• 検索結果がありません。

3.1 Binet’s formula for 2 sequences of generalized order−2 Fibonacci numbers (2SO2F)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "3.1 Binet’s formula for 2 sequences of generalized order−2 Fibonacci numbers (2SO2F)"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

www.i-csrs.org

Available free online at http://www.geman.in

Determinant and Permanent of Hessenberg Matrix and Fibonacci Type Numbers

Kenan Kaygısız1 and Adem S¸ahin2

1Department of Mathematics Faculty of Arts and Sciences Gaziosmanpa¸sa University 60240, Tokat, Turkey

E-mail: [email protected]

2Department of Mathematics Faculty of Arts and Sciences Gaziosmanpa¸sa University 60240, Tokat, Turkey

E-mail: [email protected] (Received: 23-3-12/ Accepted: 10-4-12)

Abstract

In this paper, we obtain determinants and permanents of some Hessenberg matrices that give the terms of k sequences of generalized order-k Fibonacci numbers for k = 2. These results are important, since k sequences of gen- eralized order-k Fibonacci numbers for k = 2 are general form of ordinary Fibonacci sequence, Pell sequence and Jacobsthal sequence.

Keywords: Fibonacci Numbers, Jacobsthal Numbers, k sequences of gen- eralized order-k Fibonacci numbers, Pell Numbers, Hessenberg Matrix.

1 Introduction

Fibonacci numbersFn, Pell numbersPnand Jacobsthal numbersJnare defined by

Fn = Fn−1+Fn−2 for n >2 and F1 =F2 = 1, Pn = 2Pn−1+Pn−2 forn >1 and P0 = 0, P1 = 1,

Jn = Jn−1+ 2Jn−2 for n >2 and J1 =J2 = 1, respectively.

Generalizations of these sequences have been studied by many researchers.

(2)

Er [3] definedksequences of generalized order-kFibonacci numbers (kSOkF) as; for n >0,1≤i≤k

fk,ni =

k

X

j=1

cjfk,n−ji (1)

with boundary conditions for 1−k ≤n≤0, fk,ni =

( 1 , if i= 1−n, 0 , otherwise,

where cj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) are constant coefficients, fk,ni is the n-th term of i-th sequence of orderk generalization.

Example 1.1 fk,n1 and fk,n2 sequences are

0,1, c1, c2+c21, 2c1c2+c31, c22+c41+ 3c21c2, c51+ 3c1c22+ 4c31c2, c32+c61 + 5c41c2+ 6c21c22, c71+ 4c1c32+ 6c51c2+ 10c31c22,

c42+c81 + 7c61c2+ 10c21c32+ 15c41c22, . . . and

1, 0, c2, c1c2, c22+c21c2, 2c1c22+c31c2, c32 +c41c2+ 3c21c22, 3c1c32+c51c2+ 4c31c22, c42+c61c2+ 6c21c32+ 5c41c22,

4c1c42+c71c2+ 10c31c32+ 6c51c22, . . . respectively.

A direct consequence of (1) is

fk,n2 =c2fk,n−11 , for n ≥0. (2) Remark 1.2 Let fk,ni , Fn, Pn and Jn be kSOkF (1), Fibonacci sequence, Pell sequence and Jacobsthal sequence, respectively. Then,

(i) Substituting c1 =c2 = 1 for k = 2 in (1), we obtain fk,n−11 =Fn. (ii) Substituting c1 = 2 and c2 = 1 for k= 2 in (1), we obtain fk,n−11 =Pn. (iii) Substituting c1 = 1 and c2 = 2 for k= 2 in (1), we obtain fk,n−11 =Jn.

(3)

Remark 1.2 shows that fk,n1 is a general form of Fibonacci sequence, Pell sequence and Jacobsthal sequence. Therefore, any result obtained from fk,n1 holds for other sequences mentioned above.

Many researchers studied on determinantal and permanental representa- tions ofk sequences of generalized order-k Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. For example, Minc [7] defined ann×n (0,1)-matrix F(n, k),and showed that the permanents ofF(n, k) is equal to the generalized order-k Fibonacci numbers.

