• 検索結果がありません。

On Concircular φ-Recurrent K-Contact Manifold Admitting Semisymmetric Metric Connection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "On Concircular φ-Recurrent K-Contact Manifold Admitting Semisymmetric Metric Connection"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Volume 2012, Article ID 757032,9pages doi:10.1155/2012/757032

Research Article

On Concircular φ-Recurrent K-Contact Manifold Admitting Semisymmetric Metric Connection

Venkatesha, K. T. Pradeep Kumar, C. S. Bagewadi, and Gurupadavva Ingalahalli

Department of Mathematics, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta, Shimoga 577 451, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Venkatesha,[email protected] Received 29 March 2012; Accepted 29 May 2012

Academic Editor: J. Dydak

Copyrightq2012 Venkatesha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the present paper, we have studiedφ-recurrent and concircularφ-recurrentK-contact manifold with respect to semisymmetric metric connection and obtained some interesting results.

1. Introduction

The idea of semisymmetric linear connection on a differentiable manifold was introduced by Friedmann and Schouten1. In2, Hayden introduced idea of metric connection with torsion on a Riemannian manifold. Further, some properties of semisymmetric metric con- nection has been studied by Yano3. In4, Golab defined and studied quarter-symmetric connection on a differentiable manifold with affine connection, which generalizes the idea of semisymmetric connection. Various properties of semisymmetric metric connection and quarter-symmetric metric connection have been studied by many geometers like Sharfuddin and Hussain5, Amur and Pujar6, Rastogi7,8, Mishra and Pandey9, Bagewadi et al.

10–14, De et al.15,16, and many others.

The notion of local symmetry of a Riemannian manifold has been weakened by many authors in several ways to a different extent. As a weaker version of local symmetry, Taka- hashi17introduced the notion of localφ-symmetry on a Sasakian manifold. Generalizing the notion of φ-symmetry, De et al. 18 introduced the notion of φ-recurrent Sasakian manifolds.

The paper is organized as follows.Section 2is devoted to preliminaries. InSection 3, we study semisymmetric metric connection in aK-contact manifold. InSection 4, it is proved that aφ-recurrentK-contact manifold with respect to semisymmetric metric connection is an

(2)

Einstein manifold. Finally, inSection 5it is also shown that concircularφ-recurrentK-contact manifold admitting semisymmetric metric connection is an Einstein manifold, and the characteristic vector fieldξand the vector fieldρassociated to the 1-formAare codirectional.

2. Preliminaries

An n-dimensional differentiable manifold M is said to have an almost contact structure φ, ξ, η if it carries a tensor field φ of type 1,1, a vector field ξ, and a 1-form η on M, respectively, such that,

φ2−I ηξ, ηξ 1, ηφ0, φξ0. 2.1

Thus a manifoldMequipped with this structureφ, ξ, ηis called an almost contact manifold and is denoted by M, φ, ξ, η. If g is a Riemannian metric on an almost contact manifoldMsuch that,

g

φX, φY

gX, YηXηY, gX, ξ ηX, 2.2

whereX,Y are vector fields defined onM, then,Mis said to have an almost contact metric structureφ, ξ, η, g, andMwith this structure is called an almost contact metric manifold and is denoted byM, φ, ξ, η, g.

If onM, φ, ξ, η, gthe exterior derivative of 1-formηsatisfies dηX, Y g

X, φY

, 2.3

thenφ, ξ, η, gis said to be a contact metric structure, andMequipped with a contact metric structure is called an contact metric manifold.

If moreoverξis killing vector field onM, then,Mis called aK-contact Riemannian manifold19,20. AK-contact Riemannian manifold is called Sasakian19, if the relation

Xφ

Y gX, YξηYX 2.4

holds, where∇denotes the operator of covariant differentiation with respect tog.

In aK-contact manifoldM, the following relations holds:

Xξ−φX, 2.5

gRX, YZ, ξ gY, ZηXgX, ZηY, 2.6

SX, ξ n−1ηX, 2.7

for all vector fieldsX,Y, andZ. HereRandSare the Riemannian curvature tensor and the Ricci tensor ofM, respectively.

(3)

Definition 2.1. AK-contact manifoldMis said to beφ-recurrent if there exists a nonzero 1- formAsuch that,

φ2WRX, YZ AWRX, YZ, 2.8

whereAis defined byAW gW, ρ, andρis a vector field associated with the 1-formA.

