Intenrat. J. Math. & Math. Sci.
VOL. 17 NO.I (1994) 1-14
ON COMPLETE CONVERGENCE IN A BANACH SPACE
ANNA KUCZMASZEWSKA TechnicalUniversity ul. Bernardyfiska 13 20-109 Lublin, Poland
DOMINIK SZYNAL Institute ofMathematics, UMCS
Pia,cMarii Curie-Sktodowskiej 20-031 Lublin,Poland
(Received May 19, 1992 and in revised form January I, 1993)
ABSTRACT:Sufficient conditionsaregiven underwhichasequence ofindependentrandom elements taking valuesina Banachspacesatisfy theHsuandRobbins lawoflarge numbers. The complete convergence of random indexedsumsofrandom elementsisalso considered.
KEY WORDS AND PHRASES
completeconvergence,stronglaw oflarge numbers,random elements,Banach space, random indexedsums.1991
AMS SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATIONCODES.
60F15,60B12.1. INTRODUCTION
Let
{X,,,
n_> }
beasequence ofindependentrandom elementstakingvaluesinaseparable Banach space(B, {{). Put S, Z X,. a
sequence{X,,
n> 1}
of random elementsissaid tosatisfy the law oflarge numbersof Hsu-Robbins type if for any given
>
0Hsu nd Robbins
[1]
proved that the existence of the second moment of independent, identica,lly distributed rndom vribles for whichEX
0, implies the Hsu-Robbins type lw of lrge numbers, grd6s[2]
showed that the existence of the second moment of independent, identicMly distributed rndomvribles nd the conditionEX
0 is lso thenecessary oneforthe Hsu-Robbins type lawof large numbers. Considerations concerning
(1.1)
for sequences nd subsequences of independent, identically distributed rndom vribles cn be found inKtz [a], Bum, Ktz [4], Asmussen, Eurtz []
nd Out[fi].
Theresults in thosecses re given underthe assumption when thereexists finite momentof orderr(1 <
r5 2).
Someconditions,whichguarantee the convergenceof
(1.1)
forsequences ndsubsequences in thecsenonidenticMlydistributed rndom variablescn be found inDuncan, SzynM [7], Br-
toszyfiskiPuri[8]
andKuczmaszevska,, Szynal[9], [10].
Forinstance,ithasbeen showninDuncan,
Szynal[7]
thatifa,sequence{X..
n2 1}
of independent random variables withEX
0and2 A. KUZCMASZEWSKA AND D. SZYNAL
(,)
()
(,’)
.-( E(X,I[IX,
<,,]))’ <
on=! ==1
tholl
n----I
The following eampleshows that the assumptions
(i)-(iv)
hich aresucient conditionsir(I.I) inthecseofindependent random variablesrenot sucientife
conser
sequencesof independent randomelements taking valuesinBanachspaceB.EXAMPLE. Let denote theseparableBanach space
and e" denote theelenenthaving foritsn-th coordinate and 0 in the othercoordinates.
Let
{{n.
’)> 1}
be a sequenceof independent random variablesdefined asfollowsP[{. 1]
P[{. -1] 1/2,. >
1, and defineX.
{.e", n>_
1. Thus{X.,
n> 1}
is a sequence of independent 11 -valued random elements with symmetric distributions, such thatEX.
0,EIIXII
1,EIIXII
1,, >_ ,
,d{X, _> 1}
satisfies the assumptions(i)-(iv)
butII,*-l-
X,,,.-
-
1, which shows that the conditionZ P[llS.II _> ,,e]
< o does nott=l t=l n=l
holdfor all > 0.
Theaimofthis note is togivesufficientconditions,whichguarantee theHsu-Robbinstype oflargenumbers for independent random elementstakingvaluesin Banach space B.
2. PRELIMINARIES
Weneednow anextension ofHoffman-Jhrgenseninequality cf. Hoffmann-Jhrgensen
[11],
andGut
[6]).
LEMMA
1. Let{X,,
n> 1}
be a sequence of independent random elements taking values in a real separable Bana,ch space (B,II)
with a symmetric distribution. Then for every j=l, 2,...,n and>
0P[IIS.II _>
3Jr] <
CjP[IIX, _> ]
/D(P[IIS.II _>
==1
whereCj and
D
arepositive constants depending onlyonj.(2.1)
COMPLETE CONVERGENCE IN A BANACH SPACE 3
Moreover,
P[IIS s, _> ] _< P[m,.(llS.- S, ll, IIS. & + &ll) _> ] _< 2P[IIS.ll _> t],
as ,9, S, and S, areindependent, symmetricallydistributedrandom elements.
