• 検索結果がありません。

A New Criterion for Meromorphically Convex Functions of Order α

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "A New Criterion for Meromorphically Convex Functions of Order α"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

A New Criterion for Meromorphically Convex Functions of Order α

H. E. Darwish, M. K. Aouf

and

G. S. Sˇ alˇ agean

Dedicated to Professor Dumitru Acu on his 60th anniversary

Abstract

Let Jn(α) denote the classes of functions of the form f(z) = 1

z + X k=0

akzk,

which are regular in the punctured disc U={z : 0<|z|<1} and satisfy

Re

(Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))0 2

<−n+α

n+ 1, z∈U, n∈N={0,1, ...} and α∈[0,1), where

Dnf(z) = 1 z

zn+1f(z) n!

(n) .

In this paper it is proved that Jn+1(α)⊂Jn(α) (nN and α∈ [0,1)). Since J0(α) is the class of meromorphically convex functions of order α, α [0,1), all functions in Jn(α) are meromorphically convex functions of order α. Further we consider the integrals of the functions in Jn(α).

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45 and 30C50.

Keywords: Meromorphically convex, Hadamard product.

71

(2)

1 Introduction

Let Σ denote the class of functions of the form

(1) f(z) = 1

z + X

k=0

akzk,

which are regular in the punctured disc U ={z : 0<|z|<1}.

The Hadamard product of two functions f, g Σ will be denoted by f∗g. Let

Dnf(z) = 1

z(1−z)n+1 ∗f(z) = 1 z

zn+1f(z) n!

(n)

=

= 1

z + (n+ 1)a0+ (n+ 1)(n+ 2)

2! a1z+...

In this paper among other things we shall show that a function f in Σ, which satisfies one of the conditions

(2) Re

(Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))0 2

<−n+α

n+ 1, z ∈U, n∈N,

for α∈[0,1), is meromorphically convex of order α in U. More precisely, it is proved that for the classes Jn(α) of functions in Σ satisfying (2) (3) Jn+1(α)⊂Jn(α), (n N, α[0,1))

holds. Since J0(α) = Σk(α) (the class of meromorphically convex functions

of order α,

α [0,1) ) the convexity of the members of Jn(α) is a consequence of (3).

We note that in [1] Aouf and Hossen obtained a new criterion for mero- morphic univalent functions via the basic inclusion relationship Mn+1(α)

(3)

Mn(α), n N and α [0,1), where Mn(α) is the class consisting of functions in Σ satisfying

Re

Dn+1f(z) Dnf(z) 2

<−n+α

n+ 1, z ∈U, n∈N and α [0,1).

Futher, for c∈(0,∞) let F(z) = c

zc+1 Z z

0

tcf(t)dt.

In this paper it is shown that F Jn(α) whenever f ∈Jn(α). Also it is shown that if f ∈Jn(α), then

(4) F(z) = n+ 1

zn+2 Z z

0

tn+1f(t)dt.

belongs to Jn+1(α). Some known results of Bajpai [2], Goel and Sohi [3], Uralegaddi and Ganigi [10] and Sˇalˇagean [8] are extended. Techniques are similar to those in [6] (see also [4], [5] and [8]).

2 The classes J

n

(α)

In order to prove our main results (Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 below) we shall need the following lemma due to S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu [4], [5]

(see also [6] or [8])

Lemma A. Let the function Ψ : C2 C satisfy Re Ψ(ix, y)0

for all real x and for all real y, y ≤ −(1 +x2)/2. If p(z) = 1 +p1z +...

is analytic in the unit disc U ={z : |z|<1} and Re Φ(p(z), zp0(z))>0, z ∈U,

(4)

then Rep(z)>0 for z ∈U.

Theorem 1. Jn+1(α)⊂Jn(α) for each integer n∈N and α [0,1).

Proof. Let f be in Jn+1(α). Then

(1) Re

(Dn+2f(z))0 (Dn+1f(z))0 2

<−n+ 1 +α

n+ 2 , z ∈U. We have to show that (1) implies the inequality

(2) Re

(Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))0 2

<−n+α

n+ 1, z ∈U. We define the regular in U ={z :|z|<1} function p by

p(z) = n+ 2−α

1−α n+ 1 1−α

(Dn+1f(z))0

(Dnf(z))0 , z∈U and p(0) = 1. We have

(3) (Dn+1f(z))0

(Dnf(z))0 = 1

n+ 1(n+ 2−α−(1−α)p(z)).

