• 検索結果がありません。

Table 5 Exposure Dose Data by Age

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Table 5 Exposure Dose Data by Age"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Attachment

18-19 years old

Dose ranges (mSv) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

Above 250 0 0 0

200-250 0 0 0

150-200 0 0 0

100-150 0 0 0

75-100 0 0 0

50-75 0 0 0

20-50 0 1 1

10-20 0 14 14

5-10 0 10 10

1-5 0 35 35

1 or less 0 36 36

Total 0 96 96

Max. dose 0.00 28.79 28.79

Average dose 0.00 4.29 4.29

20-29 years old

Dose ranges (mSv) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

Above 250 2 0 2

200-250 0 0 0

150-200 3 0 3

100-150 10 0 10

75-100 79 7 86

50-75 51 72 123

20-50 80 501 581

10-20 87 571 658

5-10 65 511 576

1-5 71 862 933

1 or less 64 933 997

Total 512 3457 3969

Max. dose 477.01 99.25 477.01

Average dose 33.36 9.99 13.01

30-39 years old

Dose ranges (mSv) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

Above 250 1 0 1

200-250 1 2 3

150-200 0 1 1

100-150 27 2 29

75-100 79 24 103

50-75 86 265 351

20-50 144 1088 1232

10-20 146 973 1119

5-10 103 921 1024

1-5 165 1608 1773

1 or less 188 1905 2093

Total 940 6789 7729

Max. dose 310.97 238.42 310.97

Average dose 25.58 11.66 13.35

40-49 years old

Dose ranges (mSv) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

Above 250 2 0 2

200-250 0 0 0

150-200 9 0 9

100-150 32 4 36

75-100 73 58 131

50-75 83 417 500

20-50 196 1650 1846

10-20 222 1578 1800

5-10 183 1476 1659

1-5 340 2538 2878

1 or less 433 3258 3691

Total 1573 10979 12552

Max. dose 678.80 133.24 678.80

Average dose 19.06 11.20 12.18

(Aggregation period: March 11, 2011 - March 31, 2015)

Table 5 Exposure Dose Data by Age

(2)

50-59 years old

Dose ranges (mSv) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

Above 250 1 0 1

200-250 0 0 0

150-200 13 0 13

100-150 45 10 55

75-100 58 70 128

50-75 93 392 485

20-50 178 1622 1800

10-20 133 1427 1560

5-10 125 1361 1486

1-5 234 2406 2640

1 or less 401 3186 3587

Total 1281 10474 11755

Max. dose 353.12 147.90 353.12

Average dose 22.17 11.47 12.64

60-69 years old

Dose ranges (mSv) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

Above 250 0 0 0

200-250 0 0 0

150-200 1 1 2

100-150 3 4 7

75-100 4 34 38

50-75 16 210 226

20-50 24 808 832

10-20 6 777 783

5-10 15 716 731

1-5 14 1532 1546

1 or less 38 2067 2105

Total 121 6149 6270

Max. dose 197 176.00 197.00

Average dose 24.26 10.14 10.42

70 years old and over

Dose ranges (mSv) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

Above 250 0 0 0

200-250 0 0 0

150-200 0 0 0

100-150 0 0 0

75-100 0 2 2

50-75 0 2 2

20-50 0 17 17

10-20 1 23 24

5-10 1 32 33

1-5 0 65 65

1 or less 1 88 89

Total 3 229 232

Max. dose 16.19 89.50 89.50

Average dose 8.37 6.63 6.66

Number of workers by age

Age ranges (years old) TEPCO's employees Contractors Total

18-19 years old 0 96 96

20-29 years old 512 3457 3969

30-39 years old 940 6789 7729

40-49 years old 1573 10979 12552

50-59 years old 1281 10474 11755

60-69 years old 121 6149 6270

70 years old and over 3 229 232

Age unknown* 0 7 7

Total 4430 38180 42610

Max. dose 678.80 238.42 678.80

Average dose 23.13 11.03 12.29

Note)

・The ages above are those as of March 31, 2015

・The values of the exposure dose and the number of the workers in the table above are subject to change, because there are times when APD data are replaced with monthly dose data measured by integral dosimeters. Or dose data of workers who wore only an integral dosimeter (ex., workers who entered only the Main Anti-earthquake Building) need to be updated in the table after the publication of the data.

*The seven workers that were not able to be contacted are classified as "Age unknown" because we do not know which age range they belonge to.

参照

関連したドキュメント

It has been identified that the numeracy demands of most of the worksites are minimal; that the numeracy is highly situational – that is, it is governed by demands and needs that

Indeed a prominent giant in the development of interior point methods is clearly Newton himself, for all of the complexity results for linear programming depend on using Newton’s

As we can see, this definition is based on the Definition 2.3 and the previous one is based on the characterization, in the univariate case, in terms of the hazard rate function. In

First, for the pairs of knots that do not appear in Theorem 1.1 or in Table 4, we can show easily that there exists no surjective homomorphism between their groups by using only

As it was shown in [22, 23] the Lyapunov-type methods are also applicable to prove the convergence of the trajectories to a point stationary in limit. Namely, it has been proved, if

(To be more precise, Newton found one such function, because since that time it turned out that for investigation of certain stability problems in mechanics, several Lyapunov

First, inspired by the famous result of Bass: A one-dimensional Noetherian local domain R is Gorenstein if and only if each nonzero fractional ideal of R is reflexive (see [1],

This paper presents an investigation into the mechanics of this specific problem and develops an analytical approach that accounts for the effects of geometrical and material data on