• 検索結果がありません。

Proposing the Multi-layered Semantic Frame Analysis of Text

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Proposing the Multi-layered Semantic Frame Analysis of Text"

Copied!
1
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Proposing the Multi-layered Semantic Frame Analysis of Text

Kow Kuroda and Hitoshi Isahara

National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Japan

Tokenization

F5*: <Producing>

F2: <Name Givting>

F: <Interactivity>

F10: <Fun Having>

F9: <Reading>

F7: <Buying>

=<Purchasing>

F6: <Selling>

F4: <Authoring>

F5: <Publishing>

F1: <Title Givting>

F12: <Activity>

Agent F12: <Disclosure>

The

White Hose -d

Discloser Secret

F3: <Book Writing>

Author

Book

Title Giver

Purpose Objects book

title

Inside

Title

Publisher

Publication

Purpose

A unit U realizes a frame element F.R, i.e. semantic role

R defined relative to F, thereby evoking frame F.

A role F.R unconditionally elaborates/instantiates a more abstract role G.B*

(strong ontological implication)

F.R G.R*

U F.R

Instantiation Network of Semantic Frames, Specifying

“Ontological Hierarchies”

A frame F realizes a role G.R Purpose or Means.

F G.R

will go on a

sale

U.S.

January 14 in the

on

.

Purpose

Piece of Work

Name Giver

Name Item

Purpose Purpose

Purpose Means

Seller

Purpose

Supporters

Author

Piece of Work

Purpose

Place Time

Place Time Goods

Buyer

Purpose Place Time Goods Buyer

Seller

F6*: <Commercial Trasaction>

Buyer

Purposes Place Time Goods Seller

Price Price

Cost

F8: <Consuming>

Provider

Place Time Items Consumer

Cost

Purpose Place Time Book Reader

Benefit

Place Time Fun Source

Fun-Haver F10*: <Experiencing>

Place Time Experience Experiencer

Purpose Purpose

Purpose

Place Time

Fun Place Time Place

Time

Product

Place Time Producer

Purpose Consumer

Place Time Interactive

Agents

Purposes By products

By-product

Objects Place

Time

A role F.R conditionally elaborates/instantiates a more abstract role G.B*

(weak ontological implication)

F.R G.R*

Reader Reader

By-product

Author Provider

!

"

#$

%&

'( )

!*

!!

!"

!#!$

!%!&

!'!(

!)"*

"!

""

"#

"$

"%

"&

"'

"(

")

#*#!

#"

+ , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Frame ID F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13

F-to-F relations elaborates F2;

constitutes F3

constitutes F5;

presumes F5;

elaborates F4

presupposes F3

presupposes F4; constitutes F5; presumes

F7 presupposes F6; elaborates F9

presupposes F5 presupposes

F9 constittues

F3,F5

Frame Title Giving Name Giving Writing Authoring Publishing Selling Purchasing Consuming Reading Having Fun Presidential Government

in the U.S. Disclosure Reporting

* Reporter

* Purpose GOVERNOR GOVERNOR Means Report[start

1,end]

* Purpose Means GOVERNOR Means

* Purpose Purpose GOVERNOR

* Retailer Seller Seller Provider3

* Customer Customer Purchaser Consumer Reader Enjoyer

* Title

Giver[seconda ry]

Name

Giver[2] Supporter Publisher Provider Provider2

* Title

Giver[primary] Name

Giver[1] Writer Author Supporter? Provider1 Revealer

* Purpose1 Domain=Topic GOVERNOR

A Work Object Book Work[+Piece] Publication Goods Goods Commodity Book Fun Source Report[start

2,end]

book

titled GOVERNOR GOVERNORBook.attribute Work.attributePublication.att ribute

Goods.attribut es Goods.attribu

tes Commodity.a

ttribtute Book.attribute Fun Source.attribut

e

" MARKER[1,2] MARKER[1,2]

The Title Name Secrets:

EVOKER Inside

White Presidential

Office:

EVOKER Target House

" MARKER[2,2] MARKER[2,2]

will EXTENDER2 EXTENDER2

go EXTENDER1 EXTENDER1

on Purpose2 GOVERNOR[+

composite] GOVERNOR[+

composite] Means

sale

in MARKER MARKER

the Place Place

U.S.

on MARKER MARKER

January Time: Date Time: Date

14 .

