The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
The JapanesePsychonomic Society
The
fopanese
Jbumat
of
I)sychonomicSeience
2003,
VoL
22,
No.
1,49-50Prizewinner's
Summary2-B-15
The
effect
of
contrast
change
on
the
motion-in-depth
perception
Norimichi
KITAGAwA,*
Hiromi
AKuTsu,**
and
Shigeru
IcHmARA**
IVihon
U)liversity*
andTolayo
Mbtrmpolitan
Uhiversiby**
Contrast
is
a
cuefor
depth
perception;
the
farthcr
away
an
objectis,
the
less
contrast appearsin
thc
surfaceplane.
What
happens
if
the
contrast
of an object variesin
tirne?
Do
we
perceive
the
object moves
in
depth?
Wc
examined
whethera
contrast
change
induccs
motion-in-depthperception.
The
stimulus
was
a
circular
sine wavegrating
of1
sduration
whose
phase
was shiftedby
various angles every250
ms.The
contrast
of
the
grating
citherdecreased
remained constant.or
mcreased.
The
subjectsjudged
whetherthe
stimulus appearcdto
movetowards
them,
or
away
from
them.
When
thg
contrast
of
the
stimulus
decreased
(increased)
the
number ef 'receding'Clooming')
responses
increased.
The
resu]ts suggcstthat
a
contrast
change
produces
motion-in-depth
perception.
Key
words:contrast
change,
motion-in-depth,
size change, visienFor
static
depth
perception
there
is
mountingevi-dence
that
the
human
visualsystem
has
the
ability
to
estimatethe
depth
from
the
contrast
{Ichihara
et al. submitted;Ashley,
1898).
To
our
knewledge
however,
the
contribution of a contrast changeto
the
perception
of adynamic
eventhas
notbeen
exam-ined.
In
the
present
study we examined whether a change ofcontrast
could
induce
the
perception
of motion-in-depth.To
assess
the
contribution ofa
contrast
changeto
motion-in-depthperception,
we used a stimulus whichinduces
an
apparent
size
change,If
the
contrast
change
could
induce
aper-ception
of
motion-in-depth
then
the
changein
con-trast
would
cancel
the
impression
of motion-in-depthwhich
wasinduced
by
the
apparent
sjze
ehange.
Methods
The
stimuli were circular sinewave
gratings
of1
s
duration
(Figure
la).
The
spatial
frequency
of
the
gratings
was1,56
c/deg,
the
size ofthe
stimulus was9
degrees
of
visual
angle
andthe
averageluminance
of
the
stimulus
waskept
constant at60
cd/m2.
The
contrast ofthe
grattngs
either
decreased,
remained constant orincreased
exponentially
between
O,Ol
and
O,6,
The
phase
of
the
gratings
was shiftedby
either
120,
150,
180,
210,
or240
every
250
ms.
The
*
Department
ofPsycholegy,
Nihon
University,
25-40,
Sakurajosui,
Setagaya-ku,
Tokyo
8550
amount
of
the
shift
below
(over)
180
produced
an
apparent motion of expansion(contraction).
Each
stimulus waspresented
50
times
in
a
random
order.Five
stuclentsparticipated
in
the
experirnent,All
had
norrnal
or corrected-to-normal vision.The
sub-jects
were askedto
fixate
onthe
center
of
the
stimuli
and
to
judge
whether
the
stimulus
appeared
to
movetowards
them,
or
away
from
them.
The
experimentwas
conducted
with
binocular
vision
in
a
dark
room,
Results
and
Discussion
We
found
that
the
change of contrastinfluenced
the
judgment
ofthe
motion-in-depthdirection
(Fig-ure
lb).
When
the
contrastdecreased,
the
`receding' responsesincreased,
resulting
in
apsychometric
function
which
shifted
towards
the
left
relativcto
the
function
ofthe
constant condition.On
the
oth-erhand,
whenthe
contrast
increased,
the
function
shifted
towards
the
right.The
function
for
the
con-stant
condition
waslocated
between
the
decreasing
and
increasing
conditions,These
trends
were ob-servedfor
all ofthe
subjectsexcept
for
NA.
