandelandStamaugh,“AMeean−VarianceFrameWOrkforTestsofAssetPricing Models,”ReviewqfFihancialStudies2(1989)125−156・ 【3]Kubota,K・,andH・Takehara,“TheCross−SectionRiskandReturn.ofTokyoStock

Exchange Firms,”to appearin T.Boss and T.Fetherstone eds.,Advancesin the

PacificBasinCapitalMarketReseachII・,JAIPressInc・(1995)・

[4]Kubota,K・,andH・Takehara,“CommonriskFactorsofTokyoStockExchangeFirms: InfindingtheMimickingPortfolios,”WorkingPaper,MusashiUniversity(1995)

一131−

参照

関連したドキュメント

Reference mortgage portfolio Selected, RMBS structured credit reference portfolio risk, market valuation, liquidity risk, operational misselling, SIB issues risk, tranching

To evaluate the optimal hedging portfolio produced by the risk minimization algorithm for an option n 30 days to expiration, the stock prices for October 15, 2002 through September

Bearing these ideas in mind, for the stock market analysis, in the next section, is adopted i the set of thirty-three SMI listed in Table 1 ii the CWs for the signal analysis, iii

As the number of firms in the triangular network increases, the Kolmogorov statistic D increases, thus allowing us to reject the null hypothesis that the copula of the counterparty

Our objective in this paper is to extend the more precise result of Saias [26] for Ψ(x, y) to an algebraic number field in order to compare the formulae obtained, and we apply

The stage was now set, and in 1973 Connes’ thesis [5] appeared. This work contained a classification scheme for factors of type III which was to have a profound influence on

Examples of directly refinable modules are semisimple modules, hollow modules [1], dual continuous modules [2], and strongly supplemented modules [6].. In [B, lroposition

Tactics of agile manufacturing are mapped into different production areas eight-construct latent: manufacturing equipment and technology, processes technology and know-how, quality