• 検索結果がありません。

Some Jensen’s type inequalities for log-convex functions of selfad- joint operators in Hilbert spaces under suitable assumptions for the involved operators are given

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Some Jensen’s type inequalities for log-convex functions of selfad- joint operators in Hilbert spaces under suitable assumptions for the involved operators are given"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

FUNCTIONS OF SELFADJOINT OPERATORS IN HILBERT SPACES

S.S. DRAGOMIR

Abstract. Some Jensen’s type inequalities for log-convex functions of selfad- joint operators in Hilbert spaces under suitable assumptions for the involved operators are given. Applications for particular cases of interest are also pro- vided.

1. Introduction

Let A be a selfadjoint linear operator on a complex Hilbert space (H;h:; :i): The Gelfand map establishes a -isometrically isomorphism between the set C(Sp(A))of allcontinuous functionsde…ned on thespectrumofA;denotedSp(A); and the C -algebra C (A) generated byA and the identity operator1H on H as follows (see for instance [6, p. 3]):

For anyf; g2C(Sp(A))and any ; 2Cwe have (i) ( f + g) = (f) + (g) ;

(ii) (f g) = (f) (g)and f = (f) ; (iii) k (f)k=kfk:= supt2Sp(A)jf(t)j;

(iv) (f0) = 1Hand (f1) =A;wheref0(t) = 1andf1(t) =t;fort2Sp(A): With this notation we de…ne

f(A) := (f) for allf 2C(Sp(A))

and we call it thecontinuous functional calculus for a selfadjoint operator A:

IfAis a selfadjoint operator andf is a real valued continuous function onSp(A), then f(t) 0 for any t 2 Sp(A) implies that f(A) 0; i:e: f(A) is a positive operator onH:Moreover, if bothf andg are real valued functions onSp(A)then the following important property holds:

(P) f(t) g(t) for anyt2Sp(A) implies thatf(A) g(A) in the operator order ofB(H):

For a recent monograph devoted to various inequalities for functions of selfadjoint operators, see [6] and the references therein. For other results, see [12], [7], [11] and [9]. For recent results, see [3], [4] and [1].

Date: March 03, 2010.

1991Mathematics Subject Classi…cation. 47A63; 47A99.

Key words and phrases. Selfadjoint operators, Positive operators, Jensen’s inequality, Convex functions, Functions of selfadjoint operators.

1

(2)

2. Some Jensen’s Type Inequalities for Log-convex Functions The following result that provides an operator version for the Jensen inequality for convex functions is due to Mond and Peµcari´c [10] (see also [6, p. 5]):

Theorem 1 (Mond-Peµcari´c, 1993, [10]). Let A be a selfadjoint operator on the Hilbert space H and assume that Sp(A) [m; M] for some scalars m; M with m < M:If f is a convex function on[m; M];then

(MP) f(hAx; xi) hf(A)x; xi for eachx2H with kxk= 1:

Taking into account the above result and its applications for various concrete examples of convex functions, it is therefore natural to investigate the corresponding results for the case of log-convex functions, namely functions f : I ! (0;1) for whichlnf is convex.

We observe that such functions satisfy the elementary inequality f((1 t)a+tb) [f(a)]1 t[f(b)]t

for any a; b2 I and t 2[0;1]: Also, due to the fact that the weighted geometric mean is less than the weighted arithmetic mean, it follows that any log-convex function is a convex function. However, obviously, there are functions that are convex but not log-convex.

As an imediate consequence of the Mond-Peµcari´c inequality above we can provide the following result:

Theorem 2. Let A be a selfadjoint operator on the Hilbert space H and assume that Sp(A) [m; M] for some scalars m; M with m < M:If g : [m; M]!(0;1) is log-convex, then

(2.1) g(hAx; xi) exphlng(A)x; xi hg(A)x; xi for eachx2H with kxk= 1:

Proof. Consider the functionf := lng; which is convex on[m; M]:Writing (MP) forf we getln [g(hAx; xi)] hlng(A)x; xi; for eachx2H withkxk = 1;which, by taking the exponential, produces the …rst inequality in (2.1).

If we also use (MP) for the exponential function, we get

exphlng(A)x; xi hexp [lng(A)]x; xi=hg(A)x; xi for eachx2H withkxk= 1and the proof is complete.

