• 検索結果がありません。

EXISTENCE OF PERIODIC SOLUTIONS FOR NONLINEAR LIENARD SYSTEMS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "EXISTENCE OF PERIODIC SOLUTIONS FOR NONLINEAR LIENARD SYSTEMS"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

VOL. 18 NO. 2 (1995) 265-272

EXISTENCE OF PERIODIC SOLUTIONS FOR NONLINEAR LIENARD SYSTEMS

WAN SEKIM

Department

of Mathematics

Dong-A

University

Pusan

604 714 Republicof

Korea

(Received January

26, 1993and in revisedform March29,

1993)

ABSTRACT. We

provethe existenceand multiplicity ofperiodicsolutions for nonlinear Lienard

System

ofthetype

x"(t)

+

-[VF(x(t))]

d /

g(x(t))

+

h(t,x(t)) e(t)

under variousconditionsuponthe functionsg, hand e.

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES:

Nonlinear Lienardsystem, multiplicityofperiodicsolution.

1991

AMS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES:

34B15, 34C25 1.

INTRODUCTION

LetR"

be n-dimensionalEuclidean

space. We

define

xll [. 1 x,I ]

forx

(xl, x2,...,x,)

E

R .

By L 2([0,

2

:t],R")we

denote the

space

of allmeasurablefunctions x:

[0, 2hi R"

for which

integrable. The normisgiven

by

1/2

By C*([0.2n],R")

wedenote theBanach

space

of

2g-periodic

continuous functionsx"

[0,2g]

whose derivativesuptoorderkarecontinuous. The norm isgivenby

where

Ilyll(R) sup,..lly(t)ll

which is a norm in

C([0,2],R"). We

use the

symbol (o,o)

for the

Euclidean inner

product

in the

space R ". For x, y

in

C([0,2],R )

we definethe

L2-inner product

as follows

2

(x,y)-

fo (x(t),y(t))dt.

fx(t)dt

and Themean valuex ofx and the function of mean value zero are defined

by

-

f(t) x(t) ,

respectively.

We

define inequalities in

R" componentwise,

i.e.

x,y

_R

,

x

y

if and

only

if xi syl for 1,2,...,n,andx<

y

if and

only ifxi

<yifor

1,2

,n.

In

thiswork,we will

study

the existence of periodicsolutionsandmultiple periodicsolutionsfor theproblem

x"(t)

+

-[VF(x(t))]

+

g(x)

+

h(t,x) e(t)

(B) x(0) x(2 n) x’(0) x’(2 n).=

0

(2)

where

F :R" R

isa

C2-function, g :R" R"

iscontinuous, h

[0,2] xR" R

is continuous in both variables and 2n-periodic in t, and e

:[0,2n]---,R

is in

L ’([0,

2

n], R" ). We

assume that

g(x) (gl(xl),g2(x2), ...,gn(x))

for allx

(x,x2,...,x) R

and

h(t,x) (h(t,x),h2(t,x),...,hn(t,x))

forall

(t,x)[O,2n]xR .

Moreover,

weassume thefollowing:

(HI)

hisbounded;i.e., for each 1,2,3 n, there exists

Ki

>0 such that

h,(t,x)]

g

forall

(t,x)[O,2n]R n.

(Hz)

for each 1, 2 n,

andthere exists

Ci

>0such that

a OF(x).o(X)x.

at Ox, ox?

OF(x)

for allx

(xl,x2 xn)

The

purpose

of this work istogiveexistenceand

multiplicity

resultsfor periodicsolutionsof

coupled

Lienardsystemin

R".

This

paper

wasmotivated

by

the results in

[1

andsoour results in this work extend some results in

[1]. To prove

ourresults we

adapt

Mawhin’s continuation theorem in

[2],

andwegive appropriate regionfor the

system’s

multiplicity by

finding

ana’prioribound.

A’prioriBound

To prove

ourassertion,we consider thefollowing

homotopy:

x"(t)

+

dt

[VF(x(t))]

+

.g(x)

+

Xh(t,x) Xe(t)

Let X (0,1)

and let

x(t)

beapossiblesolutionofthe

problem (E)(B).

Taking

L 2-inner product by x’(t)

onboth sidesof

(E),

wehave

2t 2x

x,’. ., foOF.(-x(t"[x,’(t,dt+Xoxi fo g’(x’(t),x’’(t)dt

2t

+

X,.. hi(t,x(t))xi’(t)dt

".

ei(t)xi’(t)dt.

dF0’)

(H2)

and theperiodicity of

x(t)

in t,wehave

By

thecontinuity of

--?,

2f 2"a F(x)

, c, tx,’(t)at , dt

i-1 i-1

Hence

1/2 1/’2

1/2

By

theSobolev

inequality,

we have

6M0

(3)

Suppose

there exist a

--(al,

a2

a,),b (bl, b2 b,,)

in

R

such that a<b;if

x(t)

isa solutionof

(E) (B)

such thata b and

.g[[ M1,

then

]lx]l(R)[,.l[max(lai],]b,])]2

1/2

+Mx.

