• 検索結果がありません。

Section II will contain the proof of the theorem of factorization of matrix-functions and present the theorem of singular operators that are Noetherian in weighted spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Section II will contain the proof of the theorem of factorization of matrix-functions and present the theorem of singular operators that are Noetherian in weighted spaces"

Copied!
17
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

1(94), No. 4, 377-393

SINGULAR INTEGRAL OPERATORS ON MANIFOLDS WITH A BOUNDARY

R. KAPANADZE

Abstract. This paper deals with singular integral operators that are bounded, completely continuous, and Noetherian on manifolds with a boundary in weighted H¨older spaces.

We shall investigate the matrix singular operator A(u)(x) =a(x)u(x) +

Z

D

f€

x, x−y

|x−y|

|x−y|mu(y)dy, x∈D, D⊂Rm,

in weighted H¨older spaces and develop the results obtained in [1] for one- dimensional singular operators and in [2–8] for multidimensional singular operators in Lebesgue spaces.

This paper consists of two sections. In Section I we shall prove the theorems of integral operators that are bounded and completely continuous in H¨older spaces with weight. Section II will contain the proof of the theorem of factorization of matrix-functions and present the theorem of singular operators that are Noetherian in weighted spaces.

1. LetRm(m2) be anm-dimensional Euclidean space,x= (x1, ..., xm), y= (y1, ..., ym) be points of the spaceRm,

|x|=€Xm

i=1

x2i12

, Γ ={x: x∈Rm, xm= 0}, Rm+ ={x: x∈Rm, xm>0}, x0= (x1, . . . , xm1),

B(x, a) ={y: y∈Rm, |y−x|< a}, S(x, a) ={y: y∈Rm, |y−x|=a}.

Definition 1. A function u defined on Rm\Γ belongs to the space Hα,βν (Rm\Γ) (0< ν,α <1,β 0,α+β < m) if

(i) ∀x∈Rm\Γ |u(x)| ≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)β,

1991Mathematics Subject Classification. 45F15.

377

1072-947X/94/0700-0377$12.50/0 c1994 Plenum Publishing Corporation

(2)

(ii) ∀x∈Rm\Γ, ∀y∈B(x,1 2|xm|)

|u(x)−u(y)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−y|ν. The norm in the spaceHα,βν (Rm\Γ) is defined by the equality

kuk= sup

x∈Rm\Γ|x|α(1 +|x|)β|u(x)|+

+ sup

x∈Rm\Γ yB(x,12|xm|)

|xm|α+ν(1 +|x|)β|u(x)−u(y)|

|x−y|ν . The spaceHα,βν (Rm+) is defined similarly.

Note that ify∈B(x,12|xm|), then

|y| ≤ 3

2|x|, |y| ≥ 1

2|x|; |ym| ≤ 3

2|xm|, |ym| ≥ 1

2xm|. (1) Thus fory∈B(x,12xm) we have |x| ∼ |y|,|xm| ∼ |ym|.

Letx, y∈Rm\Γ and|x−y| ≥ 12min(|xm|,|ym|). Then the condition (i) implies

|u(x)−u(y)| ≤c(min(|xm|,|ym|))α(min(1 +|x|,1 +|y|))β

≤c|x−y|ν(min(|xm|,|ym|)αν(min(1 +|x|,1 +|y|)β; and therefore the condition (ii) can be replaced by the condition

∀x, y∈Rm\Γ

|u(x)−u(y)| ≤c|x−y|ν(min(|xm|,|ym|)αν(min(1 +|x|,1 +|y|)β. One can easily prove that the space Hα,βν (Rm\Γ)[Hα,βν (Rm+)] is the Ba- nach one.

Consider the singular integral operator v(x) =A(u)(x) =

Z

RmK(x, x−y)u(y)dy, whereK(x, z) =f€

x,|zz|

|z|m.

Theorem 1. Let the characteristicf defined on (Rm\Γ)×(S(0,1)\Γ)sa- tisfy the conditions

(a) ∀x∈Rm\Γ Z

S(0,1)

f(x, z)dzS= 0;

(b) ∀x∈Rm\Γ, ∀z∈S(0,1)\Γ |f(x, z)| ≤c|zm|σ (0≤σ≤α);

(c) ∀x, y∈Rm\Γ, ∀z, θ, ω∈S(0,1)\Γ

(3)

|f(x, z)−f(y, z)| ≤c|x−y|ν(min(|xm|,|ym|))ν|zm|σ

|f(x, θ)−f(x, ω)| ≤c|θ−ω|ν1(min(m|,|ωm|))ν1σ ν1> ν, ν1+σ <1.