Hence
P[ll,%ll -> 3] _< e[llX, _> t] + 2P[llSll _> t]. P[T i]
=l t=l
_< P[IIX, _> t] + 2P[11o%11 >_ ]-P[
l_<s<,maxIISll _> t]
< P[IIX, > t] + 4(P[IIS.II > t]) 2.
t"-I
By
the inductionprinciple,wegetP[llS.II _> 3J+’t] P[IIs.II _>
3._< e[ilX, >_ 3,t] + 4(P[llS.II >_ 3t])
_< P[llX, >_ t] + 4(c P[llX, >_ t] + D. pV[llS.II >_ t])
t=l t=l
_< c,/ e[llx, _> ] + D+I(P[IIS,II _> t])
Moreover,
weshallusethefollowinglemmas.4 A KUCZMASZEWSKA AND D. SZYNAL
I/’:(11.,,
I-)-/’:( I,g’,,ll--I)l _< II.vll +/cllxll.
I,I’;I.IA 3. l,obve
[13]
Forevery > 0P[llX- ,,,,
d.vii _ ] _
2.P[llX’ll d.
whew .V isa svmelrized versionofX.
I wlal followsweshall usethoslronglawoflargnund)ersforasequence of independ(ut, ideticllvdisl.ril)ut(’d randonelemeis
{X,,, 1}
in aseparable Banach space given inTaylor[4].
TIIEOREM.l,et
{X,.
n beasequence ofindel)endentidenticallydistributedB-valued randomElcm,,t re,d, thatEllX,
<.
3. RESIrLTS
THEOREM 1. Let
{Xn, _>
1)e a sequenceof independent, symlnetrically distributed, B-valued random elenents.Suppose
that{n,
/,"_> 1}
isastrictly increasingsequenceof positive integers. If for somepositive integer and anygiven>
0() P[IIX, _> ,,e/3 1
<,
k=l t=l
(ii)
E(,,.4 E EIIX, III[IIX,
<,,e])’ < ,
k=l ==1
then
iff
k=l m=2 t=l
I1%/,,11
0 inprobabilityas k c:x.(3.1)
PROOF. Itisenoughtoshowthat under the conditions
(i)-(iv) IIS,,,./-,ll
0 in proba-bilityas k
=1
Put
"’= ,_. .,
m,d},, E(II’ II1,) E(II,S._III, 1)where
COMPLETE CONVERGENCE IN A BANACH SPACE 5
]IllOrt"ove
(P[IIS,,,II > ,,</3])
k--!
nk
Notethat
(PIIIIS’.,II- llS’.,lll _> ",1]) ’ Y(P[(-
k=l k=l ,=I
nk f-I
-< ZCP[Z Y:<,, > ",(-/3)/1 + P[Z lr,<,,.,, Z Y’<,’ > ’q(/3’)/41) ,’-
k=l i=l m-’2 I=l
Now putting
Z.,,, Ir,,,- E},,,
andusing the inequality(2.2)
weget for’= (/3’)/2
".(P[I z,.,,<,,I > ,,<e’])"
5(e’)-"+’ Y’(,q"EI
k=l l=l k=l l=l
b=l l=l =1 =1
< (e’)
-’+’2’"’ -(,,’ - EIIX/II’)" < .
