Dale J. Ward
What is Critical Thinking?
Though there is continuing debate on the precise meaning and scope of the term “critical thinking,” it can broadly be described as an evidence-based methodology or thought process which helps one decide on the veracity of a claim (Brookfield, 2000). Rudinow & Barry (2004) describe it as “a set of conceptual tools with associated intellectual skills and strategies useful for making reasonable decisions about what to do and what to believe” (p. 42).
The Western roots of critical thinking lie in ancient Greece and the Socratic method, while its Eastern strands can be traced to the Buddhist Kālāma Sutta (Thera, 1994). Both methods advocate sound logical reasoning and dialectic principles for inquiries in the quest for truth, wisdom and knowledge.
Critical thinking crucially includes identifying and challenging assumptions, recognizing the importance of context, imagining and exploring alternatives and practicing a healthy, reflective skepticism (Brookfield, 1987). It is increasingly seen as a core component of formal education worldwide, with its importance growing as students progress from high school to university to graduate study.
There is broad consensus that critical thinking is a crucial skill in the workplace (Paul, 1993; Pink, 2005; Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2006;
Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2008).
Benefits of Learning about Critical Thinking
In an age dominated by technology, information changes with such alacrity
『コミュニカーレ』３（2014）73－103
©₂₀₁₂ 同志社大学グローバル・コミュニケーション学会
that an effective method of analysis (“principled reflexive judgment,” Facione, 2007, p. 19) is required to make sense of it all. The democratization effected by the
“worldwide web” has been a double edged sword; access to information is easier than ever, yet there is now an overabundance of data, requiring each piece of information to be evaluated individually. Clearly, students who learn how to assess information properly will gain an empowering advantage in every aspect of their lives, from conducting academic research to making the right career choices to purchasing consumer products.
A simple “Google Alert” for the phrase “critical thinking,” (the writer receives a total of five to ten per day) will quickly demonstrate the preponderance of articles, courses and conferences addressing the subject presently dominating the academic zeitgeist. Schools and universities worldwide have recognized that there are profound advantages to be gained by teaching critical thinking to their students.
For American educators, instruction in critical thinking has been a focus for decades. In 1933 educational reformer John Dewey identified “learning to think”
as a primary purpose of education (Halpern, 2003, p.8). By the 1980s there was an increased emphasis on pedagogy designed to foster critical thinking (Facione, 1990). This focus has continued, and American higher education has continued to emphasize the discipline. The Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU) promotes “inquiry, critical and creative thinking” as a key skill to be fostered by higher education (AACU, “Liberal Education Outcomes,” 2005).
Critical thinking is, or should be, a central component of a liberal arts education.
Facione argues that it “leads us away from naïve acceptance of authority, above self-defeating relativism, and beyond ambiguous contextualism.” Such skills are essential if a democratic society is to function properly, with every generation requiring better critical thinking skills than its predecessor due to a bigger and more complex base of knowledge (Halpern, 2003).
Not only does critical thinking enable students to question and evaluate core assumptions, but since it is now practiced worldwide, the study of critical thinking
brings students into line with global academic standards. When they are able to view issues and concepts from different perspectives, avoiding bias and prejudice, learners are better able to engage in constructive communication and acquire a mature mindset which will benefit them in the workplace and in life generally.
These skills are particularly useful to those planning to embark upon study abroad programs since, “International students need to be explicitly taught the forms of expression of critical thinking and inquiry which are expected within their particular context and discipline” (Higher Education Academy, 2013). Furthermore, since critical thinking teaches transferable skills, it is beneficial to graduates participating in the global economy.
Numerous studies prove conclusively that people better at “fluid reasoning”
― an aspect of critical thinking ― “outperform others in producing creative ideas”
(Nusbaum & Silvia, 2011). Furthermore, adults with high scores on critical thinking tests report “fewer negative life outcomes associated with poor decision making”
(deBruin, Parker, & Fischhoff, 2007).
A twenty-year Vanderbilt University study (Park, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2008) saw cognitive ability predict the number of patents produced by science, engineering, technology, and mathematics graduates. Studies of cognitive ability demonstrated that the top 25% of students would go on to produce four times more patents than those in the lowest 25%. Not only does this underline the fact that critical thinking plays a crucial role in innovation, it emphasizes its key role solving the scientific and technological challenges facing the world in the 21st century.
In the workplace, study after study emphasizes the importance of critical thinking skills. A 2009 Canadian study of nurse educators found that those with high critical thinking scores were more likely to incorporate dispositions such as inquisitiveness, confidence and research knowledge into their work (Profetto- McGrath, Bulmer Smith, Hugo, Patel, & Dussault, 2009). Not only would this help medical personnel reach the desired professional standards; those personnel would also make important contributions to patient and systems outcomes.
Crucially, people with high scores in critical thinking assessment are also
less likely to show biases common in thinking. Such biases are related to “important real-world decisions in domains such as personal finance, employment, health, and public policy (West, Toplak, & Stanovich, 2008). Thus it is easy to see how the acquisition of critical thinking skills enables students to become empowered, productive citizens in a free and democratic society.
