© Hindawi Publishing Corp.
LIPSCHITZ MEASURES AND VECTOR-VALUED HARDY SPACES
MAGALI FOLCH-GABAYET, MARTHA GUZMÁN-PARTIDA, and SALVADOR PÉREZ-ESTEVA
(Received 24 January 2000)
Abstract.We define certain spaces of Banach-valued measures called Lipschitz measures.
When the Banach space is a dual spaceX∗, these spaces can be identified with the duals of the atomic vector-valued Hardy spacesHXp(Rn),0< p <1. We also prove that all these measures have Lipschitz densities. This implies that for every real Banach spaceXand 0< p <1,the dualHpX(Rn)∗can be identified with a space of Lipschitz functions with values inX∗.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 42B30, 46E30.
1. Introduction and notation. An interesting question in the theory of vector- valued Hardy spaces is the representation of their dual spaces. This matter has been considered by several authors in the different versions (not necessarily equivalent) of these spaces, namely theHp-spaces of holomorphic functions in the disk with values in a Banach spaceXas well as the “maximal” and the atomic Hardy spaces of Banach- valued distributions in the unit circle (cf. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]). In particular, in [1], it is proved that for every Banach spaceX, the dual of the atomicspaceH1at(X)in the unit circle is the spaceᏮᏹᏻ(X∗)of measures in the circle and values inX∗ of bounded mean oscillation. In that paper, it is proved that this space of measures is in fact the space of functions of bounded mean oscillation if and only ifX∗has the Radon-Nikodym property and in this caseH1at(X)∗=Ꮾᏹᏻ(X∗).
In this paper, we consider the atomic Hardy spacesHXp inRn for 0< p <1. The dual space of each of theseHXpwill be a space of measures with values inX∗modulo polynomials of degreeN≤[n(1/p−1)](measures with polynomial densities). These measures will be finitely additive measures defined in the ring of all bounded Borel sets inRnand have a control imposed on cubes analogous to that one shared by the Lipschitz functions:f∈L1loc(Rn)is a Lipschitz function with exponentα >0 if and only if there exists a positive constantC >0 such that
f−PQ[α](f )
L2(Q)≤C|Q|(α/n)+1/2, (1.1) for every cubeQ, wherePQ[α](f )is the unique polynomial of degree less than or equal to[α]having the same moments of order less than or equal to[α]asf.
The exponentp∈(0,1)makes possible to adapt the arguments of the scalar theory to approximate these measures by measures with smooth density. The final result is that every measure belonging to our space of measures denoted byᏹXαhas a Radon- Nikodým derivative that is a Lipschitz function with exponentα=n(1/p−1). Then
the dual ofHXp is the space of Lipschitz functions inRnwith values in X∗ modulo polynomials of degree less than or equal to [α].This holds for every real Banach spaceX, contrasting with the casep=1 mentioned above.
The following notation will be used throughout this paper,(Rn,X)will denote the space of rapidly decreasing functions onRnwith values in a real Banach spaceX. We will denote byᏰ(Rn,X)the space ofX-valued distributions inRn,that is, the space of all continuous linear operators fromCc∞(Rn)intoXand(Rn,X)will be the space of all the linear and continuous operators from(Rn)with values inX. s(Rn,X) and b(Rn,X)will denote, respectively, (Rn,X)with the topologies of pointwise convergence and uniform convergence in bounded subsets of(Rn).
For a cubeQ⊂Rnand 1≤p <∞,LpX(Q)will denote the space of all theX-valued Bochner measurable functions onQsuch thatfbelongs toLp(Q).
For 1≤q <∞, VXq(Q)will be the space of all countably additive measuresµon the Borel sets on the cubeQwith values inXand with finiteq-variation
µVXq(Q)=sup
A∈π
µ(A)q m(A)q−1
1/q
, (1.2)
where the supremum is taken over all finite partitions (measurable)π ofQandm is the Lebesgue measure. Forp >1,the dual space ofLpX(Q)can be identified with VXq∗(Q), where 1/p+1/q=1. For complete expositions of vector measures and vector integration see [6, 7].
