• 検索結果がありません。

-9/--4)15)615./47551-37)16;751/41-)1781-.4)+61)16-/4)5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "-9/--4)15)615./47551-37)16;751/41-)1781-.4)+61)16-/4)5"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, URL: http://www.bmathaa.org Volume 2 Issue 3(2010), Pages 93-99.

NEW GENERALISATIONS OF GRUSS INEQUALITY USING RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS

ZOUBIR DAHMANI, LOUIZA TABHARIT, SABRINA TAF

Abstract. In this paper, we use the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals to establish some new integral inequalities of Gruss type. We give two main re- sults; the first one deals with some inequalities using one fractional parameter.

The second result concerns others inequalities using two fractional parameters.

1. Introduction In 1935, G. Gruss [3] proved the well known inequality:

1 𝑏−𝑎

𝑏

𝑎

𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥)𝑑𝑥− 1 𝑏−𝑎

(∫ 𝑏

𝑎

𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 ) ( 1

𝑏−𝑎

𝑏

𝑎

𝑔(𝑥)𝑑𝑥 )

(𝑀−𝑚)(𝑃−𝑝)4

(1.1)

provided that 𝑓 and 𝑔 are two integrable functions on [𝑎, 𝑏] and satisfying the conditions

𝑚≤𝑓(𝑥)≤𝑀, 𝑝≤𝑔(𝑥)≤𝑃; 𝑚, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑃 ∈ℝ, 𝑥∈[𝑎, 𝑏]. (1.2) The inequality (1.1) has evoked the interest of many researchers and numerous generalizations, variants and extensions have appeared in the literature, to mention a few, see [1, 4, 5, 6, 7] and the references cited therein.

The main aim of this paper is to establish some new generalizations for (1.1) by using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. We give two main results; the first one deals with some inequalities using one fractional parameter. The second result concerns another class of inequalities using two fractional parameters.

2. Basic Definitions of the Fractional Calculus

Definition 1. A real valued function 𝑓(𝑡), 𝑡 ≥ 0 is said to be in the space 𝐶𝜇, 𝜇 ∈ ℝ if there exists a real number 𝑝 > 𝜇 such that 𝑓(𝑡) = 𝑡𝑝𝑓1(𝑡), where 𝑓1(𝑡)∈𝐶([0,∞[).

Definition 2. A function 𝑓(𝑡), 𝑡 ≥ 0 is said to be in the space 𝐶𝜇𝑛, 𝜇 ∈ ℝ, if

2000Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D10, 26A33.

Key words and phrases. Integral inequalities; Riemann-Liouville fractional integral; Gruss inequality.

c

⃝2010 Universiteti i Prishtin¨es, Prishtin¨e, Kosov¨e.

Submitted January 30, 2010. Published August 09, 2010.

93

(2)

𝑓(𝑛)∈𝐶𝜇.

Definition 3. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of order 𝛼≥0, for a function𝑓 ∈𝐶𝜇,(𝜇≥ −1) is defined as

𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡) =Γ(𝛼)1𝑡

0(𝑡−𝜏)𝛼−1𝑓(𝜏)𝑑𝜏; 𝛼 >0, 𝑡 >0,

𝐽0𝑓(𝑡) =𝑓(𝑡), (2.1)

where Γ(𝛼) :=∫

0 𝑒−𝑢𝑢𝛼−1𝑑𝑢.

For the convenience of establishing the results, we give the semigroup property:

𝐽𝛼𝐽𝛽𝑓(𝑡) =𝐽𝛼+𝛽𝑓(𝑡), 𝛼≥0, 𝛽≥0, (2.2) which implies the commutative property

𝐽𝛼𝐽𝛽𝑓(𝑡) =𝐽𝛽𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡). (2.3) More details, one can consult [2].

3. Main Results

Theorem 3.1. Let 𝑓 and 𝑔 be two integrable functions on [0,∞[ satisfying the condition (1.2) on[0,∞.[ Then for all𝑡 >0, 𝛼 >0,we have:

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑓 𝑔(𝑡)−𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡)

≤( 𝑡𝛼 2Γ(𝛼+ 1)

)2

(𝑀−𝑚)(𝑃−𝑝). (3.1) We need the following lemma

Lemma 3.2. Let 𝑢 be an integrable function on [0,∞[ satisfying the condition (1.2) on [0,∞[. Then for all𝑡 >0, 𝛼 >0, we have:

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑢2(𝑡)−(

𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡))2

=(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 )

Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 𝐽𝛼(𝑀 −𝑢(𝑡))(𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚).

