• 検索結果がありません。

Asymptotics of the probability distributions of the first hitting times of Bessel processes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Asymptotics of the probability distributions of the first hitting times of Bessel processes"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

ISSN:1083-589X in PROBABILITY

Asymptotics of the probability distributions of the first hitting times of Bessel processes

Yuji Hamana

Hiroyuki Matsumoto

Abstract

The asymptotic behavior of the tail probabilities for the first hitting times of the Bessel process with arbitrary index is shown without using the explicit expressions for the distribution function obtained in the authors’ previous works.

Keywords:Bessel process; hitting time; tail probability.

AMS MSC 2010:60G40.

Submitted to ECP on December 20, 2013, final version accepted on January 29, 2014.

1 Introduction and main results

Let P(ν)a be the probability law on the path space W = C([0,∞);R) of a Bessel process with indexν∈Ror dimensionδ= 2(ν+ 1)starting froma >0. Forw∈W we denote the first hitting time tob >0byτbb(w):

τb= inf{t >0;w(t) =b}.

In recent works [4, 5] the authors have shown explicit forms of the distribution function and the density of the distribution ofτbunderP(ν)a in the case where0< b < a. The other case, which is easier since we do not need to consider a natural boundary, has been known by Kent [6]. See also Getoor-Sharpe [2].

Whenν > 0and b < a, it is shown in [5] that there exists a positive constantC(ν) such that

P(ν)ab> t) = 1−b a

+C(ν)t−ν+o(t−ν).

The constantC(ν)may be expressed explicitly and we could treat all the cases. How- ever, we need to consider separately the case whereδis an odd integer and the expres- sion forC(ν)is different from the othere cases. This is because the expression for the distribution function itself is different.

The aim of this note is to show that the constantC(ν)has the same simple expression also whenδis an odd integer by considering the asymptotics without using the explicit expressions for the distribution functions obtained in [5].

Whena < bandν >0, the explicit expressions for P(ν)ab > t)have been shown in [6] and, from his result, it is easily shown that the tail probability decays exponentially.

Hence we concentrate on the case ofb < a.

The authors are partially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for scientific Research (C) No. 23540183 and 24540181, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Kumamoto University, Japan. E-mail:[email protected]

Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan. E-mail:[email protected]

(2)

Theorem 1.1. Letν >0and0< b < a.Then,ast→ ∞,it holds that P(ν)a (t < τb<∞) =bn

1−b a

o 1

Γ(1 +ν)(2t)ν +O(t−ν−ε) for anyε∈(0,1+νν ),whereΓdenotes the usual Gamma function.

Theorem 1.2. Letν <0and0< b < a.Then,ast→ ∞,it holds that P(ν)ab> t) =a2|ν|n

1−b a

2|ν|o 1

Γ(1 +|ν|)(2t)|ν|+O(t−|ν|−ε) for anyε∈(0,1+|ν||ν| ).

Whenν= 0, it is known that

P(0)ab > t) =2 log(a/b)

logt +o((logt)−1).

This identity has been discussed in [5] and we omit the details.

2 Proof of Theorem 1.1

We assume ν > 0 in this section. At first we give some lemmas. The first one is shown by Byczkowski and Ryznar [1].

Lemma 2.1. There exists a constantC, independent oft, such that

P(ν)a (t < τb<∞)5Ct−ν. Lemma 2.2. If0< b < a,one has

P(ν)ab> t) = 1−b a

+E(ν)a

h b Rt

1{inf

05s5tRs>b}

i

(2.1)

for anyt >0,whereE(ν)a is the excpectation with respect to P(ν)a and{Rs}s=0denotes the coordinate process.

Proof. It is well known that

P(ν)ab =∞) =P(ν)a ( inf

s=0

Rs> b) = 1−b a

.

By the Markov property of Bessel processes, we have fort >0 P(ν)ab=∞) =P(ν)a ( inf

05s5t

Rs> band inf

s=t

Rs> b)

=E(ν)a [P(ν)Rtb=∞)1{inf

05s5tRs>b}]

=E(ν)a

hn 1− b

Rt

o 1{inf

05s5tRs>b}

i ,

which implies (2.1).

