• 検索結果がありません。

Zigzagged: Ripped to bits, torn to shreds 利用統計を見る

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Zigzagged: Ripped to bits, torn to shreds 利用統計を見る"

Copied!
25
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Zigzagged: Ripped to bits, torn to shreds

著者

Joff Peter Norman Bradley

journal or

publication title

dialogos

number

14

page range

83-106

year

2014-02

URL

http://id.nii.ac.jp/1060/00006639/

Creative Commons : 表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.ja

(2)

83

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,torntoshreds

JoffPeterNormanBradley

Abstract Inthispaperlendeavourtoexplorethetropesof6tearing'andthe。veil'. Throughananalysisofmodemistliteratureandpoetry(D.H.Lawrence)and philosophy(WilliamJames,DeleuzeandGuattari,HegelandHeidegger),this paperexplorestheideasofripping,tearingandslittingtherent.Whilethisfbrthe mostpartmayappeararatherstrangechoiceoftopic,itisintimatelyboundtothe

i

n

t

e

l

l

e

c

m

a

l

h

i

s

t

o

r

y

o

f

t

h

e

e

a

r

l

y

p

a

r

t

o

f

t

h

e

2

0

'

h

c

e

n

t

u

r

y

a

n

d

t

o

t

h

e

n

a

t

u

r

a

l

d

i

s

a

s

t

e

r

s

whichblighttheplanet.Atthecentreoftheanalysisisaconsiderationofchaosand crisis.ThecruxofthematterpertainstothenotionoftheveilandZe〃j“e"he〃

o

r

t

e

a

r

i

n

g

i

n

s

e

v

e

r

a

l

o

f

t

h

e

a

f

b

r

e

m

e

n

t

i

o

n

e

d

w

r

i

t

e

r

s

.

'

h

t

h

e

f

i

r

s

t

p

a

r

t

o

f

t

h

e

p

a

p

e

r

,

thenotionoftearingisexplicateduponthroughaninitialexaminationof'Mlliam JameyderivednotionofZe〃j”e"ルe"befbreconsideringD.H.Lawrence.The paperconcludeswithanexaminationorHegelandHeideggerandadiscussionof whythediscussionistimely. Keywords:〃〃畑e"ルe",Hegel,D.H.Lawrence,literature,veil,poetry

Zigzagged

AwitnesstothementalanguishwhichbesetSanFranciscansafierthe 7.9-magnitudeearthquakedevastatedtheBayAreaonAprill8th,1906,William

(3)

84 JoffPeterNonnanBradley James(1842-1910),inanalysingthepsychosocialeffectsoftheearthquake, exploredmanisinnerfiagmentationinthewakeofsuchamomentousnatural event.Inachapterentitled@OnSomeMentalEffectsoftheEarthquake'in

M

o

"

α

S

"

e

s

(

1

9

1

1

)

,

2

t

h

e

A

m

e

r

i

c

a

n

p

s

y

c

h

o

l

o

g

i

s

t

a

n

d

p

h

i

l

o

s

o

p

h

e

r

n

o

t

e

d

akindofkineticempathyamongstthesurvivors,a@rapidityoftheimprovisation oforderoutofchaos、tocreateorderoutofchao3.Amidstthedestructionthat theearthquakeunleashed,JamesdetectedastrOngsenseofcamaraderieanda renewedsenseofhope,auniversalequanimity,orwhathecalledakindofheroism assurvivorsekedoutanewbeginningfromamidsttheruins.Inhimselfand others,Jamesfbundnotraceoffearassuch,butonlyaGpuredelightandwelcome' astheearthquakeunleasheditsalmightynaturalpower・Recordingasenseof Gnervousexcitement'amongthosebearingwitnesstothetremor、hediscemed@the passionatedesirefbrsympatheticcommunication'.Hediscernedauniversalsense ofcheerfillness,a。steadfastnessoftone',and廿omtheexperienceconcludedby speakingupfbrthecommonestman,declaringthatsuchmenwillgoonthriving, Gsinglyandcollectively',displayingan$admirablefbrtimdeoftemper'.Despitethe gravityofthedevastation,James,accordingtohisbiographerRichardson(2006), inthelatterdaysofhislife,learnedmuch廿omthisexperience,andadopted,in thelastinstance,aphilosophyoflifethataffirmed。chaos,cataclysm,change, Zど〃畑e"ルe"(brokenness),impulse,andchance'.Moreover,inhisyouth,James, likesomanyofusperllaps,wasaHlictedby@aconstimtionaldisease'fomwhich hesufferedgreatly.Hecalledthis〃〃伽e"〃e"ortorn-to-pieces-hood,deriving thetermfiomGermanphilosophyOnthematterofyouthandtorn-to-pieces-hood, Jameswrites: 恥加veα〃た"ow"//iqrexpe"e"ce,./br/o6eル"mα〃/S/Oたe/α〃伽鄙成w庇臥 かαα"だα〃此α加α伽ze〃α"ec伽"s…α"droyeqr"/brsere"叩/b7so"7e

(4)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 85 '"e"戒"gQ/oz"'/or"-"p/eces-/7ooci' Rippedtobits,torntoshreds,JameWsdaysarebroken。inpurezigzagand interruption'.Onthematterofthezigzag,thesenseofawildnightofideasor rhapsodyofperceptionsinEFsc加加Ra成cQ/E'"p脚c畑"(1912/1990)isdescribed as:@Mererestlesszigzagmovement,orawildMbe城"c/i/,orRル叩sod/eder

b

"

e

m

"

"

g

e

"

.

'

3

H

i

s

e

a

r

l

y

l

i

f

e

o

n

e

o

f

<

z

i

g

z

a

g

v

o

y

a

g

e

s

'

-

t

o

r

n

a

n

d

s

e

v

e

r

e

d

throughout・Yet,itisthroughtheveryexperienceof〃〃応se"ルe"thatJameshnds thepossibilityofmetamomhosis;fbritisinhopeandredemptionthatchaosand despairare,ashesays6severedlikecobwebs,brokenlikebubbleg.

FantaSiaOftheunconsciouS:4""-0α加"sandD.H.Lawrence

777e/"kQ/SC/"zOα"αlysisgoeshywqyQMes""C"O〃‐αw/7o/esco"""gqハルe ""co"scjo"s,Qco'"p/e/eα"。e"age.Des"・qyOedjp"s,//iei//"s/o"Q///'eego, /ルe〃〃e/QMies"e'弓ego,g"/",/he/α州cas"α"o".〃js〃o/α'"α"erQ/p/o"s 火s""c伽"s,s"c/i"//iosepeノb""'edhy"yc/70α"α恥/s〃"娩旅hebe"evo/e"/ "e""α/eyeQf//7eα"αlys/.(DeleuzeandGuattari,1977/1983) O2""Ws/o",o"'・"7α叩ノりノs/cWsweα""gwoe/iィ"W〃",α〃/ルeα〃13weα""g "6so/"/e/V/ル'でα助α形.恥加ve"ojiィ""℃.・"e"/ie'・jbroz〃/7叩es〃oro"rαノ脚s〃oγ o"rα".〃ル“α〃go"eg/Eyq"叩α9"e."e'vego//o"//7eo"'ノe//Q/qvMo" qcmss,Q"万"dw加/oI"/7eα〃'でα"1'6e//evesj",q/iera"霞・q"dw/7q//ノ'eノ7eα〃 肥α"vwα"応/b'/〃e"ex/ji!""℃…Rjp//ieve"Q/r/7eo/dvMo〃αcmss,q"dwq/h ノノ”"g伽ルeだ"/.(D.HLawrence,1922/2004)

(5)

