• 検索結果がありません。

EXTREME POINTS AND ROTUNDITY OF ORLICZ-SOBOLEV SPACES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "EXTREME POINTS AND ROTUNDITY OF ORLICZ-SOBOLEV SPACES"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

http://ijmms.hindawi.com

© Hindawi Publishing Corp.

EXTREME POINTS AND ROTUNDITY OF ORLICZ-SOBOLEV SPACES

SHUTAO CHEN, CHANGYING HU, and CHARLES XUEJIN ZHAO Received 28 February 2002

It is well known that Sobolev spaces have played essential roles in solving nonlinear par- tial differential equations. Orlicz-Sobolev spaces are generalized from Sobolev spaces. In this paper, we present sufficient and necessary conditions of extreme points of Orlicz- Sobolev spaces. A sufficient and necessary condition of rotundity of Orlicz-Sobolev spaces is obtained.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 47L10.

Definition1. LetA(u)=|u|

0 p(t)dt, wherep(t)satisfies the following proper- ties:

(1) p(t)is right-continuous and nondecreasing;

(2) p(t) >0(t >0);

(3) p(0)=0, limt→∞p(t)= ∞.

ThenA(u)is called anN-function andp(t)is called the right derivative ofA(u).

Definition2. LetA(u)be anN-function,p(t)the right derivative ofA(u). Let

q(v)=sup

u≥0 :p(u)≤v

=inf

u≥0 :p(u)≥v

. (1)

Then ¯A(v)=|v|

0 q(t)dtis called the complementary function ofA(u).

Definition3. LetA(u)be anN-function,u∈R, ifv, w∈R,v+w=2u,uv, impliesA((v+w)/2) < (1/2)(A(v)+A(w)). Thenuis called a strictly convex point ofA. The set of strictly convex points ofAis denoted bySA.

Definition4. LetA(u)be anN-function,Rn, Orlicz space is defined as fol- lows:

LA(Ω)=

u(t):∃λ >0,such that

A λu(t)

dt <∞

. (2)

Definition5. LetA(u)be anN-function, andΩbe a bounded and connected field ofRn. Orlicz-Sobolev space is defined as follows:

Wm,A0 =

u∈LA():αu∈LA(),|α| ≤m

, (3)

whereα=(α1, α2, . . . , αn),|α| =α12+···+αn,αuis a distribution ofu.

(2)

Foru∈Wm,A0 , its norm is defined as

u0m,A=

0≤|α|≤m

α(u)0p

1/p

, 1≤p <∞. (4)

Orlicz-Sobolev spaces with the norm defined above are Banach spaces, see [1].

Definition6. For anyx≠0,x∈LA(), let

Kx=inf

K >0 :

A¯ p

kx(t) dt≥1

, Kx∗∗=sup

K >0 :

A¯ p

kx(t) dt≤1

.

(5)

Thenkx≤k∗∗x . We setK(x)=[kx, k∗∗x ].

Definition7. LetXbe a Banach space,B(X)the closed unit ball ofX, andS(X) its unit sphere. Letx∈S(X). Ify, z∈B(X), y+z=2x impliesx=y=z, thenx is called an extreme point ofB(X). The set of extreme points ofB(X)is denoted by extB(X). IfS(X)=extB(X), thenXis called a rotund space.

Lemma8. For anyx∈L0A,x0A=(1/k){1+

A(kx(t))dt}if and only ifk∈K(x). Theorem 9. Letx∈S(Wm,A0 ). Ifµ{t∈Ω:kx(t)SA} =0, k∈K(x), thenx∈ extB(Wm,A0 ).

Proof. Lety, z∈B(Wm,A0 ), andy+z=2x. By the convexity off (u)=up,(1≤ p <∞)

1=

y0m,A

p

+ z0m,A

p

2 =

0≤|α|≤m

αy0p

+∂αz0p

2

0≤|α|≤m

αy0+∂αz0 2

p

0≤|α|≤m

αy+∂αz 2

0p

=

0≤|α|≤m

αx0p

=1p=1.