MSFA of A book titled “The Inside White House” will go on sale in the U.S. on January 14.

Semantic roles in our sense are neither

“thematic roles” in the sense of Generaive Grammar nor “deep cases” in the sense of Case Grammar; Rather, they are part of a

“cognitive models,” or situations, granting that a situation is an organization of situational roles rather than entities.

Domain Effect Arising from Frame Clustering

A Hierachical Frame Network Containing Ontological Hierarchies

Designed to develop (mainly Japanese)

databases of “word senses in contexts” to fullfil the need to describe the “ecology” of words and their senses

D0: Existence (Domain)

D2: Consuming (Domain) D1: Production (Domain); AGENTIVE ROLE is defined against this

Piece of Work

Content Intention Author F3: Book Writing

Publisher F5:

Publishing F6:

Selling

Cover n. of pages

Weight

Claim Message

Location

Bookstore

Owner Place Retail price Price

Tel Num Tel

Number Owner

G1[1]:

Consignment

Employer Employee Contract

DesigningG2:

Designer Binding/

Design Compens

ation

G1[2]:

Consignment

Employer Employee Contract Compens

ation

Intention Style

Reader F9:

Reading

Content Impression

Evalution BuyingF7:

Seller Goods Buyer

Motivation Expense Shape

Motivation

Publication Goods Book*

book

Supports a “preprocess” that needs to be done before defining entries for any useful (generative) lexicon

Each word is linked to as many situational/

semantic roles as needed, based on the Berkeley FrameNet approach to word sense representation/disambiguation.

Theoretically, HNFA implements a PDP-style computation:

1) Words evoke, or “activates” frames that they are components of.

2) Evoked frames activate other frames (partially indicated), typically by such associative relations as elaboration, preparation, realization, motivation, presupposition (some of them are pecified as Frame-to- Frame relations in MSFA).

3) Lateral inhibition among activated frames (not indicated per se) leads to convergence.

Certain frames “cluster” together, thereby constituting a “domain” like Production, Consumption. Typically, clustering is caused by Purpose/Means coupling.

Frames specify units of human situational understanding, thereby defining cognitive structures that lead to semantic field effects.

Frame enumeration in MSFA needs not to be exhaustive, as far as it specifies information necessary to construct a Hierarchical Frame Network Analysis (HFNA) below.

HFNA is supposed to specify what people actually

“understand” when they hear (or read) a sentence. HFNA is a fuller specification of human understanding than MSFA.

MSFA serves as a preprocess for the construction of a HFNA of a given setence.

Ontological hierarchies like “Book IS-A Goods IS-A Product IS-A Artifact IS-A Physical Entity” are a derivative of hierarchical frame network.

Frame-evoking elements (evokers) are typically words or morphemes, but they need not be so. Certain kinds of frame-evocation are distributed in nature. This is true especially for “collocations“ and ”styles.”

参照

関連したドキュメント

As for the rest of the paper, in Section 2 we recall the notion of a partial moving frame, in- troduce the recurrence relations that unlock the structure of the algebra of

This abundance of braid group actions enhances our beliefs that triangulated and derived categories are the right place to search for 4-dimensional TQFTs, and that quantum invariants

While conducting an experiment regarding fetal move- ments as a result of Pulsed Wave Doppler (PWD) ultrasound, [8] we encountered the severe artifacts in the acquired image2.

Key words and phrases: representable functor among varieties of algebras, initial representable func- tor, colimit of representable functors, final coalgebra, limit of coalgebras;

Cut-free proof analysis for disjunction property (Maximova’s variable separation

Here we present a new method to construct the explicit formula of a sequence of numbers and polynomials generated by a linear recurrence relation of order 2.. The applications of

The intention of this work is to generalise the limiting distribution results for the Steiner distance and for the ancestor-tree size that were obtained for the special case of

The explicit treatment of the metaplectic representa- tion requires various methods from analysis and geometry, in addition to the algebraic methods; and it is our aim in a series