• 検索結果がありません。

Solutions to a Nearly Simple Harmonic Vibration Equation by Means of N-Fractional Calculus (Study on Applications for Fractional Calculus Operators in Univalent Function Theory)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Solutions to a Nearly Simple Harmonic Vibration Equation by Means of N-Fractional Calculus (Study on Applications for Fractional Calculus Operators in Univalent Function Theory)"

Copied!
11
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

37

Solutions

to

aNearly Simple

Harmonic Vibration

Equation

by

Means

of N.

Fractional Calculus

デカル

$|\backslash$

出版

-

酉本勝之

(Katsuyukl

Nishimoto)

Research

Institute for Applied Mathematics

Descartes

Press

$\mathrm{C}o$

.

Abstract

In

this

paper, solutions

to anearly simple

harmonic

vibration

equation

are

discussed

by

means

of N-

fractional

calculus,

and

some

investigation

of the

solutions

are

reported.

Keywords

:

$\mathrm{N}$

-Fractional Calculus, Simple Harmonic

Vibration

Equation.

Introduction

(Definition

of

Fractional

Calculus)

(I)

Definition.

(by

K.

Nishimoto)([1

]

Vol.

1)

Let

$D=\{D_{-}, D_{+}\}$

,

$C$

\approx

$\{C_{-*}C_{+}\}$

,

$C$

-be acurve

along the cutjoining two

points

$z$

and

$-\infty+$

$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{m}(\mathrm{z})$

,

$C_{*}$

be

acurve

along

the

cutjoining two points

$\mathrm{z}$

and

$\infty+$ $\mathrm{i}$

$\mathrm{f}(\mathrm{z})$

,

$D_{-}$

be

adomain

surrounded by

$C_{-}$

P

$D_{\star}$

be adomain surrounded by

$C_{*}$

(Here

$D$

contains

the

points

over

the

curve

$C$

).

Moreover,

let

$f\Leftrightarrow f(\mathrm{z})$

be

aregular

function in

$D(z\in D)$

,

$f_{\mathrm{V}}=(f)_{v} \sim_{C}(f)_{\nu}arrow\frac{\Gamma(v+1)}{2\pi i}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)}{(\zeta-z)^{v*1}}d\zeta$

$(v \not\in T)$

,

(1)

$(f)_{-m}\infty$

$\lim(f\mathrm{J}_{\nu} (m \in ff), (2)$

where

$-\pi$

\leq $\arg(\zeta-z)$

\leq \pi

for

$C_{-}$

I

0\leq

$\arg$

(

$\zeta-$

z)

$\mathrm{s}2\pi$

for

$C_{*}$

:

$\zeta {}^{t}\mathrm{Z}$

,

$z$$\in C\eta$

$v$

$\in R$

,

$\Gamma$

; Gamma

function,

then

$(f)_{\mathrm{v}}$

is

the

fractional

differintegration

of

arbitrary

order

$v$

(derlvatives

of

order

$v$

for

$v>0$

,

and

integrals

of order-v for

$v$

$<0$

),

with

respect

to

$\mathrm{z}$

,

of

the

function

$f$

:

if

$|(f)_{v}|$

<

$\infty$

.

(II)

On

the fractional calculus

operator

$N^{\mathrm{v}}[3]$

Theorem

A. Let

fractional

calculus

operator(Nishimoto’s

Operator)

$N^{v}$

be

$N^{\vee}$

-

$( \frac{\Gamma(v+1)}{2\pi i}\int_{\mathrm{c}}\frac{d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^{\nu*1}})$

$(v\not\in T)$

[Refer

to

(1)]

:

(3)

wirh

$N^{-m}-$

Jim

$N^{\mathrm{v}}$ $(m\in \mathrm{Z}^{*})$

,

{4)

$\nuarrow-n|$

and

define

the binary

operation

$0$

as

$N^{\beta}\circ N^{\alpha}f\approx N^{\beta}N^{\alpha}f$\approx $N^{\beta}(N^{\alpha}f)$