Taking

L Z-inner

product by

x"(t)

onbothsidesof

(E0,

wehave

2n 2n

fo [x’"(t)]2dt

+

’,’l Io O2F(x)

Ox,

x, ,t)xi"(t)dt

’(

2 2

+’i . fo g,(x,(t))x,"(t)dt+?i.1 fo h,(t,x(t))x,"(t)dt

2

?,Y:I ei(t)xi"(t)dt

Since

F

is a

C-function,

foreach 1,2 n,there exists >0 such that

o2F(x)

x O,

andalsosincegiscontinuous, foreach 1,2 n, thereexists

Li

>0such that

g,(x,)l L,.

Hence

and thus we have

fo[Xi"(t)]2dt(maxD,) ix,’(t)iat

i-1 \1li.n i-l

1/2

+ +

fo x’’(t)l 2dt

i..1

f01 x,’’(t)l

i,,,1

2n 1/2 2n 1/2

( ),,o

’:

gz max

O

+ +

liin

By

theSobolev inequality

for

every

solutionoftheproblem

(E0 (B)

where

M2

dependsona,b,

M0

and

3.

OPERATOR FORMULATION

Define

L’D(L)C_ C([0,

2

x],g ") L :([0,

2

x],R ")

by

(xx(t),xz(t), .,x,(t))--

t),x2

t), .,x,, ’(t))

where

D(L) C2([0, 2t],R").

Then

KerL R

and

1/2

(4)

ImL f

te EL 2([O,

k

Consider two continuousprojections suchthat

and

definedby

Then

2n]’R’)I fo e(t)dt

0

P: C*([0, 2n],R ") C’([0, 2n],R’) ImP KerL

Q" L 2([0,

2

n],R’) L 2([0,

2

n],R’)

(Qe)(t)-- -n e(t)dt

KerQ lmL, C([0,

2

n],R’) KerL O KerP

and

L :’([0, 2:x],Rn) ImL

O)

ImQ

as atopologicalsum. Since

dim

[L 2([0,

2

n],R")/ImL

dim

Jim Q dim[KerL

n,

L

isaFredholmmappingof index zero and hence there exists anisomorphism

J"

lm

Q KerL.

The operator

L

is notbijective but therestrictionof

L

on

DomL NKerP

is one-to-oneandonto

lmL,

so it has itsalgebraic rightinverse

Ks and,

aswellknown,it is

compact.

Define

N: C 1([0,

2

n],R ") L 2([0,

2

n],Rn)

by

x(t) -t [VF(x(t))] g(x(t)) h(t,x(t))

+

e(t)

where

x(t) (x(t),x(t) x,(t)).

Then

N

is continuousand

maps

boundedsets into bounded sets.

Let G

be

any open

bounded subset of

CI([0,2n],R"),

then

QN:G----L2([0,2n],R n)

is bounded and

KR(I Q):

" L :’([0, 2n],R")

iscompactand continuous.

Hence N

is

L-compact

on

G. Now

we see

x

D(L)

is a solution to the

problem (Ex)(B)

if and

only

if

Lx . Nx

MAIN RESULTS

THEOREM

4.1. Besides conditionson

F, g,

e,and

(H1), (H2),

we assume

(Ha)

there exists r

(r,r2, ...,r,),s (s,s, sn),A (A,A An)

andB

(B1,B, ...,Bn)

inR"

suchthatr<sandA

B

and

for

every

" R"

suchthat

2 2

2-" g(r /.(t))dt

+

h(t, /.(t))dt A

1

g(s +X(t))dt +- h(t,+X(t))dtaB

2n

(5)

and forevery.f(E

CI([0,2t],R ")

havingmean valuezero,

satisfying

theboundary condition

(B)

and such that

Then

(E)(B)

hasatleast one solution if

2

PROOF. We

constructa bounded

open

set in

C(([0,2]),R ")

to

apply

Mawhin’scontinuation theorem in

[2].

Using a’prioriestimate, we have

foranysolution

x(t)

of

(EO(B 1, (0,11. Hence I111- M0- M.

Define aboundedset

n by

f2

{x C ([

0, 2

hi, R")I

r< <s,

:e

<

Mt }.

Then,for

any

solution

x(t)

of

(E) (B)

lyingin

fo,

we have

[" [max(

1/2

I111. . ir, l,ls, i)] +M,

and

where

L,

dependsonr,sand

M.

