• 検索結果がありません。

AND ON AN

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "AND ON AN"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

THE PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS OF

THE LIMITING BEHAVIOR OF AN INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION DEPENDING ON A SMALL PARAMETER, AND

ITS APPLICATION TO STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

O.V. BORISENKO

Kiev Polytechnic Institute

Department of

Mathematics N3

Prospect

Pobedy

3,

Kiev-252056,

UKRAINE A.D. BORISENKO

Kiev University

Department of

Probability Mathematical Statistics

Kiev-252017, UKRAINE

I.G. MALYSHEV San Jose State

University

Department of

Mathematics 8_4

Computer

Science

San Jose, CA

95192

USA

ABSTRACT

Using connection between stochastic differential equation with Poisson measure term and its Kolmogorov’s equation, we investigate the limiting behavior of the Cauchy problem solution of the integro- differential equation with coefficients depending on a small parameter.

We also study the dependence of the limiting equation on the order of the parameter.

Key words: Stochastic process, Kolmogorov’s averaging, integro-differential equation, Cauchy problem, limiting behavior, small parameters, white and Poisson noise.

AMS

(MOS)

subject classifications: 60H15, 60H20, 35R60.

It

is well known that investigation of a nonlinear oscillating

systems

with

a small stochastic white noise at the input, can be accomplished applying the averaging method for

Kolmogorov’s

parabolic equation with coefficients depending on a small parameter

[1].

If both white and Poisson types of noise are

present,

then the

corresponding Kolmogorov’s

equation is

integro-differential [2],

1Received"

December 1993. Revised: February 1994.

Printed in theU.S.A. (C)1994byNorthAtlantic SciencePublishingCompany 25

(2)

and we shall exend here he averaging principle

o

such equations.

Let

us study

behavior,

as

e--,0,

ofthe following equation

k2

tU(t, x) + e(f(t, x), V U(t, x)) + --Tr(g(t, x)g*(t, x) V U(t, x)) (i)

-4-R

f

d

[U(t,

x

+ ek3q(t,

x,

y)) U(t, x) e’3(q(t,

x,

y),U(t, x))]II(dy) 0,

(t, x) [0, T)

x

R d,

where e

>

0 is a small parameter and

k,k2, k3,

are some positive

numbers,

and

Ox,

,i = 1,...,d

:U(t,x)=[ 0-’/0

,i,j =

1,...,d

Here H

is a finite measure on Borel sets in

R d, f(t,x), q(t,x, y)

are d-dimensional

vectors,

and

g(t, x)

is a d x d square matrix.

Lemma: If

s+A

f

A

uniformly with respect to

A for

each x, the

function b(x)

is continuous, and

b(t, x)

is continuous in x uniformly with respect to

(t,x)

in arbitrary compact

Ix <_ C,

and stochastic process

(t)

is continuous, then

0 0

The

proof

is similar to that in

[2].

Now,

replacing t with

t/

k in

(1),

where k =

min(k,k2,k),

and denoting

V(t, x)= U(t/e,x),

we can derive the following equation:

tV(t, gg)

"Jr"

kl (f(t/e , x), V V(t, x)) + e- k2-k

2

Tr(g(t/e , x)g*(t/e , x) V :V(t, x))

+ i [V(t,

z

+ 3q(t/,

z,

y)) V(t, z) ek3(q(t/e ,

x,

y) V V(t, x))JH(dy) O,

Rd

(t,z)[O,T)xR .

(3)

Theorem:

Let

the following conditions hold:

1)

the

functions f (t, x), g(t, x), q(t, x, y)

are continuous in

(t, x),

bounded

and twice continuously

differentiable

with

respect

to

x,

with derivatives also

bounded;

2)

uniformly with respect to

A for

each x

R a,

y

R

d there exists the following three limits

s+A s+A

A A

and

s+A

li,oo 1-

5

f

A

q(t, x, y)q*(t, x, y)dt O(x, y).

3)

The

functions f (x), G(x), Q(x,y)

satisfy the Lipschitz condition in

x,

and the matrix

is uniformly parabolic.

[3(z) (z) + f Q(x, y)II(dy)

Rd

a) if kx

=

k: = 2k3

and

V,(t, x) satisfies (2)

and the

"Cauchy"

condition lira

V,(t, x)= F(x) F(x) e C(Rd),

tTT

then lira

V,(t, x)

=

V(t, x),

where

V(t, x)

is a solution

of

the

problem"

ttff’(t, x) + ( (x), V fir(t, x)) + 1/2Tr(3(x) V (t, x)) O,

(3)

p(t,

=

(5)

ttT

b) If

k

< k,

then

V satisfies (4)-(5)

but in this case there is no term

containing

?(x)

in

(4);

Similarly,

if

k

< k:,

then

[3(x)

does not

depend

on

(x);

and

if

k

< 2k3,

then

B(x)

does not contain the term

f

Proof: Applying the results of

[2-3]

to the coaditions of the

theorem,

it

follows that the solution of the

problem (2)-(3)

exists for each e, is unique

can be represented in the form

(4)

V(t, x) = E[F((t,

x,

T))],

where

(t,

x,

T)

is the solution ofthe stochastic equation

(t, , ) = + 2 f(/ , (t, ,

1

+ / f

Rd

where

w(t)is

a d-dimensional Wiener process,

u(,A)is

a Poisson measure

independent of

w, A

is a Borel seg of

R

e and

(t, A) (t/e , A) tH(A)/e; E(t, A) = tII(A).