It is also important to observe that, as a special case of Theorem 1 we have the following important inequality in Operator Theory that is well known as the Hölder-McCarthy inequality:

Theorem 3(Hölder-McCarthy, 1967, [8]). LetAbe a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert spaceH. Then

(i) hArx; xi hAx; xir for all r >1 andx2H with kxk= 1;

(ii) hArx; xi hAx; xir for all0< r <1 andx2H withkxk= 1;

(iii) IfAis invertible, then hA rx; xi hAx; xi r for allr >0 andx2H with kxk= 1:

Since the function g(t) = t r for r > 0 is log-convex, we can improve the Hölder-McCarthy inequality as follows:

(3)

Proposition 1. LetAbe a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible, then

(2.2) hAx; xi r exp ln A r x; x A rx; x for allr >0 andx2H withkxk= 1:

The following reverse for the Mond-Peµcari´c inequality that generalizes the scalar Lah-Ribari´c inequality for convex functions is well known, see for instance [6, p.

57]:

Theorem 4. Let A be a selfadjoint operator on the Hilbert space H and assume thatSp(A) [m; M]for some scalarsm; M withm < M:Iff is a convex function on[m; M]; then

(2.3) hf(A)x; xi M hAx; xi

M m f(m) +hAx; xi m

M m f(M) for eachx2H with kxk= 1:

This result can be improved for log-convex functions as follows:

Theorem 5. Let A be a selfadjoint operator on the Hilbert space H and assume that Sp(A) [m; M] for some scalars m; M with m < M:If g : [m; M]!(0;1) is log-convex, then

(2.4) hg(A)x; xi Dh [g(m)]

M1H A

M m [g(M)]

A m1H M m i

x; xE M hAx; xi

M m g(m) +hAx; xi m

M m g(M) and

(2.5) g(hAx; xi) [g(m)]

M hAx;xi

M m [g(M)]hAx;xi

m M m

Dh[g(m)]

M1H A

M m [g(M)]

A m1H M m

ix; xE for eachx2H with kxk= 1:

Proof. Observe that, by the log-convexity ofg;we have (2.6) g(t) =g M t

M m m+ t m

M m M [g(m)]MM mt [g(M)]Mt mm for anyt2[m; M]:

Applying the property (P) for the operatorA, we have that hg(A)x; xi h (A)x; xi

for eachx2H with kxk= 1;where (t) := [g(m)]MM mt [g(M)]Mt mm; t2[m; M]: This proves the …rst inequality in (2.4).

Now, observe that, by the weighted arithmetic mean-geometric mean inequality we have

[g(m)]MM mt [g(M)]Mt mm M t

M m g(m) + t m

M m g(M) for anyt2[m; M]:

Applying the property (P) for the operatorA we deduce the second inequality in (2.4).

(4)

Further on, if we use the inequality (2.6) fort=hAx; xi 2[m; M]then we deduce the …rst part of (2.5).

Now, observe that the function introduced above can be rearranged to read as

(t) =g(m) g(M) g(m)

t m M m

; t2[m; M] showing that is a convex function on[m; M]:

Applying Mond-Peµcari´c’s inequality for we deduce the second part of (2.5) and the proof is complete.

The above result from Theorem 5 can be utilized to produce the following reverse inequality for negative powers of operators:

Proposition 2. LetAbe a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible and Sp(A) [m; M] (0< m < M);then

(2.7) A rx; x h

mM1MHmAMAMm1mHi r

x; x M hAx; xi

M m m r+hAx; xi m

M m M r

and

(2.8) hAx; xi r h

g(m)MMhAx;xim g(M)hAx;xiM mmi r h

mM1MHmAMAMm1mHi r

x; x for allr >0 andx2H withkxk= 1:

3. Jensen’s Inequality for Differentiable Log-convex Functions The following result provides a reverse for the Jensen type inequality (MP):

Theorem 6(Dragomir, 2008, [5]). LetJ be an interval andf :J !Rbe a convex and di¤ erentiable function on °J (the interior ofJ)whose derivativef0is continuous on °J:IfAis a selfadjoint operator on the Hilbert spaceH withSp(A) [m; M] °J;

then

(3.1) (0 )hf(A)x; xi f(hAx; xi) hf0(A)Ax; xi hAx; xi hf0(A)x; xi for any x2H with kxk= 1:

The following result may be stated:

Proposition 3. Let J be an interval andg:J !Rbe a di¤ erentiable log-convex function on °J whose derivativeg0 is continuous on °J. IfA is a selfadjoint operator on the Hilbert spaceH with Sp(A) [m; M] °J; then

(3.2) (1 )exphlng(A)x; xi g(hAx; xi)

exphD

g0(A) [g(A)] 1Ax; xE

hAx; xi D

g0(A) [g(A)] 1x; xEi for eachx2H with kxk= 1:

(5)

Proof. It follows by the inequality (3.1) written for the convex function f = lng that

hlng(A)x; xi lng(hAx; xi) +D

g0(A) [g(A)] 1Ax; xE

hAx; xi D

g0(A) [g(A)] 1x; xE for eachx2H withkxk= 1:

Now, taking the exponential and dividing byg(hAx; xi)>0for eachx2H with kxk= 1;we deduce the desired result (3.2).