Differentiating (3) logarithmically, we obtain (4) (Dn+1f(z))00

(Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))00

(Dnf(z))0 = −(1−α)zp0(z) n+ 2−α−(1−α)p(z). From the identity

(5) z(Dnf(z))0 = (n+ 1)Dn+1f(z)(n+ 2)Dnf(z) we have

(6) z(Dnf(z))00 = (n+ 1)(Dn+1f(z))0(n+ 3)(Dnf(z))0. Using the identity (6) the equation (4) may be written

(n+2)

(Dn+2f(z))0 (Dn+1f(z))0 2

+n+1+α+(1−α)p(z) = −(1−α)zp0(z) n+ 2−α−(1−α)p(z)

(5)

or (7)

p(z) + zp0(z)

n+ 2−α−(1−α)p(z) = n+ 2 1−α

2 (Dn+2f(z))0

(Dn+1f(z))0 −n+ 1 +α n+ 2

Since f ∈Jn+1(α), from (1) and (7) we have

(8) Re

p(z) + zp0(z)

n+ 2−α−(1−α)p(z)

>0, z ∈U.

We define the function Ψ by

(9) Ψ(u, v) =u+v/(n+ 2−α−(1−α)u).

In order to use Lemma A we must verify that Re Ψ(ix, y)0 whenever x and y are real numbers such that y≤ −(1 +x2)/2. We have

Re Ψ(ix, y) = yRe 1

n+ 2−α−(1−α)xi =y n+ 2−α

(n+ 2−α)2+ (1−α)2x2

≤ − (1 +x)2(n+ 2−α)

(n+ 2−α)2+ (1−α)2x2 <0.

From (8) and (9) we obtain

Re Ψ(p(z), zp0(z))>0, z ∈U.

By Lemma A we conclude that Rep(z) > 0 in U and (see (5)) this implies the inequality (2).

3 Integral operators

Theorem 2. Let f be a function in Σ; if for a given n N and c∈(0,∞) f satisfies the condition

(10) Re

(Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))0 2

< 1−α−2(n+α)(c+ 1−α)

2(n+ 1)(c+ 1−α) , z ∈U,

(6)

then

(11) F(z) = c

zc+1 Z z

0

tcf(t)dt belongs to Jn(α).

Proof. Using the identity

(12) z(DnF(z))0 =c(Dnf(z))(c+ 1)(DnF(z))

obtained from (11) and the identity (5) for the function F the condition (10) may be written

(13) Re







(n+ 2)(Dn+2F(z))0

(Dn+1F(z))0 −n−2 +c (n+ 1)(n+ 1−c) (DnF(z))0

(Dn+1F(z))0







−2< 1−α−2(n+α)(c+ 1−α) 2(n+ 1)(c+ 1−α) .

We have to prove that (13) implies the inequality

(14) Re

(Dn+1F(z))0 (DnF(z))0 2

<−n+α

n+ 1, z ∈U. We define the regular in U function p by

(15) p(z) = n+ 2−α

1−α n+ 1 1−α

(Dn+1F(z))0

(DnF(z))0 , z ∈U and p(0) = 1.

From (6) we have

(16) (Dn+1F(z))0

(DnF(z))0 = n+ 2−α−(1−α)p(z) n+ 1

and for the function F instead of f the identity (15) becomes (17) z(DnF(z))00= (n+ 1)(Dn+1F(z))0(n+ 3)(DnF(z))0.

(7)

Differentiating (16) logarithmically and using (17) we obtain (n+ 2)(Dn+2F(z))0

(Dn+1F(z))0 −n−2 +c (n+ 1)(n+ 1−c) (DnF(z))0

(Dn+1F(z))0

2 =

= 1

n+ 1

−n−α−(1−α)p(z)− (1−α)zp0(z) 1−α+c−(1−α)p(z)

and (13) is equivalent to (18)

1−α n+ 1 Re

p(z) + zp0(z)

1−α+c−(1−α)p(z) + 1 2(c+ 1−α)

>0, z ∈U.

We define the function Ψ by Ψ(u, v) = 1−α

n+ 1

u+ v

1−α+c−(1−α)u + 1 2(c+ 1−α)

For the real numbers x, y with y ≤ −(1 +x2)/2, we have Re Ψ(ix, y) = 1−α

n+ 1

1

2(c+ 1−α) + Re y

c+ 1−α−(1−α)x i

=

= 1−α n+ 1

1

2(c+ 1−α) (1 +x2)(c+ 1−α) 2 [(c+ 1−α)2+ (1−α)2x2]

=

= 1−α n+ 1

−2(1−α)c−c2

2 [(c+ 1−α)2+ (1−α)2x2] (c+ 1−α) <0.

We obtained that Ψ satisfies the conditions of Lemma A. This implies Rep(z) > 0, and from (15) it follows that (12) implies (14), that is F Jn(α).