$(\alpha, \beta \in R)$

,

$(5)$

fhert

the set

$\{N^{\mathrm{v}}\}\Leftrightarrow\{N^{\nu}|v\in R\}$

(6)

is

an

Abelian

product

group

(having

continuous index

$v$

)which

has

the inverse

fransform

operator

$(N^{\mathrm{v}})^{-1}$

\sim

$N^{-v}$

to

the

fractional

calculus

operator

$N^{\nu}$

for

the

function

$f$

such

that

$f\in F$

=

$\{/$

;

0\neq

$|f_{\nu}|<\infty$

,

$v$

$\in R\}$

, where

$7\approx$$f(\mathrm{z})$

and

$\mathrm{z}\in C$

.

(vis.

$-\mathrm{Q}\mathrm{Q}<v$$<\mathrm{Q}\mathrm{Q}$

).

(2)

(For

our

convenience,

we

call

$N^{\beta}\circ N$

’as

product of

$N^{\beta}$

and

$N^{\alpha}1$

)

Theorem B. ”F.O.G.

$\{N^{v}\}$

is

an

”Action product

group

which

has continuous

index

$v$

\prime\prime for

the

set

of

$F1$

(

$F.O$

.G.

$j$

Fractional calculus

operator

group

)[3].

\S

1.

General

solution to

nearly simple

harmonic

vibration equations

Theorem

1.

Let

$\varphi\in p^{\mathrm{o}}=\{\varphi :

0\neq|\varphi_{v}|<\infty, v\in R\}$

:

then

the

homogeneous

fractional

order

differintegral

equation

(nearly

simple

harmonic vibration

equation

for

I

$\epsilon 1$

$<<1$

)

.

$j_{2*\epsilon}+f.\omega^{2}=0$

$(^{a)\neq 0,\varphi\simeq\varphi(t)}l,\epsilon\in R|\epsilon-- 2’)$

(0)

has the following

general solutions

.

(i)

$\varphi$

=

$\sum_{n\cdot 0}^{m}a_{n}e^{4}\mathrm{t}n,\epsilon$

)

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}1l11\cdot\iota$

),

$\mathrm{x}[\cos B(n, \epsilon)\omega^{2l(2*\epsilon)}l+i\sin B(n, \epsilon)\omega^{2l(2*\epsilon)}t$

],

$(1)$

where

$A$

(n,

$\epsilon$

)

$=\cos\beta(n,\epsilon)$

(2),

$B(n, \epsilon)=\sin\beta(n,\epsilon)$

(3)

and

/3

$(n,\epsilon)$\approx

$\pi(1+2n)$

$/(2+\epsilon)$

(4)

for

$\epsilon\in R$

.

$\mathrm{t}$$\mathrm{i}$$\mathrm{i})$ $\varphi$

=

$\sum_{n}’$

$a_{n}e^{G(n_{1}\epsilon)\omega^{\prime(\not\subset)}l}$

$\mathrm{x}$

[

$\cos H(n,$

$\epsilon)\omega^{r(e)}t+i\sin H$

(n,

$\epsilon)a)^{r(e)}l$

],

(5)

where

$G$

(n,

$\epsilon$

)-

$\cos\pi(_{2}^{[perp]}+n)r$

$(\epsilon)$

(6),

$H(n, \epsilon)=\sin\pi(_{2}^{[perp]}+n)r(\epsilon)$

(7)

and

$r( \epsilon)=\sum_{k-0}^{\infty}(-\epsilon/2)^{k}$

(8)

for

I

$\epsilon \mathfrak{l}<2$

.

$(\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i}1)$ $\varphi$

\sim

$\sum_{n\cdot 0}^{1n}a_{\mathrm{t}},e^{P(}$

’1.

