• 検索結果がありません。

Vol.52 , No.2(2004)097Satoko YABUUCHI「Kingship and the Sangha in the Polonnaruva Period -Sangha Reform and Forest-Dwelling Monks-」

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Vol.52 , No.2(2004)097Satoko YABUUCHI「Kingship and the Sangha in the Polonnaruva Period -Sangha Reform and Forest-Dwelling Monks-」"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

( 6 )

Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, Vol. 52, No. 2, March 2004

Kingship

and

the

Sangha

in

the

Polonnaruva

Period

•\

Sangha

Reform

and

Forest-Dwelling

Monks•\

Satoko

YABUUCHI

1. During the period of Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka, the sarigha was divided into

three sects : i. e. the Mahavihara nikaya, the Abhayagiri nikaya, and the Jetavana

nikaya. Parakkamabahu I (1153-1186), who reigned in the subsequent Polonnaruva

period, is renowned for having purified and unified the sarigha under the authority

of the Mahavihara nikaya; with the experienced theca Mahakassapa at the helm1).

This event is also recorded in the Galvihara inscription as the Katikavata

promul-gated by the king. According to the Katikavata, Mahakassapa was a forest-dwelling

monk (arahhavasin) who belonged to Dimbulagala (Udumbaragiri)

of the Mahavihara

nikaya2), which was based ten miles to the southeast of Polonnaruva. The role of

the arannavasins in the Polonnaruva period was of critical importance in the

trans-formation of the organization of the sarigha. This paper attempts to provide a rough

picture of the history of the unification of the sarigha. In particular, I focus on the

way in which the king took advantage of the power of arannavasins.

2. Sometime after the 10th century, in the late Anuradhapura period, the term

ara-nnavasin begins to make frequent appearances in the Cv. During this period, the

northern plains of Sri Lanka faced severe hardships due to invasion from the Cola

dynasty of India. Many urban monasteries were destroyed and their property was

confiscated. The arannavains, however, flourished under the patronage of kings,

and are described in the Cv. with a level of admiration previously unheard of. They

are described, for example, as "the light of the tradition of the theras3)" and as "an

ornament of the isle of Lanka4)". However, while there are several references in

the Cv. to arannavasins of the Mahavihara nikaya, there is no such information on

those affiliated to the other two nikayas.

Vedeha, who was an arannavi sin and the author of the Rasavahini, a text

composed in the 13th century during the Dambadeniya period, has given us, in the

(2)

-949-( 7 )

Kingship and the Sangha in the Polonnaruva Period (S. YABUUCHI)

colophon to this work, an account of the beginning of the school he belonged to

during the reign of Aggabodhi ‡U (608-618). According to this text, the origins of

the school begin with the King of Kalinga, who, having resolved to lead the life

of a recluse, came to Ceylon and joined this order under the famous theca Jotipala

who defeated the Vaitulyas in a debate during the reign of Aggabodhi I (575-608) 5).

Vedeha's lineage of preceptors, which extends as far back as the Polonnaruva period,

can be confirmed as follows : Vedeha Vanaratana Ananda Dimbulagala

Medhankara Sariputta Dimbulagala Mahakassapa. According to this

lineage, the disciples of Jotipala and the King of Kalinga are regarded as having

been the predecessors of Dimbulagala Mahakassapa.

Mahinda ‡X (982-1029) was captured by the Cola king Rajaraja I and the capital

at Anuradhapura was destroyed. Vijayabahu 10055-1110), however, succeeded in

defeating the Colas and came to power at his capital in Polonnaruva. After the death

of Vijayabahu I, his son, Vikkamabahu ‡T(1111-1132), as part of his struggle for

sovereign power, proceeded to confiscate monastic estates and the city was once

again devastated 6) . Despite such destruction to the sangha, Dimbulagala (where, in

the 12th century, Mahakassapa would have been active) escaped unscathed, as it was

patronized and protected by Sundaramahadevi, Vikkamabahu's Kalinga-born queen.

