• 検索結果がありません。

Let ε 1 , . . . , ε n denote the standard basis of R n . For each σ ∈ S n , we define g σ ∈ O(R n ) by setting

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Let ε 1 , . . . , ε n denote the standard basis of R n . For each σ ∈ S n , we define g σ ∈ O(R n ) by setting"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Exercise 12. Let n 2 be an integer, and let S n denote the symmetric group of degree n.

Let ε 1 , . . . , ε n denote the standard basis of R n . For each σ ∈ S n , we define g σ O(R n ) by setting

g σ (

n

i=1

c i ε i ) =

n

i=1

c i ε σ(i) ,

and set G n = { g σ | σ ∈ S n } . Show that { s ε

i

ε

j

| 1 i < j n } is precisely the set of reflections in G n . In other words, for σ ∈ S n , show that g σ is a reflection if and only if σ is a transposition.

Proof. We saw earlier that g σ is a reflection if σ is a transposition. (See p. 11 of our lecture note.) Next assume g σ is a reflection. Then g 2 σ = 1. Since the mapping S n G n defined by σ 7→ g σ is an isomorphism, we have

σ 2 = 1.

Therefore there exist 2m integers 1 k 1 , . . . , k 2m n such that σ = (k 1 k 2 )(k 3 k 4 ) · · · (k 2m 1 k 2m ).

Without loss of generality, we may assume k i = i for 1 i 2m, so that σ = (1 2)(3 4) · · · (2m 1 2m).

We need to show that m = 1. We give two independent proofs of this.

(1) Since g σ is a reflection, there exists a nonzero vector α R n such that g σ = s α . For any 1 i m,

s α2i 1 ) = ε 2i 1 2(ε 2i 1 , α) (α, α) α Also since σ = (1 2)(3 4) · · · (2m 1 2m),

g σ2i 1 ) = ε 2i .

Therefore we get

α R(ε 2i 1 ε 2i ).

Since i was arbitrary, this holds for every 1 i m. But since α is nonzero and ε 2i 1 ε 2i (1 i m) are linearly independent, m must be equal to 1.

(2) For 1 i m, by the definition of g σ , we have

g σ2i−1 ε 2i ) = ε 2i ε 2i−1 = 2i−1 ε 2i ).

Since ε 2i 1 ε 2i (1 i m) are linearly independent, g σ has an eigenvalue 1 with multiplicity at least m. On the other hand, since g σ is a reflection, g σ has an eigenvalue 1 with multiplicity exactly 1. This proves m = 1 as desired.

1

(2)

Exercise 13. With reference to Exercise 12, set Φ = i ε j ) | 1 i < j n } is a root system, with a positive system Π = { ε i ε j | 1 i < j n } . For w W (Φ), setting n(w) = | Π w 1 ( Π) | , show that

n(g σ ) = |{ (i, j) | i, j ∈ { 1, 2, . . . , n } , i < j, σ(i) > σ(j) }|∈ S n ).

Proof. Fix σ ∈ S n . By definition, we have

g σ Π = { g σi ε j ) | 1 i < j n }

= { ε σ(i) ε σ(j) | 1 i < j n } . Since ε σ(i) ε σ(j) ∈ − Π if and only if σ(i) > σ(j ),

g σ Π ( Π) = { ε σ(i) ε σ(j) | 1 i < j n, σ(i) > σ(j) } . Therefore

n(g σ ) = | Π g σ 1 ( Π) |

= | g σ Π ( Π) |

= |{ ε σ(i) ε σ(j) | 1 i < j n, σ(i) > σ(j ) }|

= |{ (i, j) | 1 i < j n, σ(i) > σ(j) }| . The result follows.

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

S49119 Style Classic Flexor Grade 7.0 Fixation Manual Weight 215g Size range 35 - 52 TECHNOLOGY-HIGHLIGHTS. •

There is a bijection between left cosets of S n in the affine group and certain types of partitions (see Bjorner and Brenti (1996) and Eriksson and Eriksson (1998)).. In B-B,

New families of sharp inequalities between elementary symmetric polynomials are proven.. We estimate σ n−k above and below by the elementary symmetric polynomials σ

This paper is a sequel to [1] where the existence of homoclinic solutions was proved for a family of singular Hamiltonian systems which were subjected to almost periodic forcing...

(The Elliott-Halberstam conjecture does allow one to take B = 2 in (1.39), and therefore leads to small improve- ments in Huxley’s results, which for r ≥ 2 are weaker than the result

Our main interest is to determine exact expressions, in terms of known constants, for the asymptotic constants of these expansions and to show some relations among

This set will be important for the computation of an explicit estimate of the infinitesimal Kazhdan constant of Sp (2, R) in Section 3 and for the determination of an

のようにすべきだと考えていますか。 やっと開通します。長野、太田地区方面