(6)

So the equality holds in the above inequalities. Since for any 0≤ |α| ≤m, we have αy0p

+∂αz0p

2 αy0+∂αz0 2

p

αy+∂αz 2

0p

. (7)

From (6) and (7), we know that the equality holds in (7). In particular, whenp >1, αy0+∂αz0=2αx0. (8)

(3)

Takeh∈K(y),l∈K(z), and letk=hl/(h+l). Then

2x0= y0+z0

= 1 h

1+

A hy(t)

dt

+1 l

1+

A lz(t)

dt

=h+l hl +1

h

A hy(t)

dt+1 l

A lz(t)

dt

=h+l hl

1+

l h+lA

hy(t) + h

h+lA lz(t)

dt

≥h+l hl

1+

A hl

h+l

y(t)+z(t) dt

2· 1 2k

1+

A 2kx(t)

dt

2x0.

(9)

So the equality holds in the above inequalities. Hence 2k∈K(x)and for a.e.t∈Ω, (l/(h+l))A(hy(t))+(h/(h+l))A(lz(t))=A(2kx(t)). By the known conditions, for almost allt∈Ω,hy(t)=lz(t)=2kx(t). Therefore,

l=lz0m,A= lz0m,A= hy0m,A=hy0m,A=h. (10)

This impliesx=y=z. Sox∈extB(Wm,A0 ).

Theorem10. Letx∈S(Wm,A0 ). If for anyi=1,2, . . . , n,µ{t∈Ω:kiix(t)SA} = 0, whereKi∈K(∂ix(t)). Thenx∈extB(Wm,A0 ).

Proof. Lety, z∈B(Wm,A0 ), and y+z=2x. By the proof ofTheorem 9, for any 0≤ |α| ≤mwe have

2αx0=∂αy0+∂αz0. (11) In particular, if|α| =1, then 2∂ix0= ∂iy0+∂iz0. Takehi∈K(∂iy),li∈K(∂iz), and letki=hili/(hi+li). By the proof ofTheorem 9, we have

hiiy(t)=liiz(t)=2kiix(t), i=1,2, . . . , n (12)

andli=hi=2ki. Henceiy(t)=∂ix(t)=∂iz(t). Thus there exists a constantcsuch thaty(t)=x(t)+c,z(t)=x(t)−c. Now, we show thatc=0. If not,c≠0. Without loss of generality, we may assume thatc >0. If|x|< c, theny(t) >0,z(t) <0. Since 0∈SA, whena >0,b <0, for anyλ∈(0,1), we haveA(λa+(1−λ)b) < λA(a)+(1−λ)A(b).

By (9),|x(t)|< cdoes not hold. Then for a.e.t∈Ω,|x(t)| ≥c.

(4)

LetE1= {t∈Ω:x(t)≥c},E2= {t∈Ω:x(t)≤ −c}. Thenµ(E1∪E2)=µΩ. SinceΩ is connected, for anyp∈E1,q∈E2,pcan continuously move toqinΩby a transform of finite single-variable. IfµE1>0 andµE2>0, there exists at least ap∈E1,q∈E2

such that the connecting line betweenp and q over E1∪E2 is condense. So there exists a linel= {(t1, t2, . . . , ti−1, λti+1, . . . , tn) λ∈[a, b]}on that connecting line, such thatl∩E1,l∩E2. Butx(t)≥coverE1andx(t)≤ −coverE2whereasE1∪E2

is condense ofl. This is a contradiction to the fact that∂ix(t)∈LA⊂L1implies that x(t)is absolutely continuous with respect toti. So, eitherµE1=0 orµE2=0. Without loss of generality, letµE2=0. Then for almost allt∈Ω,x(t)≥c. So,y(t) > x(t).

Thusy0m,A>x0m,A=1. This contradictsy∈B(Wm,A0 ). From above, we know that c=0. Sox(t)=y(t)=z(t). This meansx∈extB(Wm,A).

Theorem11. Letx∈S(Wm,A0 ). For anyi=1,2, . . . , n, µ

t∈Ω:kx(t)SA

t∈Ω:kiix(t)SA

=0, ki∈K

ix

, k∈K(x), (13)

thenx∈extB(Wm,A0 ).

Proof. Lety, z∈B(Wm,A0 )andy+z=2x. LetB= {t∈Ω:kx(t)SA},Bi= {t∈ Ω:kiix(t)SA}, andy(t)=x(t)+δ(t).

Case1. For almost allt∈\B,δ(t)=0 byTheorem 10. Thereforex(t)=y(t)= z(t).