It is evident from an inscription issued in the sixth year of Gaj abahu ‡U's(1132-1153)

reign that there were 500 monks living at Dim' bulagala7)

. 3. After the death of Gaj abahu ‡U, Parakkamabahu I, the son of Manabharana and

nephew of Vikkamabahu I, ascended the throne. Parakkamabahu I rebuilt the city

of Polonnaruva and carried out the purification and unification of the sangha. At

the request of Parakkamabahu I, four monks, Nanapala, Moggallana, Nagindapalliya

and Nanda, were chosen to represent the great many monks at the synod, which

was held under the supervision of Dimbulagala Mahakassapa. The names of these

four monks are found only in the Cv8). These monks were summoned not only from

the city but from the outlying provinces as well (i. e. Sapara and Rohana). Purification

and reconciliation began with the monks of the Mahavihara nikaya and was followed

by the other two nikayas. This unification was based on re-ordination in the tradition

of the Mahavihara nikaya. Parakkamabahu I had Mahakassapa enact the Katikavata,

which was seen as the essence of the Vinaya and what every recluse should observe.

(3)

-948-( 8 )

Kingship

and the Sangha in the Polonnaruva

Period (S. YABUUCHI)

The Katikavata that Parakkamabahu ‡T issued was the first Sasana Katikavata, which

was called the Polonnaru Katikavata, or the Maha-Parakkamabahu Katikavata. This

established the rules (upasampada, general conduct, daily routine, basic texts which should

be mastered, the management of monastic property, and so on) adopted by the sangha

after the purification. It also regulated the lives of monks in accordance with the

two courses, the vipassanadhura and the ganthadhura. Although this legislation

was made to differentiate these two practices in monastic life, the Katikavata

stipu-lated that monks should acquire knowledge of both systems9).

Also under Parakkamabahu ‡T, the Jetavana monastery was erected. A great number

of monks assembled at Jetavana and helped to compile sub-commentaries along

with the theras in eight ayatanas, which developed from the three nikayas, and

Sariputta who was a disciple of Mahakassapa10) and famous for his great wisdom

as Sagara-mati. According to the Katikavata enacted in the Dambadeniya period,

Sariputta was the first thera who was conferred the title Mahasami, or "head of the

sangha" 11) . This fact tells us that the sahgha was unified under common leadership

and indicates the development of a new hierarchical dimension which differed from

that found in the early sangha, where a head successor was not chosen.

4. After the cruel rule of Magha of Kalinga, Vijayabahu ‡V (1232-1236) ascended

the throne at Dambadeniya, the capital. According to the Dambadeni Katikavata,

issued by the subsequent king Parakkamabahu 110 236-1270), the hierarchy of the

sangha was further revamped. According to this text, two administrative positions

known as the Mahatheras (one representing the arahhavasa and another representing the

gamavasa 12)), who came second in command to the Mahasami, were established.

With this, the unity and organization of the sangha in the Polonnaruva period was

further consolidated and strengthened.

(Texts and Abbreviations) Cv.: Culavamsa, PTS. / EZ.: Epigraphia Zeylanica (rep.), Asian

Educational Services. (Footnotes) 1) Cv. 7895-7. 2) Ratnapala, N., The Katikavatas,

Miunchen ; Mikrokopie, 1971, pp. 38,128. 3) Cv. 52,64. 4) Cv. 54,36. 5) Cv. 42,35.

6) Cv. 61,54-57. 7) EZ. ‡U, pp. 194-202. 8) Cv. 78,8-10. 9) Ratnapala, op.cit., pp.

129-132. 10) Cv. 78,32-34. 11) Ratnapala, op. cit., pp. 47,139. 12) ibid., pp. 146-147.

•q Key Words•rarahhavasin, Parakkamabahu ‡T, Culavamsa, Katikavata

(Graduate Student, University of Tokyo)

参照

関連したドキュメント

This paper develops a recursion formula for the conditional moments of the area under the absolute value of Brownian bridge given the local time at 0.. The method of power series

The study of the eigenvalue problem when the nonlinear term is placed in the equation, that is when one considers a quasilinear problem of the form −∆ p u = λ|u| p−2 u with

Greenberg and G.Stevens, p-adic L-functions and p-adic periods of modular forms, Invent.. Greenberg and G.Stevens, On the conjecture of Mazur, Tate and

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

The proof uses a set up of Seiberg Witten theory that replaces generic metrics by the construction of a localised Euler class of an infinite dimensional bundle with a Fredholm

Using the batch Markovian arrival process, the formulas for the average number of losses in a finite time interval and the stationary loss ratio are shown.. In addition,

[Mag3] , Painlev´ e-type differential equations for the recurrence coefficients of semi- classical orthogonal polynomials, J. Zaslavsky , Asymptotic expansions of ratios of

The important dynamical difference between the transient AIDS state in the acute infection stage and the chronic AIDS state that signals the end of the incubation period is the value