S INGULARITIES IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC
A. Benito, A. Bravo and O. Villamayor U.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
RIMS Kyoto, December 2008
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
Multiplicity and theτ-invariant
k[x 1 , . . . , x n ]
g(x 1 , . . . , x n ) = G b (x 1 , . . . , x n )+G b+1 (x 1 , . . . , x n )+· · ·+G N (x 1 , . . . , x n ) G b 6= 0 ⇐⇒ ν x (g) = b at a local ring of the origin.
Spec(k [x 1 , . . . , x n ]), X = {g = 0} ⊃ F b set of b − fold points.
X X 1 X s
V ←− V 1 ←− . . . ←− V s
F b F b 1 F b s
(1)
Problem: Given F b ⊂ X ⊂ V find a sequence as (1) so that F b s = ∅.
k[x 1 , . . . , x n ]
g(x 1 , . . . , x n ) = G b (x 1 , . . . , x n )+G b+1 (x 1 , . . . , x n )+· · ·+G N (x 1 , . . . , x n ) G b 6= 0 ⇐⇒ ν x (g) = b at a local ring of the origin.
Spec(k [x 1 , . . . , x n ]), X = {g = 0} ⊃ F b set of b − fold points.
X X 1 X s
V ←− V 1 ←− . . . ←− V s
F b F b 1 F b s
(1)
Problem: Given F b ⊂ X ⊂ V find a sequence as (1) so that F b s = ∅.
Multiplicity and theτ-invariant
k[x 1 , . . . , x n ]
g(x 1 , . . . , x n ) = G b (x 1 , . . . , x n )+G b+1 (x 1 , . . . , x n )+· · ·+G N (x 1 , . . . , x n ) G b 6= 0 ⇐⇒ ν x (g) = b at a local ring of the origin.
Spec(k [x 1 , . . . , x n ]), X = {g = 0} ⊃ F b set of b − fold points.
X X 1 X s
V ←− V 1 ←− . . . ←− V s
F b F b 1 F b s
(1)
Problem: Given F b ⊂ X ⊂ V find a sequence as (1) so that F b s = ∅.
k[x 1 , . . . , x n ]
g(x 1 , . . . , x n ) = G b (x 1 , . . . , x n )+G b+1 (x 1 , . . . , x n )+· · ·+G N (x 1 , . . . , x n ) G b 6= 0 ⇐⇒ ν x (g) = b at a local ring of the origin.
Spec(k [x 1 , . . . , x n ]), X = {g = 0} ⊃ F b set of b − fold points.
X X 1 X s
V ←− V 1 ←− . . . ←− V s
F b F b 1 F b s
(1)
Problem: Given F b ⊂ X ⊂ V find a sequence as (1) so that F b s = ∅.
Multiplicity and theτ-invariant
V (d) smooth scheme of dimension d over k X ⊂ V (d) hypersurface, b the highest multiplicity of X
F b := {x ∈ X | mult x (X ) = b}
x ∈ F b if and only ν x (I(X )) = b
Notation: ν x denotes the order in the local regular ring O V
(d),x
Fix X , I(X ) ⊂ O V
(d),x
{x 1 , . . . , x d } r.s.p.
gr M
x(O V
(d)) ∼ = k 0 [X 1 , . . . , X d ] I X ,x initial ideal of I(X ) in gr M
x(O V
(d))
τ x : least number of variables needed to express a generator of I X,x .