Then the operator A is bounded in the spaceHα,β(Rm\Γ).

Proof. In the first place note that the second inequality of the condition (c) yields the inequality

∀x, y, z∈Rm\Γ

ŒŒf€ x, y

|y|

−f€ x, z

|z|ŒŒ≤c|y−z|ν1 |y|σ

|ym|ν1 + |z|σ

|zm|ν1

‘. (2)

Set

D1=B(x,12|xm|), D2=B(x,12(1 +|x|))\D1,

D3=B(0,12(1 +|x|))\(D1∪D2), D4=Rm\(D1∪D2∪D3), (3) D={y: (y0, ym)∈Rm, |ym| ≤2(|y0|+ 1)}.

We have v(x) =

Z

D1

K(x, x−y)[u(y)−u(x)]dy+ X4 i=2

Z

Di

K(x, x−y)u(y)dy≡

X4

i=1

Ii(x).

By virtue of the condition (ii) and the inequalities (1)

|I1(x)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β Z

D1

ŒŒf€ x−y

|x−y|ŒŒ|x−y|νmdykuk ≤

≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)β Z

S(0,1)|f(z)|dzSkuk. (4) Ify 6∈D1, then|x−y| ≥ 16(|x0−y0|+|xm|+|ym|) and if y∈D2, then 1 +|y| ≥1 +|x|−|x−y| ≥ 1+2|x|. Therefore due to the conditions (i) and (b)

|I2(x)| ≤c(1 +|x|)β Z

D2

|ym|α|ym−xm|σ

(|x0−y0|+|xm|+|ym|)mσdykuk. After performing the spherical transformation ofy0−x0, we obtain

|I2(x)| ≤c(1 +|x|)β Z

0

rm2dr Z

−∞

|ym|α|xm−ym|σ

(r+|xm|+|ym|)mσdymkuk.

(4)

The transformation ofr=|xm|er,ym=|xm|eym leads to

|I2(x)| ≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)β Z

−∞|ym|α|ymsignxm|σdym×

× Z

0

(r+|ym|+ 1)σ2drkuk ≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)β×

× Z

−∞|ym|α|ymsignxm|σ(1 +|ym|)σ1dymkuk. (5) The term I4(x) is evaluated in the same manner, since in that case, too, 1 +|y| ≥ 12(|x|+ 1). RepresentI3(x) in the form

I3(x) = Z

D3B(0,12|xm|)

K(x, x−y)u(y)dy+ +

Z

D3\B(0,12|xm|)

K(x, x−y)u(y)dy≡J1(x) +J2(x).

If y D3, then |x−y| ≥ 12(1 +|x|) ≥ |y|; if y 6∈ B(0,12|xm|), then

|y| ≥ |x2m| and hence |y| ≥ 14(|y0|+|xm|+|ym|). Therefore, in evaluating J2(x), we shall have

|J2(x)| ≤c(1 +|x|)β×

× Z

D3\B(0,12|xm|)|ym|α|xm−ym|σ(|y0|+|xm|+|ym|)σmdykuk. After performing the spherical transformation of y0, we obtain, as in the case of evaluatingI2(x),

|J2(x)| ≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)βkuk. (6) WriteJ1(x) in the form

J1(x) = Z

D3B(0,12|xm|)D

K(x, x−y)u(y)dy+ +

Z

D3B(0,12|xm|)(Rm\D)

K(x, x−y)u(y)dy≡J10(x) +J100(x).

(5)

Ify∈B(0,12|xm|), then|xm−ym| ≥ |xm| − |ym| ≥ 12|xm|. We have

|J10(x)| ≤c(1 +|x|)m+σ|xm|σ Z

|y0|≤1 2 (1+|x|)

(1 +|y0|)βdy0×

× Z

|ym|≤2(|y0|+1)|ym|αdymkuk ≤

≤c|xm|σ(1 +|x|)σm Z

|y0|≤1 2 (1+|x|)

(1 +|y0|)1βαdy0kuk ≤

≤c|xm|α(1+|x|)−β|xm|ασ(1+|x|)β+σm€

c+(1+|x|)m(β+α) kuk≤

≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)βkuk, (7) sinceσ≤α,α+β < m.