Critical Thinking in Japan
There has been a perception among both Japanese and foreign educators in Japan that Japanese students have been poorly instructed, if at all, in critical thinking skills. Kawato has noted that “Japanese universities have yet to sufficiently recognize the importance of critical thinking” (n.d.), while McVeigh states that, Japanese students “are not well trained in writing critically, arguing coherently, or expressing their views with conviction or verve....they have trouble with specific forms of knowledge manipulation and production that some people, with different schooling experiences, might take for granted” (McVeigh, 2002, p.13). This sentiment continues to hold sway, and despite the fact that Japanese children lead the world in numeracy and literacy scores, the dominant view criticises Japan’s state education system for “quashing original thought among pupils in favour of rote learning, and for placing an emphasis on theory rather than practical skills”
(McCurry, 2013).
In response, many of Japan’s political, business and educational leaders have called for Japan’s education system to begin producing graduates who possess the analytical skills which will help them to compete in the new information age, and these demands have been echoed in the nation’s media (Japan Times, 2011, Kawato, n.d.). The Japanese government replied with a 2002 White Paper initiated by its Education Ministry requiring that students acquire “the ability to think, judge, express, etc., to solve problems, and to continue learning with self- motivation” (MEXT 2002).
As a result, there seems to be at least a tacit recognition that the teaching of critical thinking skills be part and parcel of Japan’s educational policy. Japan’s
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology has underlined this in its Basic Act on Education, calling for students to be taught “to think logically as well as critically” (MEXT, 2008).
Although it is difficult to ascertain exactly how many of Japan’s universities offer courses in critical thinking, the subject seems to be gaining a modest toehold in faculties around the country. In addition, an increasing number of academic papers devoted to critical thinking in the Japanese context (Stapleton, 2002, Day, 2003, Rear, 2008, McKinley & Thompson, 2011) support the view that the subject is slowly beginning to make its presence felt in Japanese higher education.
Student Profile
The course offered by the writer (“Critical Thinking 101”) has been incorporated into two university programs. The first was taught to four classes of third and fourth-year students as part of an Academic English writing course, since critical thinking helps students learn not only how to think but also how to write;
West (2003) correctly notes that “pairing a critical thinking course with another curriculum reinforces the lessons by allowing students to immediately apply what they have learned.”
Classes were small in size, generally containing between twelve and sixteen students, who came from various Faculties including Sports Science, Computer Science and Engineering. Class members were generally studious and highly- motivated in terms of language learning, the vast majority exhibiting above- average English ability and in many cases approaching fluency. A good number were ‘returnee’ students who had recently re-entered Japan after residing in English-speaking countries for many years. As a result they were fluent in English and had been highly assimilated into Western societies. Since many were planning to return to the west in order to take up graduate studies, they felt that improving their academic writing and critical thinking skills would stand them in good stead in their future academic pursuits.
In the second case the course was offered to a class of twenty-five third-year
students who had returned from a one-year study abroad program as undergraduates in their university’s Faculty of Global Communications. Members of this faculty tend to exhibit a high level of motivation and ability in English and a healthy curiosity in Western study methods. Most have a strong desire to use their English skills in their future employment or to work abroad (for instance in NPOs or multinational companies such as banks and airlines).
Some Teaching Materials
The course includes a wide variety of materials and formats, including vocabulary, readings, videos, independent research, presentations, games, quizzes and field activities. Topics addressed during the course include science, pseudoscience, society, spirituality and paranormality. The final test takes the form of an essay which conforms to academic writing conventions expected in western colleges and universities.
The guiding philosophy of “Critical Thinking 101” is that it contain authentic comprehensible input (Krashen, 1982). Since the core concepts of critical thinking are ― if not terrifically complex ― quite challenging, this course has been offered mainly to students of high-intermediate level or above. Having said that, as Rear (2010) notes, a systematic approach can certainly help foster critical thinking skills among students with relatively low linguistic abilities, and the writer has seen success among pre-intermediate to intermediate learners with high levels of motivation.
(i) Vocabulary
It is essential that students immediately be acquainted with key vocabulary which appears throughout the course. Students receive a list of core terminology, consolidated through quizzes, games and repetition in all types of course materials.
It would be unimaginable to study critical thinking without constantly encountering terms such as, “assumption,” “claim,” “challenge,” and so forth (Appendix 1).
The first class also features a questionnaire in which students express their
attitudes to issues which could be examined through critical thinking (Appendix 2). These include medicine, religion, society and topics specific to Japanese culture.
This promotes a healthy debate as class members compare opinions at the start of the course. In the final class students retake the questionnaire and review their attitudes in the light of their exposure to critical thinking.
(ii) Reading: Six Criteria of Critical Thinking
The course’s key philosophy is based upon the six criteria of critical thing reading as outlined in James Lett’s A Field Guide to Critical Thinking (1990).
Designed to help students learn how to think rather than what to think, the guide introduces the six basic criteria of “the scientific method.” These criteria are:
1. Falsifiability: For a claim to have credibility, one must be able to conceive of evidence that would prove the claim false. In other words, it must be testable.
