• 検索結果がありません。

On a class of rigid Coxeter groups(Cohomology Theory of Finite Groups and Related Topics)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "On a class of rigid Coxeter groups(Cohomology Theory of Finite Groups and Related Topics)"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

99

On

a

class of rigid Coxeter

groups

宇都宮大学教育学部

保坂 哲也 (Tetsuya Hosaka)

The purposeof this note is to introduce

some

results ofrecent papers

[4] and [5] about rigid Coxeter groups.

A Coxeter group is a group $W$ having a presentation

$\langle$$S$ $|(st)^{m(s,t)}=1$ for $s$, $t\in S$ $\rangle$,

where $S$ is a finite set and$m$ : $S\mathrm{x}S$ $arrow \mathbb{N}\mathrm{U}\{\infty\}$ is a function satisfying

the following conditions:

(i) $m(s, t)=\mathrm{m}(\mathrm{t}7s)$ for any $s$, $t\in S$,

(ii) $m(\langle s, s)$ $=1$ for any $s\in S$, and

(iii) $m(s, t)\geq 2$ for any $s$, $t\in S$ such that $s$ $\neq t$.

The pair $(W, S)$ is called

a

Coxeter system. For a Coxeter group $W$,

a generating set $S^{\mathit{1}}$ of $W$ is called a Coxeter generating set

for

$W$ if

$(W, S’)$ is

a

Coxeter system. Let $(W, S)$ be a Coxeter system. For a

subset $T\subset S$, $W_{T}$ is defined

as

the subgroup of $W$ generated by $T$,

and called

a

parabolic subgroup. A subset $T\subset S$ is called a spherical

subset

of

$S$, ifthe parabolic subgroup $W_{T}$ is finite.

Let $(W, S)$ and $(W’, S’)$ be Coxeter systems. Two Coxeter systems $(W, S)$ and $(W’, S’)$

are

saidto be isomorphic, if there exists a bijection

$\psi$ : $S$ $arrow S’$ such that

$m(s, t)=m’(\psi(s), \psi(t))$

for every $s$, $t\in S$, where $m(s, t)$ and $m’(s’, t’)$

are

the orders of

$st$ in $W$ and $s’t’$ in $W’$, respectively

(2)

ioo

A diagram is an undirected graph $\Gamma$ without loops or multiple edges

with

a

map Edges(F)$)$ $arrow\{2,3, 4, \ldots\}$ which assigns an integer greater

than 1 to each of its edges. Since such diagrams

are

used to define Coxeter systems, they

are

called Coxeter diagrams.

In general, a Coxeter group does not always determine its Coxeter

system up to isomorphism. Indeed

some

counter-examples

are

known. Example ([1, p.38 Exercise 8], [2]). It is know$\mathrm{n}$that for an odd number

$k\geq 3$, the Coxeter groups defined by the diagrams in Figure 1

are

isomorphic and $D_{2k}$.

$2k$

FIGURE 1. Two distinct Coxeter diagrams for $D_{2k}$

Example ([2]). It is known that the Coxeter groups defined by the diagrams in Figure 2 are isomorphic by the diagram twisting ([2,

Defi-nition 4.4]).

232

FIGURE 2. Coxeter diagrams for isomorphic Coxeter groups

Here there exists the following natural problem.

Problem ([2], [3]). When does

a

Coxeter group determine its Coxeter

(3)

101

A Coxeter group $W$ is said to be rigid, if the Coxeter group $W$ determinesits Coxeter system upto isomorphism (i.e., for each Coxeter generating sets $S$ and $S’$ for $W$ the Coxeter systems $(W, S)$ and $(W, S’)$

are

isomorphic).

A Coxeter system $(W, S)$ is said to be even, if $m(s, t)$ is even for all

$s\neq t$ in $S$. Also a Coxeter system $(W, S)$ is said to be strong even, if $m(s, t)\in\{2\}\mathrm{U}4\mathrm{N}$ for all $s\neq t$ in $S$

.

The following theorem

was

proved by Radcliffe in [6].

Theorem 1 ([6]).