Case2. For anyi=1,2, . . . , n,µ(B∩Bi)=0, so for almost allt∈B,tBi. Hence

ix(t)∈SA. By the proof ofTheorem 10, we know thatiδ(t)=0, whenδ(t)=c. Sim- ilarly,x(t)=y(t)=z(t)byTheorem 10. By Cases1and2we knowx∈extB(Wm,A0 ).

Theorem12. Letx∈S(Wm,A0 ). If there exists an affine interval(aα, bα)and >0 such that

int

0≤|α|≤m

t∈Ω:αkαx(t)∈

aα+, bα

∅, (14)

thenx∉extB(Wm,A0 ). Proof. LetG=

0≤|α|≤m{t∈Ω:kααx(t)∈(aα+, bα−)}and intG. Take t, tintG,r >0 such thatB(t, r )=B1⊂G,B(t, r )=B2⊂G, andB1∩B2= ∅. For anytΩsatisfyingB(t, r )⊂Ω. Define

Jt(t)=



e−1/(r2ni=1(ti−ti)2), t∈B t, r

,

0, t∈\B

t, r

. (15)

ThenJt(t)is an infinitely differentiable function on Ω and for any 0≤ |α| ≤m,

αJt(t)=0 onΩ\B(t, r ). Let

c= min

0≤|α|≤m

1

maxt∈ΩαJt(t)

. (16)

(5)

Thenc >0 and for allt∈Ω,c∂αJt(t)≤. Define

y(t)=x(t)+cJt(t)−cJt, z(t)=x(t)−cJt(t)+cJt. (17)

Theny, z∈Wm,A0 , andy+z=2x,yz. LetA(u)=hαu+bαon(aα+, bα−). For anykα∈K(∂αx),

αy0= 1 kα

1+

A

kααy(t) dt

= 1 kα

1+

Ω\(B1B2)A

kααx(t) dt+

B1A

kααx(t)+kαα

cJt(t) dt +

B2A

kααx(t)−kαα

cJt(t) dt

= 1 kα

1+

Ω\(B1∪B2)

A

kααx(t) dt +

B1

hαkααx(t)+bα

dt+

B1

hαkαα cJt(t)

dt +

B2

hαkααx(t)+bα

dt−

B2

hαkαα

cJt(t) dt

= 1 kα

1+

A

kααx(t) dt

=∂αx0.

(18)

Hence for any 0≤ |α| ≤m, we have∂αy0= ∂αx0.

Likewise, for any 0≤ |α| ≤m, we have∂αz0= ∂αx0. Then

y0m,A= z0m,A= x0m,A=1. (19)

Thereforey, z∈S(Wm,A0 ).We know thatx∉extB(Wm,A0 )sinceyz.

Theorem13. We show thatWm,A0 is rotund if and only ifAis strictly convex.

Proof

Sufficiency. It is immediately obtained fromTheorem 9.

Necessity. SupposeAis not strictly convex. Then there exists 0< a < bsuch that A(u)is an affine function on(a, b). SinceΩis bounded, we can taketΩ¯,tΩ¯ such that

n i=1

ti= inf

(t1,t2,...,tn)∈Ω

n i=1

ti, n i=1

ti= sup

(t1,t2,...,tn)∈Ω

n i=1

ti. (20)

(1) When

A(p((a¯ +b)/2))dt <1, we setg(c)=

A(p(((a¯ +b)/2)ecni=1(titi)))dt.

Then by the continuity of ¯A and the right continuity ofp,g(c)is right continuous

(6)

with respect toc and g(0)=

A(p((a¯ +b)/2))dt <1, limc→∞g(c)= ∞. Takec0= inf{c >0 :g(c)≥1}, then the following two statements hold:

(a) g(c0)≥1, soc0>0;

(b) for anyl∈(0,1),

A(p(((a¯ +b)/2)lec0ni=1(ti−ti)))dt <1.

Indeed, takecnc0such thatg(cn)≥1. Theng(c0)=limn→∞g(cn)≥1 sinceg(c)is right continuous. So (a) holds.