k=l i=l
Moreover,
we seethat(ii)
and (iii)implyn[ EY,, 5 an[ EIIX:II o(1)
implies
(. llX:ll)
0ai=1
Now we see that
{y,,,, Id,,,,
2< < n}
and{k;,,,, <_ _< n}
are martingale3"-1
differencesfor fixedn. Therefore
6 A. KUCZMASZEWSKA AND D. SZYNAL
nk
>_
k=l m=2 =1
k=l m=2 =1
n
k=l m=2 =1
=+’ (’)-’+’ {. E(IIXII + EIIXII) E(IIXflI + EIIXflI)t ’
k= m=2
A {,’ ellX;ll EIIX211/ < ,
k=l m=2 =1
where
A
isapositive constantdepending onlyon ands.Thuswehave provedthat
Y(e[lllS’.,ll- 11s’.,lll >_ ,,/a]) ’ <
k-I
(3.2)
whichi,nplies that
P[lllS.,ll- IIS.,lll E > ,=1
0s }-Moreover,
westatethat(3.1)
and (i)i,nply(3.3)
or
< P[IIS.,II > 1 + P[IIX, > -l
0 ooP[IIS.II > ,1 o
a }Hence
by(3.3)
and(3.4)
weget(3.4)
whichtogether with
(3.2)
givesTakingintoaccount that
-’(P[IIS’,,,,II > n/3’l)’ <
oo.k=l
(P[II&,II > -/3’1) ’
k=l
<
2’-’ {( P[IIX, > /3]) ’ + -(P[IIS’.,II > /3’1)
vk=l t=l k=l
and using
(i)
wecomplete theproofof Theorem1.COROLLARY
1. Let{X,,
n>
beasequenceofindependent,symmetricallydistributed, B-valued random elements.Suppose
that{nk,
k> 1}
is astrictly increasing sequence of positive integers. Ifforsomepositive integer and anygivene >0COMPLETE CONVERGENCE IN A BANACK SPACE 7
(’)
hll
iff
k-1
I1.%/,,,-II o
inprobabilityas k.
NowweconsidertheHsuand Robbins law oflargenumbers forsubsequencesofindependent, nonsymmetrically distributed random elementstakingvahlesinareal separableBanach space.
THEOREM2. Let
{X,,
n> 1}
beasequenceof independent, B-valued random elements.Supposethat
{n,
k_>
isa strictly increasingsequence ofpositiveintegers. Iffor somepositive integer and anygiven. >
0(I) PIIIA’,II _> n/(2.3’)] < ,
k=l =1
(II) Z(,,4 Z EIIX, III[IIX, < 2,e])’ < ,
k=l i=l
(III)
theniff
IIS./-ll o
inprobabilityask.
PROOF. Assume that
{X,,
n> 1}
is a sequence ofsymmetrically distributed random elements. Then by Theorem weconcludethatconditions(I) -(III)
aresufficientfor theHsuand Robbins law oflarge numbers,i.e.k=l
Toremovethe symmetry assumptionweargueasfollows. Let
{X,
n_>
beasequence ofthe symmetrizedversionofX,
i.e.X, X X,,
k>
1,whereX
andX
areindependent and have thesamedistribution. Then by(I)
wegetfore’ e/3
k=l t=l k=l =1
8 A. KUCZMASZEWSKA AND D. SZYNAL
since
(,, EIIX, ll/[llX,
<2.,s]) ,,;’ EtlX, II’I[IIX,
<t=| t=l
+ 2,,; EIIX.,,II/[IIX,,,II < 2,,1 EIIX, II/[IIX, < 2,,d.
m=2 t=l
Therefore by(I),
(III)
and(3.5)
weobtain)tk
-(,;
k=l m=2’ EIIX:’II -’
t=lEIIX:’II)
v+ P[IIX, > ,,]} <
oo,k=l
whereC isapositiveconstant,depending onlyon ande.
Hence byTheorem weobtain
e[llS,:,,ll _> ,,] <
oo.k=l
Takingintoaccount thesymmetrizationinequality
(2.3)
COMPLETE CONVERGENCE IN A BANACH SPACE 9
=1
But theassU,nl)tion
P[II.’.,II > ..]
0a t.whicl togeiher vi(h
gives
k=l
C,OROLLARY 2. Let
{X,,
n_> 1}
be a sequence ofindependent, B-valued random (’le- ments. Supposethat{nk,
k_> 1}
isastrictly increasingsequenceof positiveintegers. Ifforsolnepositiveinteger andanygivene
>
0(#’)
P[IIX, > ,,,/(2.3-’)1 <
k=l =1
(II’) E(n[ EIIX, III[IIX, < 2,1) ’’ < ,
k:l I:l
then
P[IIS,,,,II > ,,] <
oiff
IIS./-ll o
inprobabilityas kCOROLLARY3. Let
{X,,
n_> 1}
be asequence ofindependent, B-valued random ele- ments. Supposethat{nt,,
k>_ 1}
isastrictly increasingsequenceof positive integers. Ifforsome positiveinteger andany givene>
0(I") P[IIX, _>
re,e/(2.3-’)] <
o,:,,k=l l=l
(II’) E(n EIIX, II’I[IIX, < 2-,e]) ’ <
<:,0,k=l
(III") E(n E EIIX, IIS[IIX, < 2n#,:])
:’+’<
oo,k=l t=l
then
I0 A. KUCZMASZEWSKA AND D. SZYNAL
iff
IIS,,/,,t.II
0i,, prol)ability askSo(, results (ocering the in(lel)edent identically distril)uted randon elements can I)e ol)laine(! ascorollariesof l’heorem 2.
