• 検索結果がありません。

ϵ, satisfiesP u∈C0∞(ω) andP u= 0 in [p.3 ↑3 — p.4 ↓15] Proof of Proposition 1.1 should be replaced by: Let ω be the open set in Definition 1.1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "ϵ, satisfiesP u∈C0∞(ω) andP u= 0 in [p.3 ↑3 — p.4 ↓15] Proof of Proposition 1.1 should be replaced by: Let ω be the open set in Definition 1.1"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Hyperbolic Systems With Analytic Coefficients:正誤表

[p.2 ↑8] with|τ|< ϵ, satisfiesP u= 0 in =⇒with|τ|< ϵ, satisfiesP u∈C0∞(ω) andP u= 0 in

[p.3 ↑3 — p.4 ↓15] Proof of Proposition 1.1 should be replaced by: Let ω be the open set in Definition 1.1. Take an open setV such thatK⋐V ⋐ω. Then for any f ∈ C0∞(V−ϵ) there exists a unique u ∈H∞(ω) satisfying P u =f in ω and vanishing in x0 ≤ −ϵ. Denote by T the map T : C0∞(V−ϵ)3f 7→u∈ H∞(ω). Note that H∞(ω) is a Fr´echet space equipped with countable semi- norms k · kHp(ω), p = 0,1, . . .. Assume that C0∞(V−ϵ) 3 fj → f in C0∞(V−ϵ) and T fj = uj → u in H∞(ω). SinceP uj = fj it is clear that P u = f and u= 0 in x0 ≤ −ϵ. From the uniqueness of the solution one has T f = uand hence the graph of T is closed. From the Banach’s closed graph theorem it follows thatT is a continuous map. Therefore for anyp∈Nthe inverse image of{u∈H∞(ω)| kukHp(ω) <1}, which is a neighborhood of 0 in H∞(ω), is a neighborhood of 0 inC0∞(V−ϵ), that is there existδ >0 andq∈Nsuch that

f ∈C0∞(V−ϵ), kfkHq(V)< δ=⇒ kT fkHp(ω)<1.

For any f ∈ C0∞(V−ϵ) the Hq(V) norm of δf /kfkHq(V) is less than 1 then from the uniqueness of the solution we conclude that for anyf ∈C0∞(V−ϵ) and u∈H∞(ω) satisfying P u=f inω and vanishing inx0≤ −ϵ satisfies

kukHp(ω)≤δ−1kfkHq(V).

[p.21 ↑12] polynomial inx=⇒polynomial iny [p.27 ↑10]Proof of Proposition 1.6. =⇒Proof.

[p.29 ↑9]Proof of Proposition 1.6. =⇒Proof.

[p.72 ↑5]hρ(sY −tX) = (−1)rhρ (−sY+tX) = (−1)rhρ (Y)∏

(−s−λj(tX)) =⇒ hρ(sY −tX) = (−1)rhρ(−sY +tX) = (−1)rhρ(Y)∏

(−s−λj(tX)) [p.125 ↑5]C|x|−2lt∗(x)2(Q−q−l−1)∑

l1+l2≤l

∫φ(x)

ε(x) |∂tQ+1+l1∂xl2f|2dxdt

=⇒C|x|−2l|r|2(q−k−l)t∗(x)2(Q−q−l−1)∑

l1+l2≤l

∫t∗(x)

ε(x) |∂tQ+1+l1∂lx2f|2dt [p.125 ↑4]C|t−ε|2(Q−k)∫t

ε|∂tQ+1∂xlf|2dxdt

=⇒Delete

[p.125 ↑3] for q+l+ 1≤Q,k+l ≤q and =⇒for|t| ≤t∗(x),q+l+ 1≤Q, k+l≤qand

(2)

[p.130 ↓7〜11] should be replaced by

|∂tk∂xlrqFq−1|2

≤C ∑

k1+k2≤k

|r|2(q−l−k1)|x|−2lt∗(x)2(Q−q−l−k2−1)+1 ∑

l1+l2≤l

∫ t∗ ε

|∂tQ+1+l1∂xl2f|2dt

≤C|x|−2l|r|2(q−l−k)t∗(x)2(Q−q−l−1)+1 ∑

l1+l2≤l

∫ t∗ ε

|∂tQ+1+l1∂lx2f|2dt

hence we conclude the proof.

[p.132 ↑10] Since ∂tpu= 0 on t = sν(x) and t = σν+1(x), |x| = δ(T−t) are space-like curves =⇒Since∂tpu= 0 ont=sν(x)

[p.164 ↑1]P(x) =⇒P(ξ)

[p.197 ↓10]intervals=⇒neighborhoods

参照

関連したドキュメント

Lair and Shaker [10] proved the existence of large solutions in bounded domains and entire large solutions in R N for g(x,u) = p(x)f (u), allowing p to be zero on large parts of Ω..

We prove a continuous embedding that allows us to obtain a boundary trace imbedding result for anisotropic Musielak-Orlicz spaces, which we then apply to obtain an existence result

We study the existence of positive solutions for a fourth order semilinear elliptic equation under Navier boundary conditions with positive, increasing and convex source term..

Rhoudaf; Existence results for Strongly nonlinear degenerated parabolic equations via strong convergence of truncations with L 1 data..

In this paper, we study the existence and nonexistence of positive solutions of an elliptic system involving critical Sobolev exponent perturbed by a weakly coupled term..

The following result about dim X r−1 when p | r is stated without proof, as it follows from the more general Lemma 4.3 in Section 4..

In [3] the authors review some results concerning the existence, uniqueness and regularity of reproductive and time periodic solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and some

The pa- pers [FS] and [FO] investigated the regularity of local minimizers for vecto- rial problems without side conditions and integrands G having nonstandard growth and proved