• 検索結果がありません。

Problem 1.20. Let ' W Œ0; 1  ! Œ0; 1  be non-decreasing and let f W X ! Œ0; 1  be M -measurable. Prove the following assertions.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Problem 1.20. Let ' W Œ0; 1  ! Œ0; 1  be non-decreasing and let f W X ! Œ0; 1  be M -measurable. Prove the following assertions."

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Prof. N. Kajino, Probability Theory WS 2012/2013

Problem set 4, submit solutions by 10.10.2012

The Problems below will be discussed in the tutorial on 12.10.2012.

(The Exercise is additional and will be discussed only if time permits.) Throughout this problem set, .X; M; / denotes a given measure space.

Problem 1.20. Let ' W Œ0; 1  ! Œ0; 1  be non-decreasing and let f W X ! Œ0; 1  be M -measurable. Prove the following assertions.

(1) ' ı f is M -measurable. (For a 2 Œ0; 1 /, set M WD inf '

1

.a; 1 

(inf ; WD 1 ) and show that '

1

.a; 1 

is either .M; 1  or ŒM; 1  (either ; or ¹1º if M D 1 ).) (2) (Chebyshev’s inequality) For any a 2 Œ0; 1  with '.a/ 2 .0; 1 /,

¹ x 2 X j f .x/ a º 1

'.a/

Z

X

.' ı f /d: (1.77)

Problem 1.21. Let f

n

W X ! Œ 1 ; 1  be M -measurable for each n 2 N and suppose that P

1

nD1

R

X

j f

n

j d < 1 . Prove that lim

n!1

f

n

.x/ D 0 for -a.e. x 2 X . (Use Proposition 1.26 and then Proposition 1.30-(2).)

Problem 1.22. Find the limits as N ! 1 of the following series:

(1) X

1 nD1

2

n

1 C sin.2

N

n/

N

1

(2) X

1 nD1

1

n.n C N / (3) X

1 nD1

1 C n

N

N

((1): Consider the case N 2 only. (3): Recall that f .x/ WD .1 C 1=x/

x

, x 2 .0; 1 /, is strictly decreasing and lim

x!1

f .x/ D e

1

. Again consider the case N 2 only.) Problem 1.23. Let m

1

be the Lebesgue measure on B . R / introduced in Example 1.8.

(1) Prove that m

1

. ¹ a º / D 0 for any a 2 R .

(2) Let a; b 2 R , a < b, and let f W Œa; b ! R be continuous. For each n 2 N , define f

n

W Œa; b ! R by

f

n

WD X

n

kD1

f

a C k n .b a/

1 .

aCkn1.b a/; aCkn.b a/

 C f .a/1

¹

: (1.78)

(i) Prove that lim

n!1

f

n

.x/ D f .x/ for any x 2 Œa; b. (Use the continuity of f .) (ii) By considering lim

n!1

R

Œa;b

f

n

d m

1

, prove that Z

Œa;b

f d m

1

D Z

b

a

f .x/dx; (1.79)

where the integral in the right-hand side denotes the Riemann integral on Œa; b. (Noting that R

Œa;b

f

n

d m

1

gives a Riemann sum for f , use Theorem 1.33 to get R

Œa;b

f d m

1

and use the definition of the Riemann integral to get R

b

a

f .x/dx.)

7

(2)

(3) Let a 2 R and let f W Œa; 1 / ! R be continuous. Prove that f is m

1

-integrable on Œa; 1 / if and only if lim

b!1

R

b

a

j f .x/ j dx < 1 ,

1

and in that case Z

Œa;1/

f d m

1

D lim

b!1

Z

b

a

f .x/dx: (1.80)

(Suffices to show when f 0. Use (1.79) and then use Theorem 1.24 to let b ! 1 .) By Problem 1.23-(2), for a continuous function on a bounded closed interval, its integral with respect to the Lebesgue measure m

1

coincides with its Riemann integral.

In fact, this fact can be generalized to any Riemann integrable function f on a bounded closed interval of any dimension. See Section 2.6 below for details.

On the other hand, Problem 1.23-(3) says that the same is true also for a con- tinuous function on an unbounded interval provided the improper Riemann integral lim

b!1

R

b

a

f .x/dx is absolutely convergent. Here the assumption of the absolute convergence is necessary; see Problem 2.14 in this connection.

Problem 1.24. Find the limits as n ! 1 of the following integrals:

(1) Z

1

0

1

1 C x

n

dx (2) Z

1

0

sin e

x

1 C nx

2

dx (3) Z

1

0

n cos x 1 C n

2

x

3=2

dx ((1): Consider R

1

0

and R

1

1

separately. (3): Imitate Example 1.34.)

Exercise 1.25 ([1, Section 4.3, Problem 1]). Let f 2 L

1

./ and ¹ f

n

º

1nD1

L

1

./.

Suppose that f

n

0 on X for any n 2 N , that lim

n!1

f

n

.x/ D f .x/ for any x 2 X, and that lim

n!1

R

X

f

n

d D R

X

f d. Prove that lim

n!1

R

X

j f f

n

j d D 0. (It suffices to show lim

n!1

R

X

.f f

n

/

C

d D 0. Note that 0 .f f

n

/

C

f .)

1Note that the limit limb!1

Rb

a jf .x/jdx always exists in Œ0;1, since Rb

a jf .x/jdxis non- decreasing inb2.a;1/.

8

参照

関連したドキュメント

Byeon, Existence of large positive solutions of some nonlinear elliptic equations on singu- larly perturbed domains, Comm.. Chabrowski, Variational methods for potential

If the interval [0, 1] can be mapped continuously onto the square [0, 1] 2 , then after partitioning [0, 1] into 2 n+m congruent subintervals and [0, 1] 2 into 2 n+m congruent

Kirchheim in [14] pointed out that using a classical result in function theory (Theorem 17) then the proof of Dacorogna–Marcellini was still valid without the extra hypothesis on E..

In addition to extending our existence proof there to the case of nonzero continuous drift (Theorem 1.6) and examining the effects of the order parameters 1 , 2 on e heat 1 , 2

The following variation was considered by Beineke and Schwenk [1] and also by Irving [5]: for 1 ≤ m ≤ n, the bipartite Ramsey number R(m, n) is the smallest integer r such that

Dive [D] proved a converse of Newton’s theorem: if Ω contains 0, and is strongly star-shaped with respect to 0, and for all t &gt; 1 and sufficiently close to 1, the uniform

Theorem 1.6 For every f in the group M 1 of 1. 14 ) converts the convolution of multiplicative functions on non-crossing partitions into the multiplication of formal power

On the way to solving this problem, we prove an angle distortion theorem for starlike and spirallike functions with respect to interior and boundary points... Let D be a