(’OROI,LAR’" 4. Let
{.I(,,
n>_ 1}
be a sequmce ofindel)endent, identically distributed B-valued raw,dora elenefls. Sal)l)OSC that{n,
/,"_>
is astrictly increasing sequenceof positive integers. Ifforsone i)osiliw,integer and anygive s> 0(I*)
(11.)
(Ill,)
then
y(,,;’EllX, ll/[llX,
<2,e])
’+’<
iff
II&,/,ll
0i,,probabilityas k oo.COROLLARY
5.(Theorem
of Hsu and Robbins for random elements taking values in Banachspace)If{X,,,
n_>
isasequence ofindependent, identicallydistributedB-valued random elements with EX, 0andEIIX, <
oo,thenP[II&,,II _> ,=,1 < .
k=l
PROOF. Itis easy toseethe that conditions
(I*) (III*)
fromCorollary4aresatisfiedbythe assumptions
EX
0andE[]X <
oo.Moreover,
bythestronglaw oflargenumbers for a sequence{X,,
n_>
of independent, identicallydistributed random elementsweconclude thatII&/,,ll
0 inprobabilityas nCOROLLARY 6. Let
{X,,,
n> 1}
beasequence ofindependent, identicallydistributed B-valued randomelements withEXa
0and let{n,
k>_ 1}
bea strictly increasing sequence of positiveintegers. Supposethat forsomer,<
r<_
’2,.r-M(O(x))
oc.sx oo,(3.6)
COMPLETE CONVERGENCE IN A BANACH SPACE
[-]
wh,.,,(.)=
,,.{,- ,, _< .,.}, .,.
>0, ,(0)=0, M(.,.),,., ..
> 0.k--1
If
then
(3.7)
k=l
PROOF.
The assu,,ption (:3.7)inplies thatEM(,(IIXII) <
which with(3.6)
givesEIIX, I1’
< fo,-ome,’, <_<
2.Novit iseasy toshow that thereexistssomepositive integer j, for which
k=l k=l
c. ,’-")’(EIIXII)’
<.
k=l
and
-’(,,’ EIIX, II[IIX, < 2ne])’+’ <_ -(,;’EIIX, II(2,,)-)
k--1 k-1
<_ C’ n’-’)"(EIIX, ll")
’+’ <k=l
Similary,as inthe proof ofCorollary 5, by thestrong lawoflargenumbers forasequence
{X,,
n_>
of independent, identicallydistributed random elementswe concludethatIIS./,ll
0inprobabilityask.
REMARK. Notethat theWLLNisimpliedbythe additional conditions: EX,,, 0and B
isof thetype2since
P[IIS,,,II _> ,,,e] _< PIll&,, E&,, _> n]
PillS’., ES’.II n] + e[llX, n,/(2.3’)]
k
e-Zn EIIXII + P[IX, na/(2.3)] o(1).
i=1
Now we aregoingtopresent someresults oncomplete convergencefor randomly indexed partialsumsofindependent, non-identicallydistributedrandom elements.
THEOREM 3. Let
{X.,
n beasequenceof independent, B-valued random elements and{T.,
n1}
be positiveintegervaluedrandomvariables. Let{a,
n1}
be strictly increing positive integers and{.,
n1}
be positive constants such thatlira
supnn fl <
ande[l./,- NI .l < , (3.S)
n=l
whereNis apositive random variablessuch that forsome
A, B,
whereP[
<< Z]
1.12 A. KUCZMASZEWSKA AND D. SZYNAL
(.)
