The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
The JapanesePsychonomic Society
TheJdpanesefoumatofPs.vchonomicScience
201L VoL 30,Ne.1,135-136
Summary
ofAwardedPresentation1-325
Representations
of
materials
in
the
human
visual
cortex
Chihiro
HiRAMATsu*-
*2' *3,Naokazu
GoDA*・
*4, andHidehiko
KoMATsu*'
*4National institute
for
PhysiologicatSciences*,KbiotoUitiversity*2,
foPan
Societyfbr
the Promotionof
Science*3,
The
Graduate
UhiveJ:sity
for
Advanced
Studies
(SOKELVDAO*4
Our ability torecognize surface qualitiesand inferthe materials that make up objects allows
us to interactappropriately with the objects, Littleisknown, however, about the mechanisms oi
material representation
in
thebrain.
In
thisstudy, weinvestigated
how
information
about various materialsis
processedin
thebrainusing a combination of multivoxel pattern analysis offunctional
magnetic resonance imaging data and perceptual and image-based physical measures of rnaterial
properties. We found that
information
about materials istransforrned from image-basedrepresen-tatiens
in
early visual areas intoperceptual category representation$ along the ventral pathway.Key words: vision, functionaJ magnetic resonance imaging, material perception
Objects
made from various materials(metal,
wood,fabriq
etc.) are characterizedby
different
surfacequalities. These characteristics provide important
information
forobject identificationandcategoriza-tion,shaping affective
impressions
and mediatingour interactionswith the objects.
Previous studies
{Cant
&
Goodale,
2007;Cavina-Pratesi
et al.2010)have
shown that surface proper-tiesare encoded near thefusiform
gyrus andcollat-eral sulcus
(FG/CoS),
Inthe present study, wefur-ther examined representations of materials
in
the hurnan visual cortex.
Methods
Participants. Five adults
<three
femaLes)with nor-rnal vision participatcdinthisstudy.
StimulL
Eight
exemplarsfor
each of nine materialcategories
(metal,
ceramic, glass,stone, bark, wood,leather,
fabric,
and fur)were synthesized usingcom-puter graphic software
<LightWave
3D;Figure 1).Psychological experiments.
Perceptual
dissimi-larities
between
images
were assessed using the se-mantic differential(SD)
method and 12 adjectivepairs that described visual and nonvisual
impres-sions of the surfaces
(e.g.
`matte-glossy', 'soft-hard').Image statistics. Image-based physical
dissimi-Iaritieswere assessed using 20 low-levelimage
statis-ticsconsisting of
12
subband statistics(four
orjenta-tions×three spatia] frcquencies)and eight moments
of CIELAB coordinates
(mean
and standarddevia-tionof
L*,
a*,b*
and skew and kurtosis ofL*).
Functional rnagnetic resonance
imaging
(fMRI)
acquisition and analysis. During fMRI acquisition,
each image
(7.5e
X7.50)in
the categoryblocks
was*
Graduate
School
ofLetters,
KyotoUniversity
Yoshida-honmachL Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501,
Japan
Copyright2011
Figurel.
Example
images
from
the ninematerial categories
(colored
stimuli wereused in the experiments). Modified
from
Hiramatsu et al.
{201
1).The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
The JapanesePsychonomic Society
136
(a)Ceramic
Leather MeteiGtssStafie BarkWoodFainric F-f Ceramic Legther kMetaiGlassstene eerkWoedFahtit FurThe
Japanese
Journal
of PsychonomicS
Image-based
MeCeG!SiBaVVoteFnFu
VW2
Figure 2.
each ROI and image-base
MeCeGEStBaWti.eFeFu
{a)
Dissimilarity taeCeG[su・BsWoteFeF" medeGlstBaWotefaFuPerception
MeCeGIStBaWci.eFeFuFGiCoS
MeCeGISteaWot.eFaFumatrices foreach
l・IptOe
g.
・...
m;,/,/isoilli
g
60Q'
Ree
9
w'
eV
(b>
cTence feWe.l・Bsedi
Ig
s?$Ee-ag#sts・
gs
smee
eVol.
30,
No.
1
e.4Vl!V2
FGfCoS
te --- sl .v'sA"."rtr s::va.7 e ' rzag・81
a . r= a.3a 10 x-"1'?g'l;.f,"
.,,
S eo.6 o.g QA e.s Q.s
Neurzal
dissimtlmritybetween
neuraldissimilarities
.
(2011),
analysis.Cb)
Correlation
d
or perceptualdissimilarities.
Modified
from
Hiramatsu et alin
presented centrally for500 ms and participants were
required
to
fixate
onthe
center of the screen andpress a button when the color of the fixationspot
changed from red to green. fMRI images
(T2*-weighted gradient-echo echo planar sequence:
TR=
2s, TE=30 rns, voxel size=3 ×3×3mm) were
ac-quired using a
Siemens
Allegra
3T
scanner,Multivoxel pattern analysis was used to extract
patterns of neural activity
for
each category.Neural
dissimilaritiesbetween categories were assessed
us-ing pairwise category classification and linear
sup-portvector machine with activation patterns
for
500
visually responsive voxels within a region of interest(ROI)
for
each subject.Regions
ofinterest
weredetermined by a separate retinotopic mapping
ex-periment and anatomical
landmarks.
Results
Matrices
in
Figure
2(a)
depict
dissimilarities
be-tween categories ineach ana]ysis. Image-based
(up-per
left
panel) and perceptual(upper
right panel)dissimilaritieswere calculated as
Euclidean
dis-tances
between
the
category pairsusing rnean imagestatistics and mean ratings
from
theSD
methodacross the eight exemplars, respectively. Neural dis-similarity rnatrices
for
early retinotopic areas(Vlf
V2} and higher ventral areas near the FG/CoS were
obtained
based
on mean pairwise classificationaccu-racy ineach ROI across subjects, The significance of the correlation
between
neuraldissimilarities
withimage-based dissimilaritieswas higher
for
VllV2
(one-tailed
permutation test,P<O,OOO1)
thanfor
FG/CoS
(P
<O.029;Figure 2(b).upper panels),whereas the opposite was observed for the correlation with per-ceptualdissimilarities
to=O.O16
for
VllV2,P=
O,0001 forFG/CoS; Figure 2(b),lower panels).
Discussion
The
neuraldissimilarities
in
early andhigher
ven-tralvisual areas correlated with image-based andperceptual dissimilaritiesdifferently,This suggests
that
representations of materials changefrom
image-based representations inearly visual areas to
percep-tual
category representations along the ventralpath-way. The results indicate that inforrnation about
multimodal characteristics of materials
is
processedin
the ventra] cortex near the FG, where the signals can be used tocategorize the materials.
References
Cant,
J.
S.
&
Goodale,
M.
A.
(2007},
Attention
toform
or surface properties modulates differentregiens
of human occipitoternporal cortex. CerebratCortex,
17,
713-731.
Cavina-Pratesi,
C.
Kentrdge, R.W. Heywood,C.
A.&
Milner,
A.
D.
(201O).
Separate
processing oftexture
and form in the ventral stream: evidence from
fMRI
and visual agnosia.Cerebrat
Cortex,
20,
446.Hiramatsu,
C.,Goda, N. & Komatsu, H.
(2011).
formation
from
image-based
to perceptualsentation of materials along the human ventral