86 JoffPeterNonnanBradley IntheprefacetoR7"rasjaQMeU>7co"scjo"s,writmgmthemannerbefittmg theroleofavisionary,ametaphysicalandiconoclasticthinker,amanatodds withhisage,D.H・Lawrencebeseecheshisreaders・toriptheveiloftheoldvision acrossandwalkthroughtherent'.Writingtosubvertthepetrifyingtendencies ofmodemlife,DH.Lawrencefindsinheringinartananti-civilandbourgeois impulse・Onthispoint,andbemoaningthelossofbeliefintheworld、hewritesin thefbrwardtohis肋"/“jaQr/ノ?eU"co"scio"s(p.vii): Mセ"/舵α〃s“αCCC城"g/oso"feg""α"y"ve/叩/"gα"‘/〃α伽α/かw"〃e""9 V加o"・肋なv航o"exな応αなo“αの"α〃c枕αoγ碗α"/Wc-emな/肺jα”"c〃. 剛e〃〃js〃"/b/伽J伽o/旅α”α".O"′v航o",o"'・be//g/;o!〃碗e/"/iys/cis weα""gwog/iM"W〃加α"伽〃eα〃Isweα""gq6so/"/ely/ル花α肋α形.恥ルave〃o ん/"7e,."e肋α/b'-oz"ル叩es〃o7oz〃αIms〃o7oz〃α".〃ル“α〃go"e〃叩aM Opq9"e. Readersareenticedtocasttheireyesbeyondfabricationandartifce,toripaway theoldveil,tofind6whattheheartreallybelievesm'.Butmorethanhs,inanact ofprovocation,theyarecalledupontoriptheveiloftheoldvision@completely'

a

n

d

t

o

@

w

a

l

k

t

h

r

o

u

g

h

t

h

e

r

e

n

t

'

.

4

R

a

n

m

g

a

g

a

m

s

t

s

t

a

s

i

s

a

n

d

a

f

f

i

r

m

m

g

t

h

e

c

r

e

a

t

i

v

i

t

y

whichcanemerge廿omchaos,heasserts: β"/"Or〃"gw///ever9"e"cルル"〃α"脚α"d/"加加α〃pore""α"〃rOeVOんe so”e〃"g"Zag刀旅e"roz"qf"""e''ノeachαos.I伽刀a6e/伽e加evo/"伽",伽〃〃 r/ies"""ge"essα"〃α加加w‐c加"geqfeve"-'℃"ewedc形α"vecM/加"o"s.(1922, p.9) AfierremarksontheearlyreceptionofFreudinFql"""Q/、/〃e[/"co"sc肋イsand

(6)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,torntoshreds 87 PWc肋α"αん油α"d/ノ7eU"co"sc/o2/s(1922),Lawrencewrites@ChaosinPoetry' in1928,publishedayearlaterinDecember..ChaosinPoetry'wasprintedin GExchangeWasanintroductiontoAmericanHarryCrosby'svolumeofpoetry Cルα"o/Q//ノ7eS"〃Crosby,aworkwhichdwelledonthesymbolismofthesun andexploredthemesofdeathandsuicide.Inthiswork,theroleofthepoetand hisrelationtotruthandchaosarediscussedindetail.Inlivingwithin.astrange andfbrever-surgingchaod,Lawrenceinsistsmancomestoknowakeydifference betweenhisownspeciesandtheanimals.MuchlikeRussianphilosopher AlexandreKmeve'sview(1902-1968),whogavehisfamouslecturesonHegelin thel930s,attendedbySartreandBatailleamongothernotaries,Lawrencestated thatwhileanimalsarecontentwiththechaos,fbrtheyknownothingelse,man cannotendureorabidebysuchastateofaffairs.Tosurvivethisanarchyman wrapshimselfinvisions,moralcowardice,falsevisions;constructseverlasting tales,simulacra,andmakes@ahouseofapparentfbrmandstability,fixity'. Terrifiedofchaos,manerectsanumbrellabetweenhimselfand、theeverlasting whirl'.ThisisnecessarylestthemadhousebeckonsorwedescendfUrtherintothe lnlre・ Whatispaintedontheunder-sideofhisumbrellaisafirmament,the archandexpanseofthesky.Blissfilllyignorantofthewildchaosbeyondthe protectivedomeorvault,@manparadesaround,livesanddiesunderhisumbrella'; unconcemedwiththeother-worldlystrife.Forthepoetthiscannotlast、Thepoet cannotabidebythishorrorastheunder-sideoftheparasol-withtime-eventually mrnsbleachedandstified;thesmulacrumlosesitsbeautyandpoweroffalsity、n turnsnihilistic.Theconsequence:lifebecomesstalewhenuntruthsmetamorphose intoentrenchedfact.Facinguptotheterrorofthispossibility,andalwaysalready

6

a

n

e

n

e

m

y

o

f

c

o

n

v

e

n

t

i

o

n

'

,

t

h

e

p

o

e

t

m

a

k

e

s

a

s

l

i

t

i

n

t

h

e

u

m

b

r

e

l

l

a

.

H

e

c

a

l

l

s

f

b

r

a

n

e

w

恥加祁c加"""g-anunprecedentedworldview,adifferingcomportmenttothe

(7)

88 JoffPeterNormanBradley world,acommitmenttoman9"αmanorapeopleyettocome. Thepoetagitates-ushersinalittlechaosintoman'sheartsandminds. Consequently,fromthisbraveact,Lawrence's・commonplace'mancatches aglimpseofchaos、through・awindowtothesun'、Yet,whencetumedintoa genuinedraught,theglimpseprovestoomuchaschaospulverisesthesoulof thecommonplaceman.A廿aidofthechaos,he。daubsasimulacrum'overthe windowthatsurveysthedisorder・Theumbrellaispatchedoverwith、thepainted patchofthesimulacrum'.Thevisionbecomesahouse-decoration,@a廿esco onavaultedroof'.Theglowingopenfirmament9"αsimulacrumisfbrmedin cinnumerablepatcheg.Atthismoment,itappearsasifLawrence'svisionshares aresemblancetoJeanBaudrillard'spostmodernnightmareoftheendofthereal andthereignofthesimulacra.ButwhileBaudrillardbemoanstheimplosionof therealinhisdarkermoments,Lawrencehasthepoetactasqge"rpmvocqre", fbreverpreparedtoexposemantothechaosofthereal.Moreover,Lawrence differscruciallyftomthenihilismofBaudrillardbyassertingthatthepoethas accesstotherealandassuchhasarole,nayduty,tomakeslitsto。theopenand windychaoT.Inapemetualstateofunrest,theunbearablemustbecon廿onted andexperiencedevenfbrthemostsatiated,commonplaceman.Confiontedwith amechanisedandimpersonalmodernity,acivilisationfar廿omthe。true'meaning ofitsname,Lawrencebemoansthefactthatchaosisallbeshutout.5Thisconcern alsoappearedinhisfirstnove1,77ie〃ル"e〃αcock,inwhichLawrencehasthe characterAnnabledescribecivilisationa;thepaintedfilngusofrottennes9. AccordingtoHenlyMiller(1980,p、248),Annableisthe、filndamental,potential ofLawrence,theideal-heroimageofhimself',anay-sayertoanysignofculmre. LawrencespeaksthroughAnnable. Theumbrellaunwielding,theumbrellaabsolute,thestorytooencompassing, thevisiontooattractiveandseductive,thepatchesandplastertootightandhard

(8)

-Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,torntoshreds 89 theslitnomore.ChaosmbematesasnostalgiauntilsomeeterrificwindblowSthe umbrellatoribbons,andmuchofmankindtooblivion'.Lawrencewrites(2005, p.lll):"Therestwillshiverinthemidstofchaos.Forchaosisalwaysthere,and alwayswillbe,nomatterhowweputupumbrellasofvisions.''1nsumma:Poets renectandconveythisinwarddesireofmankind,thedesirefbrchaos,andin themselvespossessthecouragetoembracetheirfears.Thedesirefbrchaosisthe breathandlifeofpoetryandalltruepoetryi3mostsubtlyandsensitivelychaotic, outlawed'(2005,p.lll),thusspokeLawrence. 6ChaosinPoetry'iscitedintheconcludingchapterofDeleuzeandGuattari's 〃ルα〃sPMos叩ノ城(1994).CommentingonLawrence's‘violentlypoetictext, (1994,p.203),andusedprincipallyinadiscussionoverthedifferentiationofthe

t

h

r

e

e

d

o

m

a

i

n

s

o

f

t

h

i

n

k

i

n

g

:

p

h

i

l

o

s

o

p

h

y

,

s

c

i

e

n

c

e

,

a

n

d

a

r

t

,

D

e

l

e

u

z

e

6

a

n

d

G

u

a

t

t

a

r

i

agreewithLawrenceandfinditisartistsmdwriters,whommakmgslitsmthe umbrella@tearopen'thefirmamentandexposethoseshelteringtothe@廿eeand

w

i

n

d

y

c

h

a

o

s

'

.