Notation: τ X = τ
Local presentation
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
L OCAL PRESENTATION
(V (d) , x) −→ β (V (d−τ) , x τ ) a composition of smooth morphisms (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
F b =
τ
\
i=1
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x f i (p
ei)
≥ p e
i}∩{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (β ∗ (I (s) )) ≥ s}
Local presentation
L OCAL PRESENTATION
(V (d) , x) −→ β (V (d−τ) , x τ ) a composition of smooth morphisms (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
F b =
τ
\
i=1
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x f i (p
ei)
≥ p e
i}∩{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (β ∗ (I (s) )) ≥ s}
L OCAL PRESENTATION
(V (d) , x) −→ β (V (d−τ) , x τ ) a composition of smooth morphisms (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
F b =
τ
\
i=1
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x f i (p
ei)
≥ p e
i}∩{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (β ∗ (I (s) )) ≥ s}
Local presentation
L OCAL PRESENTATION
(V (d) , x) −→ β (V (d−τ) , x τ ) a composition of smooth morphisms (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
F b =
τ
\
i=1
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x f i (p
ei)
≥ p e
i}∩{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (β ∗ (I (s) )) ≥ s}
L OCAL PRESENTATION
(V (d) , x) −→ β (V (d−τ) , x τ ) a composition of smooth morphisms (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
F b =
τ
\
i=1
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x f i (p
ei)
≥ p e
i}∩{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (β ∗ (I (s) )) ≥ s}
Local presentation
L OCAL PRESENTATION
(V (d) , x) −→ β (V (d−τ) , x τ ) a composition of smooth morphisms (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
F b =
τ
\
i=1
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x f i (p
ei)
≥ p e
i}∩{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (β ∗ (I (s) )) ≥ s}
L OCAL PRESENTATION AND PERMISSIBLE TRANSFORMATIONS
Y ⊂ F b permissible center, Y ∼ = β(Y )
X X 1
Y ⊂ (V (d) , x )
β
(V 1 (d) , x 0 )
oo π
β
1β(Y ) ⊂ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) oo e π (V 1 (d−τ) , x τ 0 ) I (s) O
V
1(d−τ)= I(H 1 (d−τ) ) s · I 1 (s) ,
where H 1 (d−τ) is the exceptional locus of e π
Local presentation
Since
β : (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) the blow-up induces
β 1 : (V 1 (d) , x 0 ) −→ (V 1 (d−1) , x 1 0 ) −→ . . . −→ (V 1 (d−τ) , x τ 0 )
(1)’ Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ as before.
(2)’ Monic polynomials, g i (p
ei) for i = 1, . . . , τ (the strict transforms of the monic polynomials f i (p
ei) ).
(3)’ The ideal I 1 (s) in O
V
1(d−τ)with the same positive integer s.
(1)’+(2)’+(3)’ define a local presentation.
Since
β : (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) the blow-up induces
β 1 : (V 1 (d) , x 0 ) −→ (V 1 (d−1) , x 1 0 ) −→ . . . −→ (V 1 (d−τ) , x τ 0 )
(1)’ Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ as before.
(2)’ Monic polynomials, g i (p
ei) for i = 1, . . . , τ (the strict transforms of the monic polynomials f i (p
ei) ).
(3)’ The ideal I 1 (s) in O
V
1(d−τ)with the same positive integer s.
(1)’+(2)’+(3)’ define a local presentation.
Local presentation
A sequence of permissible transformations
X X 1 X r
V (d) oo π
1V 1 (d) oo . . . oo π
τV r (d) induces
V (d)
β
V 1 (d)
π
1oo
β
1. . .
oo V (d) r π
τoo
β
τV (d−τ) oo e π
1V 1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo e π
τV r (d−τ) and
V (d−τ) oo V 1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo V r (d−τ)
I (s) I 1 (s) I r (s)
A sequence of permissible transformations
X X 1 X r
V (d) oo π
1V 1 (d) oo . . . oo π
τV r (d) induces
V (d)
β
V 1 (d)
π
1oo
β
1. . .
oo V (d) r π
τoo
β
τV (d−τ) oo e π
1V 1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo e π
τV r (d−τ) and
V (d−τ) oo V 1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo V r (d−τ)
I (s) I 1 (s) I r (s)
Local presentation
A sequence of permissible transformations
X X 1 X r
V (d) oo π
1V 1 (d) oo . . . oo π
τV r (d) induces
V (d)
β
V 1 (d)
π
1oo
β
1. . .
oo V (d) r π
τoo
β
τV (d−τ) oo e π
1V 1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo e π
τV r (d−τ) and
V (d−τ) oo V 1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo V r (d−τ)
I (s) I 1 (s) I r (s)
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
Strategy in characteristic zero
S TRATEGY IN CHARACTERISTIC ZERO
A local presentation of X (at x ) when char (k) = 0 is (1) Positive integers 0 = e 1 = e 2 = · · · = e τ . (2) Regular parameters
f 1 (1) (z 1 ) = z 1 ∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (1) (z τ ) = z τ ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
Stage A): Reduction to the monomial case.