2. Logic: Argument offered in support of a claim must be sound, its conclusion following inexorably from its premise. If this does not occur, the argument is logically invalid.
3. Comprehensiveness: One should never consider only evidence which supports a claim. Rather, the evidence offered should be exhaustive, with all of the available data being considered.
4. Honesty: One must be completely honest about one’s results.
5. Replicability: If evidence for a claim rests upon an experimental result, then other investigators must be able to repeat the test and achieve the same results.
6. Sufficiency: Evidence offered in support of a claim must be sufficient to support it, with three crucial stipulations:
a. the burden of proof for any claim rests on the claimant b. extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence
c. evidence based purely upon authority and/or testimony is inadequate for any claim.
It is crucial for students to become familiar with these key concepts, since virtually all of the course topics will be examined through this prism. Therefore a good deal of time is spent introducing, discussing, consolidating and practicing the use of the criteria. They are represented by a useful mnemonic which students can easily memorize: “FeLCHeRS.”
(iii) Critical Thinking Check List and Presentation
In order for students to practice using the criteria of the scientific method, they are equipped with a critical thinking check list (Appendix 3) based on
“FeLCHeRS”. This useful tool provides students with a framework methodology they can use to research and assess any claim. The check list includes a glossary of useful language terms (e.g. “The claim is (not ) falsifiable because…, “The evidence is (not) replicable because…”) which students generally find invaluable during oral feedback since they generally require consolidation of potentially confusing noun/adjective structures such as falsifiability/falsifiable or logic/logical.
The check list methodology is practiced through various assigned tasks.
Firstly, students assess a pair of claims during class time in groups, then report their findings back to the class. In order to demonstrate the criteria of critical thinking at work, a scientific claim is usually compared against a pseudoscientific claim, for instance a. Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and b. the well-known claim that an American couple were abducted in a space craft piloted by alien beings. How far the claims satisfy the criteria of the scientific method is examined in class discussion.
To follow up, students choose their own individual claims for homework, researching and assessing them by using their check list, and later present their findings to class members in groups. Group members then have the opportunity to discuss one another’s findings, further consolidating their knowledge of the criteria. Topics chosen reflect the diverse interests of students: religious faith, taxation, terrorism, education, health, cultural memes and food safety to name but a few.
The “FeLCHeRS” criteria are referred to repeatedly during the course as various topics are addressed through the prism of critical thinking. They include pseudoscientific tropes such as the claim that blood types influence personality (a belief which has been used to justify discriminatory practices in Japan and other countries), the reasons why many people believe in dubious conspiracy theories, and the subjectivity of eyewitness testimony in criminal justice cases, an issue which is particularly pertinent in Japan, a nation with a criminal conviction rate of 99% (Oi, 2013).
Analysis of Student Feedback
The overall student evaluation of “Critical Thinking 101” (see Appendix 4) has been very positive. In a sampling of 94 students, a significant minority (29%) were to some degree aware of critical thinking prior to study, though an overwhelming majority (69%) were not. Since an even larger number (88%) had never studied critical thinking, the course seems to provide value in terms of bringing critical thinking to the attention of learners.
All students seemed able to cope with the level of difficulty of the course, inspiring confidence that comprehensible input had largely been achieved. In addition, students enjoyed learning about critical thinking either “a lot “ (88%) or an “average” amount (12%).
There was unanimous agreement among students that it was either “very important” (85%) or “important” (15%) for students to learn about critical thinking, with virtually identical numbers feeling that most students should take courses in critical thinking. Not only that, the overwhelming number of students (91%) felt that the course had helped them to think more effectively.
Written responses to the question “What was the most important thing you learned in this class?” revealed that students had taken on board the “nuts and bolts” mechanics of critical thinking which had been presented in class:
The most important thing I learned was the 6 criteria of critical thinking
(FeLCHeRS).
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.
The course had also encouraged students to question various aspects of their experiences:
...we need to realize how...we usually do not see or think about things critically in daily life.
It is necessary for everyone to consider or examine each of the issues...they face by themselves.
It had also promoted autonomy and self-reflection:
The phrase, ‘Everything you know is wrong.’ was very impressive. After I learned that, I started asking myself, “Am I sure about this?” before believing something.
We should not believe things without any evidence and rethink the meaning of what we already know.
It also helped them to see critical thinking as a core component of formal global education with which they should become familiar if they were to compete on the global stage:
I was disappointed when I took academic classes for the first time in...(my study abroad program)...because every American student had strong opinions and knowledge about the class. Taking classes in critical thinking makes students have more interest.
Recognizing critical thinking as an empowering, transferrable skill, students noted that they could incorporate it into other areas of study or life in general.
Today, because of globalization and the internet, we are surrounded by too much information and cannot always easily choose which one is trustworthy.
But due to your class, I can analyze information and beliefs.
...critical thinking helped me to look at my other classes in a different way..
I think critical thinking will be useful after I graduate.