Definition 2.2. AK-contact manifoldMis said to be concircularφ-recurrent12if there exists a non-zero 1-formAsuch that,

φ2

WC

X, YZ

AWCX, YZ, 2.9

whereCis a concircular curvature tensor given by21as follows:

CX, YZRX, YZ− r nn−1

gY, ZX−gX, ZY

, 2.10

whereRis the Riemannian curvature tensor andris the scalar curvature.

A linear connection∇ in ann-dimensional differentiable manifoldMis said to be a semisymmetric connection if its torsion tensorTis of the form

TX, YXY−∇YX−X, Y ηYX−ηXY, 2.11

for allX,Y onTM. A semisymmetric connection∇ is called semisymmetric metric connec- tion, if it further satisfies∇g 0.

3. Semisymmetric Metric Connection in a K-Contact Manifold

A semisymmetric metric connection∇ in aK-contact manifold can be defined by

XYXY ηYX−gX, Yξ, 3.1

where∇is the Levi-Civita connection onM3.

A relation between the curvature tensor of M, with respect to the semisymmetric metric connection∇ and the Levi-Civita connection,∇is given by

RX, YZ RX, YZ g

φY, Z Xg

φX, Z Y

gY, ZφXgX, ZφY g

φX, φZ Yg

φY, φZ

X

ηXgY, ZηYgX, Z

ξ, 3.2

whereRandRare the Riemannian curvatures of the connections∇ and∇, respectively.

From3.2, it follows that

SY, Z SY, Z−n−2gY, Z n−2g φY, Z

n−2ηYηZ, 3.3

whereSandSare the Ricci tensors of the connections∇ and∇, respectively.

(4)

Contracting3.3, we get

rr−n−1n−2, 3.4

whererandrare the scalar curvatures of the connections∇ and∇, respectively.

4. φ-Recurrent K-Contact Manifold with respect to Semisymmetric Metric Connection

AK-contact manifold is calledφ-recurrent with respect to the semisymmetric metric connec- tion if its curvature tensorRsatisfies the following condition:

φ2

WR

X, YZ

AWRX, Y Z. 4.1

By virtue of2.1and4.1, we have

WR

X, YZ η

WR

X, YZ

ξAWRX, Y Z, 4.2

from which, it follows that

−g

WR

X, YZ, U η

WR

X, YZ

gξ, U AWg

RX, Y Z, U

. 4.3

Let {ei}, i 1,2, . . . , n be an orthonormal basis of the tangent space at any point of the manifold. Then puttingXUeiin4.3and taking summation overi, 1in, we get

WS

Y, Z n

i1

η

WR

ei, YZ

ηei AWSY, Z. 4.4

PutZξ, then the second term of4.4takes the following form:

g

WR

ei, Yξ, ξ g

WRe i, Yξ, ξ

g R

Wei, Y ξ, ξ

g R

ei,WY ξ, ξ

g

Re i, YWξ, ξ .

4.5

On simplification, we obtaingWRe i, Yξ, ξ 0.

Now4.4implies that

WS

Y, ξ −AWSY, ξ. 4.6

We know that

WS

Y, ξ ∇WSY, ξS

WY, ξ

S

Y,Wξ

. 4.7

(5)

Using3.3,2.5, and2.7in the above relation, we get ∇WS

Y, ξ S Y, φW

SY, W−n−1g Y, φW n−1gY, W 2n−2g

φY, φW .

4.8

In view of4.6and4.8, we have SY, W−S

Y, φW

n−1g Y, φW

−n−1gY, W−2n−2g

φY, φW

n−1AWηY. 4.9

Again puttingY φYin4.9, we get S

φY, W

S

φY, φW

n−1g

φY, φW

−n−1g φY, W

2n−2g Y, φW

0.

4.10

InterchangingY and W in4.10, we obtain S

φW, Y

S

φW, φY

n−1g

φW, φY

−n−1g φW, Y

2n−2g W, φY

0.

4.11

Adding4.10and4.11which on simplification, we have

SY, W n−1gY, W. 4.12

Therefore, we can state the following.

Theorem 4.1. Aφ-recurrentK-contact manifold with respect to semisymmetric metric connection is an Einstein manifold.

