• 検索結果がありません。

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

Volume 7, Issue 4, Article 148, 2006

NEW INEQUALITIES ABOUT CONVEX FUNCTIONS

LAZHAR BOUGOFFA

AL-IMAMMUHAMMADIBNSAUDISLAMICUNIVERSITY

FACULTY OFCOMPUTERSCIENCE

DEPARTMENT OFMATHEMATICS

P.O. BOX84880, RIYADH11681 SAUDIARABIA.

[email protected]

Received 11 June, 2006; accepted 15 October, 2006 Communicated by B. Yang

ABSTRACT. Iff is a convex function andx1, . . . , xnora1, . . . , anlie in its domain the follow- ing inequalities are proved

n

X

i=1

f(xi)f

x1+· · ·+xn

n

n1 n

f

x1+x2

2

+· · ·+f

xn−1+xn

2

+f

xn+x1

2

and

(n1) [f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)]n[f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)f(a)], wherea= a1+···+an n andbi= na−an−1i, i= 1, . . . , n.

Key words and phrases: Jensen’s inequality, Convex functions.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15.

1. MAINTHEOREMS

The well-known Jensen’s inequality is given as follows [1]:

Theorem 1.1. Let f be a convex function on an intervalI and let w1, . . . , wn be nonnegative real numbers whose sum is1. Then for allx1, . . . , xn ∈I,

(1.1) w1f(x1) +· · ·+wnf(xn)≥f(w1x1+· · ·+wnxn).

Recall that a functionf is said to be convex if for anyt∈[0,1]and anyx, yin the domain of f,

(1.2) tf(x) + (1−t)f(y)≥f(tx+ (1−t)y).

ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756

c 2006 Victoria University. All rights reserved.

166-06

(2)

2 LAZHARBOUGOFFA

The aim of the present note is to establish new inequalities similar to the following known inequalities:

(Via Titu Andreescu (see [2, p. 6])) f(x1) +f(x2) +f(x3) +f

x1+x2+x3 3

≥ 4 3

f

x1 +x2 2

+f

x2 +x3 2

+f

x3+x1 2

, wheref is a convex function andx1, x2, x3lie in its domain,

(Popoviciu inequality [3])

n

X

i=1

f(xi) + n n−2f

x1+· · ·+xn n

≥ 2

n−2 X

i<j

f

xi+xj 2

,

wheref is a convex function onI andx1, . . . , xn ∈I,and (Generalized Popoviciu inequality)

(n−1) [f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)]≤f(a1) +· · ·+f(an) +n(n−2)f(a), wherea= a1+···+an n andbi = na−an−1i, i= 1, . . . , n,anda1, . . . , an∈I.

Our main results are given in the following theorems:

Theorem 1.2. Iff is a convex function andx1, x2, . . . , xnlie in its domain, then

(1.3)

n

X

i=1

f(xi)−f

x1+· · ·+xn

n

≥ n−1 n

f

x1+x2 2

+· · ·+f

xn−1+xn 2

+f

xn+x1 2

.

Proof. Using (1.2) witht = 12, we obtain (1.4) f

x1+x2

2

+· · ·+f

xn−1+xn

2

+f

xn+x1

2

≤f(x1) +f(x2) +· · ·+f(xn).

In the summation on the right side of (1.4), the expressionPn

i=1f(xi)can be written as

n

X

i=1

f(xi) = n n−1

n

X

i=1

f(xi)− 1 n−1

n

X

i=1

f(xi),

n

X

i=1

f(xi) = n n−1

" n X

i=1

f(xi)−

n

X

i=1

1 nf(xi)

# . ReplacingPn

i=1f(xi)with the equivalent expression in (1.4), f

x1+x2 2

+· · ·+f

xn−1 +xn 2

+f

xn+x1 2

≤ n

n−1

" n X

i=1

f(xi)−

n

X

i=1

1 nf(xi)

# .

J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 7(4) Art. 148, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

(3)

NEWINEQUALITIESABOUTCONVEXFUNCTIONS 3

Hence, applying Jensen’s inequality (1.1) to the right hand side of the above resulting inequality we get

f

x1+x2 2

+· · ·+f

xn−1 +xn 2

+f

xn+x1 2

≤ n

n−1

" n X

i=1

f(xi)−f Pn

i=1xi n

# ,

and this concludes the proof.

Remark 1.3. Now we consider the simplest case of Theorem 1.2 for n = 3 to obtain the following variant of via Titu Andreescu [2]:

f(x1) +f(x2) +f(x3)−f

x1 +x2+x3 3

≥ 2 3

f

x1 +x2

2

+f

x2 +x3

2

+f

x3+x1

2

. The variant of the generalized Popovicui inequality is given in the following theorem.

Theorem 1.4. Iff is a convex function anda1, . . . , anlie in its domain, then (1.5) (n−1) [f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)]≤n[f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)−f(a)], wherea= a1+···+an n andbi = na−an−1i, i = 1, . . . , n.

Proof. By using the Jensen inequality (1.1),

f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)≤f(a1) +· · ·+f(an), and so,

f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)≤ n

n−1[f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)]− 1

n−1[f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)], or

f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)≤ n

n−1[f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)]− n n−1

1

nf(a1) +· · ·+ 1 nf(an)

, and so

(1.6) f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)≤ n n−1

f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)− 1

nf(a1) +· · ·+ 1 nf(an)

. Hence, applying Jensen’s inequality (1.1) to the right hand side of (1.6) we get

f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)≤ n n−1

f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)−f

a1+· · ·+an n

,

and this concludes the proof.

REFERENCES

[1] D.S. MITRINOVI ´C, J.E. PE ˘CARI ´CANDA.M. FINK, Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993.

[2] KIRAN KEDLAYA, A<B (A is less than B), based on notes for the Math Olympiad Program (MOP) Version 1.0, last revised August 2, 1999.

[3] T. POPOVICIU, Sur certaines inégalitées qui caractérisent les fonctions convexes, An. Sti. Univ. Al.

I. Cuza Ia¸si. I-a, Mat. (N.S), 1965.

J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 7(4) Art. 148, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

参照

関連したドキュメント

Our counterexample was obtained with Maple (and we omit the plots here and just give relevant numerical values). Maple code, and its output, which provides the counterexample, is

In this paper we will consider a new refined form of Jordan’s inequality and an application of it on the same problem considered by Zhao [5] – [7].. Our main result is given by

A BSTRACT. In this paper, we obtain a q-analogue of a double inequality involving the Euler gamma function which was first proved geometrically by Alsina and Tomás [1] and then

(For a detailed discussion of stability of geometric inequalities see the review paper 2] by H. Groemer): If for some closed convex set C contained in K the left-hand side of

The Beurling-Bj ¨orck space S w , as defined in 2, consists of C ∞ functions such that the functions and their Fourier transform jointly with all their derivatives decay ultrarapidly

Let the functions be in some universe U usually consisting of continuous functions and the measures in some universe U b , usually regular Borel measures.. Even before this

In [5], Qi studied a very interesting integral inequality and proved the following result Theorem 1... Now consider the quotient of both sides

In the paper “ Sharp inequalities for trigonometric sums in two variables,” (Illinois Journal of Mathematics, Vol.. And the results we obtained are