As to whether students felt “culturally or academically compromised” (Eggeg
& Kutieleh, 2004, p. 78) by this course of study, recent class members were asked to comment on whether they felt pressured to accept the cultural assumptions of their instructor. The response was a unanimous rejection of notions of “cultural imperialism," and an acceptance of critical thinking as a universally valid academic discipline:
I don't think you forced us to study your ideas and critical thinking since you always asked us about our thoughts, and we did have an opportunity to take a look at the syllabus before taking this class.
Personally I enjoy learning something new, and in this case it was critical thinking because it helps me to expand my horizons.
The way of critical thinking might be western...but today it is noted by Japanese educators and even the Ministry of Education because of its utility. I think it is a good way of thinking regardless of whether it is a western or Asian cultural idea.
There are many books about logical thinking or critical thinking in the business
section...and…job hunting section…in Japanese book stores. Even though now it's not common in Japan, I think sooner or later it will be very important to acquire critical thinking skills in Japan because of globalization.
Caveats
Notwithstanding the benefits of studying critical thinking outlined above, there are certain caveats which instructors should bear in mind when considering teaching these skills in a Japanese classroom.
(i) Cultural Imperialism?
It has been suggested that the teaching of critical thinking skills in Asian colleges and universities amounts to little more than Western professors imposing their cultural values upon students. Some critics (Atkinson, 1997, Yoshino, 2004) have vehemently opposed teaching critical thinking skills in non-Western contexts, describing it as an elitist social practice with no universal basis and denying any evidence of critical thinking skills being transferable. In short, they denounce it as a form of cultural imperialism.
Such pre-globalization assertions now seem dubious now that critical thinking has become firmly established as a cornerstone of global education (Dorman, 1992). Having said that, it is important that students be made aware of the historical and cultural assumptions informing the methodology. By considering the social, cultural and individual backgrounds of their students, professors can endeavor to avoid such “cultural imperialism,” thus helping learners to choose which cultural practices they wish to take on board. Working in an Australian university context, Biggs (2003) places the socio-cultural perspectives of learners front and center in order to avoid what he calls “conceptual imperialism”.
As mentioned above, Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology has explicitly called for a greater emphasis on the teaching of critical thinking skills in classrooms. However, the teaching of critical thinking, with its emphasis on “reasoned nonconformity” (Rear, 2008, p. 2) presents Japan's
administrators with a dilemma. While independent thought undoubtedly fosters fresh ideas and innovation, it also presents a threat to systems of authority in its implied rejection of established ways of thinking.
While globalization has led to an increased demand for “a new kind of graduate...independent...unbound by conventional thinking” (Rear, 2008, p.2), Japan’s authorities have shown concern that burgeoning individualism among young people may threaten the nation’s social order. The response to this perceived cultural threat has been a re-emphasis on patriotic and moral education, intended to consolidate traditional values (Japan Times, 2005). This reactionary stance stands in direct opposition to the core values of critical thinking: challenging assumptions and modes of thought, demanding openness and transparency. Thus it will likely remain true that “perceptions of Japan as homogeneous continue to have a key role in structuring...national identity and social reality for many Japanese” (Burgess, 2004).
Be that as it may, the global reality is that, “the ideological maintenance of (national) identities is usually unable to keep up with the pace of (historical) change” (Burgess, 2004). In the present global context, “critical thinking is a vital part of teaching students how to think” (Egege and Kutieleh, p. 83). Mason (2008) notes that strong critical thinkers should be able “to see different world views in perspective...(and) dialogue with others who...have different world views and cultural backgrounds" (p. 3).
There are in any case reasons to doubt the stereotypical image of Asian students who are contentedly bound by their cultural constructs. In a 2000 study, Littlewood surveyed 2,307 students from eight Asian nations. Respondents were asked to evaluate (i) how far a teacher’s authority should be questioned, (ii) how far students should discover facts for themselves rather than being ‘spoon-fed’ and (iii) whether teacher or student should be responsible for evaluating how much had been learnt (Littlewood, 2000, p. 32). The overall message was that “Asian students do not...wish to be spoon-fed with facts...They want to explore knowledge themselves and find their own answers" (p. 34).
In Japan, a study conducted by Stapleton (2002, cited by Day, 2003) surveyed 70 university students on aspects of critical thinking. Results indicated that students were not afraid to express opinions which contradicted their teachers. In addition, Stapleton found that the students had obtained a firm grasp of the elements of critical thinking.
For each situation in which Japanese students seem culturally unique, there is another where they seem hardly different from European or other students.
Those who elect to study in Western countries are by definition curious about Western educational styles and modes of thinking. The writer has worked with a good number of outgoing, risk-taking, critically-thinking Japanese learners, and “it must be acknowledged that within any one cultural group there is variation in behavior” (Mungubhai, p.24).
Though a relatively small (albeit growing) number of Japanese students have studied critical thinking, data indicates that students are most receptive to studying these concepts. There have been shifts in perceptions of identity taking place above and below the surface of modern Japan, and it is conceivable that they will contribute to an atmosphere of change in the coming years, perhaps supporting Yamanaka’s assertion (2002, cited by Burgess, 2004) that, "Japan stands at the crossroads of becoming a multicultural...multi-ethnic society."