All the cubes considered here will be compact and will have sides parallel to the axes.
0will be the ring of bounded Borel sets inRn. Forf∈(Rn,X)andϕ∈(Rn), we define
Mϕ∗(f )(x)= sup
|y−x|<t
ϕt∗f (y)
X. (1.3)
∆hg(x)denote the differenceg(x+h)−g(x), wheregis anX-valued function and
∆2hg=∆h∆hg. For α >0, the spaces ΛαX will be the vector-valued versions of the spacesΛαof Lipschitz functions, namely, ifα=[α]+α, 0< α<1, theng∈ΛαXif g∈CX[α](Rn)and
gΛαX= sup
|β|=[α] sup
h∈Rn\0|h|−α∆hDβgL∞
X<∞. (1.4)
Forα∈Z, g∈ΛαXifg∈CXα−1(Rn)and gΛαX= sup
|β|=α−1 sup
h∈Rn\0|h|−1∆2hDβgL∞
X. (1.5)
Notice that, as in the case of scalar functions,gΛαX=0 implies thatDβgis constant for all|β| =[α]ifα∉ Z, andDβgis an affine linear function for every|β| =α−1 when α∈Z. Using this fact and Taylor’s theorem for Banach-valued functions, we conclude thatgis a polynomial of degree less than or equal to[α].
We defineΛαXto be the normed quotient space ofΛαXmodulo polynomials of degree less than or equal to[α].
As usual, the letterCdenote a constant that could be different at each occurrence.
2. Interpolation polynomials and Lipschitz measures. The aim of this section is to define an appropriate space of vector-valued measures, which turn out to be the dual of a vector-valued Hardy space.
LetQbe a cube onRnwith centerx0and letf∈L1(Q). The linear independence of the family of functions{xα}|α|≤N implies the existence of a unique polynomialPQN of degree less than or equal toNsuch that, for every multi-indexαwith|α| ≤N,
Q
x−x0 αf (x )dx
|Q|=
Q
x−x0 αPQN(x)dx
|Q|. (2.1)
This polynomialPQN can be constructed in the standard way using the dual basis of the set{(x−x0)α:|α| ≤N}inL2(Q,dx/|Q|), that is, the set of polynomials{ψQα}|α|≤N
of degree less than or equal toN, such that
Q
x−x0 αψQβ(x)dx
|Q|=δαβ, (2.2)
whereδαβis the Kronecker delta.
Then the interpolating polynomial is given by PQNf (x )=
|α|≤N
aαψQα(x), (2.3)
where
aα=
Qf (x )
x−x0 αdx
|Q|. (2.4)
LetQ1be the cube centered at zero and side length 1 and take any cubeQwith center x0and side lengthδ. If we letψα=ψQα1for every|α| ≤N, then
ψQα(x)=δ−|α|ψα
x−x0
δ
. (2.5)
Then we conclude that there exists a constantC >0 independent ofQandα, such
that ψQα(x)≤C|Q|−|α|/n, x∈Q. (2.6)
Theorem2.1. Given a cubeQcentered atx0,N∈N∪ {0}, q≥1andf∈LqX(Q), there exists a unique polynomialPQNf:Rn→Xof degree less than or equal toNsuch
that
QPQNf (x )
x−x0 αdx
|Q|=
Qf (x )
x−x0 αdx
|Q| (2.7)
for every multi-indexαwith|α| ≤N. This polynomialPQNfsatisfies PQNf (x )
X≤ C
|Q|1/qfLqX(Q), x∈Q. (2.8)
Thus PQNf
LqX(Q)≤CfLqX(Q). (2.9)
Proof. Letaα=
Qf (x)(x−x0)αdx/|Q|andPQNf (x )=
|α|≤NaαψQα(x). Then if βis a multi-index with|β| ≤N, then
QPQNf (x )
x−x0 βdx
|Q|=aβ=
Qf (x )
x−x0 βdx
|Q|. (2.10)
To prove the uniqueness, suppose that
QP(x)(x−x0)αdx/|Q| =0 for everyαwith
|α| ≤N, whereP is a polynomial of degree less than or equal toN. Then, for every ξ∗∈X∗,
Qξ∗◦P(x)
x−x0 αdx
|Q|=0 (2.11)
and sinceξ∗◦Pis a polynomial with scalar coefficients whose degree is less than or equal toN, it follows thatξ∗◦P =0 for everyξ∗∈X, thereforeP=0. Finally, given x∈Q,
PQNf (x )
X≤
|α|≤N
aα
X|Q|−|α|/n. (2.12)
From Hölder’s inequality, we have
aαX≤C|Q|(|α|/n)−1/q
Q
f (x )qXdx 1/q
(2.13)
and this implies the desired estimates.
