「リーマン面・不連続群論」研究集会, Feb.1.2007
Hyperbolic volumes and
pants distances
for two-bridge knots
市原一裕
Kazuhiro Ichihara
§ 1. Back ground
Classification of 3-manifolds Every closed orientable 3-manifold is;
• Reducible (containing essential 2-sphere),
• Toroidal (containing essential torus),
• Seifert fibered (foliated by circles), or
• Hyperbolic (admitting Riem.metric of curv. − 1) .
By the Geometrization Conjecture raised by Thurston, (late ’70s).
& Established(?) by Perelman (2002?).
What’s the NEXT?
• Attack the remaining Open Problems.
(e.g., Virtually Haken Conjecture,
“Heegaard genus VS rank of π
1” problem, etc . . . )
• Study the Relationships between 3-manifolds.
(e.g., degree-one map, Dehn surgery, etc . . . )
• Relate Geometric & Topological invariants.
(e.g., Volume conjecture (for knots), etc . . . )
§ 2. Motivation
Let M be a closed orientable 3-manifold.
“Thm.” [Brock-Souto]
Suppose that M is hyperbolic.
For ∀ g , ∃ constant L g > 0 s.t.
L − g 1 · δ P ( U ∪ V ) ≤ vol( M ) ≤ L g · δ P ( U ∪ V )
for ∀ strongly irreducible Heegaard splitting
M = U ∪ V of genus g .
This is included in Note:
Geometry, Heegaard splittings and rank of the fundamental group of hyperbolic 3-manifolds.
by Juan Souto as Theorem 8.4 (Brock-Souto) . The note is available at Souto’s web page;
http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~juan/papers.html
Heegaard splitting
Definitions
• A Heegaard splitting of M means the de- composition M = U ∪ V into two handlebod- ies U and V .
• The surface appearing as U ∩ V is called the Heegaard surface.
• The genus of a Heegaard surface is called
the genus of the Heegaard splitting.
A Heegaard splitting M = U ∪ V is called;
• reducible if ∃ essential disks D U ⊂ U & D V ⊂ V with ∂D U = ∂D V .
• weakly reducible if ∃ essential disks D U ⊂ U
& D V ⊂ V with ∂D U ∩ ∂D V = ∅ .
• strongly irreducible if it is not weakly re-
ducible.
Pants complex
Let Σ be a compact orientable surface.
Def. (Pants decomposition)
A pants decomposition of Σ means a set of
disjoint simple closed curves on Σ cutting it
into pairs of pants.
Def. (Pants complex)
The graph constructed as follows is called the pants complex P (Σ) of Σ.
• vertex ←→ isotopy class
of a pants decomposition
• edge ←→ single “S-move” or “A-move”
Invariant δ P ( U ∪ V )
Let M = U ∪ V be a Heegaard splitting of M with Heegaard surface S .
Then they define δ P ( U ∪ V ) as min
½
d P ( S ) ([ P U ] , [ P V ]) | [ P U ] ∈ H ( U ) , [ P V ] ∈ H ( V )
¾
where, for the handlebody U , H ( U ) denotes;
[ P ] ∈ P ( ∂U )
¯¯¯¯
¯¯¯¯
∃ a union ∆ of disks in U with
∂ ∆ ⊂ P s.t. U − ∆ = ∼ solid tori
In the same way, H ( V ) is set for V .
§ 3. Result Thm. [I.]
Let K be a hyperbolic two-bridge knot in the 3-sphere S 3 . Then we have
v8
2
(δ
P( T
1∪ T
2) − 3) ≤ vol( S
3− K ) ≤ 10 v
4(2δ
P( T
1∪ T
2) − 3)
for ∀ two-bridge decomposition ( S 3 , K ) = T 1 ∪ T 2 . Here
v 8 = vol (ideal regular octahedron) .
= 3 . 66 . . .
Let K be a knot in S 3
Definitions.
• A bridge decomposition for K means the decomposition ( S 3 , K ) = T 1 ∪ T 2 into two trivial tangles T 1 = ( B 1 , t 1 ) & T 2 = ( B 2 , t 2 ).
• The 2-sphere appearing as B 1 ∩ B 2 is called the bridge decomposing sphere.
• The knot is called a two-bridge knot if the
tangles T i ’s are 2-string tangles.
Invariant δ P ( T 1 ∪ T 2 )
Let ( S 3 , K ) = T 1 ∪ T 2 be a bridge decomposition for K with bridge decomposing sphere S .
Let Σ = S ∩ Exterior( K ) and T i = ( B i , t i ).
Then we define δ P ( T 1 ∪ T 2 ) as min
½
d P (Σ) ([ P 1 ] , [ P 2 ]) | [ P 1 ] ∈ H ( T 1 ) , [ P 2 ] ∈ H ( T 2 )
¾
where, for i = 1 , 2, H ( T i ) denotes;
¯¯
¯¯