(ii) Teacher as Authority Figure
The notion of instructors imposing assumptions upon students raises another caveat for professors to consider. While it is the responsibility of the instructor to introduce learners to the core concepts of critical thinking, helping them absorb and put them into practice, he or she should also encourage students to be vigilant toward the professor’s role as authority figure. This underlines one of the core concepts of critical thinking: that an appeal to authority is often applied fallaciously.
It also highlights the fact that the academic process can only benefit from transparency.
The writer emphasizes this from the start by advising students not to accept
his assertions without question. Rather, they should be prepared to query, check, find out for themselves. By resisting the urge to exercise power by hiding behind authority, “wielding the threat of grades,” (Palmer, 1997, p. 16), the professor makes students more receptive to using the concepts at hand, (Ellis, 1994), and helps them become better critical thinkers.
Despite the instructor relaxing his authoritarian stance, he is not handing everything over to the whim of the students. Rather, he must guide learners through core concepts while allowing them the freedom to, in the most extreme scenario, challenge the methodology itself.
(iii) Realistic Goals
It is essential that instructors teaching critical thinking skills to ESL students be realistic about the goals that can be achieved. It is true that, through carefully considered teaching methodology, key concepts can be acquired and practiced.
Nevertheless it is no exaggeration to say that it takes a concentrated period of study and practice, often over many years, to fully acquire critical thinking skills.
Clearly, it is unrealistic to expect students to magically be transformed into first- rate critical thinkers over a fifteen-week university term.
In many instances the critical thinking content will in any case be subordinate to a larger goal: acquiring skills in the second language. When the critical thinking content is added, not only are students endeavoring to understand and practice new and challenging skills, they are doing so in a language which is not their mother tongue. Professors should not underestimate this challenge, and bear it in mind when grading by placing more emphasis on participation, effort and general understanding of the concepts involved rather than anticipating that each student will miraculously become transformed into an accomplished critical thinker during the course of a term.
(iv) Liberal Bias
Related to the issue of professorial authority is the charge, often leveled by
conservatives, that the teaching of critical thinking contains a liberal bias. This, in Rizzola’s words (2013) produces graduates who “have been inundated with liberal opinions.”
As mentioned above, there are compelling arguments that since critical thinking necessarily involves challenging established assumptions and paradigms it becomes, almost by definition, a liberal pursuit. This is particularly true if one takes the view that conservatism wishes to protect what it believes it has and that, by contrast, liberals seek progressive solutions to the challenges of the new millennium.
This is a wide-ranging debate which is outside the scope of this paper.
However it is certainly an issue which instructors intending to teach critical thinking should bear in mind.
(v) Personal Self-Reflection
“Critical Thinking 101” is a new course which the writer has been offering students for only two years. While a good foundation has been laid, it is recognised that certain flaws need to be addressed and continuing development necessary for the course to achieve its full potential.
Two areas in particular stand out as being in need of improvement. The first is that greater emphasis should be placed on encouraging students to reflect on the validity of this admittedly western version of critical thinking in an Asian/Japanese context. If critical thinking requires that we question assumptions, then the particular version of critical thinking we are advocating should itself come under scrutiny, and students should feel free to advocate non-western modes of thought as a viable alternative. This aspect will be addressed with greater vigour in future courses.
Secondly, the writer feels that although the readings, videos and research presentations included in the course are effective pedagogical tools, more practical
‘hands on’ class activities would help improve the syllabus. For instance, students could, in future, learn how to set up ‘double-blind’ experiments to test various
theories and assumptions, practically applying the scientific method in order to consolidate the core concepts of critical thinking. With these improvements in mind, the writer is excited about the pedagogical challenges which lie ahead.
Concluding Remarks
This paper has outlined but one approach to incorporating critical thinking lessons in a Japanese university context, together with some pertinent philosophical issues. The benefits of learning critical thinking skills are numerous, with applications in academia, the workplace and private life. Since critical thinking is now a cornerstone of global education programs, it is essential that all Japanese students, particularly those wishing to study abroad, be familiarized with its basic concepts.
Course feedback indicates that Japanese students have a very positive response to studying critical thinking. Though a significant minority had heard of critical thinking prior to the course, reflecting, perhaps, its growing prominence in global education, the vast majority were unfamiliar with the core concepts and had never studied them before. By the end of the course, most had obtained a much clearer understanding of these ideas. They said that studying critical thinking had helped them to question assumptions, practice greater autonomy and engage in productive self-reflection. They also recognized the transferability of critical thinking skills in non-academic contexts.
Though the concepts of critical thinking were challenging to students, this conformed to their expectations of what a 21st-century university course should offer. They recognized that professors should be endeavoring to challenge their students and introduce them to new skills which they could either embrace or reject. They felt intellectually stimulated and rejected any notion of critical thinking being a culturally imposed methodology. Many of them realized that critical thinking is an ongoing process which continues beyond academia as a lifelong pursuit. The experiences of the writer strongly suggest that, once students have grasped the basics of critical thinking, they accept it enthusiastically as an
intellectually valid tool which will stand them in good stead, not only as students, but as empowered, productive citizens in a free and democratic society.