LetQbe any cube centered atx0andµ∈VXq(Q). As in Theorem 2.1, we can con- struct
PQNµ(x)=
|α|≤N
aαψαQ(x), (2.14)
whereaα=1/|Q|
Q(x−x0)αdµ.
As in Theorem 2.1 we can prove the following corollary.
Corollary2.2. Letµ∈VXq(Q). ThenPQNµ is the unique polynomial of degree less than or equal toNsatisfying
QPQNf (x )
x−x0 αdx
|Q|= 1
|Q|
Q
x−x0 αdµ, (2.15)
for every|α| ≤N. The polynomialPQNµverifies PQNµ(x)X≤ C
|Q|1/qµVXq(Q), x∈Q, PQNµ
LqX(Q)≤CµVXq(Q). (2.16) To abbreviate notation, we often writePQf orPQµ if the context does not cause confusion. We introduce the following space of vector-valued measures.
Definition2.3. Letµ:
0→Xbe a vector measure,mthe Lebesgue measure on
0, 0≤α <∞. We say thatµ∈ᏹαX, if the following conditions hold:
(i) µ∈VX2(Q), for every cubeQ.
(ii) There exists a constantCsuch that, for every cubeQ, µ−PQ[α](µ)m
VX2(Q)≤C|Q|(α/n)+1/2. (2.17) Forµ∈ᏹXα, we define
µᏹXα=inf
C: (ii) holds
. (2.18)
· ᏹXα is a seminorm onᏹαX andµᏹαX=0 if and only ifµis a measure with poly- nomial densityPsuch that degP≤[α]. If we form the quotient space ofᏹαXmodulo polynomials of degree less than or equal to[α](measures with polynomial density) we obtain a normed spaceᏹαX.
As in the scalar case, we have
µᏹXα∼sup
Q |Q|−α/n inf
degP≤[α]
1
|Q|1/2µ−Pm
VX2(Q). (2.19) From now on, we refer to this space as the space of Lipschitz measuresᏹXα.
Every function g∈ ΛαX defines a measure in ᏹXα, in fact, as in [9, Lemma 5.18, Chapter III], givenx0∈Rn andr >0, there exists a polynomial P(x)of degree[α]
such that
g(x)−P(x)X≤CrαgΛαX (2.20) for everyxin the cube centered inx0and side lengthr, whereConly depends onα andn. This implies that
gᏹαX≤CgΛαX, (2.21)
wheregᏹαXdenotes the norm of the measure with densityg.In Section 3, we prove that everyµ∈ᏹαXhas a densityg∈ΛαX. Now, we can prove a weak version of this fact.
Lemma2.4. Letα >0andg∈CXm(Rn), wherem=[α]ifαis not an integer and m=α−1otherwise. If the measure with densitygbelongs toᏹαX, theng∈ΛαX and gΛαX≤CgᏹXα.
Proof. For every ξ∗ ∈ X∗ and every cube Q, we have that PQ[α](ξ∗ ◦g) = ξ∗◦PQ[α](g). Then it is easy to see thatξ∗◦g∈ᏹαRandξ∗◦gᏹαR≤ ξ∗X∗gᏹαX. By the scalar theory we have thatξ∗◦g∈Λαand
ξ∗◦g
Λα≤Cξ∗◦g
ᏹαR≤Cξ∗
X∗gᏹαX. (2.22) The lemma follows from this inequality.