7

Y

e

t

D

e

l

e

u

z

e

a

n

d

G

u

a

t

t

a

r

i

w

a

m

o

f

t

h

i

s

o

v

e

r

-

e

x

p

o

s

u

r

e

t

o

c

h

a

o

s

i

n

philosophy,science,andart,廿omthosewhoarebenton、violently'tearingopen thefirmamentwithoutasecondthought.ForDeleuzeandGuattari,inorderto extricateoneself廿omthenihilismofthisfbnnofchaos,oneneedsamodicum ofconsistencytowardoffthedangers.Putanotherway,toavoid,accordingto Hallward(2006,p.109),those@searingboltsofcreativitythattearthroughus, throughanyoneandeveryone'.Oneneedsalittlelandtofallbackupon.With Guattari,Deleuzeinsistsupon。alittleordertoprotectusfiFomchaog.One mustlearnhowtoenduretheemptinessofBlanchot'seSpqce〃〃”α〃eorthe 'exhaustion!thatDeleuzeattributestoBeckett.Artistsbecome.Thatistheirnature. Theirwildnature.Chaosistheimpersonal.ItisAnglo-Americanwriterswho knowhowtoescape,howtoexperimentwithchaos,tofindalittleshelter,toHee 廿omthequotidianandthedomestic・DeleuzeandGuattariwrite:

(9)

90 JofTPeterNonnanBradley ルo胴〃と"てfyroLqwだ"Ce,/知"7Me/v///e/oA"/eK/"esα"7ecハノ〃"邸oz"..go αc'りss,gero"6花α肺ノ”"g〃血w伽/〃ice?鮒/hep"ceqfq6eco〃"g-α"伽αノリ q6eco""gr/7Owe7o7・roc応α"6eyo""'",q@g"α"gebeco"""g-i"フe7cql肋ノセ… Miller'sworkechoesmuchofthesamespiritofLawrence'sdefinitionoftheartist Hewritesthattheartistisalwaysagainstfbnn(1980.p.242),adding: /Hノe/sq/wqy8α〃jco"oc/"/becα"se/Iere9""esc"oso"/Qfw/7/c"oes"〃杣 oJttrα耐加『碗o岬一ル/so/て〃ルjs/jq/w70"yLMe〃"かc花α伽e加成v〃"αん,6e //7GWフoe/s,/7emes,pノりp舵応,SqI"応,加veα/wqWbee"/"/-s"7"ノ7"s,α/wqysbee" /h"α"cα〃"CO'"pmm伽"gα"α'℃ルノc,α伽o'mqノ;〃rルo/Ogic,ctge"em/ei/yo"/伽. DiscussingLawrence'sparagonofthepoet-artist,Millerimpressivelydescribes thevisionofwalkingthroughtherent,imaginingtheanteriorworldlefibehind. Heisalone.Assuch,itisthisveilofillusionwhichmustbetomtobits,which givestheartisthis""o""'e"e.Millercontinuesbysayingthattheveilsconceal endlessothers:"[I]nsunderingtheveilhegivesushisart.Butwhenhehastom theveilitisonlytodiscovernewveils.Thatishismissiontotearasundertheveils inordertorevealnewveils.''Thereisnorespitefromtheendless,violent,task. IntheprefacetoFannyDeleuze'sFrenchtranslationofLawrence's

4

c

α

s

e

,

e

n

t

i

t

l

e

d

G

N

i

e

t

z

s

c

h

e

a

n

d

S

a

i

n

t

-

P

a

u

l

L

a

w

r

e

n

c

e

a

n

d

J

o

h

n

o

f

P

a

t

m

o

3

,

8

LawrenceisnamedbyDeleuzeinthesamebreathalongsideSpinozaand

Nietzsche,asawriterwhopeeksbeyondthefirmamem.AccordmgtoBuchanan

inhisessay<Deleuzeandhissources:ResponsetoAnneleenMasschelein'(Ross, 2009),thisisbecauseDeleuzetreatsLawrence,likeSpinozaandNietzsche,as asymptomatologistoftheage・Asacriticofthemodemityofhisday,Lawrence writesthenovelsofSpinozism-aconcernwiththecomoreal,withaffect,with

(10)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 91 whatthebodycα"血withwhatproducessadnessandjoy. ItisthroughDeleuze'sreadingofLawrence's。unhinged'works,according toMasschelein(Ross,p.24)thatthelatterisknittedwithinaharlequincanonof uncannywriters,nestedalongsidenotonlyEnglishandAmericannovelistsbut EuropeanwriterssuchasH61derlin,Kleist,Kafka.Intemaltothiscanon,thereis muchcross-fertilisationbetweenphilosophyandart,philosophyandliteramre-a becomingonefbrtheother.Detennineda、hybrid'genius-Lawrenceconiuresup an@athleticism'andraisesMbだ"cetonewlevelsofexperimentation.Artistsand poetsknowhowtoinstallthemselveswithinthisverydifferenceandchaos.Such Ghybrid'geniusesarefimambulists-acrobats@tornapartinashowofstrength' -throughanexcessofstrength(DeleuzeandGuattari,1994,p.67). ReferencestoLawrencearescatteredthroughoutDeleuzeandGuattari's oe"wne.Forexample,in"""-0edjp"s(1983)itisnotFreudwhoisconsidered possessingan6accurateview'ofsexualitybutLawrenceandMiller.Thevision (2004,p.l5)ofthetrueunconsciousinLawrence'swritingsisthesitethrough which@lifebubblesupinus,priortoanymentality'.In@ToHaveDonewith Judgment',Lawrence'smodelofthebodyiscomparedtoDeleuze'sownnotion ofthe。bodywithoutorgans'-derivedfieomAntoninArtaud-thatistosay,thesite oftheafbrementioned。affectiveAthleticism'.Indeed,DeleuzeandGuattariadopt Lawrence'ssloganofthe&dirtylittlesecret'(1977/1983,p.49),tocritiquethe rigidtriangulationandsuffbcationofdesireinpsychoanalysis.Lawrenceissingled outasawriterwhothinksofthehealthofthesuMectwhoistorninalldirections,

t

h

r

o

u

g

h

s

q

u

a

r

i

n

g

u

p

t

o

t

h

e

d

e

a

t

h

-

i

n

-

l

i

f

e

o

f

m

o

d

e

m

c

i

v

i

l

i

s

a

t

i

o

n

.

W

h

a

t

l

i

t

t

l

e

h

e

a

l

t

h

i

s

p

o

s

s

e

s

s

e

d

i

s

o

f

i

e

n

t

o

o

廿

a

g

i

l

e

,

n

o

t

b

e

c

a

u

s

e

o

f

i

l

l

n

e

s

s

e

s

o

r

n

e

u

r

o

s

e

s

p

"

s

e

b

u

t

becausesomethinginlifeprovestoomuchtobearwimessto,orhasembraced@the quietmarkofdeath'(1996,p.172). Tosummarise,inhiscritiqueofmoderncivilisation,ofwhichtheopposition

(11)

92 JoffPeterNonnanBradley tothestraightiacketofFreudianconceptsfindsacentralplace,Lawrencewrites agamstthemaladyofsuhjectivityofwhichmantoilsunderandwhichsmpefies man,makes"smodemsa・ghastlysimulacrumoflife',whichshutsouteノ℃s.Such acultureisalwaysalreadyonthevergeofselfdestruction.Thetychicpoetin tearingatthefabricofthefalse,aHirmsanapocalypticvisionofchaos,tumultand

c

h

a

n

g

e

.

9

H

e

r

e

s

t

o

r

e

s

s

p

o

n

t

a

n

e

i

t

y

t

o

t

h

e

w

o

r

l

d

,

h

o

w

e

v

e

r

i

m

p

e

n

n

a

n

e

n

t

l

y

.

