• 検索結果がありません。

トップページ - 横浜国立大学学術情報リポジトリ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "トップページ - 横浜国立大学学術情報リポジトリ"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)Geometry of orbits of the isotropy group in a compact Riemannian symmetric space. ,. by. s. Shigeo AKIBA* (Received May 6, 1986). gO. Introduction. We study in this paper orbits of the isotropy group of a compact Riemannian symmetric space. These orbits are closed submanifolds and foliate the sYmmetric. space. The orbit of an antipodal point of the origin is known to be a totally geodesic submanifold. In the case of compact symmetric space of rank one, see [2], Prop. 10.4., p. 330, and in the general compact case, see [1], lemma 2.1., p.. 406. 0rbits of the other points are proved to be pseudo-umbilical with respect. to a normal vector ditected to the "radius" in the case that the symmetric space is rank one and has unique positive restricted root. Another purpose of this paper is to explore a Lie algebraic version of the covariant differentiation. and the second fundamental form of the orbit of the isotropy group. g1. Lie algebraic versien of the covariant differentiation.. Let M=U/K be a compact Riemannian symmetric space, where U is the identity component of its isometry group and K be the isotropy subgroup of U. at oEML Let u and f be the Lie algebra of U and K respectively, then there exists a subspace p of u such that tt==E+p be a Cartan decomposition.. We fix a ULinvariant Riemannian metric induced by the restriction of -B to pxp, where B is the Killing-Cartan form of u. In calculations later, let <,> denote both the minus of the Killing-Cartan form on u and the metric tonsor on. M Let z denote the natural projection U->M) and by (dre)e we identify the tangent space of M at o with p. Let T denote the action of U on M; i.e., T(g)z(g') ==. T(gg'), for g,g'E U. Let P be an arbitrary point of 11Z let M=K(P) be the KLorbit of P, and let. ffEp be such that P=Exp ffZ Then M is a closed submanifold of ML * Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Yokohama National Universlty..

(2) 12 S. AKIBA. Let a* denote a maximal abelian subspace of p containing H and b a max-. imal abelian subalgebra of u containing a*. Put a==bnt. Let ScK be the subgroup leaving the point P fixed and let i denote its Lie algebra. A oneparameter group of isometry T(exp tZ), for ZEIu and tEiR, generates a curve cz (may be singular) on M starting at P and a vector field Z on M We call Z a vector field on M generated by ZEu.. '. Then. cz (t) =T(exp H)T(exp te-ad"Z) (1) z (p) = d cz (t) dt t=o = dT (exp H) ,o (dT),(e-ad HZ). =dT(expH)o(sinh(-adH)e+cosh(-adH)X), (2) where 8 [X] respectively] is the E [p, respectively]-component of Z. Since U acts transitively on M) each tangent vector of M at P is in a form. Z7(P) for some ZGu. For eEf, c4 is a curve in ML LEMMA 1. Let 8 and rp be elements of E, then (i) Vector .field rp' generated by rp along ce(t) is written. rp'(c(t))==dT(expH)c,(t)odT(expte-adIZg),o(dT),(e-adHe-taderp),. where ci(t) =T(exp te-ad He). (ii) in Particular, rector .17eld 6' generated by e along c6(t) is written 6' (c (t)) = dT (exp H) c,(t)odT (exp te-ad He) .o (du),(e-ad He) .. PRooF. Generating curve of rp' is. rt(s)=T(exps)7)T(expt8)P. ". Calculate 7t(O), we obtain (i). Put rp=6 in (i), (ii) follows immediately.. Put t==O in Lemma 1, we have Li. LEMMA 2. Any tangent vector of M at P is written rp' ip) =rp' (c (O)) =dr (exp H),(sinh(-ad H) rp) , for some rpEIE.. LEMMA 3. I7br A(!la*, A'(P) is a normal vector to M at P.. PRooF. From Lemma 2, it suffices to prove <rpt (p), A, (P)>=O. for any rpEIE. Since cosh(-ad H)A=A and since dT(exp H)o is an isometry, we. have.