Ify∈Rm\D, then 1 +|y|<1 +|y0|+|ym|<32|ym|. Therefore

|J100(x)| ≤c|xm|σ(1 +|x|)σm Z

|y|≤1 2 (1+|x|)

(1 +|y|)βαdykuk ≤

≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)βkuk. (8) From the estimates (4)–(8) we obtain

|v(x)| ≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)βkuk. (9) Let us evaluate the difference v(x)−v(z). It is assumed that|x−z| ≤

1

8|xm|. Then|z| ∼ |x|,|zm| ∼ |xm|.

We introduce the set De1 = B(x,2|x−z|), De2 = B(z,3|x−z|), De3 = B(z,12|xm| − |x−z|). Clearly, De1 ⊂De2 ⊂De3 B(x,12|xm|) = D1. We have the representation

v(x)−v(z) = Z

Rm[K(x, x−y)−K(z, z−y)]u(y)dy=

= Z

Rm[K(x, x−y)−K(x, z−y)]u(y)dy+ +

Z

Rm[K(z, x−y)−K(z, z−y)]u(y)dy≡I1(x, z) +I2(x, z).

By virtue of the first inequality of the condition (c) the term I1(x, z) is evaluated exactly in the same manner asv(x) and we obtain the estimate

|I1(x, y)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk. (10) Rewrite the termI2(x, z) in the form

I2(x, z) = Z

D1

[K(z, x−y)−K(z, z−y)]u(y)dy+

(6)

+ Z

Rm\D1

[K(z, x−y)−K(z, z−y)]u(y)dy=

= Z

D1

K(z, x−y)[u(y)−u(x)]dy− Z

D1\De3[K(z, z−y)u(y)dy−

Z

e

D3\De2K(z, z−y)[u(y)−u(x)]dy− Z

e

D2

K(z, z−y)[u(y)−u(z)]dy+ +

Z

Rm\D1

[K(z, x−y)−K(z, z−y)]u(y)dy=

= Z e

D2

+ Z

D1\De3

‘K(z, x−y)[u(y)−u(x)]dy−

Z

e

D2

K(z, z−y)[u(y)−u(z)]dy−

Z

e

D3\De2[K(z, x−y)−K(z, z−y)][u(y)−u(x)]dy−

Z

D1\De3K(z, z−y)u(y)dy+ +

Z

Rm\D1

[K(z, x−y)−K(z, z−y)]u(y)dy≡ X5 i=1

Ji(x, z).

In evaluatingJ1(x, z), note thatDe2 ⊂B(x,4|x−z|), B(x,12|xm| −2|x− z|)⊂De3. Therefore by virtue of the condition (b) and the inequalities (1) we obtain

|J1(x, z)| ≤ Z

B(x,4(xz))|K(z, x−y)||u(y)−u(x)|dy+ +

Z

D1\B(x,1

2|xm|)2|xz|)|K(z, x−y)||u(y)−u(x)|dy≤

≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk, (11) since€1

2|xm|ν

€1

2|xm| −2|z−z|ν

≤c|x−z|ν. Similarly, ify∈De2, then

|y−z| ≤3|x−z| ≤ 3|x8m| 37|zm|. Therefore

|J2(x, z)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk. (12) It is clear thatB(x,12|xm|)⊂B(z,12|xm|+|x−z|) and hence

|J4(x, z)| ≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)β Z

D1\De3|K(z, z−y)|dykuk ≤

≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)βln|xm|+ 2|x−z|

|xm| −2|x−z|kuk ≤

(7)

≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)β |x−z|

|xm| −2|x−z|kuk ≤

≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk. (13) Note that ify6∈De2, then

|x−y|>2|x−z|, |z−y|>3|x−z|,

|x−y|<|x−z|+|z−y|<4

3|z−y|, |z−y|<3 2|x−y|.

Taking these inequalities into account, the inequality (2) readily implies that fory6∈De2

|K(z, x−y)−K(z, z−y)| ≤

≤c |x−z|ν1

|x−y|m+ν1

 |x−y|ν1

|xm−ym|ν1 + |z−y|ν1

|zm−ym|ν1

‘

, (14) using which we obtain

|J3(x, z)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|ν1×

× Z

e

D3\De2

1

|x−y|m+ν1ν

 |x−y|ν1

|xm−ym|ν1 + |z−y|ν1

|zm−ym|ν1

‘dykuk ≤

≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|ν1×

א Z

D1\De1

1

|x−y|m+ν1ν

 |x−y|

|xm−ym|

‘ν1

dy+ +

Z e

D3\De2

1

|z−y|m+ν1ν

 |z−y|

|zm−ym|

ν1‘ dy‘

.