T

h

e

p

o

e

t

andtheartistseethatrealityitselfischaotic.Theproblemiscivilisationdisguises suchchaos.Ultimatelylitbehovesthepoettotranscendthepresentstateofaffairs, tospeakagainstthehorrorsoftheworldandtoimagineaworldyettocome. Chaosmosis htheirownway,Lawrence'stextsreHectthestruggleagamstopmionand clich6;theyresistthesayablethatprotectsagainstthechaos.Itisperhapsbetter putlikethis:ifpoetsandartistsarethoseenemiesofconventionwhotearopenthe firmamem,itisthecrowdofimtatorsfomtheconnnlncationmdustrieswhich patchovertherentwithhearsay,the。clich63ofopinion,order-words(Deleuze andGuattari,1996,p,204).IimagineLawrencesidingwithDeleuzeandGuattari incondemningtheabuseofreasonandtruth加o""y. Iftheunspeakableinnerchaoscanbemi汀oredinconsciousness,mind,and evencivilisation,(Lawrence,1964,p.255),isthisnotthedescriptionofthestate ofZE〃/”e""e〃pqr.exce此"Ce?Elsewhere,Deleuzesaysweneedcircuitbreakers, vacuolesofnon-communicationtochallengetherisinghegemonyofcliche.Asa philosopherand-Iwouldargue-himselfasymptamologistoftheage,Deleuze

i

s

p

r

i

m

a

r

i

l

y

c

o

n

c

e

r

n

e

d

w

i

t

h

t

h

o

s

e

廿

a

i

l

s

o

u

l

s

w

h

o

e

x

e

r

t

a

s

t

r

a

n

g

e

d

e

s

p

a

i

r

,

t

h

o

s

e

peoplebesetonapathofimmolationbutwhoareblessedwithapowerandspirit

t

h

a

t

c

o

n

f

b

u

n

d

s

-

t

h

a

t

r

e

s

i

s

t

s

-

t

h

a

t

c

a

l

l

s

f

b

r

o

t

h

e

r

s

,

f

b

r

a

p

e

o

p

l

e

y

e

t

c

o

m

e

.

T

h

e

(12)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 93 BodywithoutOrgans(BwO)isconstructedusingLawrence'sliteraturebecauseit ishewhoGpaintsthepictureofsuchabody,withthesunandthemoonasitspoles, withitssections,anditsplexuser(Deleuzel997,p.131).Lawrence'scharacters expressthisout-ofLsynchconnectiontotheworld.Deleuzewrites: Lawre"ceceqse/ess/ydesc"bes伽αノ“/加/α'eo堰α"jca"yde/をα〃eor ""α"γαα加一ノル的ejbr"r舵伽oreα"oγoγ油esk加剛o〃Mex/cα"ge"eγαノー加r r加rα”"o"αheノess""v"sedhW肋加e郷ev伽"〃r加M2/iesoノ君α妬α”""伽“ ノルe".o堰α"jsα"o".(Deleuze,1997,p.131) ItisherethatBuchanan(2006)makesastrongargumentthatDeleuzehimself shouldbereadclinically,withsourcessuchasLawrence,WolfSon,Artaud, readassymptomatologistsoftheage,specificallyofmentalillnesses,andof modemity.TheretreattotheBwO,whenintensitiescongealand廿eezeover,isthe 〃〃畑e"he"ofsubjeCtivity,thetearingawayofthereal.HereLawrencehelpsus tounderstandtheproductionoftheBwObecausehisfantasiasoftheunconscious are(preciselyexamplesoftheworldseenthroughthelensoftheBwOratherthan theego'(Ross,p.47)。 4伽0/"花〃ZE〃応“"んe〃 Inhisdiscussionofselfalienatedspiritandcultureinhismajesticand world-shatteringP/7e"o"7e"o/ogVQ/助"〃(1807/1977),HegelwritesofaSpirit tomasunderandasumecttorntoshreds,sufferingatoilingandnaggingdespair: Describedasthe、feelingthatithasbeenrolleduponthewheelthroughall V thestagesofitsexistenceandthatitseverybonehasbeenshattered'(ZiZeke/ α/,2011,p.l42),HegelinthePreface(p.19)famouslydiscussesthissenseof

(13)

94 JoffPeterNonnanBradley dismembennentorZe〃jsse"〃e".Hedescribesitthus ""oW/"/旋呼助"〃な〃o冗加//旅w"cノi耐かjg"e"edQf""ノ',α〃叩α'でs姉e〃 伽s""c伽",伽〃加//旅w"cルα”"mes""ノノα"d//vesw肋〃.助"〃α"α伽飾 〃"j〃o"bノ帥/加加g伽〃加α6so/"redな"e"16e7"1e"r.かな〃O//加/"of!igio" pow"hyl)e加g/ノiePos"舵r〃α〃"'"sqwqy/加加/ルeJveg"ve,"w/ie"wes"Qf ”碗αルノ"9./ルなな〃o〃"goγ倣芯iWhkea凧ルαw"g伽"sノ的sposedq/必加” /;℃加油e”/o”me伽"gelFe;"o,Sp"〃応r加/〃w〃o"か/o//iecたg′でe/"w/7jcル〃 CO"た"""esr/ieノv2gα"ve/bce/o/ZMce(""の〃we/ZFw"〃〃.Tルなpm/り"gedsqjow"

j

q

g

/

c

α

e

w

c

α

"

o

s

e

s

/

/

i

e

"

e

g

a

e

r

o

g

i

v

e

"

-

B

e

9

.

1

0

ForHegel,spiritwinsitstruthonlywhenitcountenancesthenegativeface-to-f

a

c

e

,

a

n

d

t

a

I

T

y

i

n

g

w

i

t

h

i

t

-

a

n

d

s

t

a

y

i

n

g

p

u

t

,

c

o

n

v

e

r

t

s

i

t

i

n

t

o

b

e

i

n

g

'

'

Z

E

e

"

e

signifiesthesenseofinnerhagmemationandbewildermematatimeofpassage fromoldtonew,atatimecon廿ontingdeathandnegativity,atthetimeofyouthin thecaseofJames.Fromtheviolenceofdismembennentthereisaremembering・In otherwords,itisthe@absoluteliquefactionofeverythingstable'ofwhichKQjeve

s

p

e

a

k

s

.

'

2

h

t

h

e

f

i

g

h

t

f

b

r

r

e

c

o

g

n

i

t

i

o

n

,

t

h

e

s

l

a

v

e

e

x

p

e

r

i

e

n

c

e

s

a

t

o

t

a

l

d

i

s

s

o

l

m

i

o

n

o

f

idemityandasweknowmthePreface,Geistonlyfindstruthmabsolmelaceration orutter晩〃伽e"ルe〃(伽eql)so/"/e"Zセ〃畑e"ノie").46so/"re"ZE〃伽e"ルe"isthat

a

b

s

o

l

u

t

e

t

e

a

r

i

n

g

,

d

i

s

r

u

p

t

i

o

n

a

n

d

s

p

l

i

t

t

i

n

g

,

w

i

t

h

Z

e

"

i

e

"

'

3

S

i

g

n

i

f

y

i

n

g

a

t

e

a

r

i

n

g

,

rending,breaking,laceration,rupture,mutilation,ofishredding'and1tearing'.