(3) Geometry of orbits of the isotropy group in a compact Riemannian symmetric space 13 <rp' (p), A' ip)>=<sinh(-ad H) rp, A>= <rp, sinh (adEl) A>= O.. '. Let V denote the Riemannian connection of the compact symmetric space M] V that of submanifold M induced by V, and cr the second fundamental forM of A(Z Covariant derivative of vector fields tangent to M is represented in Lie algebraic version as follows:. b. PRoposlTIoN 1. Let g' and rp' are tangent vector helds to M generated by e and rp, respectiz"ely. 772en the covariant derivative of rp' in the direction of 6'(P) at P zs zvrztten. (Ve,rp') p= - aT (exp H),([cosh (ad H) rp, sinh (ad H) e]) .. PROoF. Since T(exp(-H)) is an isometry, it leaves V invariant, transforms a. tangent vector 8' (P) at P into sinh(-ad U)6Ep=Mb, and a tangent vector field rp'(c(t)) along c(t) into a tangent vector field dT(exp(-H))c(t)rp'(c(t)) along ci(t)・. Since. dT. (exp se-ad Hrp) ci (t) = dT (exp (- H))e(t)rp' (c (t)),. ds .s=o. dT(exp(-H))rp'(c(t)) is a vector field along a curve ci(t) generated by e-adHrp. Thus, by Corollary 1.3. of [3], p. 188, and since the torsion T vanishes identically,. we have (Ve'rp')p=dT(expH)o(VdT(exp(-H))etdT(exp(-H))c(t)rp'(c(t)))t=o. = dT (exp H)o(- Ae-adHn sinh(-ad H) 8) = dT (exp H).([[e-adffny]{, sinh(-ad H) 6]). = dT (exp H).([cosh(-ad H) rp, sinh(-ad H) g) ,. where AiY=-fryX-T(X) Y) and [ ]f means the E-compont of an element of :. u. This completes the proof. Since Veop' is the tangent component of Vs,rp' and cr(6',v') the normal component, we have, from Proposition 1: PROpOSITION 2. Let 6', rp' and 4' be arbitrary tangent vectors of M at P and. let A'lv) be a normal vector to M at p generated by AEa*, then. (i) A'lv)-comPonent of the secondfatndamentalform of M in M zs <cr (g', v')., A' (P) >== -<sinh (ad H) e, cosh (ad H) [A, rp]> ,. and (ii) the 4'-comPonent of the covariant derivative v6op' in M is <V6,rp', 4'>p=<[cosh (ad H) rp, sinh (ad H) 6], sinh (ad H) C>. = <cosh (ad ll) rp, [sinh (ad H) 6, sinh (ad H) C]> .. g2. Representations in terms of restricted roots..

(4) 14 S. AKIBA. Let u* and b be as in g1. Then 6C is a Cartan subalgebra of uC. Let go. denote the dual Lie algebra of u in uC. Then go=E+vi=Ip is a Cartan decomposition of go. An involutive automorphism 0 of uC is defined to be +1 on EC and '. -1 on pC. Its restrictions to u and go are denoted by the same symbol 0. Put ao==bC+vi ::'lp, then a=bCnfand ao=V=la*. Let A be the set of all nonzero. roots of uC with respect to bC. Each crEa is real on bR:=ao+vi=Ia. Choose a compatible ordering in bC with respect to ao. Let a' be the set of positive roots with respect to the ordering. Let X be the set of the restriction to ao of. roots crEa which do not vanish identically on ao and let :' be the set of positive restricted roots.. Then uC[go, respectively] is decomposed into the direct sum of root spaces with respect to bC[ao, respectively]:. uC= bC+Zu.[go=go,+Z go, R, respectively].. aEd Ze2. Put u2=(go,2+go,2-R)nE+Vi=1(go,R+go,-2)np for apositive restricted root 2. Since go,2+go,-2 is invariant by the involutive automorphism 0 (see [2], p. 263), dim u2=2m2:=2dim go,2 and we obtain decompositions of u, C and p into direct sum of subspaces:. u=6+ Z uz, E=a+ Z h, p=a*+ Z pA. 2EX+ 2E2+ 2EE+・. where f2=uanE=(go,2+go,-2)nE and pA=u2np=V](go,2+go,-A)np Let X be an arbitrary element of p2, then X=V-1(X2+X-2) for some XhE go,2 and X.2(Eigo,-2. For any AEa*, since v/=IAEiao,. [A, x] ., [vi=1A, X>+XL2] =1(V=1A) (.[Y>-L[YH2).. Since [A, X]EE, X2-XLRc!C. Conversely, we observe. -. [A, X2-X-2]. =-[vi=1[v! IlrmIA, X2-XH2]. ...V.12(V=IA)(X2-X-2) = -1(viqA) X. Thus we have LEMMA 4. thr an arbilrary elemenl X of p2, there exists an element YEEi such that. [A,X]=2(V'::'-IA)Y and [A, Y]=-2(VX=ua1-A)X for any AEa*. H2nce p2+f2 is an eigen sPace of (adA)2 with eigen value - (2(v/=-IA))2 and adA exchanges p2 and E2. Since [go,2, go,pt]cgo,2+pt (== (O), if R+pt is not a restricted root), we have. 4・.