Passing to the spherical coordinates and keeping in mind that x|mxyym| ,

zmym

|zy| do not depend on the radius, we have

|J3(x, z)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|ν1€

|xm|νν1+|x−z|νν1 kuk ≤

≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk. (15) In deriving the estimate, we took into account thatν < ν1,ν1+σ <1. By virtue of the inequality (14)

|J5(x, z)| ≤c|z−x|ν1 Z

Rm\D1

|x−y|σm|xm−ym|σν1|u(y)|dy+ +

Z

Rm\B(z,13|zm|)|z−y|σm|zm−ym|σν1|u(y)|dy‘ .

(8)

We evaluate the obtained integral expression by the same technique as was used to evaluate the integral expression

Z

Rm\D1

|K(x, x−y)||u(y)|dy (see the estimates (5)–(8)) and finally obtain

|J5(x, z)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk. (16) The estimates (10)–(13), (15), (16) show that

|v(x)−v(z)| ≤c|xm|(α+ν)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk, which, with the equality (9) taken into account, proves the theorem.

Corollary 1. Under the conditions of Theorem 1 the operator Z

Rm+

K(x, x−y)u(y)dy

is bounded when acting from the space Hα,βν (Rm+) into the space Hα,βν (Rm\Γ).

Definition 2. LetMbe a closed set inRm. The setMis called an (m1)- dimensional manifold without a boundary of the class C1,δ (0≤δ≤1), if for eachx∈M there exist a positive numberrxand a neighborhoodQ(x) of the pointxin Rm, which is mapped by means of the orthogonal transform Tx onto the cylinder Ω0 = : ξ Rm,|ξ0| < rx,|ξm| < rx} and if the following conditions are fulfilled: Tx(x) = 0, the setTx(M ∩Q(x)) is given by the equationξm=ϕx0), 0| < rx; ϕx ∈C1,δ in the domain 0|< rx

andξiϕx(0) = 0,i= 1, . . . , m1.

Clearly,Q(x) is the cylinder to be denoted byC(x, rx).

In what follows the manifoldM will be assumed compact.

We introduce the notation d(x)≡d(x, M) = inf

yM|x−y|, M(τ) ={x∈Rm, d(x)< τ}. Note some properties of the functiond(x):

d(x)≤c(1 +|x|), |d(x)−d(y)| ≤c|x−y|;

∀x∈Rm\M,∀y∈B(x,12d(x)) d(y)≤ 3

2d(x)≤3d(y), 1 +|x| ∼1 +|y|;

∀x∈M,∀y∈C(x,13rx)

(17)

d(y, M) =d(y, M∩C(x, rx)) and if y=Tx1(η), then

(9)

d(y)≤ |ηm−ϕx0)| ≤2(1 +ax)d(y), (18) whereax is the Lipshitz constant of the functionϕx.

Definition 3. A function u defined on Rm\M belongs to the space Hα,βν (Rm\M) (0< ν, α <1,β≥0,α+β < m), if:

(i) ∀x∈Rm\M |u(x)| ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)β, (ii) ∀x∈Rm\M, ∀y∈B(x,12d(x))

|u(x)−u(y)| ≤cd(α+ν)(x)(1 +|x|)β|x−y|ν. The norm in the spaceHα,βν (Rm\M) is defined by the equality

kuk= sup

x∈Rm\M

dα(x)(1 +|x|)β|u(x)|+

+ sup

x∈Rm\M yB(x,12d(x))

dν+α(x)(1 +|x|)β|u(x)−u(y)|

|x−y|ν . The spaceHα,βν (Rm\M) is the Banach one.

Theorem 2. Let M ∈C1,δ, and let the characteristic f of the singular operator Abe defined on (Rm\M)×S(0,1) and satisfy the conditions:

(a) ∀x∈Rm\M, ∀z∈S(0,1)

|f(x, z)| ≤c, Z

S(0,1)

f(x, z)dzS = 0;

(b) ∀x, y∈Rm\M, ∀θ, ω∈S(0,1)

|f(x, θ)−f(y, θ)| ≤c|x−y|ν€

min(d(x), d(y))ν

,

|f(x, θ)−f(x, ω)| ≤c|θ−ω|ν1, ν < ν1. Then the operator Ais bounded in the spaceHα,βν (Rm\M).

