• 検索結果がありません。

Certain preserving properties of the generalized Alexander operator

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Certain preserving properties of the generalized Alexander operator"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Certain preserving properties of the generalized Alexander operator

Mugur Acu

Abstract

In this paper we give certain preserving properties of the general- ized Alexander operator on some subclasses ofn-uniformly functions.

2000 Mathematical Subject Classification: 30C45

1 Introduction

LetH(U) be the set of functions which are regular in the unit disc U, A={f ∈ H(U) :f(0) =f0(0)1 = 0}

and S ={f ∈A:f is univalent in U}.

In [8] the subfamily T of S consisting of functions f of the form f(z) = z−

X

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z ∈U (1)

39

(2)

was introduced.

Let define the Alexander operator Ip :A→ H(U) I0f(z) = f(z)

I1f(z) =If(z) = Z z

0

f(t) t dt Ipf(z) = I(Ip−1f(z)), p = 1,2,3, ...

We have for f(z) =z+ P

j=2

ajzj,

Ipf(z) = z+ X

j=2

1

jpajzj, p= 1,2,3, ...

Now we can define the generalized Alexander operator Iλ :A→ H(U), Iλf(z) = z+

X

j=2

1 jλajzj, (2)

with λ∈R, λ0, where f(z) = z+P

j=2

ajzj.

The purpose of this paper is to show that the class of n-uniform star- like functions of type α and order γ with negative coefficients, the class of n-uniform close to convex functions of typeα and orderγ with negative co- efficients and some subclasses of functions with negative coefficients, which derive from the above mentioned classes, are preserved by the generalized Alexander operator.

2 Preliminary results

Let Dn be the S˘al˘agean differential operator (see [6]) Dn : A→ A, n N, defined as:

D0f(z) = f(z)

(3)

D1f(z) =Df(z) =zf0(z) Dnf(z) =D(Dn−1f(z)) Remark 2.1 If f ∈T, f(z) =z−P

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z ∈U then Dnf(z) =z− P

j=2

jnajzj.

Theorem 2.1 [6] If f(z) = z− P

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z U then the next assertions are equivalent:

(i) P

j=2

jaj 1 (ii) f ∈T

(iii) f T, where T = T T

S and S is the well-known class of starlike functions.

Definition 2.1 [6] Let γ [0,1) and n∈N, then Sn(γ) =

½

f ∈A:ReDn+1f(z)

Dnf(z) > γ , z ∈U

¾

is the set of n-starlike functions of order γ.

We denote by Tn(γ) the subclass T T

Sn(γ).

Definition 2.2 [3] Let f A. We say that f is n-close to convex of order γ with respect to a half-plane, and denote by CCn(γ) the set of these functions, if there exists g ∈Sn(0) so that

ReDn+1f(z)

Dng(z) > γ, z ∈U, where n N, γ [0,1).

(4)

Definition 2.3 [1] Let f T, f(z) = z P

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z U. We say that f is in the class CCTn(γ), γ [0,1), n N, with respect to the function g ∈Tn(0), if:

ReDn+1f

Dng > γ , z ∈U.

Theorem 2.2 [1] Letγ [0,1)andn∈N. The function f ∈T of the form (1) is inCCTn(γ), with respect to the functiong ∈Tn(0), g(z) = z−P

j=2

bjzj, bj 0, j = 2,3, ..., if and only if

X

j=2

jn[jaj + (2−α)bj]<1−γ . (3)

Definition 2.4 [4] Let f ∈A, we say thatf is n-uniform starlike function of type α if

Re

µDn+1f(z) Dnf(z)

≥α·

¯¯

¯¯Dn+1f(z) Dnf(z) 1

¯¯

¯¯, z ∈U

where α 0, n N. We denote this class with USn(α).

We denote by UTn(α) the subclass TT

USn(α).

Definition 2.5 [3] Let f ∈A, we say that f is n-uniform close to convex function of type α in respect to the function n-uniform starlike of type α g(z), where α≥0, n N, if

Re

µDn+1f(z) Dng(z)

≥α·

¯¯

¯¯Dn+1f(z) Dng(z) 1

¯¯

¯¯, z ∈U

where α 0, n N. We denote this class with UCCn(α).

(5)

Definition 2.6 [5] Let f ∈A, we say that f is n-uniform starlike function of order γ and type α if

Re

µDn+1f(z) Dnf(z)

≥α·

¯¯

¯¯Dn+1f(z) Dnf(z) 1

¯¯

¯¯+γ, z ∈U

where α 0, γ [−1,1), α+γ 0, n N. We denote this class with USn(α, γ).