$e$

)

$\varpi^{1-(d1\}}$

$\mathrm{x}[\cos Q(n, \epsilon)\omega^{1-(\epsilon}$

2)

$l+i\sin Q$

(n,

$\epsilon$

)

$\omega^{1-(el2)}t]$

,

(9)

where

$P(n, \epsilon)$

=coe

$\pi(\frac{1}{2}+n)$ $(1-\mathrm{Z})2$

:

$(1\mathrm{Q}$ $\mathrm{C}$

$Q(n,\epsilon)=\sin\pi(\mathrm{J}_{2}+n$

$)(1-_{2}^{A})$

,

(11)

(3)

39

Where

$a_{n}$

is

an

arbitrary

constant

correspond to

$\beta(n,\epsilon)$

and

$m$

is

finite

when

$\epsilon$

is

a

rational

number,

and

$m$

is

infinite

when

$\epsilon$

is

an

irrational number.

Note

1.

We

must call

(9)as

approximate

(or

almost)general

solution

to

equation

(0),

because it is not general solution in the strict

sense.

Proof

of

(i)

Set

$\varphi=e^{\lambda t}$

,

(12)

then

operate

$N^{2+e}$

to

the

both

sides

of

(12

),

we

have then

$N^{2+\epsilon}p=\varphi_{2+\epsilon}=\lambda^{2+\epsilon}e^{\lambda/}$

[1

]

(13)

Therefore,

we

have

$\lambda^{2+\epsilon}+$

$0^{2}-0$

.

$(14)$

from

(13 ),

(12)and

(0).

Hence

$2=$

$(-\omega^{2})^{1l(2+\mathrm{r})}$ \approx $\mathrm{S}^{(1+2\mathrm{F}\mathrm{t})7(2+\epsilon)}\omega^{2l(2+\epsilon)}$

$(15)$

$\equiv\gamma(n,\epsilon)$

$(n \approx 0, 1,2,\cdots, m)$

(16)

Then letting

$\beta(n,\epsilon)$ \approx

$\pi(1+2n)$

$/(2+\epsilon)$

(4)

we

have

$\gamma(\mathfrak{l}1, \epsilon)$

=

$e^{i\beta(\eta\epsilon)}\omega^{2l(2+\epsilon)}$

$(17)$

$-\{ A(n, \epsilon)+ iB(n, \epsilon)\}\omega^{2/(u\epsilon)}$

(18)

where

$A$

(n,

$\epsilon$

)

and

$B(n, \epsilon)$

are

the

ones

shown

by

(2)and (3 ),

respectively.

We have then

aparticular

solution

$\varphi=e^{\gamma(\mathrm{u}\epsilon)}$

(19)

$\approx e^{\langle A(n,\epsilon)+lB(n,\epsilon)\rangle\omega^{2l(3*\iota)}}’\Xi\varphi|_{(n)}$

(denote)

(20)

to equation

(0).

Inversely

(20)satisfies

equation

(0)clearly.

Therefore,

we

have

(1)from

$\varphi$

-

$\sum_{n-0}^{n}’ a_{n}\cdot\varphi|_{(n)}$

(21)

as

the general solution

to equation

(0),

where

$a_{n}$

is

an

arbitrary

constant

correspond

to

$\beta(n, \epsilon)$

.

Proof of

$(\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i})$

For

I

$\epsilon|<2$

,

we

have

$\frac{1}{5\overline{+\epsilon}}\approx_{2}^{1}r(\epsilon)$

,

(22)

(4)

We have then

$\beta(n.\epsilon)$ \vee

$\pi(\not\in+n)r(\epsilon)$

(23)

from

(22)

and

(4).

Therefore,

we

have

(5)from

(23)and

(1).

Proof

of

$(\mathrm{i}11)$

For {

$\epsilon 1<<1$

,

we

have

$r(\epsilon)$

-

$\mathrm{E}^{(-\epsilon/2)^{\mathrm{A}}}\infty\approx$

$1-\xi$

:

(24)

then

$\beta(n,\epsilon)-\pi(_{l^{1}} +n )$

$(1-\epsilon\tau)$

(25)

Therefore,

we

have

(9)from (25)and

(5).