Originaldismemberment

Atfirstglanceandfbrthemostpart,thereisacleardifferencebetween

theutterdiSmembermentofHegelandBataille's"c〃〃"reo"g加e//e(inner

(14)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 95 experience,originaldismemberment).WrittenwithKQieveinmind,theessay GHegel,DeathandSacrifice'byBatailleclaimsthatHegel'snnnmationofdeath hasanotherside;itunveilsanothertruth.ForBataille,itisinsacrificethatallows onetomdoneselfmabsolutedismembennem・ContraHegel'ssenseofabsolute dismembennent,Bataille'stakeonthe、intimatemovementofnegativity'canbe seenasakindofjoyfillabandonment.Thisisajoythat&tearsoneapart'inanguish. hsacdfice,ormanymtmateaH油,mdividualsmusttearopentheir、selves'and annultheirSelfenclosureinordertofbnncommunity.Batailleclaimsthathuman beingsareneverunitedwitheachother@exceptthroughtearsorwounds',or nakedness・Heargues: 〃ルe〃e/eme"応α〃α"ger/7e"se/ves/ocreq/erノ7ew/io/e,/ルノs/se""yprod"ced wルe〃eac/iqf//iem/oses,/"ozIgルareα〃〃施伽eg"軌α伽'伽〃Q/"s""/c"/” 舵/"g/b""ebe"e/i/q///ieco"'〃""α/be/"g・加加加"s,"c"ces,α〃たs"vqjs

j

E

"

e

s

e

"

"

"

s

/

s

"

c

o

"

z

e

"

"

Q

/

7

o

s

s

"

"

d

c

o

m

"

7

"

"

/

c

α

I

)

e

r

w

e

e

"

/

"

v

α

I

s

.

'

4

Thel皿tyofthe・I'istomapartmthedesiretohndanotherbemgfbroneistom apartbyloveandonlyfindsoneself@intheunityoflove'(seeSweedler,2009, p.ll6).ForBataille,thereisnocommunicationmoreprofbund,thantwobeings Iost・inaconvulsionthatbindsthemtogether'.Communicantstearthemselves

a

p

a

r

t

i

n

o

r

d

e

r

t

o

c

r

e

a

t

e

a

d

i

f

f

e

r

e

n

t

i

a

l

r

e

l

a

t

i

o

n

t

o

b

e

i

n

g

.

U

n

d

e

r

s

t

a

n

d

i

n

g

(

"

r

s

/

α

"

s

)

thuscarriesthe@tremendouspowerofthenegative'.Itisthroughafault,atear,

arip,orawoundthatone6communicategwithalterity.Loverscommunicate

t

h

r

o

u

g

h

w

o

u

n

d

s

.

T

w

o

b

e

i

n

g

s

c

o

m

m

u

n

i

c

a

t

e

w

i

t

h

e

a

c

h

o

t

h

e

r

t

h

r

o

u

g

h

@

h

i

d

d

e

n

r

e

n

t

g

[C/ec〃伽escac〃eex].InBataille'sL"era""eq"dEv//(1973),itisthissense

ofnakednessthatone伽dsmliterature.Ashesays,thepracticeofwritmgand

r

e

a

d

i

n

g

i

s

a

k

i

n

t

o

a

n

e

r

o

t

i

c

p

r

a

c

t

i

c

e

:

l

i

t

e

r

a

t

u

r

e

a

n

d

e

r

o

t

i

c

i

s

m

a

r

e

u

t

t

e

r

l

y

i

n

s

e

p

a

r

a

b

l

e

.

(15)

96 JoffPeterNonnanBradley Literatureiscommunicationwiththelattertennunderstoodas:feltasnakednesg bybothwriterandreader,withthewriter'swoundexposedtothelatter. OnecouldsayinthesameveinasJamesthat〃〃伽e"ルe"istheconditionin whichtheyoungHegelwaslefidebilitated.InastatementaboutthegreatGennan philosopherandhissystembuilding,BatailleclaimsHegeldescribesapersonal momentofviolence.HesaysthatfbrtheyoungHegel,thethirstfbrclosureand completenesstookhimtothebrinkofhimselfBatailleimaginestheyoungHegel touchingtheextreme,theverysinewsandvisceraofthought.Madnessthen mightbeconsideredacompletedismembennentoftheselfltisthetonnentof beingtorn.ForBataille,Hegelgraspedtheimpossibilityofunity,sawthesubject belabouredbyananoriginaltearbAndindeed,letusalsoremindourselvesthatat theendofthelastlectureofhisl939course,KQjeve(1969,p.168),spokeofa periodof@completedepression'inHegel'slifeinhislate20s,ofa6hypochondria' sodebilitatingasto@paralyseallhispowerg.Thedepressionstemmed6precisely 廿omthefactthathecouldnotacceptthenecessaryabandonmentofindividuality -thatis,acmally,0fhumanity-whichtheideaofabsoluteKnowledgedemanded' (p.168).Inapassage廿omHegel'sessay肋肋α"K"owIe"e(1801),KQjeve citesthefbllowing:"AllthegnatsofSubjectivityarebumedinthisdevouring Hameandtheveryconsciousnessofhsgivmg-ofLoneselfandofthisaI血hilation isannihilated."Finally,KQjeveremarksthatHegelsunnountshis.hypochondria' -onecouldsayhisZど〃isse"んe"-andreconcileshimselfwithallthatisandhas been;heclosesoffthesystem,annulsa城e伽"gandheraldingtheendofhistory thesisinsists.therewillnevermorebeanythingnewonearth'.

AholeinHeidegger'ssocks

ContrathewilltofixtheremfbundmLawrence,Heideggermsiststhatthe

(16)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 97 willtoclosethewound,patchoverthegapmgvoid、tofixtherentisdoomedto failure.Tもaringremainsandmustremainasitisintheonlyinthetearingthatthe unitycanappear. Ze"/sse"舵〃,itcanbeassumed,signifiestheconveyingofasenseof tomness,aripping,shredding,lacerating,breaking,廿agmentation,innerdivision. Itsuggestsanacutestateofanxiety,despair,ascissionandhopelessness. ZE〃℃なse"indicatesatearingapartasintotear,rend,dismember,ordisconnect・In HegelandHeidegger,wefindtmssenseof$dismembennent'and@diSjointednes3, somethingwhichismissinginBataille'stranslation(inKQieve)andabsentin thetenn"c〃〃e碗e"rinFrench.WhileZEノァ伽e"力e"canalsobetakentomean modemalienation,inthesenseofaninnerdivision,fiagmentationorafeelingof selfestrangement,italsodescribestherentorlaceratedconsciousnessproduced throughthispersonalandsocialalienation・InFrenchthetermα〃αcルeme"/ connotestotearawaysometimesexcessivelywhile"ec〃〃e胸e"/carriesthe meaningsofshreddingandtearing.InGennan〃ノ"sse"舵〃isconsistentwith asenseofchaos,disorder,cataclysm,impulseandchance.Wemightsaythat thesenseoftornnessimpliesawrenchingandwrestingasunder,asplittingand lacerating,arupturingandmilitating-orinothercontextstheterriblecurettagein DeleuzeandGuattari.'5

肋花"""g,r"""峨""bse"Z,c""叩pe"r

Etymologically,innotingthatR",usedinaderivativesensefbrtear,cleft, crack,etc,istherootofZE〃/”e"〃e",Heideggerindicatesapainfilloriginary schism.RMisgraspedmthesenseofthatwhichtears(fission)aswellasmthe senseofthefissure(rifi)thatthefissionopensup.R/ssdescribestherelation betweenthinkingandpoetry.HeusesthetennR/ssishislecmre!Theoriginofthe

(17)

98 JofTPeterNonnanBradley

w

o

r

k

o

f

a

r

t

'

,

!

6

w

h

e

r

e

t

h

e

w

o

r

d

i

s

u

s

e

d

t

o

d

e

s

i

g

n

a

t

e

t

h

e

s

t

r

i

f

e

b

e

t

w

e

e

n

w

o

r

l

d

a

n

d

e

a

r

t

h

.