Lemma 2.3. For anya >0andpwith0< p <1 +ν,it holds that Γ(1 +ν−p)

Γ(1 +ν) 1 (2t)pea

2

2t 5E(ν)a [(Rt)−2p]5Γ(1 +ν−p) Γ(1 +ν)

1

(2t)p +Ct−1−p (2.2) fort=1,whereCis a positive constant independent oft.

(3)

Proof. By the explicit expression for the transition density of the Bessel process, we have

E(ν)a [(Rt)−2p] = Z

0

y−2p1 t

y a

ν

yea2 +y

2 2t Iν

ay t

dy,

whereIν is the modified Bessel function of the first kind with indexν (cf [8]) given by

Iν(z) =z 2

νX

n=0

(z/2)2n

Γ(n+ 1)Γ(1 +ν+n) (z∈R\(−∞,0)).

Hence, it is easy to get

E(ν)a [(Rt)−2p] = 1

(2t)pe−a2/2t

X

n=0

a2nΓ(n+ν+ 1−p) Γ(n+ 1)Γ(1 +n+ν)(2t)n and the assertion of the lemma.

Remark 2.4. The moments ofRtfor fixedthave explicit expressions by means of the Whittaker functions (cf. [3], p.709), but it does not seem useful.

We are now in a position to give a complete proof of Theorem 1.1.

Proof of Theorem 1.1. By Lemma 2.2 we have

P(ν)a (t < τb<∞) =bE(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν]−bE(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν1b5t}].

For the first term we have shown in Lemma 2.3 E(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν] = 1

Γ(1 +ν)(2t)ν(1 +O(t−1)).

Hence, if we could show

E(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν1

b5t}] = 1 Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)ν

b a

+O 1 tν+ε

(2.3)

for anyε∈(0,ν+1ν ), we obtain the assertion of the theorem.

For this purpose, we letα∈(0,ν+11 ), choosepsatisfying 1

1−α < p < 1 +ν ν

and letqbe such thatp−1+q−1= 1. We devide the expectation on the right hand side of (2.3) into the sum of

I1=E(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν1b5tαq}] and I2=E(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν1{tαqb5t}] We simply apply the Hölder inequality toI2. Then we get

I25E(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν1{tαqb<∞}] 5n

E(ν)a [(Rt)−2νp]o1/pn

P(ν)a (tαq < τb<∞)o1/q

.

and, by Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3, we see that there exists a constantC1such that I25C1t−ν−αν.

In the following we mean byCi’s some constants independent oft.

(4)

ForI1, the strong Markov property of Bessel processes implies I1=

Z tαq

0

E(ν)b [(Rt−s)−2ν]P(ν)ab∈ds) =I11+I12, where

I11= Z tαq

0

1 2νΓ(ν+ 1)

1

(t−s)νP(ν)ab∈ds).

Sinceαq <1, Lemma 2.1 imples

|I12|=|I1−I11|5 Z tαq

0

C2

(t−s)ν+1P(ν)ab ∈ds)5 C3 tν+1. We devideI11into the sum of

J1= Z tαq

tα

1 2νΓ(ν+ 1)

1

(t−s)νP(ν)ab∈ds) and

J2= Z tα

0

1 2νΓ(ν+ 1)

1

(t−s)νP(ν)ab∈ds).

ForJ1we have by Lemma 2.1 05J15 C4

(t−tαq)νP(ν)a (tα< τb<∞)5 C5

tν+αν. ForJ2we have

J25 1

2νΓ(ν+ 1)(t−tα)νP(ν)ab 5tα)

5 1

Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)νP(ν)ab<∞) 1 (1−t−(1−α))ν

5 1

Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)ν b

a

1 + C6

t1−α

. On the other hand we have by Lemma 2.1

J2= 1

Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)νP(ν)ab 5tα)

= 1

Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)ν n

P(ν)ab <∞)−P(ν)a (tαb <∞)o

= 1

Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)ν b

a

− C7 tνtαν. Combining the above estimates, we obtain

E(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν1b5t}] = 1 Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)ν

b a

+ 1 tνO 1

tαν +1

t + 1

t1−α

.