\S 2.

Investigation for

$\varphi|_{\mathrm{t}n)}$

Here

wc

investigate

the

solutions

$\varphi|_{(n)}$

of the

case

$(\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i})$

in

\S

1,

Theorem 2. When

$\omega>0$

$\varphi|_{\mathrm{t}\prime)}$

\approx

$e^{(-1)’\{(2\prime*1)\epsilon\pi^{l}4\mu\iota}[\cos Q\iota$

$+(-1)^{r}i\sin Q\iota]$

,

(26)

is

convergent

for

$(\begin{array}{lllll}0<-\epsilon <<\mathrm{l} for r-2k0<\epsilon <<\mathrm{l} for r -2k+1\end{array})$

$(27)$

where

$Q-\omega(1-\not\in\log\omega)-$

.

(28)

$\varphi|_{(n)}$

\sim

$e^{P(n.\iota)\omega^{1-(\cdot\prime 1)}}$

/

$[\cos Q(n, \epsilon)o$

$l2$

)

$t+i\sin Q(n, \epsilon)\omega^{1-(tl2)}t]r$

.

(29)

and

$k$

$-0,1,2,\cdots$

Proof.

(I)

Investigation

for

$\varphi|_{(0)}$

When

1

$\epsilon 1<<1$

,

we

have

(29)from

$\mathrm{s}1$

.

(20)

having

fi 1.

(10)and

(11

),

since

$\varphi|_{(n)}$

\sim

$e\{P(\mathrm{n}.\epsilon)+iQ(n, \epsilon)\}\omega^{1-(\epsilon\prime 2)}$

In

the

case

of

$n-0$

,

we

have

$P(0,\epsilon)\omega^{1-(e\prime 2)}$

\approx

$(\epsilon\pi/4)\omega$

$(30)$

and

$Q(0, \epsilon)\omega^{1-(el2)}$

\sim

$a$

)

$(1- \not\in \log\omega )=Q$

,

$\mathrm{t}$

$311$

(5)

(32)

$\cos\frac{\pi}{2}(1-\frac{\epsilon}{2})=\sin\frac{\epsilon\pi}{4}=\sum_{k-0}^{\infty}(-1)^{k}\frac{(\epsilon\pi/4)^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}$ $( 1\epsilon\pi/4\mathrm{I}<\infty)$

,

(33)

$\sin\frac{\pi}{2}(1-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\rangle=\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\frac{\epsilon\pi}{4}=\sum_{k-0}^{\infty}(-1)^{k}\frac{(\epsilon\pi/4)^{2k}}{(2k)!}$ $(|\epsilon\pi/4\mathrm{I}<\infty)$

,

$(1\epsilon 3\pi /41 <\infty)$

,

(39)

and

$\omega^{1-(\epsilon\prime 2\rangle}$

\approx $\omega\cdot e^{\epsilon 1_{\mathfrak{B}}\omega^{-1l2}}=\omega$$\mathrm{a}\frac{(\epsilon\log\omega^{-1J2})^{k}}{k!}\infty$

(I

$\epsilon\log\omega^{-1/2}$

I

$<\infty$

).

(34)

Therefore,

we

have

$\varphi|_{(0)}$

\sim $e^{(\epsilon\pi/4)\omega t}[\cos Qt+i\sin Qt]$

,

$(1 \epsilon \mathrm{I} <<1)$

(35)

The solution

(35)is

divergent

for

$\epsilon$

\succ

$0$

and

is

convergent

(damping

form)

for

$\epsilon<0$

when

$\omega>0$

.