To
quantitatively
analyze
the
effect
of
the
contrast
change
we
calculated
the
null
points,
that
is,
the
angle of
the
phase
shift at whichthe
probability
of
a
Lreceding'
response was
O.50.
A
one-wayANOVA
withthe
contrast-changedirection
as awithin-$ubject
factor
showed
a
significant main effect{F(2,
8)
==10.42;P<
O.Ol),
A
posterior
pairwise
comparison
The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
TheJapanesePsychonomic Society
50
a
os O.4 O,2 o O,6thtu O,4t[eO o. o O,6 O,4 O.2The
Japanese
Journal
ofPsych
(Tukey's
Honestly
Significant
Difference,
P<
O.O
1}
m-dicated
a significantdifference
between
the
mean
for
the
decreasing
condition
(175,13)
andthat
for
the
increasing
condition
(193.80).
But
the
differences
between
the
mean
values
of
cither
ofthese
two
con-ditions
andthe
constant condition(183.40)
were
not
significant.
The
apparentmotion
of
cxpansion
(contraction}
was canceledby
the
decreasing
(increasing>
contrast.
The
results suggestthat
contrastchange
produces
directly
motion-in-depth
perception
andthat
the
hu-man visualsystem
integrates
the
contrastinforma-tion
to
achieveperception
of rnotion-in-depth.An
alternative
possibility
is
that
a change of contrastindirectly
contributes
to
motion-in-depthperception,
onomlc$saerege?.=o-g9tr
Science
Vol,
22,
No.
1
o 2so sco 7so deoo
Time
(m$)
1?O 150 1en 210 240 1ee ri50 1ee 210 240
Ameunt
ofphase
shift(deg)
Figure
1,
(a)
The
visual stimuliused
in
thc
cxperiment.
The
abscissa and ordinateindicate
the
time
and
the
contrast,respectively.
The
thick
white
lines
indicate
continuous contrast changcover
time.
The
top,
middle andbottom
panels
indicate
the
stimuli
with a contrast whichdecreased,
remained
constant,
and
increased,
respectively,The
stirnuli witha
phase
shift
of
180
are
shown.Four
panels
on each row show
the
stimuli atO,
250,
500,
and750
ms.
(b)
The
proportion
of `receding'responses as
a
function
of
the
phase
shift.The
resultsfor
individua]
subiectsare
shown.
For
all
of
the
subjects,except
for
NA,
thc
psychometric
function
shMed
towards
the
left
(righO
whenthe
contrast
decrcased
(increased),
b---Decreasing
1e.g・b.sOJO.6HAttttt''t/'tyt/'tttttti'
t.tttt-ttt
-e-ConstantO.5
':1'
--e--lncreasingO.4O,3
''/1t/tl'
e,2o,rio rf''.t..t..--.'p'--. dtt."Hn
=-t=.:.--osD,SO.7o.eIK
'tttttT.ri,'ttttJ'//Al
NA
7Ii'st11.i
o.sO,4O,302e.1
lttt"itttti.4./fii
t'i''tt'..t...
r-1-t
o.L.utt-t
1O.9O.BKI ..l''',J1''
oo
-ttt''/i''..t.tttt
e.To,e tfi ,,J'fi'
O,5 '
'
',11 O.4 J ,,1tt o.s02e.1 '7ti/./s''fr''"t;/
tr
.L.i
o.'-t-tt
In
ourprelimmary
experimentwe
observed
that
when we used
phase
shiftedstimulL
a
contrast
changehad
a strong effect onthe
motion-in-depthperccption.
But
the
effect
of
the
contrast change was weak whenwe
used
static
phase
stimulL
The
contrast
change
rpay
therefore
induce
an apparentchange
in
size andthen
the
apparent motionmay
'
induce
the
motion-in-depth
perception.