We denote by UTn(α, γ) the subclass T T

USn(α, γ).

Theorem 2.3 [5] Let α 0, γ [−1,1), α+γ 0 and n N. The function f of the form (1) is in UTn(α, γ) if and only if

X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)j (α+γ)]aj 1−γ.

Definition 2.7 [3] Let f A, we say that f is n-uniform close to convex function of order γ and type α in respect to the function n-uniform starlike of order γ and type α, g(α), whereα 0, γ [−1,1), α+γ 0, n N, if

Re

µDn+1f(z) Dng(z)

≥α·

¯¯

¯¯Dn+1f(z) Dng(z) 1

¯¯

¯¯+γ, z ∈U

where α 0, γ [−1,1), α +γ 0, n N. We denote this class with UCCn(α, γ).

Definition 2.8 [2] Let f T, f(z) = z P

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z ∈U. We say thatf is in the class UCCTn(α), α0, n∈N, with respect to the function g(z) UTn(α) g(z) = z P

j=2

bjzj, bj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z ∈U, if:

Re

µDn+1f(z) Dng(z)

> α·

¯¯

¯¯Dn+1f(z) Dng(z) 1

¯¯

¯¯z ∈U.

(6)

Definition 2.9 [2] Let f ∈T, f(z) = z− P

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z U. We say that f is in the class UCCTn(α, γ), α 0, γ [−1,1), α+γ 0, n N, with respect to the function g(z)∈UTn(α, γ), g(z) =z−P

j=2

bjzj, bj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z ∈U, if

Re

µDn+1f(z) Dng(z)

≥α·

¯¯

¯¯Dn+1f(z) Dng(z) 1

¯¯

¯¯+γ, z ∈U.

Theorem 2.4 [2] Let n N, α 0, γ [−1,1), with α+γ 0. The function f T of the form (1) is in UCCTn(α, γ), with respect to the function g UTn(α, γ), g(z) = z P

j=2

bjzj, bj 0, j = 2,3, ..., z U, if and only if

X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)|jaj −bj|+ (1−γ)bj]1−γ . (4)

3 Main results

Theorem 3.1 If F UTn(α, γ), α 0, γ [−1,1), α +γ 0, n N and f = Iλ(F), where Iλ is defined by (2), then f UTn(α, γ), α 0, γ [−1,1), α+γ 0, n∈N.

Proof. From F(z) = z−P

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ... and f(z) =Iλ(F)(z) we have:

f(z) = z− X

j=2

αjzj, where αj = 1

jλaj 0, j = 2,3, ...

From Theorem 2.3 we need only to show that:

X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)j(α+γ)]αj 1−γ . (5)

(7)

For λ∈R, λ≥0,aj 0 and j = 2,3, ... , we have:

αj = 1

jλaj ≤aj and thus

X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)j(α+γ)]αj X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)j(α+γ)]aj

(6)

where α≥0,γ [−1,1), α+γ 0 and n∈N. From F ∈UTn(α, γ), using Theorem 2.3, we have

X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)j(α+γ)]aj 1−γ

and thus from (6) we obtain the condition (5).

Theorem 3.2 If F ∈UCCTn(α, γ), α≥0, γ [−1,1), α+γ 0, n N, with respect to the function G UTn(α, γ) and f = Iλ(F), g = Iλ(G), where Iλ is defined by (2), then f UCCTn(α, γ), α 0, γ [−1,1), α+γ 0, n N, with respect to the function g ∈UTn(α, γ).

Proof. From the above Theorem we have g ∈UTn(α, γ). ForF(z) =z−P

j=2

ajzj, aj 0, j = 2,3, ...andG(z) = z−P

j=2

bjzj, bj 0, j = 2,3, ... we have f(z) = Iλ(F)(z) = z− P

j=2

αjzj, where αj = 1 jλaj 0, j = 2,3, ... and g(z) = Iλ(G)(z) = z P

j=2

βjzj, where βj = 1 jλbj 0, j = 2,3, ... .

From Theorem 2.4 we need only to show that:

X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)|jαj−βj|+ (1−γ)βj]1−γ . (7)

(8)

It is easy to see that

(α+ 1)|jαj −βj|+ (1−γ)βj = 1

jλ [(α+ 1)|jaj−bj|+ (1−γ)bj] (8)

(α+ 1)|jaj−bj|+ (1−γ)bj

for λ R, λ 0, aj 0, bj 0, j = 2,3, ... , α 0, γ [−1,1) and α+γ 0.

