Formal Proof of Higman's Lemma on Isabelle/HOL
全文
(2)
関連したドキュメント
On the other hand, given a period 0 of length P, we associate a cycle to it, as explained in the proof of Theorem 3.1, using Lemma 4.2.. Since, by the same lemma, the cycle
Since the augmented Tchebyshev transform of a lower Eulerian poset is lower Eulerian, in the case of lower Eulerian binomial posets we obtain a particularly elegant rule: to invert
This is a consequence of a more general result on interacting particle systems that shows that a stationary measure is ergodic if and only if the sigma algebra of sets invariant
We point out that in the case when the nonlocal operators from equation (1.3) are replaced by the corresponding differential operators (Laplacian and p-Laplacian) the resulting
We give a new sufficient condition in order that the curvature determines the metric: generically, if two Riemannian manifolds have the same ”surjective” (1,3)-curvature tensor
We also realize the configurations in question as formal toric schemes and compute their formal Gromov–Witten invariants using the mathematical and physical theories of the
As an application of this technique, we construct a free T -algebra functor and the underlying T -monoid functor, which are analogues of the free monoidal category functor and
In [9], it was shown that under diffusive scaling, the random set of coalescing random walk paths with one walker starting from every point on the space-time lattice Z × Z converges