If

(W, S) is

a

strong even Coxeter system, then the

Coxeter group W is rigii.

In [4], we first proved the following theorem which give a new class of rigid Coxeter groups.

Theorem 2. Let (W, S) be a Coxeter system. Suppose that (0)

for

each $s$, $t\in S$ such that $m(s, t)$ is even, $m(s, t)$ $=2_{f}$

(1)

for

each $s$ $\neq t\in S$ such that $m(s, t)$ is odd, $\{s, t\}$ is a maximal

gpherical subset

of

$S_{\lambda}$

(2) there does not exist a th$ree$-points subset $\{s, t, u\}\subset S$ such that $m(s_{?}t)$ and $m(t, u)$ are odd, and

(3)

for

each $s\neq t\in S$ such that $m(s, t)$ is odd, the number

of

maximal sphericalsubsets

of

$S$ intersecting with $\{s, t\}$ is at most $rwo$.

Then the Coxeter group $W$ is rigid.

Example. The Coxeter groups defined by the diagrams in Figure 3

are

rigid by Theorem 2.

23323

(4)

102

In [5],

we

also proved the following theorem which is an extension of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2.

Theorem 3. Let (W, S) be

a

Coxeter system. Suppose that

(0)

for

each $s$, $t\in S$ such that $m(s, t)$ is even, $m(s, t)\in\{2\}\cup 4\mathrm{N}_{2}$

(1)

for

each $s\neq \mathrm{t}$ $\in S$ such that $m(s, t)$ is odd, $\{s, t\}$ is

a

maximal

spherical subset

of

$S$,

(2) there does not exist a three-points subset $\{s, t, u\}\subseteq S$ such that

$m(s, t)$ anti $m(t, u)$

are

odd, and

(3)

for

each $s\neq t\in S$ such that $m(s, t)$ is odd, the number

of

maximalsphericalsubsets

of

$S$ intersecting with$\{s, t\}$ is at most $rwo$.

Then the Coxeter group $W$ is rigid.

REFERENCES

[1] N. Bourbaki, Groupes et Algebres deLie, Chapters IV-VI, Masson, Paris, 1981.

[2] N. Brady, J.P. McCammond, B. Miihlherr and W,D. Neumann, Rigidity of

Coxeter groups and Artin groups, Geom. Dedicata 94 (2002), 91-109.

[3] R. Charney and M.W. Davis, When is a Coxeter system determined by its

Coxeter group? J. London Math. Soc. 61 (no.2) (2000), 441-461.

[4] T. Hosaka, A class ofrigid Coxetergroups, preprint.

[5] T. Hosaka, On a netn class ofrigid Coxeter groups, preprint.

[6] D. Radcliffe, Unique presentation of Coxeter groups and related groups, Ph.D. thesis, The University ofWisconsin-Milwaukee, 2001.

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, [TSUNOMIYA uNIVERSITY

UTSUNOM IYA. 321-8505, JAPAN

参照

関連したドキュメント

Keywords and Phrases: Profinite cohomology, lower p-central filtra- tion, Lyndon words, Shuffle relations, Massey

The reason all coherent 2-groups with the same underlying weak 2-group are isomorphic is that we have defined a homomorphism of coherent 2-groups to be a weak monoidal functor,

In the next section we gather preliminaries on poset topology and Coxeter groups, including some new ma- terial on twisted involutions, that we need in the sequel.. Section 5

In this context, the Fundamental Theorem of the Invariant Theory is proved, a notion of basis of the rings of invariants is introduced, and a generalization of Hilbert’s

These include the relation between the structure of the mapping class group and invariants of 3–manifolds, the unstable cohomology of the moduli space of curves and Faber’s

In the present paper, starting from Matsumoto’s presentations, we calculate pre- sentations for all punctured mapping class groups M (F g,r , P n ) as quotients of Artin groups by

The principal theorem of Brink and Howlett, and in my opinion one of the most remarkable facts about general Coxeter groups, is that the number of minimal roots is finite.. That

Finally, some new families of finite CI-groups are found, that is, the metacyclic groups of order 4 p (with centre of order 2) and of order 8 p (with centre of order 4) are