Thus

x’ll V/’-M:’’

Define a boundedopenset by

-{xeC’([O,2],R")lr <

<

,llll

<

2M,,IIx’II

<

VM= }

Let (x, :k) [D(L)NO] (0,1)

and if

(x,k)

is

any

solutionto

Lx Nx,

then

(x,k)

is asolutiontothe

problem (EO(B ),

l[2[l [il[max(lri[’[si[ ) I[2[I "M

and there exists some

{1,2 n}

such that $-r or

s.

Take

L-inner product

with

ei

(0,

0 0,1,0,...,

0)

onboth sidesof

(EO,

wehave

2 2x 2x

fog,(x,(t))dt+foh,(t,x(t)t-foe,(tt,

or

2x 2 2

fogi(xi(t))dt+ fo hi(t’x(t))dt- fo ei(t)dt-0

if

x

-ri,then,byassumption

2x 2n 2n

fo gi(ri +$i(t))dt

+

fo hi(t,l +’l(t),"’,ri +$i(t),’",n +$n(t))dt- fo ei(t)dt <O

If

x-i

si,thenagain

by

assumption,

(6)

2n 2rt 2n

fo g,(s,+f,(t))dt

+

fo h,(t,l +fl(t s, +f,(t) , +f,(t))dt- fo e,(t)dt

<O.

Thus,for each

Z.

@

(0, 1),

foreverysolutionof

Lx .Nx

issuch thatx O.

Next,

we will show that

QNx

0 for each x

KerL

O and

d[JQN, KerL,O]

0

where

d

is the

Brouwer

topological degree. Since

J:ImQ KerL

is an

isomohism

and

dim[ImQ ]- dim[KerL

n,wemaytake

J

tobetheidentityon

R

and hence

2 2 2

f0 f0 f0

(JaN)(x)(t)=- g(x(t))dt- h(t,x(t)t + e(t)dt

with, for 1, 2 n,

2 2n 2n

(JQN), (x)(t)

- g(x,(t))dt - h(t,x(t))dt

+

e,(tMt

where

x(t) (x(t),x() x(t)).

Let

x

KerL 0,

thenx is constant in

R ,

andthere exists

{

1, 2 n

}

such that

x r

or

s.

a similar manner we have

(QN) (x)

0.

us QNx

0for each x

KerL

0.

It

iseasytosee that

P KerL .[r,,s]. t

en

x

,x’

are constant with and

x x r,x/ ,’ s,. Hence

2 2

(Jel,(xl- g,(r- h(t,x, r x . e,(

-0

and

2s 2s 2

1

fo fo +1 fo

(JQN)i(x’)

---- g,(si)dt --- hi(t,xi’,

s

,xn’)dt e,(t)dt

<0.

Thus

(JQN)i(x)(JQN)i(x’)<O

for i-1,2,...,n. erefore,

by

thegeneralized intermediate value theorem,

d[JQN,KerL,O]

O.

Hence,

byMawhin’s continuationtheorem, theproblem

(E)(B)

has at least one solution in

D (L) .

THEOM

4.2. Besides conditions on

F,g,e,

and

(H)

and

(He),

we assume

(H4)

there exists q

(qx, q2,"-,q),

r

(r,r2,...,r),

s

(s,s,...,s), A (At,A2,...,A)

and

B-(B,B2, ...,Bn)inR

such thatq<r<s and

A B

such that

2 2n

2g

(7)

and

foreveryx

R"

such that

2,’t 2a

afo lfo

2" g(s +f(t))dt +’n h(t, +.f(t))dt B

1/2

andfor every

.

tE

Cl([0,2n],R n)

havingmeanvalue zero,

satisfying

the

boundary

condition

(B)

such that

IIvll..

mini,,,

c, v

Then

(E)(B)

hasatleast2 solutions if

A

<1/2n

fo e(t)dt <B.

PROOF. We

construct2 bounded

open

setsin

C([0,2n],R n)

toapplyMawhin’s continuation theorem in

[3]. I/sing

a’priori estimate,wehave

x’ll,.

min.,.,

c, v ,.,

/

ell M0

for

any

solution

x(t)

of

(Ex) (B), Z. (0,1). Hence 11. X/-Mo M,. Let I, J

betwodisjoint subsets of

{ 1,2,

...,n

}

such that

I UJ {1,2

,n and define

f2j by ff2j {x

tE

C([0,2n],R)lq r

for l,

ri sx ss forj J, II.f.ll(R)sMt};

then the number of suchsetsis2"andfor

any

solution,

x(t)

of

(EO(B)

lyingin

j,

wehave

xll.-[,,[max(I ql, ril )]2+,,

and

1/2

IIx"ll,.

1.i

maxD, M o+/’ L

/

where

L, depends

on

nu-lxC([O,2n],R")lq,<,<r, q,r,s andM. us IIx’ll. .

for

l,r<x

boudea

op <s

set

u by

for j

J, II:ell

<

2Ma, llx"ll.