(b)
iffor .,,oo
io.ilix’o
ilogor al for aygix’o >0P[llX, > ,,.(A-/)/(2.3,)] < ,
L=I =1
EIIX, II’/[IIX, <
2a,(A,3)])
v <(c)
then
k=l m-2
EIIX,,,II/[IIX,,,II
<23,(A-3)] E EIIX’III[IIX, < 2a’(A-fl)l)V <
oo,t=l
P[llSr,,ll > n] <
oo(3.9)
k=l
IISI,,,(+,))/["-(B +/)]11 o
inprobabilityas k co.PROOF. Notethat,
e[ll x, _>
< P[ll x, _> T,,, IT/,,- NI <
=1
_< P[
maxIIS, _> a,e(A -/3)] + P[IT,/a,,
N> fl,] (3.10)
an(A-B,,)<3<a,,(B+/3,,)
Nowassuming that
X,,
n_>
l,aresymmetricallydistributedrandom elementsweget bytheLvy’s
inequalityP[
maxIIS, >
< 2P[II x, > a,,e(a-/3)].
Butunder the assumptions of Theorem3onecanverify after using Theorem with
n [ak(B+fl)]
that
b(B+)]
PIll ’ x, >_ a:e(A- fl)] <
oo.k=l =1
Thisbound andthe assumption
(3.8)
togetherwith(3.10)
imply(3.9)
forsymmetrically distributed randomelements.To removethe symmetry assumption weproceedsimilaras ithas been done in the proof ofTheorem2.
n-’l
Nowwenote that
PIll x, > T.]
COMPLETE CONVERGENCE IN A BANACH SPACE 13
_</’[
.x,,,,( .-,,,)<< (H+,,,)
’[11.\,11 _>
,,ts(..t-.)] + P[IT,,/,,,- .Vl _> A]
Bt I)y the l,olmogoov’s ine,lualitv
P[
nlaxo,,(A-3,,)<.<,,,(+3,,)
<
(s(A-))-a
Takig iloac(’ount tha!
[,,(+,,)]
(/n
x./[llX.II
< ...(A.)]11 >_
...(Afl)]
(B+,,,)]
EIIX, II’/[IIX,
<..(.4-/)].
EIIX, II/[IIX, < a,,c(A-/3)]
0as,,
o(cf. theproofof Theorem 1), (3.8)and assunption
(a)
wehaveTherefore,
(3.11)
and(3.12)
imply that,(3.12)
I1,-d(Sr./T,,)II
0s,,
and cotnpletetheproofofthe Theoren 3.
Note thatTheorem3generalizesthe resultspresented by Adler
[15].
The following corollary is an extension of Adler’s result to independent non-identically distributed B-valued randomelements.
COROLLARY
7. Let{X,,
n>_
beasequence ofindependent, B-valued random elements and{T.,
n>
be positive integer valued randomvariables.Suppose
that{a.,
n>
isastrictly increasing sequenceof positive integers and{/3,,,
n> 1}
is asequenceof positive constants such thata. e as n oe,hm sup.-oofl.fl <
andP[IT.la.- 11 > ,,]
<Iffor somepositive integer and for anygivene
>
0 the assumptions(a)-(c)
aresatisfiedthen
Y P[IIS,II _> 1 <
ook=l
IlSt,,,,(,+,,,)]/[,(1 +/)]11 o
inprobability as k oo.The next corollaryis an extension ofone ofthe results given in Adler
[15]
to thecaseofi.i.d. B-valued randomelements.
14 A. KUCZMASZEWSKA AND D. SZYNAL
COIOLI,ARY 8. l.et
{X,,,
n >1}
be a sequence ofindependent identically distributed B-value(i randoln elements witlEX
0 and{T,
n1}
be a sequenceof positive integer- val(’d race(loin variables.Suppose
tlat{a,.
n1}
is a strictly increasing sequence ofpositive ilegers and{/,,.
n1}
is a sequenceof positive constants such that a, as n,
/m .up
, fl
< a(IP[IT,,/ 1 ,]
<.
n=l
Sul)l)OSC
that forsomer, <r
’2,x-’hI(,(x))
as x,
[.]
k=l
k=l
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. Weareverygrateful totherefereefor hishelpfulcoInmentsallowingus toimprove the previousversionof the paper.