(3.2)

Proof. Let𝑢 be an integrable function on [0,∞[ satisfying the condition (1.2) on [0,∞[. For any𝜏, 𝜌∈[0,∞[,we have

(

𝑀−𝑢(𝜌))(

𝑢(𝜏)−𝑚) +(

𝑀 −𝑢(𝜏))(

𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)

−(

𝑀−𝑢(𝜏))(

𝑢(𝜏)−𝑚)

−(

𝑀 −𝑢(𝜌))(

𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)

=𝑢2(𝜏) +𝑢2(𝜌)−2𝑢(𝜏)𝑢(𝜌).

(3.3)

(3)

Multiplying (3.3) by (𝑡−𝜏)Γ(𝛼)𝛼−1;𝜏 ∈(0, 𝑡), 𝑡 >0 and integrating the resulting identity with respect to𝜏 from 0 to𝑡,we get

(

𝑀−𝑢(𝜌))(

𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚 𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛼+ 1)

) +(

𝑀 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)−𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡))(

𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)

−𝐽𝛼(

(𝑀 −𝑢(𝑡))(𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚))

−(

𝑀−𝑢(𝜌))(

𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)

𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛼+1)

=𝐽𝛼𝑢2(𝑡) +𝑢2(𝜌)Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −2𝑢(𝜌)𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡).

(3.4) Now, multiplying (3.4) by (𝑡−𝜌)Γ(𝛼)𝛼−1; 𝜌∈(0, 𝑡) and integrating the resulting identity with respect to𝜌from 0 to𝑡,we have

(

𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚 𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛼+ 1)

) 1 Γ(𝛼)

𝑡

0

(𝑡−𝜌)𝛼−1(𝑀 −𝑢(𝜌))𝑑𝜌 +(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡))

1 Γ(𝛼)

𝑡

0(𝑡−𝜌)𝛼−1(𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)𝑑𝜌

−𝐽𝛼(

(𝑀−𝑢(𝑡))(𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚))

1 Γ(𝛼)

𝑡

0(𝑡−𝜌)𝛼−1𝑑𝜌

Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛼)1𝑡

0(𝑡−𝜌)𝛼−1(𝑀 −𝑢(𝜌))(𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)𝑑𝜌

=Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 𝐽𝛼𝑢2(𝑡) +𝐽𝛼𝑢2(𝑡)Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −2𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)

(3.5)

which gives (3.2) and proves the lemma.

□ Proof of Theorem 3.1. Let 𝑓 and 𝑔 be two functions satisfying the conditions of Theorem 3.1.

Define

𝐻(𝜏, 𝜌) := (𝑓(𝜏)−𝑓(𝜌))(𝑔(𝜏)−𝑔(𝜌));𝜏, 𝜌∈(0, 𝑡), 𝑡 >0. (3.6) Then, multiplying (3.6) by (𝑡−𝜏)𝛼−1Γ2(𝛼)(𝑡−𝜌)𝛼−1; 𝜏, 𝜌∈ (0, 𝑡) and integrating with re- spect to𝜏 and𝜌over (0, 𝑡)2,we can state that

1 Γ2(𝛼)

𝑡

0

𝑡

0

(𝑡−𝜏)𝛼−1(𝑡−𝜌)𝛼−1𝐻(𝜏, 𝜌)𝑑𝜏 𝑑𝜌

= 2Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 𝐽𝛼𝑓 𝑔(𝑡)−2𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡).

(3.7) Applying Cauchy Schwarz inequality, we have

( 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑓 𝑔(𝑡)−𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))2

≤(

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+1)𝐽𝛼𝑓2(𝑡)−(𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡))2)(

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+1)𝐽𝛼𝑔2(𝑡)−(𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))2) .

(3.8)

Since (𝑀−𝑓(𝑥))(𝑓(𝑥)−𝑚)≥0 and (𝑃−𝑔(𝑥))(𝑔(𝑥)−𝑝)≥0,we have 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼(𝑀−𝑓(𝑡))(𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚)≥0 (3.9)

(4)

and

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼(𝑃−𝑔(𝑡))(𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝)≥0. (3.10) Therefore

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑓2(𝑡)−(

𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡))2

≤(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 ) (3.11)

and

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑔2(𝑡)−(

𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))2

≤(

𝑃Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 ) .