3. Vector-valued Hardy spaces. We start with the classical definition of a vector- valued atom.
Definition3.1. Let 0< p≤1.A functiona∈L1X(Rn)is called an(X,p)-atom, or simply an atom inX, if the following conditions hold:
(1) suppa⊂Q, whereQis a cube onRn.
(2) 1
|Q|
Q
a(x)2Xdx 1/2
≤ |Q|−1/p. (3.1) (3) For every multi-indexα, with|α| ≤n(1/p−1),
Rnxαa(x)dx=0. (3.2)
Definition3.2. A(p,∞)-atom inX,is a functionasatisfying(1),(3)above, and aL∞X ≤ |Q|−1/p. (3.3) Definition3.3. Given 0< p≤1 as above,HXpis the space of vector-valued dis- tributionsf∈s(Rn,X)such thatf=∞
i=1λiai, whereaiis an atom inXfor every i∈Nand∞
i=1|λi|p<∞.
We define
fHXp=inf ∞
i=1
λip1/p
. (3.4)
As usual
d
f ,g =f−gp
HpX (3.5)
defines an invariant metricinHXp.
Remark3.4. (1) Letϕ∈(Rn). Ifais an atom inX, then
Rn
Mϕ∗(a)(x) pdx≤Cϕ, (3.6)
whereCdoes not depend ona.
(2) There exists a continuous seminormρin(Rn)such that
Rnaϕ(x)dx
≤ρ(ϕ) (3.7)
for every atomainXandϕ∈(Rn).
(3) Ifaiis an(X,p)-atom and∞
i=1|λi|p<∞, then∞
i=1λiaiconverges inb(Rn,X), hence, the series always defines an element ofHXpand the convergence is in this space.
(4)HXpis a complete metric space.
The proof of (1) forϕ≥0 radial and decreasing is the same as in [9, Theorem 4.3, page 275]. The general case follows from the fact that all the gaugesMϕ∗(f )pare equivalent forϕ∈(Rn), with
Rnϕ(x)dx=0.This fact is proved as in the scalar case (cf. [8]).
To prove(2), letϕ∈(Rn)and an atomainX. Then
Rna(x)ϕ(x)dx
=a∗ϕ(0)ˇ ≤Mϕ∗ˇ(a)(y) (3.8) for every|y| ≤1, where ˇϕ(x)=ϕ(−x). Raising the inequality above to thepth power and integrating over the unit ball, we obtain
Rna(x)ϕ(x)dx
≤Cϕ. (3.9)
The Banach-Steinhaus theorem implies that the set of atoms defines an equicontin- uous family in(Rn,X), which implies(2).
Statement(3)follows directly from(2).
ThatHXpis complete follows from(3)taking a subsequence of a Cauchy sequence {fn}∞n=1inHXpsatisfying
fnk+1−fnkp
HXp< 1
2k. (3.10)
If we denote byHmaxp (X)the space of elementsf∈(Rn,X)such thatMϕ∗(f )∈ Lp(Rn),0< p≤1, then(1)in Remark 3.4 implies that we have a continuous inclusion HXp
//
Hmaxp (X). As in the scalar case, the spaceHmaxp (X)does not depends on the gaugeMϕ∗(f )p, whereϕ∈(Rn), withRnϕ(x)dx=0. Moreover, we can use the grand maximal function to define it. Latter’s proof of the atomic decomposition of the scalar Hardy spaces can be adapted to prove that, every atomainXcan be decom- posed as a seriesa=∞
i=1λiai, whereai is a(p,∞)-atom inX,with∞
i=1|λi|p< C, whereCis independent ofa.