Proof. LetM ⊂B(0, r0) ande1be an infinitely differentiable function such thate1(x) = 1 for|x| ≤r0+1,e1(x) = 0 for|x| ≥r0+2. Settinge2= 1−e1, we have

v(x) = Z

RmK(x, x−y)e1(y)u(y)dy+ +

Z

RmK(x, x−y)e2(y)u(y)dy≡v1(x) +v2(x).

Let us evaluate the integral v1(x) =

Z

RmK(x, x−y)u1(y)dy (u1=e1u).

(10)

Choose a constant r (0 < r < 1) such that the system {C(x,i 14r)}li=1

(x,i i= 1, . . . , l, are points of the manifoldM) covers the manifold M and C(x,i 4r),i= 1, . . . , l, are again the coordinate neighborhoods.

We introduce the sets

D1=B(x,12d(x)), D2= (B(x,14r)\D1)∩B(0, r0+ 2) D3=B(0, r0+ 2)\(D1∪D2), D4={y: y∈Rm, d(y)<12r} Now

v1(x) = Z

D1

K(x, x−y)[u1(y)−u1(x)]dy+ +

X3 i=2

Z

Di

K(x, x−y)u1(y)dy X3

i=1

Ii(x).

By virtue of the inequality (17) and the condition (ii) we obtain

|I1(x)| ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)βku1k ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)βkuk. (19) Next,

|I2(x)| ≤ Z

D2D4

|K(x, x−y)||u1(y)|dy+ +

Z

D2\D4

|K(x, x−y)||u1(y)|dy≡I20(x) +I200(x).

Ify∈D2, then 1 +|x| ∼1 +|y| ∼c. Moreover,d(y)≤12r fory∈D2∩D4

and therefore there exists i (i = 1, . . . , e) such that x, y C(x,i 3+22r).

Lety=Ti 1

x (η),x=Ti 1

x (ξ). By virtue of the inequality (18)

m−ϕi

x0)| ≤2(1 +ai

x)d(y), m−ϕi

x0)| ≤2(1 +ai

x)d(x).

Taking into account that|x−y|>12d(x), we therefore obtain

|x−y|=|ξ−η| ≥ 14(0−η0|+m−ηm|+d(x))≥

1

16(1 +ai

x)1€

4(1 +ai

x)0−η0|+m−ηm|+ 4(1 +ai

x)d(x)

1

16(1 +ai

x)1€

0−η0|+m−ϕi

x0)|+d(x)

, (20)

sincem−ηm| ≥ |ηm−ϕi

x0)| − |ϕi

x0)−ϕi

x0)| − |ξm−ϕi

x0)|. Thus

|I20(x)| ≤c Z

|ξ0η0|≤4r

0 Z 2r

2rm−ϕi

x0)|α×

(11)

׀

0−η|+m−ϕi

x0)|+d(x)m

mkuk. Using the transformηm−ϕi

x0) =ηem, we obtain

|I20(x)| ≤c Z 4r

0

rm2dr Z 4r

4rm|α€

r+m|+d(x)m

mkuk, which, upon applying the transformr=d(x)er,ηm=d(x)ηem, gives

|I20(x)| ≤cdα(x)kuk ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)βkuk. (21) Ify ∈D2\D4, thend(y)≥ 12r, 12d(x)≤ |x−y|< 14r by virtue of which d(x)≥d(y)− |x−y| ≥ 14r,|x−y| ≥ 18r. Therefore

|I200(x)| ≤ckuk ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)βkuk. (22) Finally, ify∈D3, then 1 +|x| ≤1 +|y|+|x−y| ≤c|x−y|. Therefore

|I3(x)| ≤c(1 +|x|)mkuk ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)βkuk. (23) The inequalities (19), (21)–(23) show that

|v1(x)| ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)βkuk. (24) In evaluating the differencev1(x)−v1(z), it will be assumed that|x−z|<

1

8d(x). Then 1 +|z| ∼1 +|x|, d(x)∼d(y).

We introduce the set

De1=B(x,2|x−y|), De2=B(z,3|x−z|), De3=B(z,12d(x)− |x−z|).