(3.12)

By Lemma 3.2 and the inequalities (3.8), (3.11), (3.12), we deduce that

( 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑓 𝑔(𝑡)−2𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))2

≤(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 )(

𝑃Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 ) . (3.13) Now using the elementary inequality 4𝑟𝑠≤(𝑟+𝑠)2, 𝑟, 𝑠∈ℝ,we can state that

4(

𝑀 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)−𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚 𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛼+ 1)

)≤( 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)(𝑀 −𝑚))2

(3.14) and

4( 𝑃 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)−𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝 𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛼+ 1)

)≤( 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)(𝑃−𝑝))2

. (3.15)

Using (3.13), (3.14) and (3.15) we get (3.1). □

Remark. Applying Theorem 3.1 for𝛼= 1,we obtain the inequality (1.1) on [0, 𝑡].

Our next result is the following theorem, in which we use two real positive parameters.

Theorem 3.3. Let 𝑓 and 𝑔 be two integrable functions on [0,∞[ satisfying the condition (1.2) on[0,∞[. Then for all𝑡 >0, 𝛼 >0, 𝛽 >0,we have:

(5)

( 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛽𝑓 𝑔(𝑡) + 𝑡𝛽

Γ(𝛽+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑓 𝑔(𝑡)−𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛽𝑔(𝑡)−𝐽𝛽𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))2

≤[(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛽𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 ) +(

𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 )(

𝑀Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 −𝐽𝛽𝑓(𝑡))]

×[(

𝑃Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛽𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 ) +(

𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 )(

𝑃Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 −𝐽𝛽𝑔(𝑡))]

. (3.16)

To prove Theorem 3.3 we need the following lemmas:

Lemma 3.4. Let 𝑓 and 𝑔 be two integrable functions on [0,∞.[ Then for all 𝑡 >0, 𝛼 >0, 𝛽 >0,we have:

( 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛽𝑓 𝑔(𝑡) + 𝑡𝛽

Γ(𝛽+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑓 𝑔(𝑡)−𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛽𝑔(𝑡)−𝐽𝛽𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡))2

≤(

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+1)𝐽𝛽𝑓2(𝑡) +Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 𝐽𝛼𝑓2(𝑡)−2𝐽𝛼𝑓(𝑡)𝐽𝛽𝑓(𝑡))

×(

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+1)𝐽𝛽𝑔2(𝑡) +Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 𝐽𝛼𝑔2(𝑡)−2𝐽𝛼𝑔(𝑡)𝐽𝛽𝑔(𝑡)) .

(3.17)

Proof. Multiplying (3.6) by (𝑡−𝜏)Γ(𝛼)Γ(𝛽)𝛼−1(𝑡−𝜌)𝛽−1; 𝜏, 𝜌∈(0, 𝑡),integrating with respect to 𝜏 and 𝜌 over (0, 𝑡)2, then applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for double

integrals, we obtain (3.17). □

Lemma 3.5. Let 𝑢 be an integrable function on [0,∞[ satisfying the condition (1.2) on [0,∞[. Then for all𝑡 >0, 𝛼 >0, 𝛽 >0,we have:

𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛽𝑢2(𝑡) + 𝑡𝛽

Γ(𝛽+ 1)𝐽𝛼𝑢2(𝑡)−2𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)𝐽𝛽𝑢(𝑡)

=(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛽𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 ) +(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛽 −𝐽𝛽𝑢(𝑡))(

𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 )

Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 𝐽𝛽(𝑀−𝑢(𝑡))(𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚)−Γ(𝛽+1)𝑡𝛽 𝐽𝛼(𝑀−𝑢(𝑡))(𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚).

(3.18)

(6)

Proof. Multiplying (3.4) by (𝑡−𝜌)Γ(𝛽)𝛽−1;𝜌∈(0, 𝑡) and integrating the resulting iden- tity with respect to𝜌from 0 to𝑡,we have

(𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚 𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛼+ 1)

) 1 Γ(𝛽)

𝑡

0

(𝑡−𝜌)𝛽−1(𝑀−𝑢(𝜌))𝑑𝜌

+(

𝑀Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡))

1 Γ(𝛽)

𝑡

0(𝑡−𝜌)𝛽−1(𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)𝑑𝜌

−𝐽𝛼(

(𝑀−𝑢(𝑡))(𝑢(𝑡)−𝑚))

1 Γ(𝛽)

𝑡

0(𝑡−𝜌)𝛽−1𝑑𝜌

Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 Γ(𝛽)1𝑡

0(𝑡−𝜌)𝛽−1(𝑀−𝑢(𝜌))(𝑢(𝜌)−𝑚)𝑑𝜌

= Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 𝐽𝛽𝑢2(𝑡) +𝐽𝛽𝑢2(𝑡)Γ(𝛼+1)𝑡𝛼 −2𝐽𝛼𝑢(𝑡)𝐽𝛽𝑢(𝑡).

