• 検索結果がありません。

Laplace-Beltrami Operators and Riemannian Submersions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Laplace-Beltrami Operators and Riemannian Submersions"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Laplace‑Beltrami Operators and Riemannian Submersions

著者 朴 貞亨

journal or

publication title

博士学位論文要旨 論文内容の要旨および論文審査 結果の要旨/金沢大学大学院自然科学研究科

number 平成2年6月

page range 65‑69

year 1990‑02‑01

URL http://hdl.handle.net/2297/33155

(2)

名 朴 貞 亨

学 位 の 種 類 学 位 記 番 号 学位授与の日付 学位授与の要件 学位授与の題目

論 文 審 査 委 員

学 術 博 士 学博甲第21号 平成2年3月25日

博士課程修了(学位規則第5条第1項)

Laplace‑BeltramiOperatorsandRiemannian

Submersions

(ラプラスーベルトラミ活用素とリーマン沈め込み)

( 主 査 ) 北 原 晴 夫 ( 副 査 ) 萬 伸 介

( 副 査 ) 土 谷 正 明

( 副 査 ) 林 田 和 也 ( 副 査 ) 藤 本 坦 孝

学 位 論 文 要 旨

WemayconsiderRiemanniansubmersions":(M,g)→(B,h)asspecialcases ofRiemannianfoliations(M,g").Inthispaper,wewilldiscussLaplace‑

BeltramioperatorsonaRiemanniansubmersionfromtheviewpointofa

Riemannianfoliation.

Ourproblemsareasfollows:

(A)Tolookfortheconditionunderwhichabasict‑formisaneigenformofthe firstkindorthesecondkindwiththesameeigenvalue.

(3Tolookforanecessaryandsufficientconditionunderwhichthepullbackof ahannonict‑formon(B,h)isahannonict‑fonnon(M,g)'

Y.Muto(1978)([2])discussedProblem(3.However,hedidnotdiscussedit fromthepointofviewofRiemannianfoliations.Inthispaperweprovidesome solutionstotheaboveproblems(TheoremA,B,andC).

Wealsogivesuchexamles.

Throughoutthispaper,weshallbeinC ‑category.Themanifoldsare supposedtobeconnected,orientableandwithoutboundary.Weassumethat everyfiberofasubmersionis(cIosed)connected,andfoliationsaretransversally

orientable.

(3)

First,wewillexaminetheRiemannianfoliations.

A(p+q)‑dimensionalmanifoldMisafoliatedmanifoldwithafoliation"of codimensionqifafamily"={L"│aEA}satisfies(i)‑(iiD,whereeachLqisan

arcwiseconnectedsubsetofM:

(i)Forfr,βEAwitha≠β,L。nLg=d, (ii)M=UL",

a E A

㈱ForeachpointxEM,thereexistsacoordinatechartU(xI,ya)aroundxsuch thateachconnectedcomponentofUnL(risexpressedbyyp+I=cp+I,…,yp+q==cp+q,

wherecaareconstants.

EachLdiscalledaleafof",whichisap‑dimensionalsubmanifoldofM.A coordinatechart{U;(xI,ya)}in(iii)iscalledaflatchartofcF.Wecantakealocal

f r a m e { X " Y 。 : r 。 # ‑ A ' a & } , ! n o f l a t c h 諏 上 { U ; ( x i , y m ) } w i t h r e s p e c t t o

"whichiscalledthebasicadaptedframeto".HereAjaaresmoothfunctions onU・Let{の',dya}={dx'+Aldyb,dya}bethedualframeto{Xi,Yu}.The foliation.ZisalsogivenbyanintegrablesubbundleEofthetangentbundleTM overM.LetE」betheorthogonalcomplementbundleofEinTM.

NOW,weassumethatMhasaRiemannianmetricg.WecanchooseAAso thatg(XI,Ya)=0.

Definitionl.giscalledabundle‑likemetricwithrespectto<Z,ifghasthe l o c a l e x p r e s s i o n : d s 2 = g i j ( x k , y c ) ( I J ' " j + g a b ( y c ) d y a d y b , w h e r e g , j = g ( X i , X j ) , g a b = g(Ya,Yb).

Definition2.Thefoliation"on(M,g)iscalledaRiemannianfoliationifgis abundle‑likemetricwithrespectto<Z.

Definition3.AvectorfieldHisthemeancurvaturevectorfieldof"onM ifH,restrictedtoaleafLof<Z,isthemeancurvaturevectorfieldonthe

submanifoldLofM・″issaidtobeminimalifH=0.