X X 1 X r
V (d) oo V 1 (d) oo . . . oo V r (d) is defined so that, setting
V (d−τ ) ←− V 1 (d−τ) ←− . . . ←− V r (d−τ) and I (s) as above, then
I r (s) = I(H 1 (d−τ) ) α
1· I(H 2 (d−τ) ) α
2. . . I(H r (d−τ) ) α
r⊂ O
V
r(d−τ).
Strategy in characteristic zero
Stage B): Resolution of the monomial case.
X r X r+1 X N
V r (d) oo V r+1 (d) oo . . . oo V N (d) is defined so that setting
V r (d−τ) oo V r (d−τ) +1 oo . . . oo V N (d−τ) I r (s) I r+1 (s) I N (s) and I i (s) ⊂ O
V
i(d−τ)as before, then
{x ∈ V N (d−τ) | ν x (I N (s) ) ≥ s} = ∅ (easy).
Key Point
The local presentation in char zero will allow us to lift sequence V r (d−τ) oo V r (d−τ) +1 oo . . . oo V N (d−τ)
I r (s) I r+1 (s) I N (s) to a resolution
X r X r+1 X N
V r (d) oo V r+1 (d) oo . . . oo V N (d) Since f i = x i and
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (x i ) ≥ 1} = {x 1 = 0, . . . , x τ = 0}
is naturally identified with V (d−τ ) .
Strategy in positive characteristic
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
S TRATEGY IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC
β : V (d) −→ V (d−1) −→ . . . −→ V (d−τ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
Strategy in positive characteristic
T HEOREM (S TAGE A): R EDUCTION TO THE MONOMIAL CASE .
X X 1 X r
V (d) ←− V 1 (d) ←− . . . ←− V r (d)
is defined so that, setting
V (d−τ ) ←− V 1 (d−τ) ←− . . . ←− V r (d−τ) and I (s) as above, then
I r (s) = I(H 1 (d−τ) ) α
1· I(H 2 (d−τ) ) α
2. . . I(H r (d−τ) ) α
r⊂ O
V
r(d−τ).
T HEOREM (S TAGE B’): T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Given I r (s) = I(H 1 (d−τ) ) α
1· I(H 2 (d−τ) ) α
2. . . I(H r (d−τ) ) α
r⊂ O
V
r(d−τ), there exists (a τ -monomial):
I r 0(s) = I(H 1 (d−τ) ) h
1· I(H 2 (d−τ) ) h
2. . . I(H r (d−τ) ) h
rwith exponents 0 ≤ h i ≤ α i , so that a combinatorial resolution:
V p (d−τ) oo V p+1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo V N (d−τ) I r 0(s) I r+1 0(s) I N 0(s)
can be lifted to a permissible sequence
X X 1 X N
V (d) oo V 1 (d) oo . . . oo V N (d) .
Strategy in positive characteristic
T HEOREM (S TAGE B’): T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Given I r (s) = I(H 1 (d−τ) ) α
1· I(H 2 (d−τ) ) α
2. . . I(H r (d−τ) ) α
r⊂ O
V
r(d−τ), there exists (a τ -monomial):
I r 0(s) = I(H 1 (d−τ) ) h
1· I(H 2 (d−τ) ) h
2. . . I(H r (d−τ) ) h
rwith exponents 0 ≤ h i ≤ α i , so that a combinatorial resolution:
V p (d−τ) oo V p+1 (d−τ) oo . . . oo V N (d−τ) I r 0(s) I r+1 0(s) I N 0(s) can be lifted to a permissible sequence
X X 1 X N
V (d) oo V 1 (d) oo . . . oo V N (d) .
