• 検索結果がありません。

SOME FIXED POINTS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "SOME FIXED POINTS"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci.

VOL. 19 NO. (1996) 97-102

97

SOME FIXED POINTS

OF EXPANSION

MAPPINGS

H.K.PATHAK

Department

ofMathematics,

Kalyan Mahavidyalaya, Bhilai

Nagar (M.P.)

490006,India

S.M. KANG

Departmentofmathematics,

Gyeongsang

NationalUniversity,

Chinju660-701, Korea J. W. RYU

Departmentofmathematics,

Dong-A

University, Pusan 604-714, Korea

(Received February I, 1995 and in revised form April 19, 1994)

ABSTRACT.

Wang

et al.

[11]

provedsomefixedpoint theoremsonexpansion mappings,which correspondsomecontractivemappings. Recently,severalauthors generalizedtheirresultsbysome war’s.

In

this paper,wegivesome fixedpoint theorems for expansion mappings, which improve the resultsofsomeauthors.

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES.

Expansion mappings andfixedpoints.

1992

AMS SUBJECT

CLASSIFICATIONCODE. 54H25.

1. INTRODUCTION.

l:hoades

[8]

summarized contractive mappings ofsome types and discussed on fixed points.

Wang

et al.

[11]

proved some fixed point theorems on expansion mappings, which correspond to some contractive mappings in

[8].

Recently, by using functions, Khan et al.

[5]

generalized the results of

[11],

and Park and Rhoades

[7]

proved some fixed point theorems for expansion mappings.

Also,

Rhoades

[9]

andTaniguchi

[10]

generalizedthe resultsof

[11]

for pairs of mappings.

Furthermore,

Kang [3]

and

Kang

andRhoades

[4]

extend the resultsobtainedbyKhan et al.

[5],

Rhoades

[9]

andWaniguchi

[10].

In

this paper, wegivesomefixed point theorems for expansion mappings, whichimprove the resultsof

Kang [3],

Khan et al.

[5],

Rhoades

[9]

andWaniguchi

[10].

2.

THE

MAIN THEOREMS.

Throughoutthis paper,followingBoydand

Wong [1],

let

"

be the family of mappings such that for each E

.T:, [0, o0)

---,

[0, o0)

is upper semi-continuousfrom the right and non-decreasing ineachcoordinate variable with

(t) <

for all

>

0.

We

also need thefollowing Lemmadue toMatkoski

[6]

intheproofofourmaintheorems.

(2)

LEMMA. If

(t)

< or

every

> O,

then lira

0"(t)

0, where

(t)

denotethe composition

of 4)(t)

with n-tzmea.

Now,

weprovesome commonfixedpoint theorerns.

THEOREM 2.1. Let S and

T

be rnappznga

from

a metric apace

(X,d)

into

itaelf

such that

for

eachx,y in

X,

at leaat one

of

thefollowingcondtiona holds:

(d(S2x, TSy)) >_ d(Sx,

Sy).

(d(Sx, TSy)) >_ [d(Sx, Sy) + d(TSy, Sy)].

((Sz, TS)) > [d(Sz, S) + d(S,S)].

(d(S2x, TSy)) >_ [[d(Sx, S2x) + d(TSy, Sy) + d(Sx, Sy)].

Then eitherS or

T

has a

fixed

point, orS and

T

have acommon

fixed

point.

(2.) (2.2) (2.3) (2.4)

PROOF.

Letx0 be an arbitrary pointX. Since

S(X)

C_

S(X)

and

S(X) c_ TS(X),

wehave for

’x0

E

X,

there exists a point xl in

X

such that

S2xi Sxo

yo, say, and for this point

xl, there exists apoint x2 in

X

such that

TSx2 Sx

yl, say. Inductively, we candefine a sequence

{y,,}

in

S(X.)

such that

S2x,+

Sx2, yn and

TSxn+2

Itis easy toshowthat,for each of the inequalities

(2.1).--(2.4),

thatwehave

(d(y,,, y,,+l)) >

d(y,+, y,+2).

Thenone canshow that

(d(y,,+l, y,,+)) >_ d(y,+2, y,,+a),

hence forarbitrary

(d(yn, Yn+l)) d(yn+l,Yn+2).

Now,

if y, y2,+ for any n,onehasthat y, is afixedpoint of

S

from the definition

{y.}.

It

thenfollows

that, also,

Y,+a Y2+,whichimpliesthat

{y,}

isalsoafixed point of

T.

Foranarbitrary n,wehave

d(ln,Yn+l) <_ (d(yn-l,ln)) en(d(yo, Yl)).

By Lemma,

lim

d(y,,,

y,,,+a O.

Now,

using the technique of

Kang [4],

one would prove that

{y,,}

aCauchy sequence and it convergesto somepoint yin

S(X).

Consequently, thesubsequences

{y2,,}, {Y,,+I}

and

{y,,+2}

converge to y.