5. Concircular φ-Recurrent K-Contact Manifold with respect to Semisymmetric Metric Connection

Let us consider a concircularφ-recurrentK-contact manifold with respect to the semisym- metric metric connection defined by

φ2

WC

X, YZ

AWCX, Y Z, 5.1

whereC is a concircular curvature tensor with respect to the semisymmetric metric connec- tion given by

CX, YZ RX, Y Z− r nn−1

gY, ZX−gX, ZY

. 5.2

(6)

By virtue of2.1and5.1, we have

− ∇WC

X, YZ η

WC

X, YZ

ξAWCX, Y Z, 5.3

from which, it follows that

−g

WC

X, YZ, U

η

WC

X, YZ

gξ, U AWg

CX, Y Z, U

, 5.4 where

WC

X, YZ ∇WRX, YZ 3

gY, WηZXgX, WηZY 3

gY, ZgW, X−gX, ZgW, Y ξ 2

ηXg φW, Z

Y−ηYg φW, Z

X 2

ηYgX, Z−ηXgY, Z

φW

gY, ZηXgX, ZηY W

2ηW

ηYgX, Z−ηXgY, Z ξ

2ηZηW

ηXYηYX

gZ, W

ηYX−ηXY

gW, RX, YZξ−ηXRW, YZ

ηYRX, WZ−ηZRX, YW

− ∇Wr nn−1

gY, ZXgX, ZY .

5.5 Let {ei}, i 1,2, . . . , n be an orthonormal basis of the tangent space at any point of the manifold. Then puttingXUeiin5.4and taking summation overi, 1in, we get

WS

Y, Z−∇Wr

n gY, Z − ∇Wr nn−1

gY, Z−ηYηZ

AW

SY, Zr ngY, Z

. 5.6

ReplacingZbyξin5.6, we obtain ∇WS

Y, ξ ∇Wr

n ηYAW

SY, ξr nηY

. 5.7

We know that

WS

Y, ξ ∇WSY, ξS

WY, ξ

S

Y,Wξ

. 5.8

(7)

Using3.3,2.5and2.7, the above relation becomes ∇WS

Y, ξS Y, φW

−SY, W−n−1g Y, φW

n−1gY,W 2n−2g

φY,φW . 5.9

In view of5.7and5.9, we obtain S

Y, φW

SY, W−n−1g Y, φW

n−1gY, W 2n−2gY, W−2n−2ηYηW ∇Wr

n ηYAW

2n−12r

n ηY

.

5.10

ReplacingYbyφYin5.10, we have S

φY, φW

S φY, W

−n−1g

φY, φW

n−1g φY, W

2n−2g φY, W

0.

5.11

InterchangingY andWin5.11, we get S

φW, φY

S φW, Y

−n−1g

φW, φY

n−1g φW, Y

2n−2g φW, Y

0.

5.12

Adding5.11and5.12, which on simplification, we have

SY, W n−1gY, W. 5.13

Thus, we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 5.1. A Concircularφ-recurrentK-contact manifold with respect to semisymmetric metric connection is an Einstein manifold.

Next, from5.3, one has ∇WC

X, YZη

WC

X, YZ

ξAWCX, YZ. 5.14

Now, using3.2,3.4,5.5, and Bianchi’s identity in5.14, one obtains AWηRX, YZ AXηRY, WZ AYηRW, XZ

−AW g

φY, Z

ηXg φX, Z

ηY

AX g

φW, Z

ηYg φY, Z

ηW

AY g

φX, Z

ηWg φW, Z

ηX

(8)

r−n−1n−2

nn−1 AW

gY, ZηXgX, ZηY r−n−1n−2

nn−1 AX

gW, ZηYgY, ZηW r−n−1n−2

nn−1 AY

gX, ZηWgW, ZηX .

5.15

PuttingY Zeiin5.15and taking summation overi, 1in, one gets −nn−1n−2 rn−2−n−1n−22

nn−1

AXηW

nn−1n−2−rn−2 n−1n−22 nn−1

AWηX A

φW

ηXA φX

ηW.

5.16

ReplacingXbyξin5.16, one gets

rn−2 2n−1n−22 n2n−12 nn−1rn−2 2n−1n−2

AWAξηW

0, 5.17

therefore

AW ηWη

ρ

, 5.18

for any vector fieldW.

Hence, one states the following.

Theorem 5.2. In a concircular φ-recurrent K-contact manifold admitting semisymmetric metric connection the characteristic vector fieldξ and the vector fieldρ associated to the 1-formAare co- directional and the 1-formAis given by5.18.

Acknowledgment

The authors express their thanks to DST Department of Science and Technology, Gov- ernment of India for providing financial assistance under major research project no.

SR/S4/MS:482/07.

References

1 A. Friedmann and J. A. Schouten, “ ¨Uber die Geometrie der halbsymmetrischen ¨Ubertragungen,”

Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 211–223, 1924.

(9)

2 H. A. Hayden, “Subspaces of a space with torsion,” Proceedings London Mathematical Society, vol. 34, pp. 27–50, 1932.

3 K. Yano, “On semi-symmetric metric connection,” Revue Roumaine de Math´ematiques Pures et Appli- qu´ees, vol. 15, pp. 1579–1586, 1970.