And

we

have

$Q=a)$

$(1-_{2}^{\mathrm{B}}\log\omega)>a)$

$(\epsilon<0, \iota v >1)$

,

(36)

Then,

letting

$T_{Q}-2\pi/Q$

; period of the function

$\cos Qt$

,

and

$T_{\omega}arrow 2\pi/\omega j$

period

of

the function

$\cos\omega l$

we

have

$T_{Q}<T_{\mathcal{O}\mathrm{J}}$

$(Q>\omega)$

when

$\epsilon<0$

That

is,

we

have that ”the

period

$T_{Q}$

of

$\cos Qt$

-

$\cos\omega(1-\mathrm{z}\mathrm{l}\epsilon \mathrm{o}\mathrm{g}a))t$

is

smaller

than

the

one

$T_{\omega}$

of

$\cos wl\mathfrak{s}\iota$

when

$\epsilon<0$

,

$\omega>$$1$

.

(II)

Investigation

for

$\varphi|_{(1)}$

In the

case

of

$n$\simeq

$1,$

we

have

$P(1,\epsilon)\mathrm{m}$

$-(\epsilon\pi/4)\omega$

$(37)$

and

$Q(1, \epsilon)$ $\approx-\omega(\mathrm{I}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\log\omega)=-Q$

,

(38)

from

(10)and

(11)respectively,

$\mathrm{b}$

ecaus

$\mathrm{e}$

we

have

$\cos\frac{3\pi}{2}(1-\frac{\epsilon}{2})=-\sin\frac{\epsilon 3\pi}{4}--\sum_{k-0}^{\infty}(-1)^{k}\frac{(e3\pi/4)^{Lk+1}}{(2k+1)!}$

$(|\epsilon 3\pi/4 1 <\infty)$

,

(40)

$\sin\frac{3\pi}{2}(1-\frac{\epsilon}{2})$ $\approx-\cos\frac{\epsilon 3\pi}{4}--E^{(-1)^{k}\frac{(\epsilon 3\pi/4)^{2k}}{(2k)!}}\infty$

and

(34

).

Therefore,

we

have

$\varphi|_{(1)}$

\sim

$e^{-(\epsilon 3}z’$

)’

$l[\mathit{7}oo\mathrm{s} Ql-i\sin Qt]$

,

$(1 \epsilon 1 <<1)$

(41)

The solution

(41)is

convergent

(damping

form)for

$\epsilon>0$

and

is

divergent

for

$\epsilon<0$

when

$\omega>0$

.

And

we

have

$Q$ $=\omega(1-^{\mathrm{B}_{2}}\log\omega)<\omega$

$( \epsilon >0, \omega\succ 1)$

(42)

Then, in

this

case we

have

(6)

$(1\epsilon 5\pi /4\mathrm{I}<\infty)$

,

(45)

than the

one

$T_{\omega}$

of

$\cos\omega l$

when

$\epsilon>0$

,

$\omega$

$>1$

.

(III)

Investigation for

$\varphi|_{(2)}$

In

the

case

of

$n=2$

,

we

have

$P(2,\epsilon)$

\approx

$(\epsilon 5\pi/4)\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}$

,

(43)

and

$Q(2,\epsilon)\approx\omega(1^{e}-2\log\omega )=Q$

,

(44)

from

(10)and

(11)respectively,

because

we

have

$\cos\frac{5\pi}{2}(1-\frac{\epsilon}{2})$ \approx $\sin\frac{e5\pi}{4}-\sum_{k-0}^{\infty}(-1)^{k}\frac{(\epsilon 5\pi/4)^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}$

(1

$\epsilon 5\pi$

$/4$

I

$<\infty$

),

(46)

$\sin$

$\frac{5\pi}{2}$$(\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{l}-\underline{\epsilon}2\end{array})$

=

$\cos\frac{\epsilon 5\pi}{4}=\sum\infty(-1)^{k}\frac{(\epsilon 5\pi/4)^{2k}}{(2k)!}$

(49)

and

$(34)$

.