<

g.

Let (x, .) [D(L n aa,A

x

(0,1)

and if

(x, .)

isanysolutionto

Lx .Nx

then

(x,X)

is a solution to the

problem (Ex)(B),

1/2

and

ere

exists some

{

1,2 n

},

suchthat

-q,r

or

s. By (H)

and assumption wecan see for each

(0,1),

for everysolution of

Lx Nx

is such thatx

Ou-

d similarly,we can also see

QNx

0foreachx

KerL OOu. It

iseasytosee

P uOKerL Hieqi, ri]xHie[r,s]. t

(8)

p {x p x q}

if

Pi {x E p xi

r

i}

if j

Pi’’{x Ep Ixi-r}

if

P/-{x Ep [x-si}

if j

and let xEPi,

x’EP/

with iEIUJ. Then, for iEl, we have xi-q, x-ri.

Hence

(JQN)i

(x) (JQN) (x’)

<0 for

E I. For

j

E J,

wehave x ri,

x/

sj. Thus

(JQN) (x) (JQN) (x’)

<0 for j

EJ.

Therefore,wehave

dB[JQN, ii

f3KerL,

0] ,

0. Thus, by Mawhin’s continuationtheorem, the

problem (E)(B)

has at least one solution

inD(L)

f3

"-i.

Thus

(E)(B)

has at least2 solutions.

Corollary 4.3.

Besides the conditions on

F, g

and e,and

(HI)

and

(H2),

weassume

(Hs)

there exists

T- (T1, T2, T,,)>

0 in

R"

such that

g(T+x)-g(x)

and

h(t,T+x)-h(t,x)

forall

(t,x) E [0,

2

n]

x

R".

(H6)

there exists r

(rl,

r2,

...,r,),

s

(sl, s, s,), A (A,A, A,)

and

B (Bt, B, B,)

in

R"

suchthat0<s r<

T,

r<s,

A

s

B

2x 2x

1

fo g(r+(t))dt +lfoh(t’+(t))dt’A

2

2

if0 fo h(t, +(t))dt "B

2"-- g(S

+

X(t))dt

+

for

every

" E R

suchthat

I111 .Cmax([ s TI, rl, [s )]

and for

every . E C([0.2t],R ") having mean

value

zero, satisfying

the

boundary

condition

(B)

and

such that

[[’f[[ 6( min ,

1

C)[ [ . 2]

+

[[ ].

en (E)(B)

hasatleast lutions if

2

A < e(tt <B.

AOGME.

is work

w supposed by 11 KOSEF ant

andnon-directed research nd, Korch Research Foundation, 1.

REFERENCES

[1] MAWHIN, J.

and

WILLEM, M.

Multiplesolutionsof the periodic

boundary

value

problem

for someforced

pendulum-type

equations,,l. Diff.

F_._,. 52,

2

(1984),

264-287.

[2] GAIHES, R. E.

and

MAWHIN, J.

Coincidence

de_m’ee

andnonlinear differentialequations,

Springer-Verlag, Hew

York, 1977.

[3] DRABEK, P.

Remarksonmultiple periodicsolutionsofnonlinearordinarydifferentialequations,

Comment.

Math. Univ. Carolinae 211

(1980),

155-160.

[4] DRABEK, P.

Periodic solutionsfor systems of forced

coupled

pendulum-like

equations, J.

Diff.

70,

3

(1987),

390-401.

ZANOLIN, B.

Remarksonmultiple periodicsolutionsfornonlinearordinarydifferentialsystems of Lienard

type,

Boll.

U.M.I. (6). I-B (1982),

683-698.

IS]

参照

関連したドキュメント

(5) where (y n ) n∈ Z ∈ l ∞ (E) is given and P is a bounded linear operator on E and they applied the criteria to show the existence of periodic and almost periodic solutions for

W ang , Existence of solutions of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems for third-order nonlinear differential equations, Northeast. W eili , Existence and uniqueness of

One of the most frequently used tools for proving the existence of positive solutions to the integral equations and boundary value problems is Krasnoselskii theorem on cone

Wang, Multiple positive solutions of boundary value problems for systems of nonlinear second order differential equations, J.. Infante, Eigenvalues of some nonlocal boundary

Yuan, Two positive solutions for (n − 1, 1)-type semipositone integral boundary value problems for coupled systems of nonlinear fractional differential equations, Commun Nonlinear

L¨u, “Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differ- ential equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol.. Trujillo, Theory

In our work, we show firstly an adequate fixed point theorem for vectorial version with two components (see theorem 2.7) which extend some existing results even in the case of

Zhang, “Existence of periodic solutions in predator-prey and competition dynamic systems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. Liu, “Multiple periodic solutions for