I

n

t

h

e

e

s

s

a

y

c

T

h

e

w

a

y

t

o

l

a

n

g

u

a

g

e

'

,

'

7

H

e

i

d

e

g

g

e

r

d

e

s

c

r

i

b

e

s

t

h

e

u

n

i

t

y

o

f

t

h

e

essenceoflanguageasthefissionthattearsopen("舵加e").Heidegger'sidea ofcircumspectionaidstheunderstandingthatourrelationswith@material'arenot mererelationsofmasterybutinvolveakindofresponsivenesstoandcarefbrtools andmaterials,sothattheymayoperateandemergeintheirownway.Inthissense, Heideggerwillinsistthatinkeepingopentherentortear,lifeissustainedinits properunity.Thetearistheopeningoflife.Heideggerwrites: 4〃/ルeα"e"p"/os"〃形ssr/ie'/eα〃"g'(ZeノWsse"ルe/伽""s/l)eα加"伽"” ‐j"sq/Zxrqs//ie'/eα〃"g'iswル“だ加α加sα祁加"Sr花加αJ〃α/r/Ie加川.〃ルy? 4"swe7.・"/so"ん加ノルe花α〃"g/伽〃〃e[ノ"/〃αsql)8e"fca刀叩peqK Despitetheratherbannychoiceofexample,asockisusedtoexplicateuponhis conceptoftearingapart.Ifthesockistom,thenitisnolongerpresent-at-hand (1ノo油α"“")andpreciselynotsoasasock.Initsgoodstate,thesockonmyfbot, fillfillingits"To"sope7α"戒,isnotgraspedassuchinitssockness.Itisjusta sock.Itremainswithdrawnandhiddenassuch.Itisonlywhenitistom,thatthe sockappearsinitstorn-to-pieces-hood・Theunityofthesockisconspicuously absent(Heidegger,2003,p.ll).Thesock"essofthesock,asitwere,appears-conspicuously-throughitstornness-itsnon-sockiness.AndtoremmtoHegel, fbrwhomthepurposeofphenomenologyistheabolitionofZe"/sse"〃e〃,

H

e

i

d

e

g

g

e

r

'

s

r

e

-

c

o

l

l

e

c

t

i

o

n

d

O

e

s

n

o

t

o

v

e

r

c

o

m

e

e

"

h

e

"

b

y

c

l

o

s

i

n

g

e

v

e

r

y

w

o

u

n

d

t

h

a

t

r

e

n

d

s

.

I

n

d

e

e

d

,

f

b

r

B

a

t

a

i

l

l

e

,

t

h

e

R

M

o

r

r

e

n

d

t

h

a

t

f

a

u

l

t

s

t

h

e

s

u

b

j

e

c

t

i

s

d

e

e

p

e

n

e

d

r

a

t

h

e

r

t

h

a

n

h

x

e

d

T

h

i

s

i

s

t

h

e

@

v

o

y

a

g

e

t

o

t

h

e

e

n

d

o

f

t

h

e

p

o

s

s

i

b

i

l

i

t

y

o

f

m

a

n

'

(

B

a

t

a

i

l

l

e

,

1988).Agam,contraHegel,mthemalinstance,Bataillemsistsm"cル舵me"

q

6

s

o

/

o

n

e

l

o

s

e

s

o

n

e

s

e

l

f

a

b

s

o

l

u

t

e

l

y

.

@

S

p

i

r

i

t

m

o

v

e

s

i

n

a

s

t

r

a

n

g

e

w

o

r

l

d

w

h

e

n

a

n

g

u

i

s

h

(18)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 99 andecstasycoexist'(Thylor,1987)

HeideggerandD・H.Lawrence

Inthethinkerpoets-exemplifiedinH61derlin,thatistosay,thosemost susceptibletoBemgassuch,Heidegger(1968)findsmthese、anticipatoryescortr thepassageto6anotherbeginning'.Thepoetthroughfimdamentalattunement tohistime,sensestherifibetweenDaseinandbeings,thesourceofmanIsinner 廿agmentation,whichfbrHeidegger,remains。shroudedintheshadowsofan unearthlyworlddestiny'.In〃肋〃sCa"〃剛加〃"9?,Heidegger(1968,p.89) sayssimplythatthethinkerthinksdeeply6toripawaythefbgthatconcealsbeings assuch'-asensewhichresonateswithLawrence's℃haosinPoetry'essay.But itwouldseemman'severydaynessoughtnottocoverovertherifithatimpedes atrueengagementwithbeing.Thisisbecauseitisthroughtherifithatatorn

c

o

n

s

c

i

o

u

s

n

e

s

s

c

a

n

u

l

t

i

m

a

t

e

l

y

a

c

c

e

s

s

t

h

e

A

b

s

o

l

u

t

e

.

'

8

F

o

r

H

e

i

d

e

g

g

e

r

t

h

e

n

i

f

s

e

l

f

consciousnessissplitasunderwhatemergesfiomthisplightisadiscemmentof thewidercrisisoftheage.ForHeidegger,suMectivityinmodernphilosophyis itselfpreciselysuhjectedtothetompredicamentastornconsciousness.Moreover, thetornconditionofthinkingkeepsthewayopenfbrmetaphysics.Onthismatter, albeitsomewhatcryptically,hewrites(1968,p.89)::6Betteramendedsockthana tomone-notsowithselfLconsciousness.''Wecanreadtherifiortornconditionas anopeningorwayintometaphysics. ThedepictionbyLawrenceofthepoetastoilingtodisrupttheeveryday, toinstilamomentof[/"ノ7e伽〃c賊e",canbereadintheHeideggerianlightof thepoeticwordatonceveiling(unconcealmentorα〃ルe/q)andunveiling:it bothrevealsandconcealsmeaningandunderstanding.Inthisway,thepoetis sitedintersticiallybetweenthesensoryandimaginary,realandappearance,the

(19)

100 JoffPeterNonnanBradley comorealandeternal;in-betweenshadowandlight,absenceandpresence,veiling andunveiling,concealmentandunconcealment,shelteringandclearing,being andbeings・Whatdifferentiatesthisreading廿omLawrence'sworkisthatchaosis notjustvisible,butpartlyconcealedfi.omview.Thisisbecausefillltransparency andexposuretochaosisthetruehorror.ContraLawrence,thepoet'sremitis rathertoelicitchaosfromconcealment,廿omwithdrawal.WhilefbrLawrence, poeticviolenceripsawaywhathasbeenpaperedover,"e"7ejqisadrawingoutof somethingfromfbrgottenness.ForHeidegger,the"ofDaseinisthepossibility ofanopening,anunveilingofthepossibilitytoexistasabeing-thereinbotha temporalandspatialsense.Yetbecausethebeinglessofbeingsisveiled,hidden, bytherationalisingspiritoftheage,therelationofDaseintotheearthisveiled. Thedisclosureorunveilingispossibilisedbutalsothebringingtoquestionof theverypossibilityofabeingbeing-thereisproblematised.Unveilingisalsoa veiling.Thepoetunveilschaos,butitischaositselfwhichwithdraws.Onthis lineofargument,Lawrencecan'tgetatthewildwindsofchaos.Theviolenceof theLawrentianpoetisneedlessonthisaccountasthepoetmustbringfbrththose latentmeaningshiddenbeneathandbeyondveilsofwords-cautiously,calmly, deliberately,peacefillly.ForPhilippeLacoue-Labarthe,onthisaccount,truth (unveiling)veilsitselfastheimpossibilityofveiling(Martis,2005,p.172).

ConclusionJapanandZE〃伽e"〃〃

Fromtheabove,wehavefbundZe"/sse"舵〃unveilsinsomewaythe psychologicalcrisisamictingmanyphilosophersandwritersatsometimein theirlives-theinnerdivisions,thebeingtornapart.Infiltureresearchitwould

b

e

o

f

v

a

l

u

e

t

o

i

n

t

e

r

r

o

g

a

t

e

s

u

c

h

a

n

o

t

i

o

n

v

/

s

-

t

i

-

W

8

B

e

r

n

a

r

d

S

t

i

e

g

l

e

r

'

s

c

o

n

c

e

p

t

i

o

n

o

f

t

h

e

d

i

s

i

n

d

i

v

i

d

u

a

t

e

d

s

e

l

f

(

2

0

1

2

)

,

a

s

e

l

f

w

h

i

c

h

s

u

f

f

e

r

s

p

r

e

c

i

s

e

l

y

i

n

t

h

i

s

p

r

o

l

o

n

g

e

d

(20)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 101 stateofZe"/sse"舵〃.Wemightalsoexaminethattheル加肋〃o"orsocial reclusesmJapanaresimilarlydescribablemthosetennsastheyhndthemselves inルセ/isc/We"orwor/fノWea〃"e".Itisquiteclearthatifmoreandmoreyoung peopleinJapanarelockedinthisstateof〃〃/”e"ノ7e",andunabletobreakfreeof it,thensomethingmustbedone. MightastartingpointbuttoconsiderD.H.Lawrence'sworkasacontribution tothisprQjectbecausehisconceptionofpoetryasviolentandbrutalwouldconnect withacritiqueofpsychoanalysis:contraFreud,schizoanalysisisde-familiarising, de-oedipalising,。e-castrating?TheprescienceofLawrencemightcontributetothe undoingoftheatre,dream,andfantasy.Writingagainstthetriangulationofdesire andthestraightjacketofpsychoanalysis,Lawrencedecodesanddeterritorialises: Hismachineshumalongtearingandlacerating.Theirjoyisamalevolentone.