Since

0< αν < ν

ν+ 1 <1−α <1 and we can choose arbitraryαsatifying this condition,

E(ν)a [(Rt)−2ν1b5t}] = 1 Γ(ν+ 1)(2t)ν

b a

+O 1 tν+ε

holds for anyε∈(0,ν+1ν ).

Now we have shown (2.3) and the assertion of Theorem 1.1.

(5)

3 Proof of Theorem 1.2

Theorem 1.2 is easily obtained from Theorem 1.1.

We recall explcit expressions for the Laplace transforms of the distributions of τb: forν∈R, it is known ([2, 5]) that

E(ν)a [e−λτb] =b a

νKν(a√ 2λ) Kν(b√

2λ), λ >0,

whereKν is the modified Bessel function of the second kind. From this identity we easily obtain forν >0

P(−ν)ab ∈dt) =a b

P(ν)ab ∈dt).

Hence we get from Theorem 1.1 P(−ν)ab> t) =a

b

P(ν)a (t < τb<∞)

=an 1−b

a

o 1

Γ(1 +ν)(2t)ν(1 +o(1)).

Acknowledgement.We thank Professor Yuu Hariya for valuable discussions.

References

[1] Byczkowski, T. and Ryznar, T.: Hitting distribution of geometric Brownian motion.Studia Math.173, (2006), 19–38. MR-2204460

[2] Getoor, R. K. and Sharpe, M. J.: Excursions of Brownian motion and Bessel processes.Z.

Wahr. Ver. Gebiete47, (1979), 83–106. MR-0521534

[3] Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M.: Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed.Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2007. xlviii+1171 pp. MR-2360010

[4] Hamana, Y. and Matsumoto, H.: The probability densities of the first hitting times of Bessel processes.J. Math-for-Industry4, (2012), 91–95. MR-3072321

[5] Hamana, Y. and Matsumoto, H.: The probability distributions of the first hitting times of Bessel processes.Trans. AMS 365, (2013), 5237–5257. MR-3074372

[6] Kent, J.T.: Eigenvalue expansions for diffusion hitting times.Z. Wahr. Ver. Gebiete52, (1980), 309–319. MR-0576891

[7] Revuz, D. and Yor, M.: Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, 3rd ed.Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. xiv+602 pp. MR-1725357

[8] Watson, G. N.: A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions. Reprinted of 2nd ed.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. viii+804 pp. MR-1349110

(6)

Electronic Communications in Probability

Advantages of publishing in EJP-ECP

• Very high standards

• Free for authors, free for readers

• Quick publication (no backlog)

Economical model of EJP-ECP

• Low cost, based on free software (OJS

1

)

• Non profit, sponsored by IMS

2

, BS

3

, PKP

4

• Purely electronic and secure (LOCKSS

5

)

Help keep the journal free and vigorous

• Donate to the IMS open access fund

6

(click here to donate!)

• Submit your best articles to EJP-ECP

• Choose EJP-ECP over for-profit journals

1OJS: Open Journal Systemshttp://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/

2IMS: Institute of Mathematical Statisticshttp://www.imstat.org/

3BS: Bernoulli Societyhttp://www.bernoulli-society.org/

4PK: Public Knowledge Projecthttp://pkp.sfu.ca/

参照

関連したドキュメント

Qiying (1995) and Aaronson, Burton, Dehling, Gilat, Hill, and Weiss (1996) studied the law of large numbers for U–statistics for stationary sequences of dependent

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

[11] Karsai J., On the asymptotic behaviour of solution of second order linear differential equations with small damping, Acta Math. 61

Chidume, “Convergence theorems for fixed points of uniformly continuous generalized φ-hemi-contractive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. S¸oltuz,

The contact problem of the plane theory of elasticity is studied for an elastic orthotropic half-plane supported by periodi- cally located (infinitely many) stringers of

The measure σ p,n of Theorem 1 assigns to measurable subsets of S p,n (1) their Minkowski surface area, an intrinsic area in that it depends on geodesic distances on the surface..

Keywords: continuous time random walk, Brownian motion, collision time, skew Young tableaux, tandem queue.. AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary:

This complements earlier results by Heinrich, Novak, Wasilkowski &amp; Wo´zniakowski, Hinrichs &amp; Novak and Gnewuch and proves that the hitherto best known upper bounds are