Proceeding as in proof of Theorem 1, we obtain

|v1(x)−v1(z)| ≤cd(α+ν)(x)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk. (25) To evaluate the integral

v2(x) = Z

RmK(x, x−y)u2(y)dy (u2=e2u)

note that the function u2 is defined on Rm and satisfies the conditions of Definition 3, if the function d(x) is replaced by the function 1 +|x|. Therefore, after introducing the sets

D1=B(x,12(1 +|x|)), D2=B(0,2|x|+ 1)\D1, D3=Rm\(D1∪D2), we readily obtain the estimate

|v2(x)| ≤cdα(x)(1 +|x|)βkuk. (26) Now, considering the sets

De1=B(x,2|x−z|), De2=B(z,3|x−z|), De3=B(z,12(1 +|x|)− |x−z|)

(12)

it is easy to show that

|v2(x)−v2(z)| ≤cd(α+ν)(x)(1 +|x|)β|x−z|νkuk. (27) The estimates (24)–(27) prove the theorem.

A result close to the one presented here is obtained in [9] (see also [10]).

Definition 4. A function udefined onRm belongs to the spaceHλν(Rm) (ν, λ >0), if

|u(x)| ≤c(1 +|x|)β, |u(x)−u(y)| ≤c|x−y|νρxyνλ, whereρxy= min(1 +|x|,1 +|y|).

Theorem 3. Let the characteristicf of the singular operatorAsatisfy the conditions of Theorem 1, assuming that σ < α and the first inequality of the condition (c) is fulfilled in the strong form

|f(x, z)−f(y, z)| ≤c|x−z|ν1(min(|xm|,|ym|))ν1|zm|σ.

It is also assumed that a C( ˙Rm) ( ˙Rm = Rm∪ ∞) and (a−a(∞)) Hδν1(Rm). Then the integral operator

v(x) =B(u)(x) = Z

Rm[a(x)−a(y)]K(x, x−y)u(y)dy is completely continuous in the spaceHα,βν (Rm\Γ).

Proof. From the proof of Theorem 1 it follows that B is the bounded operator from the space Hα,βν (Rm\Γ) into the space Hαν+γγ,β+2γ(Rm\Γ), whereγ is an arbitrary positive number satisfying the condition

γ <min{λ, ν1−ν, α−σ,12(m−β−α)}. Indeed, it is clear that

|v(x)| ≤ Z

D1D2D4

|a(x)−a(y)||K(x, x−y)||u(y)|dy+ +

Z

D3

(|a(x)−a(∞)|+|a(y)−a(∞)|)|K(x, x−y)||u(y)|dy.

Taking into account that (a−a(∞))∈Hγγ(Rm) and repeating the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain

|v(x)| ≤c|xm|γα(1 +|x|)βkuk. (28)

(13)

Let us now assume that |x−z| ≤ 18|xm| and evaluate the difference v(x)−v(z). We have

|v(x)v(y)| ≤ Z

e

D2

|a(x)−a(y)||K(x, x−y)||u(y)|dy+ +

Z e

D2

|a(z)−a(y)||K(z, z−y)||u(y)|dy+ +

Z

Rm\De1|a(x)−a(z)||K(x, x−y)||u(y)|dy+ +

Z

Rm\De2|a(z)−a(y)||K(x, x−y)−K(z, x−y)||u(y)|dy≡ X4 i=1

Ii(x, z).

Hence

|Ii(x, z)| ≤c|xm|α(1 +|x|)β(1 +|x|)ν1λ|x−z|ν1kuk ≤

≤c|xm|αγ(1 +|x|)βkuk (i= 1,2). (29) Write the termI3in the form

I3(x, z) =|a(x)−a(z)| Z

D1\De1|K(x, x−y)||u(y)|dy+ +

Z

Rm\De1|K(x, x−y)||u(y)|dy‘ . This representation gives

|I3(x, z)| ≤c|x−z|ν1(1 +|x|)ν1λ|xm|α(1 +|x|)β×

א

ln |xm|

|x−z|+c1

‘kuk ≤c|xm|αν(1 +|x|)β|x−z|ν+γkuk. (30)

To evaluate the integral termI4 note that fory6∈De1we have

|K(x, x−y)−K(z, z−y)| ≤c|x−z|ν1

|x−y|m|xm|ν1 |x−y|σ

|xm−ym|σ + +c |x−z|ν1

|x−y|m+ν1

 |x−y|ν1

|xm−ym|ν1 + |z−y|ν1

|zm−ym|ν1

‘ .