The author of [5, 6] defined two (0,1)-matrices and showed that the per- manents of these matrices are the generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers.

Ocal et al. [8] gave some determinantal and permanental representations of¨ k-generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, and obtained Binet’s formula for these sequences. Yılmaz and Bozkurt [9] derived some relationships between Pell and Perrin sequences, and permanents and determinants of a type of Hes- senberg matrices.

In this paper, we give some determinantal and permanental representations of k sequences of generalized order-k Fibonacci numbers for k = 2 by using various Hessenberg matrices. These results are general form of determinantal and permanental representations of ordinary Fibonacci numbers, Pell numbers and Jacobsthal numbers.

2 The Determinantal Representations

Ann×n matrix An = (aij) is called lower Hessenberg matrix ifaij = 0 when j−i >1, i.e.,

An=

a11 a12 0 · · · 0

a21 a22 a23 · · · 0

a31 a32 a33 · · · 0

... ... ... · · · ... an−1,1 an−1,2 an−1,3 · · · an−1,n

an,1 an,2 an,3 · · · an,n

. (3)

Theorem 2.1 [2] LetAn be an n×nlower Hessenberg matrix for all n≥1 and det(A0) = 1. Then,

det(A1) = a11 and for n≥2

det(An) = an,ndet(An−1) +

n−1

X

r=1

(−1)n−ran,r

n−1

Y

j=r

aj,j+1det(Ar−1)

. (4)

(4)

Theorem 2.2 Let f2,n1 be the first sequence of 2SO2F and Qn = (qrs)n×n

be a Hessenberg matrix defined by qrs=

i|r−s|.cr−s+1

c(r−s)2 , if −1≤r−s <2 , 0 , otherwise,

that is

Qn=

c1 ic2 0 0 · · · 0 i c1 ic2 0 · · · 0 0 i c1 ic2 · · · 0 ... ... ... . .. ... ...

0 0 0 0 c1 ic2

0 0 0 0 i c1

. (5)

Then,

det(Qn) =f2,n1, (6)

where c0 = 1 and i=√

−1.

Proof. To prove (6), we use the mathematical induction onm. The result is true form= 1 by hypothesis.

Assume that it is true for all positive integers less than or equal to m, namely det(Qm) =f2,m1 .Then, we have

det(Qm+1) = qm+1,m+1det(Qm) +

m

X

r=1

(−1)m+1−rqm+1,r

m

Y

j=r

qj,j+1det(Qr−1)

= c1det(Qm) +

m−1

X

r=1

(−1)m+1−rqm+1,r

m

Y

j=r

qj,j+1det(Qk,r−1)

+ [(−1)qm+1,mqm,m+1det(Qk,m−1)]

= c1det(Qm) + [(−1)ic2idet(Qk,m−1)]

= c1det(Qm) +c2det(Qk,m−1)

by using Theorem 2.1. From the hypothesis of induction and the definition of 2SO2F, we obtain

det(Qm+1) =c1f2,m1 +c2f2,m−11 =f2,m+11 . Therefore, (6) holds for all positive integersn.

(5)

Example 2.3 We obtain f2,61, by using Theorem 2.2

det(Q6) = det

c1 ic2 0 0 0 0 i c1 ic2 0 0 0 0 i c1 ic2 0 0 0 0 i c1 ic2 0 0 0 0 i c1 ic2

0 0 0 0 i c1

= c32+c61+ 5c41c2+ 6c21c22

= f2,61.

Theorem 2.4 Let f2,n1 be the first sequence of 2SO2F andBn= (bij)n×n be a Hessenberg matrix, where

bij =

−c2 , if j =i+ 1,

ci−j+1

c(i−j)2 , if 0≤i−j <2, 0 , otherwise,

that is

Bn =

c1 −c2 0 · · · 0 0 1 c1 −c2 · · · 0 0

0 1 c1 · · · 0 0

... ... ... . .. ... ... 0 0 0 · · · c1 −c2

0 0 0 · · · 1 c1

Then,

det(Bn) =f2,n1, where c0 = 1.

Proof. Since the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2 by using Theorem 2.1, we omit the detail.

