• 検索結果がありません。

創造連鎖活動おける参加動機に関する調査

N/A
N/A
Info
ダウンロード
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "創造連鎖活動おける参加動機に関する調査"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

今ダウンロードする ( 8 ページ )

全文

(1)Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 1. †. [1] 242. 2. 36.8% 44.2%. A Study of Participants’ Motivation in Creation Chain Activities Maiko Kamata. Daishi Kato Kazuo Kunieda Keiji Yamada†. Wikipedia [2]. and. 2009 1. This paper reports the result of our survey on participants’ motivation in creation chain activities. The creation chain is a term referring to a product / service creation process by many individuals. We carried out the online questionnaire survey of 242 people with experience of Wikipedia editing, the representative example of the creation chain activities. In this survey, the respondents were asked to answer the questions pertaining to motivation in Wikipedia editing. From the result of the survey, we concluded that people can be motivated to join the creation chain activities when: (1) they can find the room for improvement and contribution readily; and (2) the activity is intriguing in itself and helps them to develop themselves. At the same time, we couldn’t recognize clear association between the frequency of participation and: (1) the intensity of initial motivation; (2) whether they have fun or not. In addition, contrary to our initial expectation, 36.8% of the respondents confessed that they did not find pleasantness in the editing activities. Moreover, 44.2% of them did not think they contribute the Wikipedia and made themselves useful to someone by joining the editing activities.. 15 260. †. 1. 1000. C&C NEC C&C Innovation Research Laboratories.. ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(2) Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 242. 3.. 4.2. 1. 3.1. 29.8 59. 1 20. 24.4. 40. 54. 30 22.3. 170 94. 70.2. 72. 38.8 10. 2 1 3 2009 7. 31. 8. 7. 28. 7. 31. 4. 3.2. ①. ②. ③. 10. 3. 3. 6. 20. 34. 25. 59. 30. 70. 24. 94. 40. 41. 13. 54. 50. 22. 7. 29. 170. 72. 242. ① 4.3. ②. 1 2008. 1. 6. 13.6%. 2009. 2004 1. 15.3% 11.2%. 6. 1. 2 ③. 2009. 7. 22.7%. 2008. 2009 1 7 12. 6 9.1%. 31.8% 2. 3 30.6% 1 11.6%. 1. 12.8%. 3. 1. 3. 4. 4.. 1. 31.4%. 6. 10. 2 13.6%. 5. 41.7% 4. 4.1. 285. 253. 242. 2. ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(3) Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 37 15.3% 2004 2005 2005. 7. 2006 2006. 1. 2007. 1. 9(3.7%). 7. 1. 27(11.2%). 7. 24(9.9%). 1. 24(9.9%). 6. 28(11.6%). 1. 33(13.6%). 12. 2009. 3. 20(8.3%). 6. 1. 27(11.2%). 1. 26(10.7%). 12 1. 16(6.6%). 1. 22(9.1%). 6. 31(12.8%). 1 1. 15(6.2%). 12. 7. 2009. 14(5.8%). 6. 1. 2008 2008. 6 12. 7. 2007. 74 30.6%. 1. 1. 13(5.4%). 1. 12(5.0%) 17(7.0%). 2. 15(6.2%) 0. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 30. 35. 0. 40. 1. 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006. 2009. 6. 6(2.5%). 1 7. 2008 2008. 5(2.1%). 12. 7 1. 70. 80. 11. 30. 6. 10. 33(13.6%) 101(41.7%) 2. 20(8.3%) 22(9.1%). 1. 6 55(22.7%) 20. 40. 60. 5 76(31.4%). 77(31.8%). 7 0. 60. 100. 7(2.9%). 6 12. 2009. 50. 14(5.8%) 17(7.0%). 12 1. 40. 9(3.7%) 31. 8(3.3%). 6. 30. 9(3.7%). 101. 10(4.1%). 12 1. 7. 2007 2007. 6. 20. 3. 15(6.2%). 1 7. 10. 0. 20. 40. 60. 80. 100. 120. 80. 4 2. 3. ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(4) Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report 4.4. 1 6 ①. 5. 2. 75. 2. ③. 48 17. 5. B. 2. 1. ④. 20. 1. 168. A. 14. 14. 6 ①. 34. 34. ②. 20. ③. 27. ①. ④. 20. 13. 12. 5. 31 22. ① ②. ④. 2. 75 48 34. 34. 31. 27. 22. 20 13. 12. ⑨ そ の他. 4 ⑧特 にな し. 5. ⑦社 会 貢 献. ⑤楽 し い. ④自 己 啓 発. ③知 識 を共 有 した い. ② wikip に貢 edia 献 した い. ① 改 善 の余 地 があ る. ）. 5. 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0. ⑥暇 つぶ し. （. 20. ⑧ そ の他. 14 ⑦特 にな し. 14. ⑥ 知 人 の勧 め. ③ Wikip に貢 edia 献 し た か った. ②補 足 した か った. ①誤 り を修 正 し た か った. ）. 17. ⑤知 識 を共 有 した い. 20. ④興 味 があ っ た. （. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0. 6 4. ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(5) Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 3. ③. 23 74 6 ①. 7 ②. 22. ③. 10. 8. 3 16. Wikipedia 13 10. ④. 9. 5. ④. 20 14 11 89. 36.8%. 18. 9. ②. ①. ④. 22. 10. 18. 8. ⑩ そ の他. 11. ⑨特 にな し. 13. ⑧ wikip の質 edia が向 上 し て い ⑦知 識 を共 有 でき る. ⑦ そ の他. ⑥特 にな し. ⑤利 用 しな く な った. ④ ト ラ ブ ルを 恐れて. ③面 倒. 14. ⑥ 新 し い知 識 を得 ら れ る. 20. ⑤ 結 果 が反 映 される. 3. 23. ③ 多 く の人 に 閲 覧 し ても ら える ②貢 献 し て い る感 じ がす る. 5. 32. ①作 業 を し て いる と き. ）. 9. 9. ②必 要 性 を感 じ な く な った. ）. 0. 10. ①時 間 がな く な った. （. 10 5. 16. 89. ④ 他 の人 が編 集 し て いる. 20 15. （. 25. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0. 8 5. 7 4. 4 ①. 9 8 ①. 46 26. 8 32. ②. ② ③. 18. ④. 15 5. ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(6) Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 13. 17 44.2%. 107. 74 12. 31. ①. 10. ② 121 121. 17 16. 107. （. 46 26. 13/74 (17.6%). 80. 18. 15. 17. 13. 60. ⑦ そ の他. ⑥貢 献 し て い る と感 じ な い. ⑤ 他 の参 加 者 と協 力 し て い る こ とを感 じ る とき. ④ 内 容 が反 映 さ れ て いる の を見 る とき. ③情 報 を提 供 ・共 有 で き る とき. ② 他 の人 が閲 覧 し て いる の を感 じる とき. ①作 業 を行 っ て いる と き. ）. 120 100 80 60 40 20 0. 40. 20. 4/17 (23.5%). 2/12 (16.7%). 2/13 (15.4%). 4/24 (16.7%). 3/28 (10.7%). 1/31 (3.2%). 2/27 (7.4%) 3/16 (18.8%). 0. 現 在 は編 纂 活 動 に参 加 し て いな い. 一 年 に一 回 よ り少 な い. 5.. 一年 に 一回程度. 半年 に 一回程度. 三 か月 に 一回程度. 一 か月 に 一回程度. 半月 に 一回程度. 週 に 一回程度. 週 に 二回以上. 9. ■ ■. 5.1. 4.4 1 10 5.2. 10 4.4 6. 4 ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(7) Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 11 11 52.9% 5.1 121. 74. 79. 51/74 (68.9%). 80. 60. 40. 20. 9/17 (52.9%). 9/12 (75.0%). 9/13 (69.2%). 13/24 (54.2%). 17/28 (60.7%). 19/31 (61.3%). 17/27 (63.0%) 9/16 (56.3%). 7.. 0. 現 在 は編 纂 活 動 に参 加 し て いな い. 一 年 に一 回 よ り少 な い. 一年 に 一回程度. 半年 に 一回程度. 三 か月 に 一回程度. 一 か月 に 一回程度. 半月 に 一回程度. 週に 一回程度. 週に 二回以上. ■ ■. 11. 6. 1). C.K.. 2) Wikipedia 3). [3]. 7. , (2004) http://www.wikipedia.org :. :. Co‐Creation. ?,. (2008).. ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(8) Vol.2009-HCI-135 No.15 Vol.2009-UBI-24 No.15 2009/11/13. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. A.1. 16. Wikipedia. 17. Wikipedia Wikipedia. No. 1. Wikipedia. 18. 2. Wikipedia. 19. Wikipedia. 20. Wikipedia. 3. Wikipedia. 4. Wikipedia. 5. 1. 6. 21. Wikipedia. Wikipedia. Wikipedia 22. 7. Wikipedia. Q6. 8. 23. Wikipedia. 9. Wikipedia 24. 10. Wikipedia. Wikipedia 25. 11. 2. 1. 1. Wikipedia ※. Wikipedia 26. … Wikipedia. Wikipedia 27 12. 2. 1. 1. Wikipedia ※ ※. Wikipedia 13. Wikipedia Wikipedia. 14. Wikipedia Wikipedia 28. 15. 29. Wikipedia. 30. 8. ⓒ2009 Information Processing Society of Japan.