Using this estimate in the same manner as in proving Theorem 1, we obtain

|I4(x, z)| ≤c|xm|αν(1 +|x|)β|x−z|ν+γkuk. (31) The estimates (28)–(31) show that the operatorBis bounded from the space Hα,βν (Rm\Γ) into the spaceHαν+γγ,β+2γ(Rm\Γ). The validity of the theorem now follows from the complete continuity of the operator of the embedding of the spaceHαν+γγ,β+2γ(Rm\Γ) into the spaceHα,βν (Rm\Γ).

(14)

In a similar manner we prove

Theorem 4. Let m∈C1,δ, let the characteristicf of the operatorA sat- isfy the conditions of Theorem 2, the first inequality of the condition (b) being replaced by a stronger inequality

|f(x, θ)−f(y, θ)| ≤c|x−y|ν1€

min(d(x), d(y))ν1

,

and let the functionasatisfy the conditions of Theorem3. Then the operator B is completely continuous in the spaceHα,βν (Rm\M).

2. We shall consider the matrix-functionA(ξ) =kAij(ξ)kn×n. Let A(λξ) =A(ξ) (λ >0), Aij ∈C(Rm\0), detA(ξ)6= 0 (ξ6= 0).

We set A0 = A1(0, . . . ,0,1)A(0, . . . ,0,+1). It is assumed that λj

(j = 1, . . . , s) is the eigenvalue of the matrix A0 and rj is its multiplic- ity (Ps

j=1rj=n).

We introduce the matricesBr(α)≡ kBνk(α)kr×rwhere

Bνk(α) =





0, ν < k;

1, ν=k;

ανk

k)!, ν > k, B(ri;α) = diag‚

Bri1(α), . . . , Bripi(α)ƒ

(ri1+· · ·+ripi=ri).

By the Jordan theorem the matrix A0 is representable in the form A0 = gBg1, where detg 6= 0, B is the modified Jordan form of the matrix A0, B= diag[λ1B(r1; 1), . . . , λsB(rs; 1)]. We introduce the notation

δj0 = 1

2πilnλj, δj=δ0k for

k1

X

ν=1

rν < j≤ Xk ν=1

rν, j= 1, . . . , n;

α±(ξ) = 1

2πilnξm± |ξ0|

0|0= (ξ1, . . . , ξm1));

by lnzwe denote a logarithm branch which is real on the positive semi-axis, i.e.,−π <argz≤π,

ξm±i|ξ0|

0|

‘δ

diaghξm±i|ξ0|

0|

‘δ1

, . . . ,ξm±i|ξ0|

0|

‘δni , B±(ξ)diag‚

B(r1;α±(ξ), . . . , B(rs;α±(ξ))ƒ .

Theorem 5. Let the matrix A be strongly elliptic. Then A admits the factorizationA(ξ) =cgA0, ξm)D(ξ)A+0, ξm)g1, where

c=A(0, . . . ,+1), D(ξ) =B(ξ)(ξm−i|ξ0|)δm+i|ξ0|)δB+1(ξ), A±(λξ) =A±(ξ) (λ >0), detA±(ξ)6= 0.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Key words: information geometry; Gaussian curvature; statistical manifold; gener- alized normal distribution..

For an orientable compact and connected hypersurface in the Euclidean space R n+1 with scalar curvature S, mean curvature α and sectional curvatures bounded below by a constant δ

The proof uses simultaneously the theory of minimal Quillen models of a space in the category of Lie differential graded algebras and the theory of minimal Sullivan models of a space

For a class of reversible PCA dynamics on {−1, +1} Z d , with a naturally associated Gibbsian potential ϕ , we prove that a (spatial-) weak mixing condition (WM) for ϕ implies

A quantitative central limit theorem for the random walk among random conductances.. Jean-Christophe

For example, a maximal embedded collection of tori in an irreducible manifold is complete as each of the component manifolds is indecomposable (any additional surface would have to

In this short note, we attempt to study the geometry of a compact Riemannian manifold of non-constant scalar curvature that admits a nontrivial conformal vector field, with a

In order to prove that all equations from the list are really integrable, we find, in Section 4, an auto-B¨ acklund transformation involving a “spectral” parameter for each of