(5) Geometry of orbits of the isotropy group in a compact Riemannian symmetric space 15. LEMMA 5. Let 2 and pt be Positive restricted roots, then. [PR, Pp,]CER+F,+El2-p,l, [PR, Et,] C P2 + tt + Pi2- tt i, [f2, fpt] C f2 + pt + fi2- pt i,. where, ijC RgEpt, lZ-pt1 means Positive one of 2-Ft and lt-2, and of R== lt, E12-ptt=. a and pi2-pti=a*.. By the invariance of the Killing-Cartan form, we have. LEMMA 6. 71he direct decomposition. u=a+ Z ER+a*+2 pR 2El2+ 2E2+ is orthogonal.. PRooF. Since the Killing-Cartan form is invariant by automorphisms of u, especially bY the involutive automorphism 0, u==f+p is an orthogonal decomposition. So it suMces to prove that the decompositions. f=a+:Ei and p=a*+Zp2 are orthogonal.. Let Z>EE2+p2 and 4EE,+p, then <(ad A) 2Z>, Zb> =-<[A, ZR], [A, 4]>=<Zh, <ad A) 21,>. for any AEIa*. From Lemma 4, we have -R(V -IA) 2<a, 4>= - ge (V -IA) 2<a, ZL>. If R±pt, then 2(N/-IA) ?ept(vi-A) for some AEa*. Thus <Zh, 4>=O if Zipt. Similary we can prove the orthogonality of a and ER [a* and pA, respectively].. Now we shall develop formulas in Proposition 2 according to the decomposiF. tion E==a+ZREx+ E2.. l. PRoposlTIoN 3. Let 6, rp and C(EE) be decomPosed as. e=eo+Z&,rp=rpo+Em and C=Co+Z42.. REE+ ZE2E+ REE+. I7br tangent vectors 6', ny' and C' generated by 6, rp and 4(ii!E and a normal vector. A' generated by AGa*, we have sin (2R (vi - IH)) <a (6', rp'), A'>=- Z <[H) gd,[A, za]>,. x. 2z(vgH). and <v6・ny',4'>==,,e..Si"(2,(V(vtZl,IHB/in(fth(V.=)iH)).

(6) 16 S. AKIBA. × <cos((2+ pt) (H))m+,+cos((R- pt) (H))rp T2-,i, [[H] &], [H) 4pt]]>. PRooF. By means of Lemma 6, we have sinh(-ad H)s =.?¥ .Si:Ev2 (lmli-Hi)H)[H e2]. tL. and. cosh(-ad H)e= z cos(2(VtrlH))e.. -1 '. , EX+. Now the proof is an immediate consequense of Proposition 2, Lemma 5 and 6.. As stated in g1, each tangent vector of M at p is generated by some ZEu. Let g denote a map which assigns to ZEiu the generated vector Z' (p) Eit. Then q is a linear map of u onto iil,. Restriction of g to E [p, respectively] is written. - dT (exp H),osinh (ad H) [- dT (exp H)oocosh (ad H), respectively] . We define subspaces of u: '. Ez =£ {ER; 2(vi -IH) EIi 7. Z} ,. ET= Z (fR; 2(V=IH) qi 7vz}, PN == Z {P2; Z(vi -IH) EzZ},. pz=Z{p2;Z(V=IH)= n+- ff,(i) nEZ)' and. PT=Z PR; 2(v/-1H) {g Gi-Z}. Then tt is decomposed into a direct sum of subspaces:. u= ET+Ez+a+a*+piv+pz+PT, and we have. ' PROPOSITIoN 4. Let ua denote thetangent sPace to M at P, and let Ml,±. t7. denote the normal sPace to M at P. 772en. (i) q maPs fT+pT onto Mlo and maPs CT isomorPhically onto ca. (ii) g maPs a*+pN isomorPhically onto M),±. (iii) 71e2e leernel of the linear q is. tz+a+Pz+b, whereb is a linear span of {2(vi=H)sin(Z(V-IHDX-cos(1(Vt-'tH))[H] X]; XEp2} with 2 such that 2(v'=IH)e(z/2)Z. PROOF. Since T(expte)P, 6EE, is a curve on M starting at P, q(e) is tangent. to Mat P. Since Kacts transitively on M] q mapsEonto Mp. Observing g(6) =dT (exp H),(sinh (ad H) 6). 1' '.

