Monodromy
and
bifurcations
of
the
Henon
map
Zin
ARAI
Creative
Research
Institution,Hokkaido
University/JST
PRESTO
10
Dec 2010,
Research
on
Complex Dynamics
and
Related
Fields
DedicatedtoProfessor Ushiki
on
his 60thbirthday1
Monodromy
of the complex
H\’enon
Map
Wediscuss the structure oftheparameter
space
of thecomplex Hdnonmap
$H_{a_{l}c}:\mathbb{C}^{2}arrow \mathbb{C}^{2}:(x,y)\mapsto(x^{2}+c-ay,x)$, $(a,c)\epsilon \mathbb{C}^{2}$
and the prmingfront of the realH\’enon
map
$H_{a,c}|_{R^{2}}$ for$(a,c)\in \mathbb{R}^{2}$.
Let${}^{t}H$be the subset of$\mathbb{C}^{2}$which
consists ofthe parameter values $(a,c)$ such that $K_{a}^{c},$ $:=\{p\in \mathbb{C}^{2}$ : {$H_{a_{j}c}^{n}(p)|_{n\epsilon Z}$isbounded} is uniformly
hyperbolicandconjugatetothe fullshift$\sigma:\Sigma_{2}arrow\Sigma_{2}$ oftwosymbols. Wedenote$K_{a}^{\mathbb{C}},$ $\cap \mathbb{R}^{2}$by$K_{a_{l}c}^{\mathbb{R}}$
.
Let
us
fix a basepoint $(a_{0},c_{0})\in H$ and a topological conjugacy $h_{0}$ : $K_{a_{0},c_{0}}^{\mathbb{C}}arrow\Sigma_{2}$. Given a loop$\gamma:[0,1]arrow H$basedat$(a_{0},c_{0})$,
we
constructacontinuousfamilyofconjugacies$h_{t}:K_{\gamma\langle t)}^{C}arrow\Sigma_{2}$along$\gamma$.
Then
we
define $\rho(\gamma):=h_{1}o(h_{0})^{-1}$ : $\Sigma_{2}arrow\Sigma_{2}$.
It iseasy
tosee
that$\rho$ defines agroup
homomorphism$\rho$ : $\pi_{1}(H,(a_{0},c_{0}))arrow Aut(\Sigma_{2})$ where$Aut(\Sigma_{2})$ isthe
group
of the automorphisms of $\Sigma_{2}$.
We call $\rho$ themonodromyhomomorphism. Let
us
denotetheimageof$\rho$by$\Gamma$.
Inanalogywiththe
one
dimensional complex dynamics,John
Hubbard raised the followingconjec-ture,whichimpliesthat thetopological structure of$j\{$should be extremelyrich.
Hubbard’sConjecture. $\Gamma\cup\{\sigma\}$generates$Aut(\Sigma_{2})$
.
Theorem 1. Theimage$\Gamma$
satisfies
thefollowingproperties:(1) $\Gamma$contains non-trivial elements. Inparticular,it contains elements
ofinfinite
order[I].(2) $\Gamma$doesNOT contain
any
odd-time iterationof
$\sigma$.
Moreover,withrespect tothedecomposition$Aut(\Sigma_{2})=$$Z\langle\sigma\rangle\oplus Inert(\Sigma_{2})$whereInert$(\Sigma_{2})$is thesubgroup
of
inert automorphisms,we
have$\Gamma\subset Z\langle\sigma^{2}\rangle\oplus$Inert$(\Sigma_{2})$.
The proof for the statement (1) is computer-assisted (see [1, 2]). To
prove
(2),we
make use of thefollowingalgebraiccondition
on
theautomorphismof$\Sigma_{2}$.
Let$\phi\in Aut(\Sigma_{2})$beanautomorphism. Then-thsignnumber$s_{n}(\phi)$of$\phi$isthe sign$\pm 1$,of thepermutation inducedby$\phi$
on
the setof periodic orbits of leastperiod$n$.
For eachperiodicorbit$U$ofleastperiod$n$,we
choosean
arbitraryelement$x_{U}\in U$.
Since$\phi(x_{U})$and$x_{\phi(U)}$are
in thesame
periodicorbit,we can
ffidan integer$k(U)$such that$\phi(x_{U})=\sigma^{k(1I)}(x_{\phi\langle 1I)})$
.
Thenwe
definethe n-thgyrationnumber$g_{n}(\phi)\in Z_{n}$by$g_{n}( \phi):=\sum_{U}k(U)$ $mod n$
where the
sum
is takenover
alltheperiodic orbitofleastperiod $n$.