Let

y

Su

andy TSvforsome u andv in

X.,

respectively. From inequalities

(2.1),-(2.4),

it follows that at least oneofthefollowing inequalities must be true foran infinite number of values ofn:

(d(y2rt, y)) > d(Sx2n+l, S’V)

(d(y2n,y)) >_ -[d(Sx2n+l,SV)

1 H-

d(TSv, Sv)]

(d(y2n, Y)) >_ -[d(Sx2n+l,

1

S2x2n+l

-.F

d(Sx2n+l, SV)]

(d(y2,,,y)) >_ g[d(Sx,,+,,Sx2,,+,)

1

+ d(TSv, Sv) + d(S=:,,+,,Svl]

(3)

SOME FIXED POINTSOF EXPANSION MAPPINGS 99

Taking thelimit as n c ineach caseyields y St,.

A

similarargument applies to proving that y Su. Therefore,yis acommonfixed point ofSandT. This completestheproof.

THEOREM 2.2. Let

S

and

T

be continuous mappings

from

a metric space

(X,d)

into

ttself

such that

S(X)

C_

S2(X), S(X)

C_

TS(X)

and

S(X.)

is complete.

Suppose

thatthere exists such that

(d(S2x, TSy)) > min{d(Sx, S2x),d(TSy, Sy),d(Sx, Sy)} (2.5) for

all x,y inX.

ThenS orT has a

fixed

pointorS andT have acommon

fixed

point.

PROOF. Defineasequence

{y,}

asinTheorem2.1. Ify, Y,,+I forany n, thenSor

T

hasa fixed point.

It is easy to show that, for each of the inequality

(2.5),

that we have

(d(y2,,,y2,,+)) >

d(y2,+, Y2n+2).

Thenone canshow that

(d(y2n+l, Y2n+2)) > d(Y2n+2, Y2n+3),

hence for arbitrary

(d(.,.+)) > d(.+,.+).

Foranym

<

n,

d(ym, Yn) <

d(ym,Ym+)h-

d(ym+,yn)

< d(ym,y,.,+) + d(ym+l,Ym+2) +’"

A-

d(yn-l,Yn)

< Cm(d(yo, Yl))

h-... h-

cn-l(d(yo,Yl)).

Hence,

it follows that

{y,}

is a Cauchy sequence and it converges to some point y in

S(X).

Consequently,

{y2,}, {y2,+1}

and

{,+2}

converge to

. By

the continuity of

S

and

T,

S2x2n4-1

Sy2n+l Y2n Sy and

TSx2,.,+2

Ty2n+2 Y2n+l

Ty

asn 0,.

Thus, Sand

T

haveacommonfixed point.

COROLLARY

2.3.

(1)

LetSand

T

be mappings

from

ametric space

(X, d)

into

itself

such that

S(X)

C_

S2(X), S(X)

C_

TS(X)

and

S(X)

is complete.

Suppose

that there exists real numbers h

>

1 such that

for

eachx,y in

X,

at leastone

of

the following conditions holds:

d(Sx, TSy) >_ hd(Sx, Sy).

h

[d(Sx, Sy) + d(TSy, Sy)].

d(Sz, TSy) >

-

h

d(S=x, TSy) > 5[d(Sx, Sx) + d(Sx, Sy)].

d(S==,TS) >_ 5[d(S=,S==)

h

+ d(TS,S) + d(S=.S)].

Then eitherS or

T

ha a

fixed

point, orS and

T

have a common

fixed

(2) e s

a.d

T

b

oo .., o . ,. (X. d)

i.o

d(S2=,TSy) >_ hmn{d(Sx, S2x),d(TSy, Sy),d(Sx, Sy)}

for

dll x, y inX.

ThenS or

T

has a

fixed

point orS and Thave acommon

fixed

point.

(4)

PROOF. For E

.T’,

wedefine

" [0,

cx)

[0,

o) by

(t) -(t),

whereh

>

1. FromTheorem

2.1 and 2.2,weobtain

(1)

and

(2),

respectively.

THEOREM

2.4. Let

S

and

T

be mappings

from

a metric space

(X,d)

into

itself

such that

S(X)

C_

S2(X), S(X) c_ TS(X)

and

S(X)

is complete.

Suppose

that there exists non-negative real numbersa

<

1,

<

1 and/

(a +

[3

+

7

> 1)

such tha

d(S2x,

TSy)

> ad(Sx, S2x)

//3d(TSy, Sy)

+ 7d(Sx,

Sy)

for

all x, y in

X.

ThenS and

T

havea common

fixed

point.

PROOF.

Define a sequence

{yn}

as in Theorem2.1.

Suppose

that y2n y2n+a forsome n.