Remark 1. Let A be a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible, then

(3.3) (1 )hAx; xirexp ln A r x; x exp r hAx; xi A 1x; x 1 for allr >0 andx2H withkxk= 1:

The following result that provides both a re…nement and a reverse of the multi- plicative version of Jensen’s inequality can be stated as well:

Theorem 7. Let J be an interval and g : J ! R be a log-convex di¤ erentiable function on °J whose derivativeg0 is continuous on °J. IfA is a selfadjoint operator on the Hilbert spaceH with Sp(A) [m; M] °J; then

(3.4) 1 exp g0(hAx; xi)

g(hAx; xi) (A hAx; xi1H) x; x hg(A)x; xi

g(hAx; xi) D

exph

g0(A) [g(A)] 1(A hAx; xi1H)i x; xE for eachx2H with kxk= 1;where1H denotes the identity operator on H:

Proof. It is well known that if h:J !Ris a convex di¤erentiable function on °J, then the followinggradient inequality holds

h(t) h(s) h0(s) (t s) for anyt; s2°J.

Now, if we write this inequality for the convex functionh= lng;then we get

(3.5) lng(t) lng(s) g0(s)

g(s) (t s) which is equivalent with

(3.6) g(t) g(s) exp g0(s)

g(s) (t s) for anyt; s2°J.

Further, if we takes:=hAx; xi 2[m; M] °J;for a …xed x2H with kxk= 1;

in the inequality (3.6), then we get

g(t) g(hAx; xi) exp g0(hAx; xi)

g(hAx; xi) (t hAx; xi) for anyt2°J.

(6)

Utilising the property (P) for the operatorA and the Mond-Peµcari´c inequality for the exponential function, we can state the following inequality that is of interest in itself as well:

(3.7) hg(A)y; yi g(hAx; xi) exp g0(hAx; xi)

g(hAx; xi) (A hAx; xi1H) y; y g(hAx; xi) exp g0(hAx; xi)

g(hAx; xi) (hAy; yi hAx; xi) for eachx; y2H withkxk=kyk= 1:

Further, if we put y = x in (3.7), then we deduce the …rst and the second inequality in (3.4).

Now, if we replaceswith tin (3.6) we can also write the inequality g(t) exp g0(t)

g(t) (s t) g(s) which is equivalent with

(3.8) g(t) g(s) exp g0(t)

g(t) (t s) for anyt; s2°J.

Further, if we takes:=hAx; xi 2[m; M] °J;for a …xed x2H with kxk= 1;

in the inequality (3.8), then we get

g(t) g(hAx; xi) exp g0(t)

g(t) (t hAx; xi) for anyt2°J.

Utilising the property (P) for the operator A, then we can state the following inequality that is of interest in itself as well:

(3.9) hg(A)y; yi g(hAx; xi)D exph

g0(A) [g(A)] 1(A hAx; xi1H)i y; yE for eachx; y2H withkxk=kyk= 1:

Finally, if we puty=xin (3.9), then we deduce the last inequality in (3.4).

Remark 2. Let A be a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible, then

(3.10) 1 D exph

r 1H hAx; xi 1A i x; xE

A rx; x hAx; xir exp r 1H hAx; xiA 1 x; x for allr >0 andx2H withkxk= 1:

The following reverse inequality may be proven as well:

Theorem 8. Let J be an interval and g : J ! R be a log-convex di¤ erentiable function on °J whose derivativeg0 is continuous on °J. IfA is a selfadjoint operator

(7)

on the Hilbert spaceH with Sp(A) [m; M] °J; then

(3.11) (1 ) D

[g(M)]

A m1H M m [g(m)]

M1H A M m x; xE hg(A)x; xi

D

g(A) exph

(M1H A)(A m1H)

M m

g0(M) g(M)

g0(m) g(m)

i x; xE hg(A)x; xi

exp 1

4(M m) g0(M) g(M)

g0(m) g(m) for eachx2H with kxk= 1:

Proof. Utilising the inequality (3.5) we have successively

(3.12) g((1 )t+ s)

g(s) exp (1 )g0(s) g(s) (t s) and

(3.13) g((1 )t+ s)

g(t) exp g0(t) g(t) (t s) for anyt; s2°J and any 2[0;1]:

Now, if we take the power in the inequality (3.12) and the power1 in (3.13) and multiply the obtained inequalities, we deduce

(3.14) [g(t)]1 [g(s)]

g((1 )t+ s)

exp (1 ) g0(t) g(t)

g0(s)

g(s) (t s) for anyt; s2°J and any 2[0;1]:

Further on, if we choose in (3.14)t=M; s=mand =MM mu;then, from (3.14) we get the inequality

(3.15) [g(M)]Mu mm [g(m)]MM mu g(u)

exp (M u) (u m)

M m

g0(M) g(M)

g0(m) g(m) which, together with the inequality

(M u) (u m)

M m

1

4(M m)

produce

(3.16) [g(M)]Mu mm[g(m)]MM mu

g(u) exp (M u) (u m)

M m

g0(M) g(M)

g0(m) g(m) g(u) exp 1

4(M m) g0(M) g(M)

g0(m) g(m) for anyu2[m; M]:

(8)

If we apply the property (P) to the inequality (3.16) and for the operatorAwe deduce the desired result.

Remark 3. Let A be a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible and Sp(A) [m; M] (0< m < M);then

(3.17) (1 )

[g(M)]

r(m1H A)

M m [g(m)]

r(A M1H)

M m x; x hA rx; xi

DA rexphr(M1

H A)(A m1H) M m

ix; xE

hA rx; xi exp

"

1

4r(M m)2 mM

#

4. Applications for Ky Fan’s Inequality

Consider the functiong: (0;1)!R,g(t) = 1tt r; r >0:Observe that for the new functionf : (0;1)!R,f(t) = lng(t)we have

f0(t) = r

t(1 t) andf00(t) = 2r 12 t

t2(1 t)2 fort2(0;1) showing that the functiongis log-convex on the interval 0;12 :

If pi >0 for i 2 f1; :::; ng with Pn

i=1pi = 1 and ti 2 0;12 for i 2 f1; :::; ng; then by applying the Jensen inequality for the convex functionf (with r= 1) on the interval 0;12 we get

(4.1)

Pn i=1piti

1 Pn i=1piti

Yn i=1

ti

1 ti

pi

;

which is the weighted version of the celebratedKy Fan’s inequality, see [2, p. 3].

This inequality is equivalent with Yn

i=1

1 ti

ti pi

1 Pn i=1piti Pn

i=1piti

; wherepi>0fori2 f1; :::; ngwithPn

i=1pi = 1andti2 0;12 fori2 f1; :::; ng: By the weighted arithmetic mean - geometric mean inequality we also have that

Xn i=1

pi(1 ti)ti1 Yn i=1

1 ti ti

pi

giving the double inequality (4.2)

Xn i=1

pi(1 ti)ti 1 Yn i=1

(1 ti)ti1 pi Xn i=1

pi(1 ti) Xn i=1

piti

! 1

: The following operator inequalities generalizing (4.2) may be stated:

Proposition 4. LetAbe a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible and Sp(A) 0;12 ; then

(4.3) D

A 1(1H A) rx; xE

expD

ln A 1(1H A) rx; xE

h(1H A)x; xi hAx; xi 1

r

(9)

for eachx2H with kxk= 1 andr >0:

In particular,

(4.4) A 1(1H A)x; x exp ln A 1(1H A) x; x

h(1H A)x; xi hAx; xi 1 for eachx2H with kxk= 1.

The proof follows by Theorem 2 applied for the log-convex function g(t) =

1 t t

r; r >0; t2 0;12 :

Proposition 5. LetAbe a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible and Sp(A) [m; M] 0;12 ; then

(4.5) D

(1H A)A 1 rx; xE

*2

4 1 m m

r(M1H A)

M m 1 M

M

r(A m1H)

M m

3 5x; x

+

M hAx; xi

M m

1 m

m

r

+hAx; xi m

M m

1 M

M

r

and

(4.6) 1 hAx; xi hAx; xi

r 1 m

m

r(M hAx;xi)

M m 1 M

M

r(hAx;xi m) M m

*2

4 1 m m

r(M1H A)

M m 1 M

M

r(A m1H)

M m

3 5x; x

+

for eachx2H with kxk= 1 andr >0:

The proof follows by Theorem 5 applied for the log-convex function g(t) =

1 t t

r; r >0; t2 0;12 : Finally we have:

