• 検索結果がありません。

Two properties added to $M_3$-spaces (Unsolved Problems and its Progress in General・Geometric Topology)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Two properties added to $M_3$-spaces (Unsolved Problems and its Progress in General・Geometric Topology)"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Twoproperties added to $\mathrm{M}3$

-spaces

Takemi Mizokami($\mathrm{J}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{u}$ Univ. Education)

溝上 武実

1.

Introduction.

Inthis article,

we

talk about what

we

recently obtained

on

the outstanding

open

problem whether $\mathrm{M}3$

-spaces

are

$\mathrm{M}1$

.

Assume here that all

spaces are

regular T2.

As well-known, $\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}- \mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{P}^{\mathrm{a}\mathrm{C}}}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{S}(\mathrm{i}=1,2,3)$

are

defined by Cederintems of

special bases

as

follows:

Definition

1.1.

(1) A

space

X is $\mathrm{M}1$ if and only ifthere

exists a

$\sigma- \mathrm{C}\mathrm{P}$

($=\mathrm{c}1_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$-preserving) base forX.

(2) A

space

X

is

M2 ifand only if there

exists

a

$\sigma- \mathrm{C}\mathrm{P}$ quasi-base for X.

(3) A

space

X

is

$\mathrm{M}3$ ifand only if there exists

a

$\sigma$-cushioned pair-base.

The equality$\mathrm{M}2=\mathrm{M}3$ is obtained independentlyby Gruenhage and

Junnila, and $\mathrm{M}3$

-spaoes are

studied by Borges under the

name

of stratifiable

spaces.

But the implication $\mathrm{M}3\Rightarrow \mathrm{M}1$ is not answered yet.

$\mathfrak{M}\mathrm{e}$ partial

answers

to

this problem have been obtained. The first is due

to Slaughterthat

every

Lasnev

spaoe is

$\mathrm{M}1$

.

The

sequence

ofpositive

answers

which

insists

that

every

$\mathrm{M}3$

-space

with

some

specialproperty is

$\mathrm{M}1$ is $s$hown by the diagambelow.

Amongthem,

we

note that the results od lto andTamano

are

applicabe to

our cases

here.

Ito showed that

every

Nagata

space,

more

widely

every

$\mathrm{M}3$

-space

whose

every

point

has

a

CP

open

neighborhoodbase

is

$\mathrm{M}1$

.

Choosingthe

essentialpart ffom his discussion, Tamano showd that

every

Baire, Frechet

$\mathrm{M}3$

-space

is $\mathrm{M}1$

.

The difference betweenthem is

one

little thing, but

acute. Tamano proposedther the following

question:

ls

every

Frechet

M3-space an

$\mathrm{M}1$-space? We clear

it

by

adding

some

property to $\mathrm{M}3$

-spaces.

2. Two properties.

To solve his question positively,

we

introduce

the.

following property $(^{*})$, which

is

weaker than that ofFrechet

spaces:

Definition

2.1([1,

Definition

2.3]). A

space

X has property $(^{*})$ if for

any

open

subset $\mathrm{O}$ of X and

any

point

of$\mathrm{B}(\mathrm{O})$, the boundary of$\mathrm{O}$

in

X,

there

exists

a

CP closed network $B$at$\mathrm{p}$ in X such that foreach$\mathrm{B}\in B$,

数理解析研究所講究録

(2)

$\mathrm{B}\subset\overline{\mathrm{O}},$$\mathrm{B}\cap \mathrm{B}(\mathrm{O})=\{\mathrm{p}\}$

.

Withthe aid ofproperty$(^{*})$,

we

can

show the following:

Theorem2.2([1, Theorem 3.1]). Let X be

an

$\mathrm{M}3$

-space

withproperty $(^{*})$

.

Then

every

closed subset of X has

a

CP

open

neighborhood

$\mathrm{b}\mathrm{a}s\mathrm{e}$

in

X,

and hence X

is

an

$\mathrm{M}1$

-space.

Corollary

2.3.

EveryFrechet $\mathrm{M}3$

-space

is $\mathrm{M}1$

.

Does

every

$\mathrm{M}3$

-space

have property$(^{*})$ ? But unfortunately this is not the

case

, because there exists

an

$\mathrm{M}1$

-space

which does not satisfy property

$(^{*})$ ($[1$, Example 1]). This example leads

us

to define another property

addedto $\mathrm{M}3$

-spaces

that

is

weaker than the former

one.

Defimition2.4([2, Defimition 8]). A

space

Xsatisfiesproperty (P) iffor

each

open

subset $\mathrm{O}$ ofX and each

point

$\mathrm{p}$ of$\mathrm{B}(\mathrm{O})$, there exists

a

CP closed local network $B$ at$\mathrm{p}$ in X such that for each

$\mathrm{B}\in B$ , $\overline{\mathrm{B}\cap \mathrm{O}}=$

B.

Inthis

case

again,

we can

showthe following:

Theorem2.5([2, Theorem 15]). lfXis

an

$\mathrm{M}3$

-space

withproperty (P), then

every

closed subset of X has

a

CP

open

neighborhood

base

in

X.

What kind of

spaces

except for Frechet$\mathrm{M}3$

-spaces

have thisproperty (P) ?

As for this question

we can

show the following:

Theorem2.6([2, Theorem 16]). Every sequential $\mathrm{M}3$

-space

haveproperty

(P), andhence

is

an

$\mathrm{M}1$

-space.

But

we

do not knowwhether

every

$\mathrm{M}3$

-space

have property (P). Maybe

this is

a

question equivalentto the well-known M3.M1prob1em. References

1. T. Mizokami andN. Shimane: OnFrechet $\mathrm{M}3$

-spaces,

to

appear

in

Math. Japonica.

2.

:

On the M3vs. Ml problem, to

appear

in

Top. Appl.

(3)

参照

関連したドキュメント

We believe it will prove to be useful both for the user of critical point theorems and for further development of the theory, namely for quick proofs (and in some cases improvement)

Beer introduced the problem of the global coincidence on C(X, Y ) for metric spaces, and proved that if the metric space Y contains a non trivial arc, than the above two

In this work we give definitions of the notions of superior limit and inferior limit of a real distribution of n variables at a point of its domain and study some properties of

We give some results in the following directions: to describe the exterior struc- ture of spacelike bands with infinite number of branches at the infinity of R n+1 1 ; to obtain

Wall theorems give local lower bounds for the p-measure of the boundary of a domain in the euclidean n -space.. We improve earlier results by replacing the euclidean metric by the

The main problem upon which most of the geometric topology is based is that of classifying and comparing the various supplementary structures that can be imposed on a

Subsolutions of Elliptic Operators in Divergence Form and Application to Two-Phase Free Boundary Problems.. Fausto Ferrari and

When a 4-manifold has a non-zero Seiberg-Witten invariant, a Weitzenb¨ ock argument shows that it cannot admit metrics of positive scalar curvature; and as a consequence, there are