REFERENCES
HSU, P.L. and
ROBBINS,
H. CompleteConvergence
and the LawofLarge
Numbers. Proc. Nat.Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 33
(1947)
25- 31.ERDS,
P. OnaTheorem of Hsu-Robbins.Ann. of Math. Statist. 20(1949)
286-291.KATZ,M. The Probabilityin the TailofDistribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 34
(1963)
312-318.BAUM,
L.E.andKATZ,M.Convergence Rates
in theLawofLarge
Numbers. Trans. Amer. Math.Soc.,
120(1965)
108-123.ASMUSSEN,
S. andKURTZ,
T.Necessary
and Sufficient Conditions for CompleteConvergence
in the LawofLarge
Numbers.Ann. Probab.,8(1980)
176-182.6.
GUT,
A. On CompleteConvergence
inthe law ofLarge
Numbers forSubsequences. Ann. Probab. 13(1985)
1286-1291.7.
DUNCAN,
R. and SZYNAL, D. A Note on theWeak and Hsu-Robbins Law ofLarge
Numbers.Bull. Ac. Pol. Math., 32
(1984)
729-735.BARTOSZYNSKI,
R. andPURI,
P.S. On the RateofConvergence
for the Weak Law ofLarge
Numbers. Probab. Math. Statist.,5(1985)
91-97.9.
KUCZMASZEWSKA,
A. andSZYNAL,
D. On the Law ofLarge
Numbers of the Hsu-RobbinsType.
Probab. Math. Statist. 9(1988)85-93.
10.
KUCZMASZEWSKA,
A.andSZYNAL,
D. OntheHsu-Robbins LawofLarge
Numbers for Subse- quences. Bull. Ac. Pol. Math. 36(1988)69-79.
11.
HOFFMANN-J(RGENSEN,
J. Sums ofIndependent BanachSpaces
Valued Random Variables.StudiaMath. 50
(1974)
159-186.12. YURINSKI, V.V.Exponental Bounds for
Large
Deviations. Theor. Prob. Appl. 19(1974)
154-155.15.
LOIVE,
M. ProbabilityTheory.4rd ed. Vol Van Nostrand Princeton,(1977).
TAYLOR,
R. StochasticConvergence
of Weighted Sums of Random Elements in LinearSpace.
Lecture Notesin Mathematics. 672 Springer-Verlag,Berlin,
(1978).
ADLER,
A. On CompleteConvergence
of the Sum ofa Random Number of Random Variables.CalcuttaStatist.
Assoc.
Bull.,37(1988)
161-169.Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Special Issue on
Modeling Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaotic Scenarios
Call for Papers
Thinking about nonlinearity in engineering areas, up to the 70s, was focused on intentionally built nonlinear parts in order to improve the operational characteristics of a device or system. Keying, saturation, hysteretic phenomena, and dead zones were added to existing devices increasing their behavior diversity and precision. In this context, an intrinsic nonlinearity was treated just as a linear approximation, around equilibrium points.
Inspired on the rediscovering of the richness of nonlinear and chaotic phenomena, engineers started using analytical tools from “Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations,”
allowing more precise analysis and synthesis, in order to produce new vital products and services. Bifurcation theory, dynamical systems and chaos started to be part of the mandatory set of tools for design engineers.
This proposed special edition of the Mathematical Prob- lems in Engineering aims to provide a picture of the impor- tance of the bifurcation theory, relating it with nonlinear and chaotic dynamics for natural and engineered systems.
Ideas of how this dynamics can be captured through precisely tailored real and numerical experiments and understanding by the combination of specific tools that associate dynamical system theory and geometric tools in a very clever, sophis- ticated, and at the same time simple and unique analytical environment are the subject of this issue, allowing new methods to design high-precision devices and equipment.
Authors should follow the Mathematical Problems in Engineering manuscript format described at http://www .hindawi.com/journals/mpe/. Prospective authors should submit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript through the journal Manuscript Tracking System athttp://
mts.hindawi.com/according to the following timetable:
Manuscript Due December 1, 2008 First Round of Reviews March 1, 2009 Publication Date June 1, 2009
Guest Editors
José Roberto Castilho Piqueira,Telecommunication and Control Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, The University of São Paulo, 05508-970 São Paulo, Brazil;
Elbert E. Neher Macau,Laboratório Associado de Matemática Aplicada e Computação (LAC), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São Josè dos Campos, 12227-010 São Paulo, Brazil ; [email protected] Celso Grebogi,Center for Applied Dynamics Research, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK; [email protected]
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com