From F UCCTn(α, γ), with respect to the function G UTn(α, γ), we have (see Theorem 2.4):

X

j=2

jn[(α+ 1)|jaj−bj|+ (1−γ)bj]1−γ and thus from (8) we obtain the condition (7).

If we takeγ = 0 in Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2 we obtain:

Theorem 3.3 If F UTn(α), α 0, n N and f = Iλ(F), where Iλ is defined by (2), then f ∈UTn(α), α 0, n∈N.

Theorem 3.4 If F ∈UCCTn(α), α≥ 0, n N, with respect to the func- tionG∈UTn(α)andf =Iλ(F),g =Iλ(G), whereIλis defined by (2), then f ∈UCCTn(α), α≥0, n∈N, with respect to the function g ∈UTn(α).

If we take γ [0,1) and α = 0 in Definition 2.6 we have UTn(0, γ) = Tn(γ) and thus from Theorem 3.1, with γ [0,1) and α= 0, we obtain:

Theorem 3.5 If F ∈Tn(γ), γ [0,1), n N and f =Iλ(F), where Iλ is defined by (2), then f ∈Tn(γ), γ [0,1), n N.

(9)

Remark 3.1 From Theorem 3.2 with γ [0,1) and α = 0, we obtain the preserving property of the generalized Alexander operator on the subclass UCCTn(0, γ), γ [0,1), which is not the same with the class CCTn(γ).

In a similarly way with the proof of the Theorem 3.2, using the condition (3) instead of the condition (4), we obtain:

Theorem 3.6 If F CCTn(γ), γ [0,1), n N, with respect to the function G∈ Tn(0) and f =Iλ(F), g =Iλ(G), where Iλ is defined by (2), thenf ∈CCTn(γ), γ [0,1),n N, with respect to the functiong ∈Tn(0).

References

[1] M. Acu, On a subclass of functions with negative coefficients, General Mathematics, Vol. 11(2003), Nr. 1 - 2, 57-66.

[2] M. Acu, A subclass of uniformly close to convex functions with neg- ative coefficients, Analele Univ. Oradea, Fascicola Matematica, Tom X(2003), 57-68.

[3] D. Blezu,On the n-uniform close to convex functions with respect to a convex domain, General Mathematics, Vol. 9, Nr. 3 - 4, 3 - 14.

[4] I. Magda¸s,Onα-type uniformly convex functions, Studia Mathematica, Vol. XLIV, Nr. 1 (1999), 11 - 17.

[5] I. Magda¸s,A new subclass of uniformly convex functions with negative coefficients, Studia Mathematica (to appear)

(10)

[6] G. S. S˘al˘agean,Geometria Planului Complex, Ed. Promedia Plus, Cluj- Napoca, 1997.

[7] G. S. S˘al˘agean, On some classes of univalent functions, Seminar of geometric function theory, Cluj-Napoca, 1983.

[8] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc.

Amer. Math. Soc., 5 (1975), 109 - 116.

University ”Lucian Blaga” of Sibiu Department of Mathematics

Str. Dr. I. Rat¸iu, Nr. 5–7, 550012 - Sibiu, Romania.

E-mail address: acu [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Convolution Properties for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Defined by q-Derivative Operator, Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol.. Coefficient Estimates of New Classes of

In the paper [15] for functions differentiable in the sense of Lorch in an arbitrary convex domain of a commutative associative Banach algebra, some properties similar to properties

[11] de Malafosse, B., Applications of the summability theory to the solvability of certain sequence spaces equations with operators of the form B (r, s).

BAERSTEIN, A., Integral means, univalent functions and circular symmetrization, Acta Math. CHEN, H., Integral means of the subordinate class,

Alb Lupa¸s, On a subclass of analytic functions defined by dif- ferential S˘ al˘ agean operator, Analele Universit˘ at¸ii din Oradea, Fascicola Matematica, (to appear)..

The first piece of Macdonald’s proof is the observation, known before Macdonald, that there is a one-to-one correspondence, preserving the number of lattice points, between

Further they were studied by Bande and Hadjar [3, 4], Bande, Ghiggini and Kotschick [2], [5,6], which considered a special type of f -structure with com- plementary frames related to

In 1997, Harboure, Salinas and Viviani in [HSV], gave necessary and sufficient conditions on the weights for the boundedness of the fractional integral operator I γ from weighted