• 検索結果がありません。

1Introduction UniquenessofInitialValueProblems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "1Introduction UniquenessofInitialValueProblems"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Divulgaciones Matem´aticas v. 5, No. 1/2 (1997, 39–41

Uniqueness of Initial Value Problems

Unicidad del Problema de Valor Inicial Betty Travis

The University of Texas at San Antonio Division of Mathematics and Statistics

6900 North Loop 1604 West San Antonio, Texas 78249-0664

Abstract

The uniqueness of an initial value problem is established for second order linear differential equations.

Key words and phrases: differential equations, initial value problems.

Resumen

La unicidad de un problema de valor inicial es establecida para ecuaciones diferenciales lineales de segundo orden.

Palabras y frases clave: ecuaciones diferenciales, problemas de valor inicial.

1 Introduction

The existence and uniqueness of solutions for second order linear differential equations are almost always stated without proof in elementary differential equations textbooks following calculus (see [1, p. 136]). The purpose of this paper is to give an elementary proof of the uniqueness part, wich does not even require an understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. It can be understood by high school students with a basic understanding of a one semester course in calculus.

It might also be pointed out that in proving the uniqueness theorem below, we do not require, as is customary, that the coefficients be continuous. We only require that they be bounded on a closed interval, wich would, of course, follow if they are continuous.

(2)

40

Betty Travis

2 Uniqueness of Initial Value Problems

Theorem: Consider the differential equation

y00(x) +h1(x)y0(x) +h0(x)y(x) =g(x) (1) Let h0(x),h1(x)andg(x)be defined on an open intervalJ. Assume that for any finite closed subinterval [x1, x2] ofJ there exists a constant M such that

|h0(x)| ≤M, and|h1(x)| ≤M for all x∈[x1, x2]. (2) Ifx0∈J, andu(x)andv(x)are two solutions of (1) such thatu(x0) =v(x0), andu0(x0) =v0(x0), thenu(x)≡v(x)for allx∈J.

By a solution of (1) we mean a function defined on J, which has two continuous derivatives, and satisfies the differential equation.

Proof: Letw(x) =u(x)−v(x). Then by substituting into (1), we obtain w00(x) +h1(x)w0(x) +h0(x)w(x) = 0. (3) Sinceu(x0) =v(x0), andu0(x0) =v0(x0), we have

w(x0) =w0(x0) = 0. (4)

Now, choosex1, x2∈J such thatx1< x0< x2. LetM be as in (2), and let z(x) = [w0(x)]2+ [w(x)]2.

Then, from (4) we have

z(x0) = 0. (5)

Also, forx∈[x2, x2],

z0(x) = 2w0(x)w00(x) + 2w(x)w0(x)

= 2w0(x)[−h1(x)w0(x)−h0(x)w(x)] + 2w(x)w0(x)

= 2h1(x)[w0(x)]22h0(x)w0(x)w(x) + 2w(x)w0(x)

= 2h1(x)[w0(x)]2+ 2w(x)w0(x)(1−h0(x)). (6) Therefore,

|z0(x)| ≤ | −2h1(x)|[w0(x)]2+|2w(x)w0(x)||1−h0(x)|

2M[w0(x)]2+ 2|w(x)||w0(x)|(1 +M)

2M([w0(x)]2+ [w(x)]2) + 2|w(x)||w0(x)|(1 +M)

2M([w0(x)]2+ [w(x)]2) + (1 +M)([w0(x)]2+ [w(x)]2) (2|w||w0| ≤(w0)2+ (w)2 since (|w| − |w0|)20)

= (1 + 3M)([w0(x)]2+ [w(x)]2) = (1 + 3M)z(x).

(3)

Uniqueness of Initial Value Problems

41

Therefore,

(1 + 3M)z(x)≤z0(x)(1 + 3M)z(x) Now, letk= 1 + 3M. We have shown that

z0(x)≤kz(x), x∈[x0, x2] (7) z0(x)≥ −kz(x), x∈[x1, x0]. (8) From (7) we get z0(x)ekx−kekxz(x)≤ 0 for x0 ≤x ≤x2. This implies that dzd(z(x)ekx) 0 for x0 ≤x ≤x2. Hence z(x)ekx is non-increasing, wich, along with (5), implies that

z(x)ekx ≤z(x0)ekx0= 0.

This shows thatz(x)≤0 forx0≤x≤x2. But,z(x) = [w0(x)]2+ [w(x)]20.

Therefore,z(x)≡0 forx0≤x≤x2.

Similarly, from (8) we havez0(x) +kz(x)≥0 for x1≤x≤x0. This implies that

0 z0(x)ekx+kekxz(x)

= d

dx(z(x)ekx), x1≤x≤x0.

Therefore, for x1 x≤x0, we havez(x)ekx ≤z(x0)ekx0 = 0 wich implies z(x)≤0 forx1≤x≤x0. But z(x) = [w0(x)]2+ [w(x)]20. Hencez(x)≡0 forx1≤x≤x0.

We have shown thatz(x)≡0 forx1≤x≤x2, wich implies that,w(x) = u(x)−v(x)≡0 forx1≤x≤x2. Sincex1 and x2 are arbitrary numbers in J, it follows thatu(x)≡v(x) for all xin J.

References

[1] Nagle, R., Saff E., Fundamentals of Differential Equations, Addison- Wesley, New York, 1993.

参照

関連したドキュメント

First, we introduce the transition matrix for linear impulsive dynamic systems on time scales and we establish some properties of them.. Second, we prove the existence and uniqueness

GUNDERSEN, Finite order solutions of second order linear differential equations,

W ang , Existence of solutions of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems for third-order nonlinear differential equations, Northeast. W eili , Existence and uniqueness of

Tun¸c, New results about stability and boundedness of solutions of certain non-linear third-order delay differential equations, Arab.. Tun¸c, On asymptotic stability of solutions

Mallika Arjunan, Existence and uniqueness of mild and classical solutions of impulsive evolution equations, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 111 (2005), 1-8..

In this paper, we prove the existence of solutions for an anti-periodic boundary value problem of nonlinear impulsive fractional differential equations by applying some known

For abstract linear nonautonomous boundary differential equations with an almost automorphic forcing term, a Massera type criterion is established for the existence of an

Ge, Nonlocal boundary value problem of higher order ordinary differential equations at resonance, Rocky Mountain J.. Kong, Solutions of second order multi-point boundary value