4. Duality. In this section, we state the duality between the vector-valued Hardy spaces and the space of Lipschitz vector measures with values inX∗. Then we prove that all these measures have densities that are Lipschitz continuous functions, hence we have the representation of the space(HXp)∗ that holds in the scalar case without any restriction on the Banach spaceX.Henceforth, we denote
α=n1 p−1
, N= n1
p−1
. (4.1)
The first step is to prove that the elements of the dual(HXp)∗can be represented by measuresµ∈ᏹαX∗ acting on atoms inXby
Rna(x)dµ. (4.2)
Proposition4.1. Let0< p≤1. For everyΦ∈(HXp)∗, there exists a measureµ∈ ᏹαX∗ unique modulo polynomials of degree less than or equal toN (measures with polynomial density), such that (4.2) holds for every atom inX.
Proof. Denote byL2N(Q,X) the space of functionsf ∈L2X(Rn), supported inQ and with vanishing moments up to orderN,and let
ΘN(X)=
Q
L2N(Q,X). (4.3)
Iff∈L2N(Q,X), the functiona(x)= |Q|1/2−1/pf−1L2
Xf (x )is an atom inX, then Φ(f )≤ ΦfL2
X|Q|1/p−1/2. (4.4)
We can extend this functional to the whole space L2X(Q)without increasing the norm, and obtain a measureµQ∈VX2∗(Q), withµQV2
X∗(Q)≤ Φ|Q|1/p−1/2such that Φ(f )=
Qf dµQ (4.5)
for everyf∈L2N(Q,X).
We show thatµQis uniquely determined up to addition of a measure with polyno- mial density with values inX∗.
Indeed, sincef∈L2N(Q,X)has vanishing moments up to orderN, then for every polynomialP of degree less than or equal toN,µQ+P·malso satisfies (4.5). Con- versely, suppose thatµ1andµ2belong toVX2∗(Q)and satisfy (4.5). Letf∈L2X(Q), ν= µ1−µ2and consider the interpolation polynomialsPQf andPQνof degreeN. Then f−PQf∈L2N(Q,X)and
0=
Q
f−PQf dν=
Q
f−PQf dν−PQν(x)dx =
Qf
dν−PQν(x)dx (4.6) for everyf∈L2X(Q), thereforedν=PQν(x)dx.
We conclude in particular that there exists a unique measureνQ∈VX2∗(Q)satisfying (4.5) with vanishing moments of order less than or equal toN. This measure is
νQ=µQ−
PQµQ m. (4.7)
By Corollary 2.2, we have the estimate νQ
VX2∗(Q)≤CΦ|Q|1/p−1/2. (4.8) Now, we decomposeRn= ∪∞j=1Qj, where(Qj)is an increasing sequence of cubes.
We can adjust the measuresµQj adding measures with polynomial density of degree less than or equal toNto obtain a single measureµwith values onX∗ and defined
on
0, such that
Φ(f )=
Rnf dµ (4.9)
for everyf∈ΘN(X). Since the restriction to every cubeQofµ−(PQµ)misνQ, then by (4.8) we conclude thatµ∈ᏹαX∗ and
µᏹαX∗ ≤CΦ. (4.10)
SinceΘN(X)is dense inHXp, we have shown that
HXp ∗
//
ᏹXα∗. (4.11)Now, let 0< p <1 andµ∈ᏹαX∗. We prove that the natural action ofµ inΘN(X) given by
Φ(f )=
Rnf dµ (4.12)
can be extended toHXpas a continuous functional.
Since
Qa(x)dµ(x) =
Qa(x)d
µ−PQ(µ)m
≤ aL2Xµ−PQ(µ)mV2
X∗(Q)≤ µᏹαX∗,
(4.13)
the proof of the continuity ofΦwould be complete if we could prove that Φ(f )=
λjΦ
aj , (4.14)
for everyf =
λjaj∈ΘN(X)with atomicrepresentationf =
λjaj. The identity (4.14) holds ifµhas a smooth density, as the following lemma shows.
Lemma 4.2. Letψ ∈(Rn,X∗)and f ∈ΘN(X)with atomic representation f =
λjaj. Then
Rn
f ,ψ
dx= λj
Rn
aj,ψ
dx. (4.15)
(here,denotes the duality inX).