References
Adey, P.S., &Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/leap/ documents/
LEAPCommComm_Final.pdf
Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 31, 71-94.
Biggs, J. (1997). In R. Murray-Harvey and H.C. Silins (Eds.)Teaching across and within cultures: The issue of international students. Higher Education Research &
Development Society of Australasia Conference: Learning and teaching in higher education: Advancing international perspectives. Adelaide: Flinders Press.
Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. (2004). What’s driving the new economy: The benefits of workplace innovation. The Economic Journal, 114, 97-116.
Brookfield, S. D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Brookfield, S.D. (2000). Contesting criticality: Epistemological and practical contradictions in critical reflection in Proceedings of the 41st Annual Adult Education Research Conference.
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A., & Fischhoff, B. (2007).Individual differences in adult decision-making competence (A-DMC). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
Bryson, B. (2005). A Short History of Nearly Everything: Special Illustrated Edition.
Broadway Books.
Burgess C. (2004). Maintaining identities: Discourses of homogeneity in a rapidly globalizing Japan. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese studies, Article 1.
Retrieved from http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/articles/2008/Rear.html.
Burgess, C., Gibson, I., Klaphake, J., & Selzer, M. (2010). “The ‘Global 30’ project and Japanese higher education reform: An example of a ‘closing in’ or an ‘opening up’?”Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8:4, 201.
Carty, P. & Ward, D. (2012). Initial Observations on a new Communicative Performance course in Doshisha University’s Faculty of Global Communications. Communicare:
Doshisha Studies in Global Communications. 1, 53-85.
Chan, H. M. & Yan, H. K. (2008). Is there a geography of thought for East-West differences? In M. Mason, (Ed.), Critical thinking and learning. Oxford: Blackwell, 44-64.
Davidson, M. (2009). The culture of critical thinking. Learning from internationalisation:
Inclusive teaching across cultures. Learning from internationalisation website, The University of Nottingham. Retrieved from www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/
internationalisation.
Day, R. (2003). Teaching critical thinking and discussion. The Language Teacher, 27(7), 25-27.
Dorman, William A. (1992, August). The not so odd couple: Critical thinking and global education. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Rohnert Park, CA.
Douglass, M, and Roberts, G.S. (Eds.). (2000). Japan and global migration: Foreign workers and the advent of a multicultural society. London and New York:
Routledge.
Dreher, M. (2012, Feb. 22). The conservative and liberal brain, critical thinking applied:
Toward a more reasoned civil discourse. Retrieved from http://critical-thinker.
net/?p=1074.
Eades, J. (2000). Introduction: Globalization and social change in contemporary Japan.
In Eades J., Gill T. &Befu H. (Eds.), Globalisation and social change in contemporary Japan (pp. 1-7). Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Egege, S. and Kutieleh, S. (2004) Critical thinking: Teaching foreign notions to foreign students. International Education Journal, 4(4), 75-85. Retrieved from http://ehlt.
flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/v4n4/Egege/paper.pdf.
Ellis, R. (1994). Learning strategies. In R, Ellis, The study of second language acquisition (pp. 529-560). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ennis, R. H. (1958). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32(1), 81-111.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, California.
Pearson Education, 2013.
Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4thed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
The Higher Education Academy website (2013). Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.
ac.uk/resources/detail/internationalisation/isl_critical_thinking.
Japan Times Online (2005).Aso says Japan is nation of ‘one race’. Oct 18 2005. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2005/10/18/news/aso-says-japan-is-nation- of-one-race/#.UkSizBZ4VlI.
Japan Times Online. (2011, Sept. 11). Slow transparency of universities. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2011/09/18/editorials/slow-transparency-of- universities/#.UqaHMJHRpjA.
Kawato, M. (n.d.). Recommendation for Critical Thinking, The Yomiuri Shimbun.
Retrieved from http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/adv/chuo/dy/education/20130117.htm.
Krashen, S. (1982).Second Language Acquisition Theory. In Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall International.
Kubota, R. (1999). Japanese culture constructed by discourse: Implications for applied linguistics research and ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 9-35.
Lett, J (1990). A field guide to critical thinking. Skeptical Inquirer Magazine, 14(4).
Retrieved from http://www.csicop.org/si/show/field_guide_to_critical_thinking/.
Littlewood, W. (2000). Do Asian students really want to listen and obey? ELT Journal, 54(1), 31-36.
Manghubai, F. (1997). Primary socialization and cultural factors in second language learning: Wending our way through semi-charted territory, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S, 23-24. Reading 7.4, LIN 8001. Principles of Second Language Learning: Selected readings. University of Southern Queensland (2005).
Mason, M. (Ed). (2008). Critical thinking and learning.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Matsuda, T., &Nisbett, R. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934.