… 鯉 山 y

Allison,A.(JanualyOl,2012).Ordinaryrefilgees:Socialprecarityandsoulin21st centuryJapan.""/ル'"o/og/cq/g"α′γeγ〃85,2,345-370. Bataille,G.(1973).L"em""℃α"dev//.London:CalderandBoyars. Bataille,G.(1988).肋"〃expe"e"ce.Albany:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress. Buchanan,I.(2006).De/e"zeb7従'se"/e"ces.ResearchOnline. Deleuze,G.(1997).EsMysc〃"cα/α"αc""jca/,Minneapolis:Universityof MinnesotaPress. Deleuze,G.,&Guattari,F.(1983)."""-Oedip"s'・C叩加/な〃α"sc/rizOp〃だ"/α・ Minneapolis:UniversityofMinnesotaPress.OriginallypublishedLIanti-Gdipe,1977. Deleuze,G.,Guattari,F.,Tomlinson,H.,&Burchell,G.(1994).〃加〃s pMos叩/Iy?.NewYOrk:ColumbiaUniversityPress.Originallypublished

(21)

102 JoffPeterNonnanBradley Q"セs/-ce9"e/αp"/osOpルノe?1991. Gemerchak,C.M.(2003).77ieS"""yqfrルe"ega加巳・雌α‘伽gBα〃"e,reqdi"g Hege/.Albany:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress. Hallward,P.(2006).O"/qr"swoγ〃.・De/e"ze""//iepル"“叩"yqfc花α"O"、 London:Verso. Heidegger,M.(1968).〃肋〃Scα"e〃r〃"k加9?NewYork:Harper&ROW・ Originallypublished"""eMrDe"舵"?,〃卿 Heidegger,M(2003).FFo"rse"""α応.BIoomington,m:IndianaUniversityPress. Hege1,G.W.F.,Miller,A.V,&Findlay,J.N.(1977).P舵"o碗e"oノogyQ/sp/'"・ Oxfbrd:ClarendonPress. James,W(1911).Mを加oγ畑α"伽r"伽es.NewYork:Longmans,Green. James,W(1990).EsMW加rα的cα/e〃フ伽c加刀.Raleigh,N.C:AlexCatalOgue,p. 94. Lawrence,D.H(1978)."oc""se.Paris:Balland. Lawrence,D.H.,Steele,B.,&Lawrence,D.H.(1922/2004).A)Jc肋α"αか剛 α〃ノルe〃"co"scio"s.・4"cIFq"/qs/qqf//'e〃"co"scio"s.Cambridge,UK: CambridgeUniversityPress. Lawrence,D.H.,Reeve,NH,&Worthen,J.(2005).""o"c伽"sα""reWews. NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress. グ Levmas,E.(2001).ExMe"ceq"ex/s/e"応.Pittsburgh,Pa:DuquesneUniversity Press・Originallypublished,De/ExMe"ce"ExMe"1947. Martis,J.(2005).P〃抑eLqco"e-Lα加"ルe.・Re"ese"/α加刀α"//ie/ossQ///ie s""ec/.NewYOrk:FordhamUniversityPress. Miller,H.(1980).77iewor〃qrLqwre"ce.・4p"sjo"q/eα〃花cjq"o".Santa Barbara,CalifCapraPress. Pintel;H.(2005).〃Z〃"油α"〃oノ耐cs.London:FaberandFaber. Richardson,R.D.(2006).肋"/α脚〃"7es.・I"//ie腕αe/s"o"'Q/ル"e〃cα〃

(22)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,tomtoshreds 103 mo庇r肺"':α〃ogj鍾叩伽Boston:HoughtonMifflin. Ross,S.(2009).Mb庇ノ"応加α"d//7eon/.・"c"伽α/旋加re.London:Routledge. Stiegler,B.,&Ross,D.(2012).U"co""o"α6/esoc/e//esqfdisq"をα〃j〃/v肋イα血 Cambridge:Polity. Sweedler,M.(2009).7此或s〃e"76e花Jcommz〃ん.・Bα加此,B/α"c/7oI)Le"/s,q"d /ノ7e花加α伽q〃α"だ.Newark:UniversityofDelawarePress. Thylor,M.C.(1987)."伽"〃.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress. Wing,B.,&Hollier,D.(1988).TheCo//egeq/Socio/ogy・(I937-/939ノ. Minneapolis:Univ.ofMinnesotaPress. W ZiZek,S.,Crockett,C.,&Davis,C(2011).HEge/&r/ie/砿加e,.ルノjgio",po/"“ α”C加/ec"c.NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress. Notes

'

T

h

e

p

a

r

a

l

l

e

l

s

w

i

t

h

J

a

p

a

n

a

r

e

w

o

r

t

h

y

o

f

c

l

o

s

e

r

i

n

s

p

e

c

t

i

o

n

.

I

t

i

s

w

i

t

h

o

u

t

d

o

u

b

t

thatthe2011TOhokuearthquakeandtsunamihashadandwillhaveadeepand traumaticeffectontheJapanesenation.TheGreatEastJapanEarthquake(東日 本大震災)occurredonFridayllMarch2011.Themagnitude9.0earthquakeoff thecoastofJapan,producedpowerfilltsunamiwavesthatreachedheightsofupto 133fimMiyakomTOhoku'slwatePrefecmre.ThequakeandfbUowingtsunami claimed27,0001ivesandtriggeredlevel-7meltdownsatthreereactorsatthe FukushimaDaiichiNuclearPowerPlantcomplex.Tbdate,severeradiationleak problemscontinuetooccur.InaHegelianmanner,onemightsaythatJapanese societyistomtoshredsandcanonlyfinditselfmtheconsciousnessofhsutter dismemberment・Itfindsitselfindiremption[Ze"/sse"ルe"]:aschismatthe heartofawounded,dismemberedsociety,reducedtouselesspartsincapableof fbnningawhole.ThereisatearbetweensubjectandoMect:withnorelationor

(23)

104 JoffPeterNonnanBradley mediationbetweenthetwo.Theyarebothtomhalvesofanintegral廿eedomto whichtheydonotaddup,asAdornosays.Thediscussionistherefbretimelyasit isarguedthatthereisasenseinwhichpost-FukushimaJapanisasocietyatroot

t

o

m

-

t

o

-

p

i

e

c

e

s

.

I

n

t

h

e

a

c

a

d

e

m

i

c

y

e

a

r

s

2

0

1

2

-

2

0

1

3

a

n

d

2

0

1

3

-

2

0

1

4

,

3

r

d

y

e

a

r

E

n

g

l

i

s

h

communicationsmdentstakingmyWritinglllclassengagedwith,challengedand critiquedaseriousanthropologicalstudyonaperceivedsenseofsocialprecarity inJapan.Theirreactionsandideasgavemuchfbodfbrthoughttonotonlymyself butalsoProfessorAnneAllison,thejoumal'sauthor.Allisonwasverygraciousin respondingtomystudentscriticalquestionsandletters.SeeAllison,A.(January 01,2012).Ordinaryrefilgees:Socialprecarityandsoulin21stcenturyJapan. A"油mpolOg/cα/Q"α"e『〃85,2,345-370.

