(a) (b) (c) 1 (a) (b) m m = (c) p i p i+1 < = ς m L i : {1,..., n} R SVM p i (i = 1,..., m) n ς Kvarnström [1] (1) p m p 1 < = ς O(mnς) [1] (1) n O(mn

The following variation was considered by Beineke and Schwenk [1] and also by Irving [5]: for 1 ≤ m ≤ n, the bipartite Ramsey number R(m, n) is the smallest integer r such that

のようにすべきだと考えていますか。 やっと開通します。長野、太田地区方面 　

The construction of homogeneous statistical solutions in [VF1], [VF2] is based on Galerkin approximations of measures that are supported by divergence free periodic vector fields

iv Relation 2.13 shows that to lowest order in the perturbation, the group of energy basis matrix elements of any observable A corresponding to a fixed energy difference E m − E n

We note that in the case m = 1, the class K 1,n (D) properly contains the classical Kato class K n (D) introduced in [1] as the natural class of singular functions which replaces the

Three different points of P 2 are the inverse image c − 1 (l) of a trisecant l of the projected Veronese surface Im c iff all conics that fulfill the linear condition given by P

The orthogonality test using S t−1 (Table 14), M ER t−2 (Table 15), P P I t−1 (Table 16), IP I t−2 (Table 17) and all the variables (Table 18) shows that we cannot reject the

Because of the bijection Inv: ˜ S n I → P n−1 (Theorem 4.4) we can pull the Young lattice back to ˜ S n I and obtain a third partial order, in addition to weak order and Bruhat