Therefore,

we

have

$\varphi|_{(2)}$

\sim

$e^{(\epsilon 5\pi l4)atl}$

[

$\cos Qt$

$+i\sin Qt]$

,

$(1 \epsilon|<<1)$

(47)

The

solution

(47)is

divergent

for

$\epsilon>0$

and is

convergent

(damping

form

)

for

$\epsilon<0$

,

$\omega$

$>0$

.

And

we

have

$Q=\omega$

$(1-\not\in\log\omega)>\omega$

$(\epsilon<0,\omega>1)$

.

(48)

Therefore

we

have

$T_{Q}<T_{g)}$

$(Q> \omega )$

when

$\epsilon<0$

:

$\omega>1$

.

That

is,

we

have that

”the

period

$T_{Q}$

of

$\cos Qt=co\mathrm{s}$

$\omega$$($

1-\mbox{\boldmath$\xi$}

$\log\omega)t$

is

smaller

than the

one

$T_{w}$

of

$\cos\omega t$

\prime\prime

when

$\epsilon<0$

,

$\omega>1$

.

$(\mathrm{I})$

Repeating

the

same

procedure

as

$(\mathrm{I})\sim$

(

I I

$\mathrm{I}$

),

we

have this

theorem

clearly.

Note. Notice

that when

$0$ $>0,\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}$

solutions

$\varphi|_{(u\rangle}$

$(k \approx 0, 1, 2, \cdots )$

are

convergent

(damping

form)for

$\epsilon<0$

,

and

$\varphi|_{(\mathrm{k}+1)}$

are

convergent

(damping

form)for

$\epsilon>0$

,

respectively.

Theorem

3. When

$\omega>0$

the

nearly simple

harmonic

vibration

equation

$\varphi_{2*\epsilon}+\varphi\cdot\omega^{2}$ \approx$0$

$(\omega-0t,$

$\epsilon$

-R\mbox{\boldmath$\varphi$}.

$\mathrm{I}\epsilon \mathrm{I}<<=\varphi(l)1$

$)$

has

converging

almost

general

solutions

$\varphi\approx\sum_{-}^{p}a_{2k}p|_{(2k)}$

$when$

$e<0$

(50)

and

$\varphi\sim\sum^{p}a_{2k*1}\varphi|_{(2k+1)}$

when

$\epsilon>0$

:

(51)

where

$p$

is

$\beta nite$

when

$\epsilon$

is

a

rational

number,

and

$p$

is

irtfirtite

when

$\epsilon$

is

an

irrational number.

Proof.

It

is

clear

from the

proof

of Theoem

2since

we

have

(9)as

solutions

to

(7)

43

\S 3.

Some

Graphs for

$\varphi|_{(n)}$

To

equadon

$\varphi_{2*\epsilon}+\varphi\cdot\omega^{2}-0$

$(0<e\mathrm{e}<1)$

we

have

a

convergent

(damping

form)solution

$\varphi|_{(1)}$

\sim

$e^{-(*3\pi/)\alpha;}‘$

[\mbox{\boldmath$\omega$}s

$Qt-i\sin Qt$

],

$(\omega>0)$

.

To

this

function

we

have

$T_{g}$

$(> T. )$

as

its

period

for

$\epsilon>0$

,

${\rm Re}\varphi$

slnce

$Q$

-

a

$(1-\not\in\log\omega)<\omega$

$(\epsilon> 0, \omega>1)$

.

(8)

In Fig.

graphs of

and

which

the portion of amplltude

and the

one

of vibration

are

separated

When

$0<\omega<1,\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

have

$T_{Q}$

(of

${\rm Re}\varphi|_{(1)}$

)

$<T_{pp}(\epsilon>0)$

and

$T_{Q}$

(of

${\rm Re}\varphi|$

$(0)$

)

$>7\omega$

$(\epsilon<0)$

.