Proof. Every atomainXdefines a continuous functional on(Rn,X∗) Ta(ψ)=
Rn
a,ψ
dx. (4.16)
Letρbe the continuous seminorm in(Rn)of Remark 3.4(2). Then for anyψ= ϕi⊗ ξ∗i ∈(Rn)⊗X∗, we have
Ta(ψ)≤ ρ
ϕi ξ∗i
X∗. (4.17)
Hence,
Ta(ψ)≤ρ(ψ),˜ (4.18)
where ˜ρis the continuous seminormρ⊗·in the projective tensor product(Rn)⊗π
X∗. It follows that the family {Ta : a is an atom inX} is equicontinuous in ((Rn)⊗πX∗)=(Rn,X∗)(see [12, Chapter 51]). We conclude that the series
λjTaj
converges in the strong topology of the dual space(Rn,X∗)to a continuous func- tional. Since (4.15) holds forψin the dense subset(Rn)⊗X∗of(Rn,X∗), the proof of the lemma is now complete.
Now we are in position to prove the continuous inclusionᏹXα⊂ΛαX.
Proposition 4.3. Every µ ∈ ᏹαX has a density g∈ ΛαX(Rn) such that gΛαX ≤ CµᏹαX.
Proof. Let ϕ∈Cc∞ radial, ϕ≥0, with supp ϕ in the unit ball and such that
Rnϕ = 1. Consider the family of measures (µt)t>0 with density ϕt∗µ(x) = µ(ϕt(x−·)), whereϕt(x)=(1/tn)ϕ(x/t). Notice thatµtis aC∞function with values inX. In fact, for everyξ∗∈X∗, the measureξ∗◦µhas a Radon-Nikodym derivative inL1loc. Thenξ∗◦µt=(ξ∗◦µ)t is a smooth function, and this implies thatµtis also smooth (see [11]).
By Lemma 2.4 we have
ξ∗◦µtΛα=ξ∗◦µ tΛα≤Cξ∗◦µ tᏹα
R, (4.19)
and [9, proof of Theorem 5.22, Chapter III]
ξ∗◦µ tᏹα
R≤Cξ∗◦µᏹα
R. (4.20)
But we have
ξ∗◦µᏹα
R≤ξ∗X∗µᏹα
X (4.21)
and thus, we conclude that
µtΛα
X≤CµᏹαX. (4.22)
We know thatµtconverges toµinᏰ(Rn,X)ast→0. Then the proof of the propo- sition will be complete once we prove thatDβµtconverges uniformly on compact sets ofRn for|β| ≤[α]. To this end, recall that ifkis a nonnegative integer andβis a multi-index such thatk+|β|> α. Then
∂k
∂tkDβx
ϕt(x) =Ctα−k−|β|at(x), x∈Rn, t >0, (4.23) whereat(x)is a scalar(p,∞)-atom for everyt, andCis a constant depending onϕ, α,n, and the order of differentiation, but not ont(see [9, Lemma 5.20, Chapter III]).
Then
∂k
∂tkDβxµt(x,t) X=
Rn
∂k
∂tkDβy
ϕt(x−y) dµ(y) X
=Ctα−k−|β|
Rnat(x−y)dµ(y) X.
(4.24)
Proceeding as in (4.13), we see that
Rnat(x−y)dµ(y)
X≤ µᏹαX. (4.25)
Therefore, for any integerk≥0 and any multi-indexβsuch thatk+|β|> α, ∂k
∂tkDβxµt(x)
X≤Ctα−k−|β|µᏹαX, (4.26) whereCdoes not depend ontandµ.
With this inequality and the fundamental theorem of calculus it is easy to prove thatDβxµt satisfies a uniform Cauchy estimate on compact sets onRnasttends to zero. The proof is complete.