(9)

参照

今ダウンロードする ( PDF - 8 ページ - 559.46 KB )

関連したドキュメント

A survey of the degree/diameter problem

She reviews the status of a number of interrelated problems on diameters of graphs, including: (i) degree/diameter problem, (ii) order/degree problem, (iii) given n, D, D 0 ,

4 Construction of the operators for the model

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

This is the survey of the applications of the potential methods to the problems of continuum mechanics

He thereby extended his method to the investigation of boundary value problems of couple-stress elasticity, thermoelasticity and other generalized models of an elastic

THE MOMENTS OF THE AREA UNDER REFLECTED

This paper develops a recursion formula for the conditional moments of the area under the absolute value of Brownian bridge given the local time at 0.. The method of power series

OF THE GROUP

Answering a question of de la Harpe and Bridson in the Kourovka Notebook, we build the explicit embeddings of the additive group of rational numbers Q in a finitely generated group

(3.) In the statement of the criterion

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

Specialization of the

In our previous paper [Ban1], we explicitly calculated the p-adic polylogarithm sheaf on the projective line minus three points, and calculated its specializa- tions to the d-th

The Rational Homotopy of the

Our method of proof can also be used to recover the rational homotopy of L K(2) S 0 as well as the chromatic splitting conjecture at primes p > 3 [16]; we only need to use the