When

$\omega=1$

,

we

$\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}T_{Q}$

(of

${\rm Re}\varphi|_{(1)}$

)

$\approx$$T_{a\mathrm{J}}(\epsilon>0)$

and

$T_{Q}$

(of

${\rm Re}\varphi|$

$(0)$

)

$=7\omega$

$(\epsilon<0)$

since

we

have

$Q$

\approx\mbox{\boldmath$\omega$}

$(\epsilon> 0, \epsilon<0)$

.

(See

Fig.2

and

$\mathrm{F}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{g}.3$

, respectively.)

(i)

For

example

the

nearly

simple

harmonic vibration equation

$t$ $d^{2}$

.

$01\varphi$ $\varphi_{2*0.01}+\varphi\cdot\omega$ $=+\overline{dt^{2\mathrm{D}1}}\varphi$ $\cdot\omega^{2}$

-0

$(\epsilon \simeq 0.01>0)$

(52)

has

solution

$\varphi|_{(1)}\approx e^{-}$ $(0\mathrm{D}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{x}3\mathrm{x}/4)0$$t$

$[\cos Qt-i\sin Qt]$

$(\omega>0)$

,

(53)

whose

mpUtude is

$e^{-(0.03\pi/4)a11}$

and the

period is

$T_{Q} arrow\frac{2\pi}{Q}-\frac{2\pi}{\omega(1-0.005\cdot\log\omega)}>^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}\approx T_{\omega}}$

$(\omega>1)$

.

(54)

$(\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i})$

The equation

$\varphi_{2-0.01}+cp$

.

$\omega^{2}=^{\frac{d^{1S9}\varphi}{dt^{1\mathit{9}9}}+\varphi\cdot\omega^{2}}$ \simeq$0$

$(\epsilon \approx -0.01<0)$

$(55)$

has

solution

$\varphi|_{(0)}$

\sim

$e^{(-0.0}$

”4)”

$[\cos Qt+i\sin Ql]$

,

$(\omega>0)$

,

(56)

whose

amplitude is

$e(-001\pi/4)wl$

and the period

is

$T_{Q}=^{\frac{2\pi}{Q}=} \frac{2\pi}{\omega(1+0.005\cdot\log\omega)}<\frac{2\pi}{a)}$

=

$T_{w}$

$(\omega>1)$

.

(57)

$(\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i})$

The

equation

$\varphi_{2}+\varphi\cdot\omega^{\mathrm{z}}$

=

$0$

(58)

has solution

(59)

$\mathrm{P}$

$=\cos\omega$

$l+i\sin\omega l$

This

solution

is

produced

in

the

process

in

which

$\epsilon$

changes its

sign

in the

equ-$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

$\varphi_{2*\epsilon}+\varphi\cdot\omega^{2}\mathrm{g}$$0$

(49)

Notice

that;

When

$\omega$

$>0$

,

${\rm Re}\varphi|_{(n\rangle}$

, having

$n\fallingdotseq$

even

number,

give

the

same

form damping

vibration

curves

as

the

one

of

${\rm Re}\varphi|_{(0)}$

for

$\epsilon<0$

,

and

${\rm Re}\varphi|_{(n)}$

,

having

$n$

-odd

number,

give

the

same

form

damping

vibration

curves

(9)

45

To equation

$\varphi_{t*\epsilon}+{}^{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{P}^{\cdot}\omega^{\mathrm{a}}-0(0<\epsilon<<1)$

we

have

a

convergent

(damping

form)solution

$\varphi|_{(1)}$

\approx

$e^{-(\epsilon 3r\mathrm{r}\prime 4)\omega\iota}$

[ $Co(l$

-isin

$Qt$

], (to

$>$ $0$

).

$\epsilon>0$

,

To equation

$\mathrm{P},*\iota+{}^{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{P}^{\cdot}\omega^{2}-0.$

$(0< -\epsilon<<1)$

we

have

a

convergent

(damping

form)solution

$\varphi$$|_{(0)}$

\approx

$e^{(\iota\pi l4)\omega l}[\cos Qt+i\sin Qt]$

,

$(\omega>0)$

.

