• 検索結果がありません。

Hyperbolic volumes and pants distances for two-bridge knots

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Hyperbolic volumes and pants distances for two-bridge knots"

Copied!
21
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

「リーマン面・不連続群論」研究集会, Feb.1.2007

Hyperbolic volumes and

pants distances

for two-bridge knots

市原一裕

Kazuhiro Ichihara

(2)

§ 1. Back ground

Classification of 3-manifolds Every closed orientable 3-manifold is;

Reducible (containing essential 2-sphere),

Toroidal (containing essential torus),

Seifert fibered (foliated by circles), or

Hyperbolic (admitting Riem.metric of curv. 1) .

By the Geometrization Conjecture raised by Thurston, (late ’70s).

& Established(?) by Perelman (2002?).

(3)

What’s the NEXT?

Attack the remaining Open Problems.

(e.g., Virtually Haken Conjecture,

“Heegaard genus VS rank of π

1

” problem, etc . . . )

Study the Relationships between 3-manifolds.

(e.g., degree-one map, Dehn surgery, etc . . . )

Relate Geometric & Topological invariants.

(e.g., Volume conjecture (for knots), etc . . . )

(4)

§ 2. Motivation

Let M be a closed orientable 3-manifold.

“Thm.” [Brock-Souto]

Suppose that M is hyperbolic.

For g , constant L g > 0 s.t.

L g 1 · δ P ( U V ) vol( M ) L g · δ P ( U V )

for strongly irreducible Heegaard splitting

M = U V of genus g .

(5)

This is included in Note:

Geometry, Heegaard splittings and rank of the fundamental group of hyperbolic 3-manifolds.

by Juan Souto as Theorem 8.4 (Brock-Souto) . The note is available at Souto’s web page;

http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~juan/papers.html

(6)

Heegaard splitting

Definitions

A Heegaard splitting of M means the de- composition M = U V into two handlebod- ies U and V .

The surface appearing as U V is called the Heegaard surface.

The genus of a Heegaard surface is called

the genus of the Heegaard splitting.

(7)

A Heegaard splitting M = U V is called;

reducible if essential disks D U U & D V V with ∂D U = ∂D V .

weakly reducible if essential disks D U U

& D V V with ∂D U ∂D V = .

strongly irreducible if it is not weakly re-

ducible.

(8)

Pants complex

Let Σ be a compact orientable surface.

Def. (Pants decomposition)

A pants decomposition of Σ means a set of

disjoint simple closed curves on Σ cutting it

into pairs of pants.

(9)

Def. (Pants complex)

The graph constructed as follows is called the pants complex P (Σ) of Σ.

vertex ←→ isotopy class

of a pants decomposition

edge ←→ single “S-move” or “A-move”

(10)

Invariant δ P ( U V )

Let M = U V be a Heegaard splitting of M with Heegaard surface S .

Then they define δ P ( U V ) as min

½

d P ( S ) ([ P U ] , [ P V ]) | [ P U ] ∈ H ( U ) , [ P V ] ∈ H ( V )

¾

where, for the handlebody U , H ( U ) denotes;

[ P ] ∈ P ( ∂U )

¯¯¯¯

¯¯¯¯

a unionof disks in U with

P s.t. U ∆ = solid tori

In the same way, H ( V ) is set for V .

(11)

§ 3. Result Thm. [I.]

Let K be a hyperbolic two-bridge knot in the 3-sphere S 3 . Then we have

v8

2

P

( T

1

T

2

) 3) vol( S

3

K ) 10 v

4

(2δ

P

( T

1

T

2

) 3)

for two-bridge decomposition ( S 3 , K ) = T 1 T 2 . Here

v 8 = vol (ideal regular octahedron) .

= 3 . 66 . . .

(12)

Let K be a knot in S 3

Definitions.

A bridge decomposition for K means the decomposition ( S 3 , K ) = T 1 T 2 into two trivial tangles T 1 = ( B 1 , t 1 ) & T 2 = ( B 2 , t 2 ).