McCurry, J. (2013). Why do Japanese children lead the world in numeracy and literacy?
The Guardian, 8 October, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/
world/2013/oct/08/why-do-japanese-children-lead-world-numeracy-literacy.
McKinley, J., & Thompson, M. (2011). The Globalization of Japanese Higher Education and the FLA Core. Sophia International Review, 33. Retrieved from http://repository.cc.
sophia.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/123456789/24503/1/200000176573_000014100_61.pdf.
McVeigh, B. J. (2002). Japanese Higher Education as Myth. Armonk NY and London:
M.E. Sharpe.
Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2002).
Japanese Government Policies in Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 2002, Chapter 2 Section 3.’ Retrieved from http://www. mext.go.jp/b_
menu/hakusho/html/hpac200201/index.html.
MEXT (文部科学省) Japan Ministry of Sports, Culture, Education, Science and Technology. (2008).
新学習指導要領. New Course of Study: Measures to be
implemented comprehensively and systematically for the next five years. Article 17 of the Basic Act on Education, Office for the Promotion of Educational Reform, Policy Planning and Coordination Division, Lifelong Learning Policy Bureau, July 1, 2008.Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/gengo/1300858.htm Nusbaum & Silvia. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid
intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking.
Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45.
Oi, M. (2013). Japan crime: Why do innocent people confess? BBC News, January 2, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20810572.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st Century Skills: Education and Competitiveness, A Resource and Policy Guide. Tucson,AZ: Author. Retrieved from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and_
competitiveness_guide.pdf.
Paul, R. (1984). Critical thinking: Fundamental to education for a free society.
Educational Leadership, 42 (1), 4 - 14.
Paul, R. (1993). Critical Thinking – What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. California: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Pink, Daniel H. (2005). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future.
New York: Riverhead.
Profetto-McGrath, J., Bulmer Smith, K., Hugo, K., Patel, A, Dussault, B. (2009). Nurse educators' critical thinking dispositions and research utilization.Nurse Education in Practice. 2009 May; 9 (3):199-208. Retrieved from http://libportal.medilam.ac.ir/
documents/10129/36790/Nurse+educators’+critical+thinking+dispositions+an d+research+utilization.pdf.
Rear, D. (2008). Critical thinking and modern Japan: conflict in the discourse of government and business. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies Vol 8 (2). Retrieved from: http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/articles/2008/Rear.html.
Rear, D. (2010).A systematic approach to teaching critical thinking through debate. ELT World Vol 2. Retrieved from http://blog.nus.edu.sg/eltwo/2010/02/19/a-systematic- approach-to-teaching-critical-thinking-through-debate/.
Rizzola, J. (2013). America’s Liberal Universities: Destroying Critical Thinking Skills.
Patriot Update website, January 20, 2013. Retrieved from: http://patriotupdate.
com/articles/americas-liberal-universities-destroying-critical-thinking-skills/
Rudinow, J. & Barry V.E. (2004). Invitation to Critical Thinking.Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
Stapleton, P. (2002). Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing: Rethinking tired constructs. ELT Journal, 56(3), 250-257.
Thera, S. (1994). Kalama Sutta: The Buddha's Charter of Free Inquiry. Retrieved 10/3/13 from: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/soma/wheel008.html.
Ward, D. (2013). Student Empowerment through Critical Thinking. CamTESOL International Conference, February 23-24, 2013, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Yoshino, A. (2004, July 16). Well-intentioned Ignorance Characterises British Attitudes to Foreign Students. The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 18.
Appendix 1
Critical Thinking - Useful Vocabulary Match the words with their meanings
1. an assumption a. someone who does not believe in god
2. a claim b. facts/information showing something is true (1) 3. to challenge c. something which science cannot explain 4. a skeptic d. being born again
5. to debunk e. something you think is true without proof 6. paranormal f. a theory which pretends to be scientific
7. proof g. belief without evidence
8. evidence h. a statement or opinion
9. psychic i. to show that an idea or belief is false
10. reincarnation j. facts/information showing something is true (2) 11. faith k. to test/refuse to accept
12. secular l. a person who questions or doubts
13. an atheist m. having mysterious powers, such as the ability to speak to the dead
14. pseudoscience n. non-religious
Appendix 2: Questionnaire
What do you think about these beliefs?
Tick ( ✓ ) the answer which best matches your opinion.
Then compare and discuss with your classmates.
Belief Strongly agree
Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree
Aliens could have visited Earth from outer space.
Astrology can predict your future.
Your blood type can show your personality.
There is life after death.
Spiritualists can contact dead people.
A god exists who is concerned about the lives of human beings.
The American government has
“covered up” the truth about certain events.
(For example, the World Trade Center attacks.)
“Alternative” medicine like homeopathy is as good as conventional medicine.
When a crime happens, eyewitness testimony is very trustworthy.