(3.19)

Lemma 3.5 is thus proved. □

Proof of Theorem 3.3. Since (𝑀−𝑓(𝑥))(𝑓(𝑥)−𝑚)≥0 and (𝑃−𝑔(𝑥))(𝑔(𝑥)−𝑝)≥0, then can write

− 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛽(𝑀−𝑓(𝑡))(𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚)− 𝑡𝛽

Γ(𝛽+ 1)𝐽𝛼(𝑀−𝑓(𝑡))(𝑓(𝑡)−𝑚)≤0 (3.20) and

− 𝑡𝛼

Γ(𝛼+ 1)𝐽𝛽(𝑃−𝑔(𝑡))(𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝)− 𝑡𝛽

Γ(𝛽+ 1)𝐽𝛼(𝑃−𝑔(𝑡))(𝑔(𝑡)−𝑝)≤0.

(3.21) Applying Lemma 3.5 to 𝑓 and𝑔, then using Lemma 3.4 and the formulas (3.20),

(3.21), we obtain (3.16). □

Remark. (𝑖) Applying Theorem 3.3 for𝛼=𝛽 we obtain Theorem 3.1.

(𝑖𝑖) Applying Theorem 3.3 for𝛼=𝛽 = 1,we obtain the inequality (1.1) on [0, 𝑡].

Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for his/her valuable comments.

References

[1] S.S. Dragomir, Some integral inequalities of Gruss type, Indian J. Pur. Appl. Math.31 (4)(2002), 397–415.

[2] R. Gorenflo, F. Mainardi,Fractional calculus: integral and differential equations of frac- tional order,Springer Verlag, Wien (1997), 223–276.

[3] D. Gruss, Uber das maximum des absoluten Betrages von 𝑏−𝑎1 𝑏

𝑎𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥)𝑑𝑥

1 (𝑏−𝑎)2

𝑏

𝑎𝑓(𝑥)𝑑𝑥𝑏

𝑎𝑔(𝑥)𝑑𝑥,Math.Z.39(1935), 215–226.

[4] A. McD Mercer,An improvement of the Gruss inequality,Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 6, Iss. 4, Art.93 (2005), 1–4.

[5] A. McD Mercer, P. Mercer, New proofs of the Gruss inequality,Aust. J. Math. Anal.

Appl.1(2)(2004), Art. 12.

[6] B.G. Pachpatte,On multidimensional Gruss type inetegral inequalities,Journal of Inequal- ities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol 03, Iss. 2, Art. 27, (2002), 1–7.

[7] B.G. Pachpatte,A note on Chebyshev-Gruss inequalities for differential equations,Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical Sciences,22(1), (2006), 29–36.

(7)

Zoubir Dahmani, Louiza Tabharit, Sabrina Taf

Laboratory of Pure and Applied Mathematics (LPAM), Faculty of Exact Sciences, Health and Natural Sciences, University of Mostaganem Abdelhamid Ben Badis (UMAB), Mostaganem, Algeria

E-mail address:[email protected] E-mail address:[email protected] E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

In [2] and [4], Berstein-Doetsch type results were proved on rationally s-convex functions, moreover, for the s-H¨ older property of s-convex functions.. Definition

Pant [33] noticed these criteria for xed points of contraction mappings and introduced a new conti- nuity condition, known as reciprocal continuity and obtained a common xed

In this paper, we shall extend some results in [3, 5, 4] in two directions: one is from p-Laplacian operators to general elliptic operators in divergence form and the other is to

Geng, On the critical dimension of a semilinear degenerate elliptic equation involving critical Sobolev-Hardy exponent, Nonlinear Anal.. Gazzola, Existence of solutions for

It has been also prooved that a contravariant almost analytic vector

In this paper, the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral is used to establish some integral results related to Chebyshev’s functional in the case of differentiable functions

In [40], the authors investigate novel Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for K-conformable fractional integral opera- tor for exponentially convex functions in the classical

The error bounds for Gauss–Legendre and Lobatto quadratures are proved for four times differentiable functions (instead of six times differentiable functions as in the