Letλ=sup(t1,t2,...,tn)n

i=1(ti−ti). Then for anyt∈Ω,λ≥n

i=1(ti−ti) >0. For any 0< l <1, since lnl <0,

0< la+b

2 ec0ni=1(ti−ti)=a+b

2 elnl+c0ni=1(ti−ti)≤a+b

2 e(c0+lnl/λ)ni=1(ti−ti). (21) By the definition ofc0,

A¯

p

la+b

2 ec0ni=1(ti−ti)

dt≤g

c0+lnl λ

<1. (22)

Letx(t)=((a+b)/2)ec0ni=1(ti−ti). By the above discussion, 1∈K(x). Thenx0= 1+

A(x(t))dt. Letx0(t)=x(t)/x0m,A. Thenx0(t)∈S(Wm,A0 )and x00= x0

x0m,A

= 1 x0m,A

1+

A x(t)

dt

= 1 x0m,A

1+

A

x0m,Ax0(t) dt

.

(23)

Therefore x0m,A ∈K(x0(t)). Set 1/b0= x0m,A. Since (t1, t2, . . . , tn)∈Ω, x(t)→ (a+b)/2 asti→ti, we can choose a ballB⊂Ωsuch thatx(B)⊂(a, b). It means that

t∈Ω:x(t)SA

⊃B. (24)

Therefore,

t∈Ω: 1 b0

x0(t)SA

⊃B. (25)

On the other hand, as 1≤ |α| ≤m,

αx0(t)= αx(t) x0m,A

= c|α|0 x0m,A

x(t)=bαx(t), (26)

wherebα=c0|α|/x0m,A. ByLemma 8, 1/bα∈K(∂αx(t)). So

t∈Ω: 1 bα

αx0(t)SA

⊃B. (27)

(7)

Then,

int

0≤|α|≤m

t∈Ω: 1 bα

αx0(t)SA

∅. (28)

ByTheorem 12, we knowx0∉extB(Wm,A0 ). This is a contradiction.

(2) When

A(p((a+¯ b)/2))dt≥1.

Set g(c)=

A(p(((a+¯ b)/2)ecni=1(titi)))dt. Then g(c)is left-continuous with respect to c. For any (t1, t2, . . . , tn)∈Ω, n

i=1(ti−ti) <0, and g(0)=

A(p((a¯ + b)/2))dt≥1, limc→∞g(c)=0. Takec0=sup{c >0 :g(c)≤1}. As in (1), we can prove g(c0)≤1 and for anyl >1,

A¯

p

la+b

2 ec0ni=1(titi)

dt≥1. (29)

Letx(t)=((a+b)/2)ec0ni=1(ti−ti),x0(t)=x(t)/x0m,A. Then x0∈S(Wm,A0 ). Like- wise, we can showx0∉extB(Wm,A0 ). This is also a contradiction.

By (1) and (2) we know thatAis strictly convex.

Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Chinese Science Foundation and Heilongjiang Province Science Foundation.

References

[1] R. A. Adams,Sobolev Spaces, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 65, Academic Press, 1975.

Shutao Chen: Department of Mathematics, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150080, China

Changying Hu: Department of Mathematics, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150080, China

Charles Xuejin Zhao: Department of Mathematics, P.O. Box20047, Savannah State University, Savannah, GA31404, USA

E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

V\’eron, Quasilinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents, Nonlinear Anal.. $\mathrm{R}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{i}\dot{1}$

Key words: Dunkl operators, Dunkl-Bessel-Laplace operator, Generalized Dunkl-Sobolev spaces of exponential type, Pseudo differential-difference operators, Reproduc- ing

The existence of a capacity solution to the thermistor problem in the context of inhomogeneous Musielak-Orlicz-Sobolev spaces is analyzed.. This is a coupled parabolic-elliptic

The study of nonlinear elliptic equations involving quasilinear homogeneous type operators is based on the theory of Sobolev spaces W m,p (Ω) in order to find weak solu- tions.. In

In [2] employing variational methods and critical point theory, in an appropriate Orlicz-Sobolev setting, the existence of infinitely many solutions for Steklov problems associated

A., Heidarkhani S., Shokooh S., Infinitely many solutions for Steklov problems associated to non-homogeneous differential operators through Orlicz–Sobolev spaces, Complex Var.. A.,

Sickel, Sobolev Spaces of Fractional Order, Nemytskij Operators, and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, de Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, vol.

Bennouna, Existence of renormalized solutions for some elliptic problems involving derivatives of nonlinear terms in Orlicz spaces, to appear in Lec- ture Notes in Pure and