The 2-sphere appearing as B 1 B 2 is called the bridge decomposing sphere.

The knot is called a two-bridge knot if the

tangles T i ’s are 2-string tangles.

(13)

Invariant δ P ( T 1 T 2 )

Let ( S 3 , K ) = T 1 T 2 be a bridge decomposition for K with bridge decomposing sphere S .

Let Σ = S Exterior( K ) and T i = ( B i , t i ).

Then we define δ P ( T 1 T 2 ) as min

½

d P (Σ) ([ P 1 ] , [ P 2 ]) | [ P 1 ] ∈ H ( T 1 ) , [ P 2 ] ∈ H ( T 2 )

¾

where, for i = 1 , 2, H ( T i ) denotes;

¯¯

¯¯

(14)

§ 4. Outline of proof

Let K be a hyperbolic two-bridge knot in S 3 .

Remark:

It is known that which two-bridge knots are hyperbolic (Menasco, ’84).

Suppose that a two-bridge decomposition

( S 3 , K ) = T 1 T 2 for K is given.

(15)

Observation: ( δ P ( T 1 T 2 ) for K ) For a two-bridge decomposition,

Σ 4 = S 2 Exterior( K ) = four-punctured sphere

A pants decomposition on Σ 4 consists of single circle.

Only consider single disk in B i t i

(16)

Such curves on Σ 4 are parametrized by irreducible fractions; “slopes” on Σ.

P4 ) is identified with

the modular diagram D ;

(17)

From ( S 3 , K ) = T 1 T 2 ,

Consider the “pillow-cased” diagram, called the Schubert form S ( α, β ).

Claim 1.

δ P ( T 1 T 2 ) =

length of the shortest path in D

connecting h 1 0 i to h α β i

(18)

Claim 2.

correspondence such that path λ in D

connecting h 1 0 i to h β α i

diagram of K β/α ,

called Conway form C ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n )

Moreover,

length( λ ) 1 = “twist number” n

holds.

(19)

By Claim 1 and Claim 2, we have;

Lemma 1.

Let D 0 be the Conway form of K β/α with minimal twist number t ( D 0 ).

Then δ P ( T 1 T 2 ) 1 = t ( D 0 ) holds.

(20)

On the other hand, we have Lemma 2.

alternating diagram D alt of K β/α with twist number t ( D alt )

such that t ( D 0 ) t ( D alt ) 2 t ( D 0 ).

(21)

The following fact is due to

Lackenby, Agol-D.Thurston, Agol-Storm-W.Thurston

Theorem (L,A-D.T, A-S-W.T)

Let D be a prime alternating diagram of

a hyperbolic link L in S 3 with twist number t ( D ). Then

v

8

2 ( t ( D ) 2) vol ( S 3 K ) 10 v 4 ( t ( D ) 1)

holds.

diagram of K β/α ,

参照

関連したドキュメント

However, for σ-weakly closed bimodules over a Cartan MASA in a hyperfinite von Neumann algebra, the Spectral Theorem for Bimodules follows from a more general result of Fulman, see

σ(L, O) is a continuous function on the space of compact convex bodies with specified interior point, and it is also invariant under affine transformations.. The set R of regular

we start with Fuchsian groups representing pairs of pants, these are orbifolds of genus 0 with three boundary components, including orbifold points (matrices representing generators

This includes, in particular, hyperbolic curves “of strictly Belyi type”, i.e., affine hyperbolic curves over a nonarchimedean [mixed- characteristic] local field which are defined

As an important consequence of Theorem 1, we deduce in Corollary 3.11 the following prime-to-p version of Uchida’s Theorem on isomorphisms between absolute Galois groups of

— In this paper, we give a brief survey on the fundamental group of the complement of a plane curve and its Alexander polynomial.. We also introduce the notion of

We use both points of view to prove generalizations of classical results such as Whitehead Theorem and use these new results to study their homotopy properties.. Of course,

The planarization of a simple arrangement of curves is the planar graph whose vertices are crossing points of pairs of curves, and whose edges are pairs of vertices that are