4 S. Golab, “On semi-symmetric and quarter-symmetric linear connections,” Tensor, vol. 29, no. 3, pp.

249–254, 1975.

5 A. Sharfuddin and S. I. Husain, “Semi-symmetric metric connexions in almost contact manifolds,”

Tensor, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 1976.

6 K. Amur and S. S. Pujar, “On submanifolds of a Riemannian manifold admitting a metric semisym- metric connection,” Tensor, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 1978.

7 S. C. Rastogi, “On quarter-symmetric metric connection,” Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´emie Bulgare des Sciences, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 811–814, 1978.

8 S. C. Rastogi, “On quarter-symmetric metric connections,” Tensor, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 133–141, 1987.

9 R. S. Mishra and S. N. Pandey, “On quarter symmetric metricF-connections,” Tensor, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1980.

10 C. S. Bagewadi, “On totally real submanifolds of a K¨ahlerian manifold admitting semisymmetric metricF-connection,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 528–536, 1982.

11 C. S. Bagewadi, N. S. Basavarajappa, D. G. Prakasha, and Venkatesha, “Some results on K-contact and trans-Sasakian manifolds,” European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 21–31, 2008.

12 Venkatesha and C. S. Bagewadi, “On concircular φ-recurrent LP-Sasakian manifolds,” Differential Geometry—Dynamical Systems, vol. 10, pp. 312–319, 2008.

13 K. T. Pradeep Kumar, C. S. Bagewadi, and Venkatesha, “Projectiveφ-symmetricK-contact manifold admitting quarter-symmetric metric connection,” Differential Geometry—Dynamical Systems, vol. 13, pp. 128–137, 2011.

14 K. T. Pradeep Kumar, Venkatesha, and C. S. Bagewadi, “Onφ-recurrent para-Sasakian manifold admitting quarter-symmetric metric connection,” ISRN Geometry, vol. 2012, Article ID 317253, 10 pages, 2012.

15 G. Pathak and U. C. De, “On a semi-symmetric metric connection in a Kenmotsu manifold,” Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 319–324, 2002.

16 A. K. Mondal and U. C. De, “Some properties of a quarter-symmetric metric connection on a Sasakian manifold,” Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 99–108, 2009.

17 T. Takahashi, “Sasakianφ-symmetric spaces,” The Tohoku Mathematical Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 91–

113, 1977.

18 U. C. De, A. A. Shaikh, and S. Biswas, “Onφ-recurrent Sasakian manifolds,” Novi Sad Journal of Mathematics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 43–48, 2003.

19 D. E. Blair, Contact Manifolds in Riemannian Geometry, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 509, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1976.

20 S. Sasaki, Lecture note on almost contact manifolds, Part I, Tohoku University, 1965.

21 K. Yano, “Concircular geometry—I. Concircular transformations,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, vol. 16, pp. 195–200, 1940.

(10)

Submit your manuscripts at http://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematics

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

Differential Equations

International Journal of

Volume 2014

Applied MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in

Complex Analysis

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Optimization

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Combinatorics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Function Spaces

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

The Scientific World Journal

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Discrete Mathematics

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Stochastic Analysis

International Journal of

参照

関連したドキュメント

then in case of (I) a partially pseudo-symmetric K-contact manifold turns out to be Sasakian (Theorem 1); in case of (II) it is moreover of constant curvature 1, and hence it is

In 2007, Lovejoy Das [5] in his paper proved that a second order symmetric parallel tensor on an α-K-contact (α ∈ R 0 ) manifold is a constant multiple of the associated metric

After constructing a Rie- mannian metric by the help of integration of the canonical Riemann-Finsler metric on the indicatrix hypersurface it is proved that in case of Berwald

This enables us to study the pinching problem on the square of the length of the second fundamental form of 3-dimensional totally real submanifolds in S 6 in new viewpoint.. The

They are natural generalizations of Riemannian and locally Minkowski struc- tures, and it happens that the Chern connection of a Berwald manifold is in fact the Levi-Civita

The object of the present paper is to study locally ϕ- symmetric LP-Sasakian manifolds admitting a semi-symmetric metric connection and obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for

A (2n + 1)-dimensional Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold is lo- cally ϕ-symmetric with respect to the semi-symmetric metric connection if and only if the manifold is also

An n-dimensional P-Sasakian manifold is globally ϕ-conharmo- nicly symmetric with respect to the semi-symmetric non-metric connection if and only if the manifold is also