Let

E (e,

x,

s)- (t, z, Sl)[

2

C[e

2(h

-a)ls- s 12 -t-(e k2

-k

(t, , :) ((, , 1)

:

--< C( : + - ) I"

From

these estimates we infer that the family of processes

((t,

x,

s), C(t,

x,

s))

satisfies the Skorokhod’s compactness conditions

[4]. Therefore,

for any sequence e0 there exists a subsequence

e,0, m-1,2,...,

and processes

(t,z,s), (t,z,s)

such that

,(t,

z,

s)(t,

z,

s), ,(t,

z,

s)--+(t,

z,

s)

in probability as

e,0. From (6)

we can also find that

f f(,/, (t, , ,))d + (, , ). (7)

.(t,,)=+

Then,

for anyfixed

(t, x)e [0, T]

we have"

(5)

Therefore,

E i (t,x, sz)- (t,x, sx)

a

_< C[Is sx I’ + s sx e],

E I (t,

z,

sz)-- (t,

x,

sx)

4

< C lsz s 2,

and he processes

(t,z,s), (t, z, s)

sa:isfy he

Kolmogorov’s

continuity condition

Let

us consider the case kx =

k2

=2k3. Then from

(7)

we obtain:

(,(t, z, s) =

z

+ f f(r/e , ,(, z, r))dr + (,(, z, s). (8)

From

this point we shall omit the subindex m in

e,

for simplicity.

each fixed

(t, x) [0, T]

the process

Rd

is a vector-valued margingale with matrix chacerisgic

d

Using ghe above

lemma,

ig is ey

o

show

and

i,,_0 (,(t, , ), ,(t, , )) f B( (t, , ,)),.

Then for

(10) Hence,

from

(8), (9),

and

(10)

we obtain a continuous square inegrable vector- valued margingale

(t, , )

=

+ f ( (, ,,)) + (t, , ),

with matrix characteristic

(6)

It

follows from

[6]

that there exists a d-dimensional Wiener process

w(t)

such

hat

where

e ()e’()=

Consequently, the process

(t,z,s)

satisfies he equation which, according

[2],

has

a unique solution:

(t,z,s) =

z

+/((t,z,r))dr + [e((t,z,r))de(r). (ii)

The matrix

(z)

is positive definite for all z E

R a,

satisfies Lipschitz

conditions, and therefore matrix

(z)

satisfies Lipschitz condition as well.

Then,

using the

Lebesgue

dominated convergence

theorem,

we obtain

lira

rn--*O V,(t, x) fr(t, z) E[F( (t,

x,

T))]

for any sequence

e,0. But

as it follows from

[7]

the function

(t,x)is

a unique

solution of the problem

(4)-(5),

which

completes

the

proof

of the

par a)

of the

When k

< k,

the boundedness of

f(t,x)

implies that

$

E f f(r/e , ,(t,

x,

r))dr < C

and therefore the

second

term in the

right

side of

(6)

converges to 0 with e0 in

probability. The matrix characteristic of the

martingale ,(t,z,s)in (7)

has the

form

$

(,, ,) = , (,/, , ,(t, z,,))o’(/, , ,(t, ,

$

Rd

(12)

From

the boundedness of g, q, similarly to the inference made

above,

we obtain

(7)

that either first or second term in the right side of

(12)

converges to 0

(respecgively

go ghe

k < k

or k

<

2ka

case)

as

e--O,

which allows to

complete

he

proof

of the heorem as in

part a).

REFERENCES

Mitropolsky,Yu. A., Averaging Method in NonlinearMechanics, Naukova Dumka, Kiev 1971.

[2] Gikhman, I.I.,

Berlin 1972.

Skorokhod, A.V., Stochastic Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, Borisenko, A.D., The continuous dependence on parameterofthe solution ofan integro- differential equation, Teor. Veroyatnost. Mat. Statist. Vyp. 49 (1993) to appear.

[4] Skorokhod, A.V., Studies in the Theory ofRandom Processes, Addison-Wesley 1965.

Gikhman, I.I., Skorokhod, A.V., The Theory

of

Stochastic Processes, v. 1, Springer- Verlag, Berlin 1974.

[6] Ikeda, N., Watanabe, S., Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes, North Holland, Amsterdam and Kodansha, Tokyo 1981.

Friedman, A., Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications, v. 1, Academic Press, NewYork 1975.

参照

関連したドキュメント

tion for a given stochastic differential equation, the discrete It6 formula.. gives a finite difference equation for a given

We study the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions for a Cauchy problem of a viscous Burgers equation with a time dependent reaction term involving Dirac measure.. After applying

Keywords: stochastic differential equation, periodic systems, Lya- punov equations, uniform exponential stability..

This paper establishes the rate of convergence (in the uniform Kolmogorov distance) for normalized additive functionals of stochastic processes with long-range dependence to a

In this paper, we establish a Stroock-Varadhan support theorem for the global mild solution to a d (d ≤ 3)-dimensional stochastic Cahn-Hilliard partial differential equation driven by

Key words and phrases: linear second-order differential equation, Appell equation, Kummer equation, uniformly almost-periodic solution, bounded solution, phase... Supported by

Keywords: stochastic differential equation, Euler scheme, rate of convergence, Malliavin cal-

N., A semilinear wave equation associated with a linear differential equation with Cauchy data, Nonlinear Anal.. M., A semilinear wave equation associated with a nonlinear