• 検索結果がありません。

任意に高いヘンペル距離の橋分解 をもつ結び目

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "任意に高いヘンペル距離の橋分解 をもつ結び目"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

任意に高いヘンペル距離の橋分解 をもつ結び目

市原一裕

日本大学 文理学部

斎藤敏夫氏(上越教育大)との共同研究 2013年度 日本数学会秋期総合分科会

愛媛大学,2013924

(2)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting

Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

Heegaard splitting

Heegaard splitting ( Heegaard (1898) )

A decomposition of a closed orientable 3-manifold into two handlebodies.

Moise (1952)

Every closed orientable 3-manifold has a Heegaard splitting.

(3)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance

Bridge splitting Result

Hempel distance

Facts

Certain properties of Heegaard splittings reflect topological characteristics of 3-manifolds:

I any Heegaard splitting of a reducible 3-manifold is reducible (Haken (1968))

I any Heegaard splitting of a non-Haken 3-manifold is reducible or strongly irreducible

(Casson-Gordon (1987)) Motivated by such works, in 2001,

Hempel introduced an invariant of a Heegaard splitting, called the distance, or commonly called the Hempel distance.

(4)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance

Bridge splitting Result

High distance splittings for closed 3-manifolds

A lot of studies have been done about the distance of Heegaard splittings...

Among them, on the existence of high distance splittings, there are several known results.

For example,

Hempel (2001)

There exist Heegaard splittings of closed 3-manifolds with distance at leastn for arbitrarily largen.

(adapting an idea of Kobayashi (1988))

(5)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

Bridge splitting

A natural generalization of Heegaard splitting for a link is given by the bridge splitting(or bridge decomposition).

(g, b)-bridge splitting

A decomposition of(M, L) into

two pairs of a genusg handlebody and btrivial arcs for a link Lin a closed 3-manifoldM.

For bridge splittings, the notion of distance is naturally defined as a generalization of the case of Heegaard splittings.

Precise definition will be given as follows...

(6)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

Curve complex

To define the (Hempel) distance,

we first prepare the terminology about thecurve complex, originally introduced by Harvey (1981).

Let F be a compact orientable surface

possibly with non-empty boundary.

the curve complex C (F )

Thesimplicial complex whose k-simplexes are the isotopy classes of k+ 1collections of mutually non-isotopicessential loops onF which can be realizeddisjointly.

Remark

“essential” means non-trivial and not boundary-parallel.

(7)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

Distance on the curve complex

Distance on the curve complex

For a pair of vertices[x]and[y]in C(F),

thedistanced([x],[y])between[x]and[y]is defined as the minimal number of edges in a path from[x]to[y].

The well-definedness is due to:

Masur-Minsky (1999)

The curve complex is connectedifF is notsporadic,

i.e.,∂F has at least 5 (resp.2) components if g= 0(resp.1).

(8)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

Distance of bridge splitting

For a bridge splitting((V1, t1),(V2, t2))of (M, K), set E(K) :=M intN(K),

Wi:=Vi∩E(K) , S0:=∂Vi∩E(K) for i= 1,2.

For eachi= 1,2, thedisk setD(Wi) is the set of

vertices corresponding to the curves bounding disks in Wi.

Hempel distance d( D (W

1

), D (W

2

))

min{d([x],[y]) |[x]∈ D(W1),[y]∈ D(W2)}

(9)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

On high distance bridge splittings

Saito (2004)

In any closed3-manifold with a Heegaard splitting of genus one, there is a knot with a(1,1)-bridge splitting of arbitrary high distance.

Blair-Tomova-Yoshizawa (preprint)

For given integersb, c, g, and n,

there existsa c-component linkLin a 3-manifoldM so that(M, L)admits a (g, b)-bridge splitting of distance at leastn.

(10)

任意に高いヘンペ ル距離の橋分解を

もつ結び目 K.Ichihara

Heegaard splitting Hemple distance Bridge splitting Result

Main Theorem

Theorem (I.-Saito)

For anygiven closed 3-manifold M with a Heegaard surface S of genus g, and any given positive integersb & n, there exists a knot K in M

admiting a (g, b)-bridge splitting of distance> n with respect to S except for(g, b) = (0,1),(0,2).

参照

関連したドキュメント

mapping class group, relative pro-l completion, congruence subgroup problem, modular curve, pro-l outer Galois

On the other hand, from physical arguments, it is expected that asymptotically in time the concentration approach certain values of the minimizers of the function f appearing in

We present sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to Neu- mann and periodic boundary-value problems for some class of quasilinear ordinary differential equations.. We

˙Ibrahim C¸anak: Department of Mathematics, Adnan Menderes University, 09010 Aydın, Turkey Email address: [email protected]. Umit Totur: Department of Mathematics, Adnan

Splitting homotopies : Another View of the Lyubeznik Resolution There are systematic ways to find smaller resolutions of a given resolution which are actually subresolutions.. This is

As a consequence of this characterization, we get a characterization of the convex ideal hyperbolic polyhedra associated to a compact surface with genus greater than one (Corollary

It is thus often the case that the splitting surface of a strongly irreducible Heegaard splitting of a graph manifold can’t be isotoped to be horizontal or pseudohorizontal in

The group acts on this space by right translation of functions; the implied representation is smooth... We want to compute the cocy-