Now, we are ready to prove that
Rnf dµ= λj
ajdµ (4.27)
for everyf∈ΘN(X)with atomicrepresentationf=
λjajand everyµ∈ᏹαX∗. Letg∈ΛαX∗ be the density ofµ. Lethm(x)=g(x)ψ(x/m), where ψ is a radial andC∞scalar function supported in the unit ball such thatψ(x)=1 for|x| ≤1/2 and 0≤ψ(x)≤1 for all x. The family{hm}m∈N is a sequence of functions inΛαX∗
with norm bounded byCgΛαX∗. This cut-off process combined with the regulariza- tion described in the proof of Proposition 4.3 implies that there exists a sequence of functions(gm)∞m=1inCX∞∗ with compact support such that
(1) gmΛαX∗ ≤CgΛαX∗ for everym∈N, whereCis an absolute constant, (2)
f ,gmdx→
f ,gdxasm→ ∞for everyf∈ΘN(X).
Lemma 4.2 and the bounded convergence theorem imply (4.14). Thus, we have proved the following theorem.
Theorem4.4. LetXbe a Banach space overR. F or0< p <1andα=n(1/p−1),
HXp ∗=ΛαX∗ (4.28)
with equivalent norms.
Acknowledgement. This work was partially supported by PAPIIT-UNAM IN1027 99 and CONACyT 32408-E.
References
[1] O. Blasco,Hardy spaces of vector-valued functions: duality, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.308 (1988), no. 2, 495–507. MR 90a:46082. Zbl 658.46021.
[2] , On the dual space of H1,∞B , Colloq. Math. 55 (1988), no. 2, 253–259.
MR 89m:46068. Zbl 663.46028.
[3] ,Vector valued measures of bounded mean oscillation.Conference on Mathematical Analysis (El Escorial, 1989), Publ. Mat.35(1991), no. 1, 119–130. MR 92i:46051.
Zbl 746.46040.
[4] J. Bourgain,Vector-valued singular integrals and theH1-BMO duality, Probability The- ory and HarmonicAnalysis (Cleveland, Ohio, 1983), Monographs Textbooks Pure Appl. Math., vol. 98, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986, pp. 1–19. MR 87j:42049b.
Zbl 602.42015.
[5] A. V. Buhvalov,The conjugates of spaces of analytic vector-valued functions and the du- ality of functors generated by these spaces.Investigations on linear operators and the theory of functions, IX, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov.
(LOMI)92(1979), 30–50, 318 (Russian). MR 81b:46052. Zbl 431.46050.
[6] J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl, Jr., Vector Measures, Mathematical Surveys, no. 15, Ameri- can Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1977, with a foreword by B. J. Pettis.
MR 56#12216. Zbl 369.46039.
[7] N. Dinculeanu,Vector Measures, International Series of Monographs in Pure and Ap- plied Mathematics, vol. 95, Pergamon Press, Oxford; VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1967. MR 34#6011b.
[8] C. Fefferman and E. M. Stein,Hpspaces of several variables, Acta Math.129(1972), no. 3- 4, 137–193. MR 56#6263. Zbl 257.46078.
[9] J. García-Cuerva and J. L. Rubio de Francia,Weighted Norm Inequalities and Related Topics, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 116, North-Holland Publishing Co., Ams- terdam, 1985, Notas de Matematica [Mathematical Notes], vol. 104. MR 87d:42023.
Zbl 578.46046.
[10] R. H. Latter,A characterization ofHp(Rn)in terms of atoms, Studia Math. 62(1978), no. 1, 93–101. MR 58#2198. Zbl 398.42017.
[11] L. Schwartz,Espaces de fonctions différentiables à valeurs vectorielles, J. Analyse Math.4 (1954/55), 88–148 (French). MR 18,220a. Zbl 066.09601.
[12] F. Trèves,Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels, Academic Press, New York, 1967. MR 37#726. Zbl 171.10402.
Magali Folch-Gabayet: Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, D.F.,04510, Mexico
E-mail address:[email protected]
Martha Guzmán-Partida: Universidad de Sonora, Departamento de Matemáticas, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales, Hermosillo, Sonora,83000, Mexico
E-mail address:[email protected]
Salvador Pérez-Esteva: Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Unidad Cuernavaca Apartado Postal273-3, Administración de Correos #3, Cuernavaca, Morelos,62251, Mexico
E-mail address:[email protected]