Let/ir(M)and/is't(M)bethespacesofallr‑formsand(s,t)‑formsonM respectively([7]).Wehavethedecompositionsof/ir(M)andtheexterior

derivatived:

Ar(M)=Z/1s'!(M)

S+1=r

(#)d=d'+d''+d''',

whered':ノls'((M)−→/ls+''!(M),d'':/is'!(M)‑→/l鴬・{+'(M)andd'":/Is・'(M)

(4)

一→/is‑'''÷2(M).Anoperator6:/ir(M)−→A「‑I(M)isdefinedby6=

(‑1)(r+')<p+q)+'*d*,where*denotestheHodgestaroperator.

Definition4([5]).pe/10''(M)iscalledabasict‑formonMifd'や=0.

Weset△!(M)={?E/1{M(M)│d'?=0}.

Lemma5([5>].If.isa(0,t)‑formonM,thend.=d'.>d''の.Moreover,d'p=

0ifandonlyifphanalocalexpressionp=pa!…aI(yb)dya'/l…/ldyal.

Let":(M,g)−→(B,h)beaRiemanniansubmersion,whereMisa(p+q)‑

dimensionalfoliatedRiemannianmanifold(M,g,GZ)whoseleavesarefibers,andg isabundle‑likemetricwithrespecttothefoliation",andBisaq‑dimensional

Riemannianmanifold.

D e f i n i t i o n 6 . T h e L a p l a c e ‑ B e l t r a m i o p e r a t o r b ( r e s p . D ] o n ( M , g , & / ) [ r e s p . ( B , h ] isanoperatoractingon/i'(M)[resp.At(B)]definedbya=6d+d6(resp.D=&,dm +dB6B,wheredBistheexteriorderivativeactingonのr(M),and6B=

( ‑ 1 ) q r + q + ' * d B * o n / i r ( B ) ] .

Definition7([3)).IfpE/1((B)isaneigenfomofD(i.e.,□ゆ)andl=〃* isan eigenfOrmofa(i.e.,6f="),thenpiscalledaneigenfonnofthefirstkindin theRiemanniansubmersion、If?eA (B)isaneigenformof□andthe(0,t)−

componentof(af一応)vanishes,thenpiscalledaneigenformofthesecond

kind・Inbothcases入iscalledtheeigenvalueofや、

Ifwecomputeb'forabasict‑formf=/7*pon(M,g,")andD9'forat‑form

のon(B,h),thenwehevethefollowingtheorems.

TheoremA,Let?=〃*砂beabasicl−fonnonM(?isal−fonnonB)andH themeancurvaturevectorfieldof@;7..Then(6f‑I7*(Dp))(V)=0ifandonlyjf ( . D I I ' ) ( V ) = 0 f o r a n d b a s i c v e c t o r f i e l d V , / 7 * ( , ) = V , w h e r e a Z , 1 d e n o t e s t h e L i e

differentionwithrespecttoH.

(ThisisananswertothesecondpartofproblemA.)

Remark8.WeassumethesameassumptionsofTheoremA・Forabasict‑

fonn(t≧2),ifweassumethatELisintegrable,thenthisisalsoananswertothe answertothesecondpartofproblemA.

TheoremB・If<ZisminimalandE・Lisintegrable,thenthepullbackofa harmonict‑formon(B,h)isaharmonict‑fonnon(M,g,").

(ThisisannanswertoproblemB.)

(5)

TheoremC.IfMiscompactand"isminimal,thenthepullbackP="*pof aharmonicl‑formon(B,h)isaharmonicl‑formon(M,g,").Inparticular,b,(B)

≦b,(M)whereb,()isthefirstBettinumberof().

(Inthecaseoft=1,thisisananswertothefirstpartofproblemA.)

NowwegiveexamplesofRiemanniansubmersionwithminimalandnottotally geodesicfibers.

Examplel([4]).WedefinedametricgonRp+q=Rp×Rq={(x,y)│x=(xi)ERp,y=

(ya)ERq}by

g = Z ( f ' ( y ) ) 2 ( d x i ) 2 + Z ( d y a ) 2 ,

a

wherefi:Rq−→R(i=1,…,p)arepositivevaluedfunctionsandf!×…×fpisa constantfunction,buteachf!isnotconstant.Let":Rp+q一一→Rqbea submersiondefinedby/7((x,y))=zandz。。〃=ya,whereRq={z=(za)IzaER}.We canobtainafolliation"={Rp×{y}lyERq}onRp+q.Ifwetakeametrich=

Z(dza)2onRq,thentheaboveRiemaniansubmersion":(Rp+q,g,")−→(Rq,h)

a

hasminimalandnottotallygeodessicfibers,andgisabundlelikemetricwith respectto",andELisintegrable.

Example2([4]).LetGbea3‑dimensionalHeisenberggroup:

( 脈 ) 緬 刈

G={

andKaclosedsubgroupofGdefinedby

( M 胸 壁 Ⅲ

A={

ThenKactsfreelyandproperlyonGbymatrixmultiplication.Thus":G−−→

G/Kisasubmersion.WedenotebyJJ(resp.JQ)theLiealgebraofG[resp.K).