Then

d(y,,

Y2n+l

d(Sxzn+, TSx2n+2)

Ot

d(12n, /2n+l) "4-/ d(/2n+l, /2n-t-2) +

")

d(12n+X, /2n-t-2),

tfiat is,

d(y2,,y,+a) > (l+_)d(Y2n+l,Y2n+2),

which says that y2,,+, y2n+2 since

/

-")’

#

0.

Thus, Y2, is acommonfixedpoint of

S

andT. Similarly, Y2,+a Y2,,+2 gives that Y2,,+ is a commonfixedpoint ofSandT.

Now,

suppose that y,, y,+l for eachn. Then

d(y2n, Y2n+l) _ d(S2X2n+l,TSx2n+2)

ot

d(Y2n,

Y2n+l

+ d(Y2n+l Y2n+2)

-t-7

d(Y2n+l

Y2n+2

)"

Thus,wehave

d(Y2n+l, Y2n+2) < pld(y2n, Y2n+l),

Similarly,wehave

d(Y2n+2, Y2n+3) _ P2d(Y2n+l,Y2n+2),

where <1.

where p

<

1.

Puttingp

max{pl,

p2

},

wehave

d(yn,Yn+l) < pd(yn-l,y,).

Since p

<

1, by LemmaofJungck

[2], {y, }

isaCauchysequenceanditconverges tosomepoint y in

S(X).

Consequently,thesubsequences

{y2,,}, {y2,,+}

and

{y,,+}

converge to y. Lety and y

TSv

forsome uandvin

X,

respectively. Then

d(y2n, y) d( ’2z2n+l, TSv).

Taking the limitas n oo, wehave 0

_> (/ + 7)d(y, Sv),

so that y

Sv.

Similarly, y

Su.

Therefbre, S

and

T

havea commonfixed point.

REMARK. Our results improve several results of

Kang [31,

Khan et al.

[51,

Rhoades

[9]

and

Taniguchi

[10]. Furthermore,

wehave used non-surjective mappings.

(5)

SOME FIXED POINTSOF EXPANSION MAPPINGS 101

REFERENCES

1.

BOYD,

D. W. and

WONG,

J.

S.

W. On nonlinearcontractions,

Proc.

Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (1969),458-464.

2.

JUNGCK, G.

Commutingmaps andfixed points,

Amer.

Math. Monthly83

(1976),

261-263.

3.

KANG,

S. M. Fixedpoints forexpansionmappings,

Math.

Japonica 38

(1993),

713-717.

4.

KANG,

S. M.and

RHOADES,

B. E. Fixedpoints for four mappings,Math.._._.Japonica 37

(1992),

1053-1059.

5.

KHAN,

M.

A., KHAN, M. S.

and

SESSA, S. Some

theoremsonexpansionmappingsand their fixedpoints,DemonstratioMath. 19

(1986),

673-653.

6.

MATKOWSKI, J.

Fixedpoint theoremsformappings withcontractive iterateatapoint,

Proc.

Math.

Soc.

62

(1977),

344-348.

7.

PARK,

S. and

RHOADES,

B. E. Somefixed point theorems for expansion mappings, Math.

Japonica 33

(1988),

129-132.

8.

RHOADES,

B. E.

A

comparison ofvarious definitionsofcontractivemappings, Trans.

A.__mer.

Math.

Soc.

226

(1977),

257-290.

9.

RHOADES,

B.

E.

Some fixed point theorems for pairsof mappings,

Jfianbha

15

(1985),

151-156.

10.

TANIGUCHI, T. Common

fixed point theorems on expansion type mappings on complete metricspaces, Math____:.Japonica 34

(1989),

139-142.

11.

WANG, S. Z., LI,

B.

Y., GAO,

Z. M. and

ISIKI,

K. Somefixedpoint theoremsonexpansion mappings, Math. Japonica 29

(1984),

631-636.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Aliouche, A common fixed point theorem for weakly compatible mappings in symmetric spaces satisfying a contractive condition of integral type, J.. Aliouche, Common fixed point

Keywords: Fixed point theory, partial α-ψ contractive mappings, generalized metric spaces, binary relation.. 2010 MSC:

Samet, Fixed point results for mappings satisfying (ψ, φ)- weakly contractive condition in partially ordered metric spaces, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications

Abbas, Coincidence point and invariant approximation for map- pings satisfying generalized weak contractive condition, Fixed Point Theory Appl., (2006), 1–7... Dhage, Generalized

Suzuki, “Fixed point theorems and convergence theorems for some generalized nonexpansive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol.. Suzuki, “A new type of

Aliouche, “Common fixed point theorems of Gregus type for weakly compatible mappings satisfying contractive conditions of integral type,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis

The purpose of this note is to establish fixed point theorems for densifying mappings and compact mappings which are contractive in metric spaces and to investigate the existence

Berinde, Coupled fixed point theorems for \Phi ‐contractive mixed monotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces, Nonlinear Anal.. Borcut, Tripled coincidence