Example 2.5 We obtain f2,41 by using Theorem 2.4 that

det(B5) = det

c1 −c2 0 0 1 c1 −c2 0 0 1 c1 −c2

0 0 1 c1

= c22 +c41+ 3c21c2

= f2,41.

(6)

Corollary 2.6 If we rewrite Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.4 forci = 1, then we obtain det(Qn) = Fn+1 and det(Bn) = Fn+1, respectively, where Fn’s are the ordinary Fibonacci numbers.

Corollary 2.7 If we rewrite Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.4 for c1 = 2 and c2 = 1, then we obtain det(Qn) = Pn+1 and det(Bn) = Pn+1, respectively, where Pn’s are the Pell numbers.

Corollary 2.8 If we rewrite Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.4 for c1 = 1 and c2 = 2, then we obtaindet(Qn) =Jn+1 anddet(Bn) = Jn+1, respectively, where Jn’s are the Jacobsthal numbers.

3 The Permanent Representations

Let A = (ai,j) be an n×n matrix over a ring. Then, the permanent of A is defined by

per(A) = X

σ∈Sn n

Y

i=1

ai,σ(i),

whereSn denotes the symmetric group on n letters.

Theorem 3.1 [8] Let An be n×n lower Hessenberg matrix for all n ≥ 1 and per(A0) = 1. Then, per(A1) = a11 and for n≥2

per(An) = an,nper(An−1) +

n−1

X

r=1

an,r

n−1

Y

j=r

aj,j+1per(Ar−1)

. (7) Theorem 3.2 Let f2,n1 be the first sequence of 2SO2F and Hn = (hrs) be an n×n Hessenberg matrix, where

hrs=

i(r−s).cr−s+1

c(r−s)2 , if −1≤r−s <2, 0 , otherwise,

that is

Hn =

c1 −ic2 0 · · · 0 0

i c1 −ic2 0 0

0 i c1 · · · 0 0

... ... ... . .. ... ...

0 0 0 · · · c1 −ic2

0 0 0 · · · i c1

. (8)

Then,

per(Hn) =f2,n1, where c0 = 1 and i=√

−1.

(7)

Proof. This is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2 using Theorem 3.1.

Example 3.3 We obtain f2,31 by using Theorem 3.2 that

per(H4,3) = per

c1 −ic2 0 i c1 −ic2

0 i c1

= 2c1c2+c31

= f2,31.

Theorem 3.4 Let f2,n1 be the first sequence of 2SO2F and Ln = (lij) be an n×n lower Hessenberg matrix given by

lij =

ci−j+1

c(i−j)2 , if 0≤i−j <2, 0 , otherwise,

that is

Ln=

c1 c2 0 · · · 0 0 1 c1 c2 · · · 0 0 0 1 c1 · · · 0 0 ... ... ... . .. ... ...

0 0 0 · · · c1 c2 0 0 0 · · · 1 c1

.

Then,

per(Ln) = f2,n1, where c0 = 1.

Proof. This is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2 by using Theorem 3.1.

Corollary 3.5 If we rewrite Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.4 for ci = 1, we obtain per(Hn) = Fn+1 and per(Ln) = Fn+1, respectively, where Fn’s are the Fibonacci numbers.

Corollary 3.6 If we rewrite Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.4 for c1 = 2 and c2 = 1, we obtain per(Hn) = Pn+1 and per(Ln) = Pn+1, respectively, where Pn’s are the Pell numbers.

Corollary 3.7 If we rewrite Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.4 with c1 = 1 and c2 = 2, then we obtain per(Hn) = Jn+1 and per(Ln) =Jn+1, respectively, where Jn’s are the Jacobsthal numbers.

(8)

3.1 Binet’s formula for 2 sequences of generalized order−2 Fibonacci numbers (2SO2F)

Let P

n=0

anzn be the power series of the analytical function f such that f(z) =

X

n=0

anzn when f(0) 6= 0 and

An =

a1 a0 0 · · · 0 a2 a1 a0 · · · 0 a3 a2 a1 · · · 0 ... ... ... . .. ...

an an−1 an−2 · · · a1

n×n

.

Then, the reciprocal off(z) can be written in the following form g(z) = 1

f(z) =

X

n=0

(−1)ndet(An)zn, whose radius of converge is inf{|λ|:f(λ) = 0}, [1].

