• 検索結果がありません。

Algebraic Topology I Lars Hesselholt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Algebraic Topology I Lars Hesselholt"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Algebraic Topology I Lars Hesselholt

Object of the course: To every category C , we associate a topological space B C . The space B C is called the classifying space of C . A functor f : C → D gives rise to a continuous map Bf : B C → B D . Moreover, a natural transformation α from the functor f : C → D to the functor g : C → D gives rise to a homotopy Bα : B C × [0, 1] → B D from the map Bf to the map Bg. In short, the classifying space construction gives rise to a 2-functor from the 2-category of categories to the 2-category of topological spaces. In this way, properties of categories are reflected in the homotopy type of their classifying spaces.

The classifying space is constructed by gluing together simplices

∆[n] = {(x

0

, . . . , x

n

) ∈ [0, 1]

n+1

| x

0

+ · · · + x

n

= 1}.

The general recipe for constructing a topological space by glying together simplices is called a simplicial set. The resulting topological space is called the geometric realization of the simplicial set. The first part of the course will focus on simpli- cial sets and their geometric realization along with the basic category theoretical notions of limits and colimits and adjoints functors which are needed to develop this theory.

The next part of the course focuses on homotopy theory. We introduce homo- topy groups and define a continuous map between topological spaces to be a weak equivalence if it induces an isomorphism of the associated homotopy groups. The homotopy category of topological spaces to be the category obtained from the cate- gory of topological spaces and continuous maps by formally introducing an inverse map for every weak equivalence. The main techniques for studying the homotopy category are centered around two classes of maps called the fibrations and the cofibrations. The category of topological spaces together with the three classes of maps given by the weak equivalences, the fibrations, and the cofibrations form a model category. In homotopy theory, theorems live in the homotopy category, but their proofs live in the model category.

The final part of the course uses the techniques we have developed to define al- gebraic K-theory. We prove the so-called additivity theorem from which many of the basic properties of algebraic K-theory are readily derived.

Keywords: Homotopy theory, model categories, algebraic K-theory.

Required knowledge: An introductory course in algebraic topology including the fundamental group and covering spaces.

1

(2)

Text: The course lecture notes. The following texts are also useful:

Mark Hovey, Model Categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 63, American Mathematical Society.

Daniel G. Quillen, Homotopical Algebra, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 43, Springer-Verlag, New York.

Friedhelm Waldhausen, Algebraic K-theory of spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathemat- ics, vol. 1126, Springer-Verlag, New York.

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

We construct a cofibrantly generated model structure on the category of flows such that any flow is fibrant and such that two cofibrant flows are homotopy equivalent for this

In this article we provide a tool for calculating the cohomology algebra of the homo- topy fiber F of a continuous map f in terms of a morphism of chain Hopf algebras that models (Ωf

We are going to represent λ-calculus via a translation into MELL proofnets MELL proofnets are going to be presented via a mix between sharing graphs (i.e. numbered interaction nets)

Incidentally, it is worth pointing out that an infinite discrete object (such as N) cannot have a weak uniformity since a compact space cannot contain an infinite (uniformly)

First, the theory characterizes the category of sets and mappings as an abstract category in the sense that any model for the axioms which satisfies the additional (non-elementary)

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

Our method of proof can also be used to recover the rational homotopy of L K(2) S 0 as well as the chromatic splitting conjecture at primes p > 3 [16]; we only need to use the