Putting n = 0 in the statement of Theorem 2 we obtain the following result

Corollary 1. If f Σ and satisfies Re

1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

< 1−α−2α(c+ 1−α) 2(c+ 1−α) ,

(8)

then F given by (11) belongs to Σk(α).

Putting α= 0 and c= 1 in Corollary 1 we obtain the following result Corollary 2. If f Σ and satisfies

Re

1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

< 1 4, then the function F defined by

F(z) = 1 z2

Z z

0

tf(t)dt belongs to Σk(0).

Remark 1. Corollary 1 was obtained by Goel and Sohi [3]. In [8] there is another extention of this result.

Remark 2. Corollary 2 extends a result of Bajpai [2]

Theorem 3. If f ∈Jn(α), then F(z) = n+ 1

zn+2 Z z

0

tn+1f(t)dt belongs to Jn+1(α).

Proof. From (11) we have

cDnf(z) = (n+ 1)Dn+1F(z)(n+ 1−c)DnF(z) and

cDn+1f(z) = (n+ 2)Dn+2F(z)(n+ 2−c)Dn+1F(z).

Taking c=n+ 1 in the above relations we obtain (n+ 2)(Dn+2F(z))0(Dn+1F(z))0

(n+ 1)(Dn+1F(z))0 = (Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))0 which reduces to

(n+ 2)(Dn+2F(z))0

(n+ 1)(Dn+1F(z))0 1

n+ 1 = (Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))0

(9)

Thus Re

(n+ 2)(Dn+2F(z))0

(n+ 1)(Dn+1F(z))0 1 n+ 1 2

= Re

(Dn+1f(z))0 (Dnf(z))0 2

<−n+α n+ 1 from which it follows that

Re

(Dn+2F(z))0 (Dn+1F(z))0 2

<−n+α+ 1 n+ 2 . This completes the proof of Theorem 3.

Remark 3. Taking α = 0 in the above theorems we get the results obtained by Uralegaddi and Ganigi [10].

References

[1] M. K. Aouf and H. M. Hossen,New criteria for meromorphic univalent functions of order α, Nihonkai Math. J., 5 (1994), no. 1, 1-11.

[2] S. K. Bajpai, A note on a class of meromorphic univalent functions, Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl., 22 (1977), 295-297.

[3] R. M. Goel and N. S. Sohi,On a class of meromorphic functions, Glas.

Mat., 17 (1981), 19-28.

[4] S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu,Second order differential inequalities in the complex plane, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 65 (1978), 289-305.

[5] S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu,Differential subordination and univalent functions, Michigan Math. J., 28 (1981), 157-171.

[6] P. T. Mocanu and G. St. Sˇalˇagean,Integral operators and meromorphic starlike functions, Mathematica (Cluj), 32 (55) (1990), no. 2, 147-152.

(10)

[7] St. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer.

Math. Soc.,49 (1975), 109-115.

[8] G. St. Sˇalˇagean, Integral operators and meromorphic functions, Rev.

Roumaine Math. Pures Appl.,33 (1988), no. 1-2, 135-140.

[9] R. Singh and S. Singh, Integrals of certain univalent functions, Proc.

Amer. Math. Soc., 77 (1973), 336-349.

[10] B. A. Uralegaddi and M. D. Ganigi,A new criterion for meromorphic convex functions, Tamkang J. Math., 19 (1988), no. 1, 43-48.

H. E. Darwish

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Mansoura,

Mansoura, Egypt.

E-mail: [email protected]

M. K. Aouf

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Mansoura,

Mansoura, Egypt.

E-mail: [email protected]

G. S. Sˇalˇagean

Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, str. M. Kogalniceanu nr. 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

E-mail:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Known facts (2-bridge links) Let M L be a 3-mfd obtained by a Dehn surgery on a component of a 2-bridge link L. 8

While not attempting to provide a complete review of this publications, we do list some known results [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [11], [12], [17] and [18], where there were

5L (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) ① ② ③ ④ (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (1) (2) (3) (1) (1)

包  装 パコマ   1L (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) ① ② ③ ④ (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (1) (2) (3) (1)

[10] introduced the following two subclasses of the bi-univalent function class Σ and obtained non-sharp estimates on the first two Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients |a 2 | and |a 3 |

In [2] and [4], Berstein-Doetsch type results were proved on rationally s-convex functions, moreover, for the s-H¨ older property of s-convex functions.. Definition

In Section 2 we record some known results on Wiener–Hopf operators, which are then employed in Section 3 to describe the behaviour of the singular values and eigenvalues of

Analogous results are also obtained for the class of functions f ∈ T and k-uniformly convex and starlike with respect to conjugate points.. The class is