Let

pk(z) = 1 +a1z+· · ·+akzk. (9) Then, the reciprocal ofpk(z) is

1 pk(z) =

X

n=0

(−1)ndet(Ak,n)zn, where

Ak,n =

a1 1 0 · · · 0

a2 a1 1 · · · 0 a3 a2 a1 · · · 0 ... ... ... · · · ... ak ak−1 ak−2 · · · 0 0 ak ak−1 · · · 0 ... ... ... · · · ... 0 · · · ak · · · a1

n×n

[8]. (10)

Inselberg [4] showed that det(Ak,n) =

k

X

j=1

1 p0kj)

−1 λj

!n+1

(n≥k) (11)

(9)

ifpk(z) has distinct zeros λj forj ∈ {1,2, . . . , k}; where p0k(z) is the derivative of polynomialpk(z) in (9).

Theorem 3.8 Letf2,n1 be the first sequence of2SO2F. Then, forn ≥2and (c1)2+ 4c1c2 >0,

f2,n1 =

k

X

j=1

1 p0j)

−1 λj

!n+1

, (12)

wherep(z) = 1 +c1z−c2z2 andp0(z)denotes the derivative of polynomialp(z).

Proof. This is immediate from Theorems 2.4 and (11).

Corollary 3.9 Let f2,n2 be the second sequences of 2SO2F. Then, f2,n+12 =c2.

k

X

j=1

−1 p0j)

1 λj

!n+1

for n≥2.

Proof. One can easily obtain the proof from (2) and Theorem 3.8.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their pleasure to the anonymous reviewer for his/her careful reading and making some useful comments, which improved the presentation of the paper.

References

[1] E.T. Bell, Euler algebra, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 25(1923), 135-154.

[2] N.D. Cahill, J.R. D’Errico, D.A. Narayan and J.Y. Narayan, Fibonacci determinants,College Math. J., 33(3) (2002), 221-225.

[3] M.C. Er, Sums of Fibonacci numbers by matrix method,Fibonacci Quart., 23(3) (1984), 204-207.

[4] A. Insenberg, On determinants of Toeplitz-Hessenberg matrices arising in power series, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 63(1978), 347-353.

[5] G.-Y. Lee and S.-G. Lee, A note on generalized Fibonacci numbers, Fi- bonacci Quart., 33(1995), 273-278.

(10)

[6] G.-Y. Lee, k-Lucas numbers and associated bipartite graphs, Lineer Al- gebra Appl., 320(2000), 51-61.

[7] H. Minc,Encyclopaedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Permanents, (Vol.6), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, London, (1978).

[8] A.A. ¨Ocal, N. Tu˘glu and E. Altını¸sık, On the representation of k-generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, Appl. Math. Comput., 170(2005), 584-596.

[9] F. Yılmaz and D. Bozkurt, Hessenberg matrices and the Pell and Perrin numbers,J. Number Theory., 131(2011), 1390-1396.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Using the generalized sine law for simplices and a known inequality in [2], we get some inequalities for the sines of k-dimensional vertex angles of an n-simplex.. Recently, Yang Lu

An isometry different from the identity and fixes all the points belonging to some line (the axis) will be called the generalized reflection of A(K)... Note that this is the

[2] Johann Cigler, Fibonacci polynomials, generalized Stirling numbers, and Bernoulli, Genocchi and tangent numbers, http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2610.. [3] Johann Cigler,

We give some recurrent relations for Kurepa’s function via appropriate sequences of rational functions and gamma function.. Also, we give some inequalities for Kurepa’s function

In that direction, Al-Addasi [1] has studied some properties of bipartite diametri- cal graphs of diameter 4 and constructed an S -graph of diameter 4 and order 4 k for any k ≥ 2..

A survey of results on domination in directed graphs by Ghoshal, Lasker and Pillone is found in chapter 15 of Haynes et al., [1], but most of the results in this survey chapter

We

Bhatia, Lacunary statistical limit and clus- ter points of generalized difference sequences of fuzzy numbers, Advances in Fuzzy Systems, (2012)..