2

A

c

c

o

r

d

i

n

g

t

o

h

i

s

b

i

o

g

r

a

p

h

e

r

,

R

i

c

h

a

r

d

s

o

n

(

2

0

0

6

)

,

J

a

m

e

s

,

i

n

t

h

e

l

a

s

t

i

n

s

t

a

n

c

e

,

havmgwitnessedthedevastationfbllowingtheqUake,affirmed6chaos,cataclysm, change,Ze"/sse"舵〃(brokenness),impulse,andchance'.Confrontedwith whatPeircecallsthe"c/ijs"7ofnature,thatistosaythatabsolutechance orindeterminism,isafimdamentalstructureintheuniverse、Jamesmetthe earthquakewith、awildOlympianjoy',accordingtoRichardson(2006),whoadds: ccTherecanbenorealdoubtthatWilliamJames,inhisheartofhearts,embraced andwelcomedchaos,cataclysm,change,ZE"isse"ルe"[tunnoil],impulse,and chance.Hemayhavehadacertainfellowfeelingwiththequakefbrdisorder.''

3

J

a

m

e

s

,

W

.

(

1

9

9

0

)

.

E

s

s

q

)

A

W

"

γ

α

c

q

/

e

W

7

.

R

a

l

e

i

g

h

,

N

.

C

:

A

l

e

x

C

a

t

a

l

o

g

u

e

,

p

.

94.

4

M

i

l

l

e

r

(

1

9

8

0

,

p

.

2

4

3

)

d

e

s

c

r

i

b

e

s

t

h

e

p

o

e

t

a

r

t

i

s

t

w

a

l

k

s

t

h

r

o

u

g

h

t

h

e

r

e

n

t

,

i

m

a

g

i

n

i

n

g

theworldisbehindhim.Heisalone.Assuch,itisthisveilofillusionwhichgives theartisthisγα/so〃〃'e"e.Hecontinues:"[I]nsunderingtheveilhegivesus hisart.Butwhenhehastorntheveilitisonlytodiscovernewveils.Thatishis missiontotearasundertheveilsinordertorevealnewveilW

(24)

Zigzagged:Rippedtobits,torntoshreds 105

5HenryMillerin7>・op/cQfCa"cerdiscussestheroleoftheartistandthe

confiontationwiththechaos.Hewritesofimpersonaljoys,scrambledcodesas akindofstuttering:.6Whenlrefiectthatthetaskwhichtheartistimplicitlysets himselfistooverthrowexistingvalues,tomakeofthechaosabouthimanorder whichishisown,tosowstrifeandfennentsothatbytheemotionalreleasethose whoaredeadmayberestoredtolife,thenitisthatlrunwithjoytothegreat imperfectones,theirconfUsionnourishesme,theirstutteringislikedivinemusic tomyearWDifferentiatingcivilisation廿omculture,Millerwrites(Cowley,1967): G6Iseecivilisationasacrippling,thwartingthingastultifyingthing.Civilisationis thearteriosclerosisofculture.ラツ

6

D

e

l

e

u

z

e

'

s

w

i

f

e

F

a

n

n

y

w

a

s

t

h

e

F

r

e

n

c

h

t

r

a

n

s

l

a

t

o

r

o

f

L

a

w

r

e

n

c

e

.

7

1

n

t

h

e

i

r

o

w

n

w

a

y

t

h

e

t

h

r

e

e

d

o

m

a

i

n

s

-

a

r

t

,

s

c

i

e

n

c

e

a

n

d

p

h

i

l

o

s

o

p

h

y

-

e

a

c

h

e

n

t

e

r

intoasingularstrugglewithchaos.Eachunfilrlsamapoverwhatiswildand treacheroustotraceaterritory.Differentfbnnsofthoughtarecreated廿omchaos asaresult.Inthecaseofphilosophywhatisnecessitatedisexteriority:philosophy needsnonphilosophy.Herephilosophyembracestheprephilosophicalplaneof chaosasimmanent.Itmanufacturesideasontheplaneofimmanencepopulated bymaterialconcepts,whichbytheirnaturehavethecapacitytoproduceinfinite variations.

8

L

a

w

r

e

n

c

e

,

D

.

H

(

1

9

7

8

)

.

,

4

p

o

c

α

s

e

.

P

a

r

i

s

:

B

a

l

l

a

n

d

.

G

i

l

l

e

s

D

e

l

e

u

z

e

p

e

n

n

e

d

t

h

e

introductiontotheFrenchversionofDHLawrence's"po""se.

9

M

i

l

l

e

r

d

e

s

c

r

i

b

e

s

L

a

w

r

e

n

c

e

'

s

p

h

i

l

o

s

o

p

h

y

o

f

c

h

a

o

s

t

h

u

s

(

1

9

8

0

,

p

.

2

4

3

)

:

"

C

h

a

o

s

!

Hethrivesonchaos!Notonlytomakelifebearable,buttomakeitmoregrand, nottomakelifemoreliveable,buttomakeitmorepotent,moredeath-dealing: tocommunicatethegreatnamelessterrorwhichisinhissoul,thewild,primitive fearwhichnatureinspiresherselfandwhichgivesthelietothefeebleillusionson whichallcivilisationisnourished.''

(25)

106 JoffPeterNonnanBradley

l

o

Z

e

e

"

e

"

c

a

n

b

e

b

e

t

t

e

r

a

p

p

r

e

c

i

a

t

e

d

t

h

r

o

u

g

h

t

h

e

n

o

t

i

o

n

o

f

t

a

I

T

y

i

n

g

[

v

e

"

w

e

/

/

e

"

]

withthenegativeasitisthroughthistarryingwiththenegativethatnilis convertedtobeing.

'

'

H

e

g

e

l

,

P

"

o

e

"

o

/

o

g

y

,

p

.

1

9

;

2

0

-

3

0

.

'2Gemerchak,C.M(2003)."eS""じ伽ノQ/.//ie"egq"ve.・此α"加gBqrα"/e,

花αc加gHege/.Albany:StateUniversityofNewYoIkPress,p.162.

'

3

K

O

j

e

v

e

,

H

y

p

p

o

l

i

t

e

a

n

d

B

a

t

a

i

l

l

e

t

r

a

n

s

l

a

t

e

Z

"

e

"

/

7

e

"

a

s

"

c

"

?

e

"

/

'

4

W

i

n

g

,

B

.

,

&

H

o

l

l

i

e

r

,

D

.

(

1

9

8

8

)

.

7

1

/

7

e

C

o

/

/

e

g

e

Q

f

S

o

c

/

o

/

o

g

y

.

"

9

3

7

-

I

9

3

9

Minneapolis:Univ.ofMinnesotaPress

'5Deleuze,Gilles,andF61ixGuattari.1983.4""-Oe""s.・c叩加"s〃α"d

sc/"z叩ノW"/q.Minneapolis:UniversityofMinnesotaPress,p.318.

'6Heidegger,M.,&Krell,D.F.(1993).B"/cw"""邸.・Ro"7Be加g""dr"e

″92〃/077ie/"kQf/ル加灯"g〃9M.SanFrancisco,Calif:HamerSanFrancisco.

'

7

H

e

i

d

e

g

g

e

r

,

M

,

&

H

e

r

t

z

,

P

L

D

.

(

1

9

8

2

)

.

O

"

r

"

e

w

q

W

o

/

α

"

g

"

a

g

e

.

N

e

w

Y

o

r

k

[

e

t

c

.

:

Harper&Row.

'

8

L

e

v

i

n

a

s

(

1

9

4

7

)

i

n

s

i

s

t

s

t

h

a

t

t

o

b

e

c

o

n

s

c

i

o

u

s

m

e

a

n

s

o

n

e

m

u

s

t

b

e

t

o

r

n

a

w

a

y

廿

o

m

ther/'"e".

参照

関連したドキュメント

特許権は,権利発生要件として行政庁(特許庁)の審査が必要不可欠であ

今回のわが国の臓器移植法制定の国会論議をふるかぎり,只,脳死体から

これに対し,わが国における会社法規部の歴史は,社内弁護士抜きの歴史

2保険約款の制定・改廃は,主務大臣の認可をえて定められるもので

106-7頁;舟本信光「欠陥車事故訴訟の問題点」自動車事故民事責任の構造37-8

成人刑事手続で要請されるものを少年手続にも適用し,認めていこうとす

多くは現在においても否定的である。 ノミヅク・ロスと物理的 イギリスにあっては製品 また,生命自体・財産に しかし,

ずして保険契約を解約する権利を有する。 ただし,