(10)

To equation

$\varphi_{2\star\epsilon}+\varphi\cdot$

$\omega^{2}$

\sim $0$

$(0< \epsilon<<1)$

we

have

a

convergent

(damping

form)solution

$\varphi|_{(1)}$

\approx

$e^{-(t}$

”14)

$\omega$

l[

$\cos Qt$

-isin

$Qt$

],

$(\omega>0)$

.

$\epsilon>0$

,

To

equation

$\varphi_{2\star t}+\varphi\cdot\omega^{2}$

-0

$(\epsilon-0)$

we

have

asolution

$=$

$2\pi/\omega$

(11)

47

References

[3]

K.

Nishimoto

i

Fractional

Calculus,

Vol.

1

(1984),

Vol.

2

(1987),

Vol.

3

(1989),

Vol.

4

(1991),

Vol.

5,

(1996),

Descartes

Press,

Koriyama, Japan.

[21

K.

Nishimoto;An

Essence of Nishimoto’s

Fractional Calculus

(Calculus

of

the

21st

Century);

Integrals

and

Differentiations of Arbitrary

Order

(1991),

Descartes

Press,

Koriyama, Japan.

[31

K.

Nishimoto;

On

Nishimoto’s lractional calculus

operator

$N^{v}$

(

0n

an

action

group),

J.

Frac.

Calc. Vol.

4, Nov.

(1993),

1 .11.

[41

K.

Nishimoto

j

Unification

of the integrals and derivatives

(A

serendipity in

fractional

cal-culus),

J.

Frac.

Calc. Vol.

6,

(1994),

1

.14.

[3]

K. Nishimoto

jN

-method

to nearly simple harmonic

vibration

equations,

J.

Frac. Calc. Vol.

15,

May

(1999),

67-72.

[6]

K.

Nishimoto and

S.S. de

Romero;

N

-method

to nearly simple hannonic vibration

equa-tions

(Continued),

J.

Frac.

Calc.

$\mathrm{V}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}.17_{1}$

May

(2000),

19-

24.

[71

R.

Hilfer

(Ed)

..

Applications

of

Fractional Calculus

in Physics,

(2000),

World

Scientific,

Singa-pore,

New

Jersey, London,

HongKong.

[81

A. Carpinteri

and

F.

Mainardi

(Ed.)

;Fractals

and

Fractional

Calculus in Continuum

Mechanics

(1997),

Springer, Wien,

New

York.

Katsuyuki

Nishimoto

Institute

of

Applied

Mathematics

Descartes Press

Co.

2

.

13

.

10

Kaguike, Koriyama

963-8833Japa

Fig. 3. Case of $\omega$ \sim $1_{\mathrm{c}}$

参照

関連したドキュメント

This article concerns the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions to the fractional Kirchhoff equation with critical indefinite nonlin- earities by applying the Nehari

In this paper we study multidimensional fractional advection-dispersion equations in- volving fractional directional derivatives both from a deterministic and a stochastic point

Results on the oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of solutions of fractional and integro- differential equations are relatively scarce in the literature; some results can be found,

Trujillo; Fractional integrals and derivatives and differential equations of fractional order in weighted spaces of continuous functions,

In this paper, based on a new general ans¨atz and B¨acklund transformation of the fractional Riccati equation with known solutions, we propose a new method called extended

In view of Theorems 2 and 3, we need to find some explicit existence criteria for eventually positive and/or bounded solutions of recurrence re- lations of form (2) so that

The commutative case is treated in chapter I, where we recall the notions of a privileged exponent of a polynomial or a power series with respect to a convenient ordering,

Arnold This paper deals with recent applications of fractional calculus to dynamical sys- tems in control theory, electrical circuits with fractance, generalized voltage di-