Then、』』isregardedasthespaceofallleft‑invariantvectomfieldsonG・We

thenseethatGhasafoliation"andaleftinvariantmetricg.Thengisabundle

‑likemetricwithrespecttoの.ThusweobtainaRiemanniansubmersion":(G, g,")一一→(G/K,h)whosefibersareleavesof<Z.Thissubmersionhasminimal andnottotallygeodesicfibers.WeremarkthatEisintegrable.

Example3((4)).LetG=SO(2)×SO(3)andK=SO(2)×SO(2).ThenKisa closedsubgroupofG.WeseethatKactsfreelyandproperlyonG.Thus":

G−−→G/Kisasubmersion.

(6)

Wedenoteby"[resp."theLiealgebraofG[resp.K).Let{eo,e,,e2,e3)be abasisofLiealgebragofGsatisfying[e,,e2)=e3,[e2,e3]=e,,[e3,e,]=‑ae0 +e2,and[eo,es]=0(s=1,2,3)foranonzerorealnumbera.TheLiealgebra、"of Kisgeneratedby{eo,e,}.ThenGhasafoliation<Zandaleftinvariantmetric gsothat{eo,e,,e2,e3}isorthononnal.Wethenseethatgisabundle‑likemetric withrespectto<Z.NotethatG/KisdiffeomorphictoS2,thuswehavea

sumersion":G一一→S2whosefibersareleavesofダ.Nowwetakeametrich

onS2sothat":(G,g,cZ)一一→(S2,h)isaRiemanniansubmersion.

ThisRiemanniansubmersionhasminimalandnottotallygeodesicfibers,and Eisnotintegrable.

REFERENCES

(1)R.H.Escobales,Riemanniansubmersionswithtotallygeodesicfibers,J.

DifferentialGeometrylO(1975)253‑276.

(2)Y.Muto,RiemanniansubmersionandtheLaplace‑Beltramioperator,Kodai Math.J.1(1978),329‑338.

(3)Y.Muto,SomeeigenformsoftheLaplace‑Beltramioperatorsina Riemanniansubmersion,J・KoreanMath.Soc、15(1978),39‑57.

[4)J、H.Park,TheLaplace‑BeltramioperatorandRiemanniansubmersionwith minimalandnottotallygeodesicfibers,toappearinBull.Korean

Math.Soc.

(5)B、L・Reinhar/,Hannonicintegralsonfoliatedmanifold,Amer.J・Math.

8 1 ( 1 9 5 9 ) , 5 2 9 ‑ 5 3 6 .

(6)R.TakagiandS.Yorozu,MinimalfoliatioonsonLiegroups,TohokuMath.

J . 3 6 ( 1 9 8 4 ) , 5 4 1 ‑ 5 5 4 .

(7)I.Vaisman,Cohomologyanddifferentiaifonns,MarcelDekker,INC,New York,1973.

論 文 審 査 の 結 果 の 要 旨

武藤義夫教授によって,fibehsが全測地的RiemanniansubmersionsM→Nの Laplace‑Beltrami作用素△M,4Nの研究が既に行われている。(KodaiMath.J.

1(1978),329‑338,J.KoreanMath.Soc.15(1978),39‑57)この論文では,fibersが全測 地的でないが極小的なRiemanniansubmersionsの△M,4Nについて同教授の結果 の拡張を行い,併せて,その例を構成している。Riemmanniansubmersionsを RiemannianfOliationの立場から見直したために,4M,4Nの関係が見透しの良いも のになりfibersのrneancurvatnresの役割が良く分るようになった。

したがって,この論文を博士学位論文として適当であると判定した。

参照

関連したドキュメント

The obtained results are applied to the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary value problems for the Laplace–Beltrami operator ∆ C and to the system of anisotropic elasticity on an open

In order to prove these theorems, we need rather technical results on local uniqueness and nonuniqueness (and existence, as well) of solutions to the initial value problem for

We find the criteria for the solvability of the operator equation AX − XB = C, where A, B , and C are unbounded operators, and use the result to show existence and regularity

Real elastic waves (earthquakes) propagate through many layers which do not necessarily lie in good order. Therefore, more general study, we extend the elastic wave equations

[1] Albeverio, S., Daletskii, A. and Kondratiev, Yu., Stochastic analysis on product mani- folds: Dirichlet operators on differential forms, J. and Lytvynov, E., Laplace operators

In particular, in view of the results of Guillemin [16] [17], this means that on Toeplitz operators T Q of order ≤ −n, the Dixmier trace Tr ω T Q coincides with the residual trace

Stevi´c, “On a new integral-type operator from the Bloch space to Bloch-type spaces on the unit ball,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. Hu, “Extended

An orderly presentation of this investigation requires that we begin with our look at the GHO condition and prove some needed results over general measure spaces. This is done