Proposition 6. LetAbe a selfadjoint positive operator on a Hilbert space H:If A is invertible and Sp(A) 0;12 ; then

(4.7) (1 )exp ln (1H A)A 1 rx; x (1 hAx; xi)hAx; xi 1 r

exph

r hAx; xi D

A 1(1H A) 1x; xE D

(1H A) 1x; xE i and

(4.8) 1 D exph

r(1 hAx; xi) 1 1H hAx; xi 1A i x; xE (1H A)A 1 rx; x

(1 hAx; xi)hAx; xi 1 r D

exph

r(1H A) 1 hAx; xiA 1 1H

i x; xE for eachx2H with kxk= 1 andr >0:

(10)

References

[1] S. Abramovich, S. Iveli´c and J.E.Peµcari´c, Improvement of Jensen-Ste¤ensen’s inequality for superquadratic functions.Banach J. Math. Anal.4(2010), no. 1, 159–169.

[2] E.F. Beckenbach and R. Bellman,Inequalities, 4th Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.

[3] S.S. Dragomir, Grüss’type inequalities for functions of selfadjoint operators in Hilbert spaces, Preprint,RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll.,11(e) (2008), Art. 11. [ONLINE:http://www.staff.vu.

edu.au/RGMIA/v11(E).asp].

[4] S.S. Dragomir, Some new Grüss’ type Inequalities for functions of selfadjoint operators in Hilbert spaces, Preprint RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll., 11(e) (2008), Art. 12. [ONLINE: http:

//www.staff.vu.edu.au/RGMIA/v11(E).asp].

[5] S.S. Dragomir, Some reverses of the Jensen inequality for functions of selfadjoint operators in Hilbert spaces, Preprint RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll., 11(e) (2008), Art. . [ONLINE:http:

//www.staff.vu.edu.au/RGMIA/v11(E).asp].

[6] T. Furuta, J. Mi´ci´c Hot, J. Peµcari´c and Y. Seo,Mond-Peµcari´c Method in Operator Inequal- ities. Inequalities for Bounded Selfadjoint Operators on a Hilbert Space, Element, Zagreb, 2005.

[7] A. Matkovi´c, J. Peµcari´c and I. Peri´c, A variant of Jensen’s inequality of Mercer’s type for operators with applications.Linear Algebra Appl.418(2006), no. 2-3, 551–564.

[8] C.A. McCarthy,cp;Israel J. Math.,5(1967), 249-271.

[9] J. Mi´ci´c, Y.Seo, S.-E. Takahasi and M. Tominaga, Inequalities of Furuta and Mond-Peµcari´c, Math. Ineq. Appl.,2(1999), 83-111.

[10] B. Mond and J. Peµcari´c, Convex inequalities in Hilbert space,Houston J. Math., 19(1993), 405-420.

[11] B. Mond and J. Peµcari´c, On some operator inequalities,Indian J. Math.,35(1993), 221-232.

[12] B. Mond and J. Peµcari´c, Classical inequalities for matrix functions,Utilitas Math.,46(1994), 155-166.

Mathematics, School of Engineering & Science, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne City, MC 8001, Australia.

E-mail address: [email protected]

URL:http://www.staff.vu.edu.au/rgmia/dragomir/

School of Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of the Witwater- srand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa

参照

関連したドキュメント

It was shown in [4] that, under some assumptions, a function is outer γ-convex (convex, respectively) iff the sum of this function and an arbitrary continuous linear functional

In this paper, using the series representation of ψ(x) and ideas used in [2] we will establish some double inequalities involving the gamma function, &#34;similar&#34; to (1.2).. M

In recent years many authors had established several generalizations of the Simp- son’s inequality for functions of bounded variation and for Lipschitzian, monotonic, and

Classical inequalities like Jensen and its reverse are used to obtain some elemen- tary numerical inequalities for convex functions.. Furthermore, imposing restrictions on the

We construct an example that the class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings include properly the class of nonexpansive mappings in locally convex spaces, prove a theorem on

[2] , Some inequalities for the Euclidean operator radius of two operators in Hilbert spaces, Linear Algebra Appl. Kittaneh, A numerical radius inequality and an estimate for

Key words and phrases: Riemann-Stieltjes integral, Functions of bounded variation, Lipschitzian functions, Integral inequal- ities, ˇ Cebyšev, Grüss, Ostrowski and Lupa¸s

The proof exploits Bellman function method: the above in- equality is deduced from the existence of a special function possessing certain majorization and concavity