We
say
thata map
$\phi;\Sigma_{2}arrow\Sigma_{2}$satisfies thesign-gyration compatibilitycondition(SGCC,see
[3])if$g_{2^{n\prime}q}(\phi)=\{\begin{array}{ll}0 if \prod_{j=0}^{m-1}s_{21q}(\phi)=1,2^{m-1}q if \prod_{i=0}^{m-1}s_{2lq}(\phi)=-1.\end{array}$
数理解析研究所講究録
for
every
odd positive integer$q$ andevery
non-negative integer$m$.
Itis known thatevery
inertauto-morphism satisfies SGCC.
Note thatif$\phi$ satisfiesSGCC,itfollows from thecondition for$q=1$ and $m=1$ that$\phi$interchanges
the two fixed points ifand only if it rotates theperiod 2 orbit. By
investigatin
$g$the.
coMgurationofbifurcation
curves
ofperiodic orbit of period1 and2,we
can
prove
that this property alsoholds forallautomorphismsin$\Gamma$
.
Lemma 2. Let$\phi\in\Gamma$. Then$\phi$interchangesthe
twofixed
pointsif
andonly$\iota f$it rotates the period 2orbit,Proof
of
Theorem 1 (2). Let$\phi\in\Gamma$ andassume
$\phi=(\sigma^{k},\phi’)$ where$k$is odd. Then $\sigma^{-k}\circ\phi\in$Inert$(\Sigma_{2})$ andtherefore satisfies SGCC. However, by Lenuna 2 andthe assumption$k$is odd,$\sigma^{-k_{O}}\phi$does notsatisfy
SGCC. This is
a
contradiction. $o$2
Application
to pruning fronts
of
the
reat
H\’enon
Map
The key to relate the monodromy of the complex $H6non$
map
to thepruning front ofthereal H\’enonmap
is thefollowihg theorem.Theorem 3 (ZA[1]). For$(a,c)\in \mathcal{H}\cap N^{2}$ anda path
a
connecting $(a_{0},b_{0})$to $(a,c)$,define
$\gamma:=\alpha\cdot(\overline{\alpha})^{-1}$.
Then$\rho(\gamma)$ isaninvolutionand$H_{a,c}$: $K_{a,c}^{R}arrow K_{a,c}^{R}$is topologicallyconjugate$i0\sigma|_{Fix(\rho(\gamma))}$ :Fix$(\rho(\gamma))arrow$Fix$(\rho(\gamma))$
.
By virtue ofthetheorem,
we can
define thepruningfrontfor theserealH\’enonmap
by$P:=([0]\cap(\rho(\gamma))^{-1}[1])\cup([1]\cap(\rho(\gamma))^{-1}[0])$
.
Thepruningfront$P$completely determinesthedynamicsof the realH\’enon
map
acting on$K_{a,c}^{\mathbb{R}}$ (see[1]).Itisknown that SGCC holds for
any
automorphisms ofafull shift which isacomposition offinite-orderautomorphisms. Itfollows that
Proposition4.
If
$\gamma$ is symmetric$(i.e. \overline{\gamma}=\gamma)$ then$\rho(\gamma)$musf$satis\beta$SGCC.This implies there is a restriction
on
the shape of pmning fronts. For example, although $0_{1}^{0}10$ ispossible (andinfact,is the pruningfrontfor $a=-1,c=-5$),$0_{1}^{0}100$isnotallowed.
Recently,NicholasLongproved the.followingrelated resultposing an algebraicrestriction
on
subshiftsthat
can
bethefixedpointset ofan
involution.Theorem5(Long [5]).
If
a$SFTY$is thefixed
poinfsetof
aninertinvolutionof
a mixingshift
offinite
typeX,thenPer$(X)\backslash Per(Y)$is thedisjointunion
of
2-cascades.This theorem suggests that in a hyperbolic SFT that
appears
via pmning, if a periodic orbit $O$ ismissing,then allperiodicorbits
on
theperiod-doublingcascadebeginningat$O$should also be missing.References
[1] Z. Arai, On loops in the hyperbolic locus of the complex H\’enon
map
and their monodromies,preprint.
[2] Z.Arai,On Hyperbolic PlateausoftheH\’enonMap, ExperimentalMathematics,16:2(2007),181-188.
[3] M. Boyleand W.Krieger, Periodic points andautomorphismsof theshift,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,
302(1987),125-149.
[4] K.H.Kim,F. W.Roush and
J.
B.Wagoner,Characterization of inertactionson
periodic points,PartIandII,Forum Mathematicum, 12 (2000), $56k602(I),$$671-712$(II).
[5] N. Long, Fixed point setsofinertinvolutions, preprint.