(7) Geometry of orbits of the isotropy group in a compact Riemannian symmetric space 17 = dT (exp H) .(z Sil "((ill)(-".!i-. 'Hi)H)[H; e2]),. ,. g(e)=O if and only if 2(V---IH)EilTZ. Thus g maps fT isomorphically onto ca.. For AEa*, we have alreadY shown that g(A) is normal to M (Lemma 3). Let XEp be such that <q(X),g(E)>=O for any eEE. Since ,. sin(2(V=1'H))crmos(R./Y-IH)). <g(X),g(e)>=Z2- 2(7t-H) <[ILXi],&> and since <,> is nondegenerate on E2xra, we have. sin(2(V=H))cos(1(V=IH)) [E X,]= O,. ny -・2(V='IH). for each ZEg'. Thus, if2(vi=rH)G(z/2)Z, we have [IZ XR]=O. By Lemma 6, it follows that XA=O. It is obvious thatq(X2)=O, if R(vi-IH)=(n+(1/2))n,. nEZ. Thus we have (ii). Let XGpT. It is easily seen that <g(X), g(Y)>=O for any Y(Ia*+pN. So g(X)GMp and we have (i). Let ZEu be such that g(Z)=O. If we write. Z== Xb+ Z X2+e,+Z &,. a2. then q(Z) Xb + 4 cos (Z (V L7IH)) X> + ¥ tj-"2(t-Vtti }- g))[IZ 6R]・. So we have Xb=O and ' cos(2(v=1' H))x+ Si:2/ttttit#))[I4 62]=O. for any REIS". Thus (iii) follows.. This completes the proof.. PRoposlTIoN 5. Let 7iZf be a compact symmetric spaceofranle oneandsumpose that there evists zaniqace positive restricted root R.. 71hen orbit sPace K(P) is Pseudo-umbilical with respect to the normal direction H'(p) at p.. 2111 ]ietrther, Z(-H) eTZ then H' (p) is the anique nGrmal direction and K(P) is an umbilical hmpersu2zf17ce of th; in particular, ijC R(vi=IH)=(n+(1/2))z for some nEZ, K(P) is a totally geodesic hmpersurftice of ]iiZL. PRooF. Observing that <e' (P), rp' (P) > = <sinh (ad H) g, sinh (ad H) rp>.

(8) S. AKIBA. 18. = sin2(2 (V --IH))<6, rp> ,. the assertions are immediate consequenses of Proposition 3 and 4. Bibliography [1]. ,. B. Y. Chen and T. Nagano, Totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces II, Duke Math. J., 45 (1978), 405-425.. [2]. S. Helgason, Differtial geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, (1978), Academic. [3]. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry, Vol. II (1969), Inter-. sl. Press. ・ sclence.. 4.

(9)

参照

関連したドキュメント

As with subword order, the M¨obius function for compositions is given by a signed sum over normal embeddings, although here the sign of a normal embedding depends on the

The inclusion of the cell shedding mechanism leads to modification of the boundary conditions employed in the model of Ward and King (199910) and it will be

On the other hand, when M is complete and π with totally geodesic fibres, we can also obtain from the fact that (M,N,π) is a fibre bundle with the Lie group of isometries of the fibre

The torsion free generalized connection is determined and its coefficients are obtained under condition that the metric structure is parallel or recurrent.. The Einstein-Yang

In the first section we introduce the main notations and notions, set up the problem of weak solutions of the initial-boundary value problem for gen- eralized Navier-Stokes

The strategy to prove Proposition 3.4 is to apply Lemma 3.5 to the subspace X := (A p,2 ·v 0 ) ⊥ which is the orthogonal for the invariant form h·, ·i p,g of the cyclic space

Answering a question of de la Harpe and Bridson in the Kourovka Notebook, we build the explicit embeddings of the additive group of rational numbers Q in a finitely generated group

In our previous paper [Ban1], we explicitly calculated the p-adic polylogarithm sheaf on the projective line minus three points, and calculated its specializa- tions to the d-th