Appendix 3: Critical Thinking Check List and Example
Critical Thinking Check List
The claim is (not) falsifiable because…
The evidence is (not) replicable because…The evidence is (not) comprehensive because…
The claim is (not) logical because…
The evidence is (not) sufficient because... The claimants are (not) honest because…
Theory or Claim Falsifiability
Logic
Comprehensiveness
Honesty
Replicability
Sufficiency
Critical Thinking Check List (Example 1)
The claim is (not) falsifiable because… The evidence is (not) comprehensive because…
The evidence is (not) replicable because…
The claim is (not) logical because… The claimants are (not) honest because…
The evidence is (not) sufficient because...
Theory or Claim Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
(Random genetic mutations cause biological populations to adapt to their environment. The offspring of those populations which adapt more successfully will have a greater chance of survival.)
Falsifiability Yes.
The theory could be falsified if, for example, a genuine fossil were found in the wrong geological layer. That’s never happened.
Claimants can support their claims with a LOT of tests and data.
Logic Yes.
The more data we have, the more evolution is proven. The data is logical in the way it supports evolution. Darwin’s theory also enables scientists to predict certain evolutionary events.
Comprehensiveness Yes.
Data from many fields supports the theory: biology, chemistry, physics, anthropology, genetics etc.
Honesty Yes.
Scientists have open discussions in publications and conferences.
When there is dishonestly, scientists usually find it.
Replicability Yes.
Experiments on carbon-dating, DNA-testing and many more can be replicated.
Sufficiency Yes
Claimants (mainly scientists) can support their claims with a LOT of data. And new discoveries are being made all the time.
Critical Thinking Check List (Example 2)
The claim is (not) falsifiable because… The evidence is (not) comprehensive because…
The evidence is (not) replicable because…
The claim is (not) logical because… The claimants are (not) honest because…
The evidence is (not) sufficient because...
Theory or Claim Aliens (“UFOs”) have visited Planet Earth.
Falsifiability No.
You can’t disprove a negative. (For example when people say, “You can’t prove they don’t exist!” No one can do that.)
Logic No.
No logical proof for alien spacecraft. But many logical explanations
for why people think they see UFOs, such as the influence of popular culture and copycat reports.
Comprehensiveness No.
There’s a lot of data, but it’s not reliable.
Honesty Yes and no.
Some people report honestly (but mistakenly).
Others may be ‘copycat’ reports or fakers.
Replicability No.
Evidence is usually from eye-witnesses, so difficult to repeat.
Research shows that eye-witness evidence is not always trustworthy.
Sufficiency No.
Evidence is doubtful/fake.
There is no extraordinary evidence to support extraordinary claims.
Appendix 4
Student Questionnaire
The course in question was taught to five groups of Doshisha University undergraduates during: Spring and Fall 2012 (4 groups) and Spring term 2013 (1 group). A total of 94 students completed the course. At the end of the course students completed an anonymous questionnaire. Results were as follows.
Critical Thinking Questionnaire
1. Had you heard of critical thinking before this class?
Yes 29%
No 69%
2. Had you learned about critical thinking before this class?
Yes 12%
No 88%
3. How was the level of this class?
Challenging but OK 71%
Just right 29%
Too difficult 0%
4. How much did you enjoy learning about critical thinking?
A lot 88%
Average 12%
Not much 0%
5. How important is it for students to learn about critical thinking?
Very important 85%
Important 15%
Not important 0%
6. Do you think most students should take courses in critical thinking?
Yes 82%
No 6%
Not sure 12%
7. Do you think this course helped you to think more effectively?
Yes 91%
No 3%
Maybe 6%
8. Please comment. What was the most important thing you learned in this class?
(See main text for examples.)
Student Empowerment through Critical Thinking
Dale J. Ward Keywords: critical thinking global education empowerment
Abstract
Practice in critical thinking familiarizes learners with the rhetorical conventions of a discipline which is fast becoming a cornerstone of global education. This is especially significant at a time when record numbers of students are studying abroad.
This paper begins with a definition of critical thinking. It goes on to outline benefits obtained from the study of skills which empower students with the ability to question and evaluate a variety of assumptions. The paper suggests ways instructors may incorporate critical thinking skills into L2 classes, outlining the philosophy of a course (“Critical Thinking 101”) the writer teaches at a university in Japan.
The paper also presents the results of student feedback on the course in question.
Finally it will address certain caveats, including the charge that teaching critical thinking skills in a Japanese context somehow constitutes a form of cultural imperialism.
現在グローバル教育に主に焦点が集まっている。批判的思考を学ぶ事で、
そのトピックの詳細に生徒を慣れさせる。より多くの学生が留学している状 況で、これは特に重要である。
この論文は批判的思考の定義から始まる。これは、学生が様々な仮定に対 して疑問を持ち、評価するよう促す方法を学ぶ利点について述べている。ま た、指導者が言語の授業に批判的思考を取り入れ、著者が日本の大学レベル で教えるコース（「批判的思考 101」）の哲学を述べている。
日本語の文脈で批判的思考を教えることは、「カルチュラル インペリア リズム」（例えば、欧米思考をアジアの人に強いること）という非難を含む という、特定の危険性についても話し合うことになる。最終的に、上で述べ られたコースについて、学生からのフィードバックの結果を提示する。
