• 検索結果がありません。

advmacro Takeki Sunakawa assignment34 answer

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "advmacro Takeki Sunakawa assignment34 answer"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Proposed Answers to Assignment #3 and #4

Takeki Sunakawa

December 9, 2015

Assignment #3 (1)

The planner’s problem is

{cmaxt,kt}

X

t=0

βtln ct

subject to ct+ kt kθt−1, given k−1.

[Note that A in the production function is set as A = 1.] The value function is defined as

V (kt−1) ≡ max

kt

X

t=0

βtln(kt−1θ kt). The Bellman equation is written as

V (kt−1) = max

kt

ln(kt−1θ kt) + βV (kt) .

Assignment #3 (2)

Conjecture V (k) = A + B ln k. Then we have V (k) = max

k ln(k

θk) + β (A + B ln k) . 1

(2)

The FOC is

1 kθk =

βB k . It can be solved for

k = βB 1 + βBk

θ.

Pluging it into the Bellman equation, we have ln(kθk) + β (A + B ln k) ,

= ln



kθ βB 1 + βBk

θ



+ βA + βB ln

 βB 1 + βBk

θ

 ,

= ln

 1

1 + βBk

θ



+ βA + βB ln

 βB 1 + βBk

θ

 ,

= βA + ln

 1

1 + βB



+ βB ln

 βB 1 + βB



+ θ ln k + βBθ ln k. Thus we have

A = βA + ln

 1

1 + βB



+ βB ln

 βB 1 + βB

 , B = θ(1 + βB).

Finally, we have

B = θ/(1 − βθ), and

A = (1 − β)−1ln

 1

1 + βB

  βB 1 + βB

βB

.

Assignment #4 (1)

The equilibrium conditions are

1 = β1 + θy k δ

, (1 − θ)y

h = Bc, y = kθh1−θ, c + δk = y.

2

(3)

These are solved for the ratio values y k = θ

−1−11 + δ),

k h =

y k

θ−11 , c

k = y k δ. Then we have

h = (1 − θ)

y k

Bkc ,

= (1 − θ)

y k

B(ykδ),

= (1 − θ)(β

−11 + δ)

B(β−11 + (1 − θ)δ),

= (1 − θ)[1 − β(1 − δ)] B(1 − β[1 − (1 − θ)δ]). Also, k = (k/h)h, y = (y/k)k and c = (c/k)k are obtained.

As for the log-linearization, only two equations are new.

(1 − θ)yt ht

= Bct,

⇒ (1 − θ)(1 + ˆyt− ˆht) = Bc(1 + ˆct),

yˆt− ˆht = ˆct. Note that we have used (1 − θ) = Bc.

λt = (1 − γ) + γλt−1+ εt,

λ(1 + ˆλt) = (1 − γ) + γλ(1 + ˆλt−1) + εt,

λˆt = γˆλt−1+ εt.

Note that we have used λ = (1−γ)+γλ therefore λ = 1. Also, net investment is given by

xt = kt(1 − δ)kt−1

3

(4)

x(1 + ˆxt) = k(1 + ˆkt) − (1 − δ)k(1 + ˆkt−1),

xt = kˆkt(1 − δ)kˆkt−1,

δˆxt= kˆkt−(1 − δ)kˆkt−1. Note that we have used x = δk.

4

参照

関連したドキュメント

(The Elliott-Halberstam conjecture does allow one to take B = 2 in (1.39), and therefore leads to small improve- ments in Huxley’s results, which for r ≥ 2 are weaker than the result

[r]

“Breuil-M´ezard conjecture and modularity lifting for potentially semistable deformations after

lines. Notice that Theorem 4 can be reformulated so as to give the mean harmonic stability of the configuration rather than that of the separate foliations. To this end it is

S., Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, Oxford University Press, Oxford

At the end of the section, we will be in the position to present the main result of this work: a representation of the inverse of T under certain conditions on the H¨older

支払方法 支払日 ※② 緊急時連絡先等 ※③.

過少申告加算税の金額は、税関から調査通知を受けた日の翌日以