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
Rees algebras and main invariants
B smooth over k ; V = Spec (B)
G = B[f 1 W n
1, f 2 W n
2, . . . , f s W n
s] = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n ⊂ B[W ]; I 0 = O V Sing(G) = {x ∈ V | ν x (I n ) ≥ n}
D EFINITION (H IRONAKA )
ord : Sing(G) → Q ord(x ) = min n ν x (I k )
k o
Remark: ord(x ) = min n ν
x
(f
i)
n
i, i = 1, . . . , s o
B smooth over k ; V = Spec (B)
G = B[f 1 W n
1, f 2 W n
2, . . . , f s W n
s] = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n ⊂ B[W ]; I 0 = O V Sing(G) = {x ∈ V | ν x (I n ) ≥ n}
D EFINITION (H IRONAKA )
ord : Sing(G) → Q ord(x ) = min n ν x (I k )
k o
Remark: ord(x ) = min n ν
x
(f
i)
n
i, i = 1, . . . , s o
Rees algebras and main invariants
B smooth over k ; V = Spec (B)
G = B[f 1 W n
1, f 2 W n
2, . . . , f s W n
s] = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n ⊂ B[W ]; I 0 = O V Sing(G) = {x ∈ V | ν x (I n ) ≥ n}
D EFINITION (H IRONAKA )
ord : Sing(G) → Q ord(x ) = min n ν x (I k )
k o
Remark: ord(x ) = min n ν
x
(f
i)
n
i, i = 1, . . . , s o
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
Resolution of Rees algebras
Smooth center Y ⊂ Sing(G) = {x ∈ V | ν x (I n ) ≥ n}
V ←− π V 1 H = π −1 (Y ) I n O
V
1(d)= I(H) n I n 0 D EFINITION (T RANSFORMATION )
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n 0 W n is the transform of G = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n
(V , G) oo (V 1 , G 1 )
Y ⊂ Sing(G)
Smooth center Y ⊂ Sing(G) = {x ∈ V | ν x (I n ) ≥ n}
V ←− π V 1 H = π −1 (Y ) I n O
V
1(d)= I(H) n I n 0 D EFINITION (T RANSFORMATION )
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n 0 W n is the transform of G = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n
(V , G) oo (V 1 , G 1 )
Y ⊂ Sing(G)
Resolution of Rees algebras
R ESOLUTION
V smooth /k , G = ⊕I k W k ⊂ O V
(d)Find a sequence of permissible transformations:
(V , G) ←− (V 1 , G 1 ) ←− . . . ←− (V n , G n )
with
Sing(G n ) = ∅
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
Rees algebras and integral closure
R EES A LGEBRAS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n , G 2 = ⊕ n≥0 J n W n , ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] G 1 ∼ G 2 if same integral closure in O V
(d)[Z ] Then:
G 1 ∼ O V
(d)[I s W s ] for some s.
Sing(G 1 ) = Sing(G 2 ).
Hironaka’s functions coincide.
Equivalence is stable by transformations.
R EES A LGEBRAS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n , G 2 = ⊕ n≥0 J n W n , ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] G 1 ∼ G 2 if same integral closure in O V
(d)[Z ] Then:
G 1 ∼ O V
(d)[I s W s ] for some s.
Sing(G 1 ) = Sing(G 2 ).
Hironaka’s functions coincide.
Equivalence is stable by transformations.
Rees algebras and integral closure
R EES A LGEBRAS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n , G 2 = ⊕ n≥0 J n W n , ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] G 1 ∼ G 2 if same integral closure in O V
(d)[Z ] Then:
G 1 ∼ O V
(d)[I s W s ] for some s.
Sing(G 1 ) = Sing(G 2 ).
Hironaka’s functions coincide.
Equivalence is stable by transformations.
R EES A LGEBRAS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n , G 2 = ⊕ n≥0 J n W n , ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] G 1 ∼ G 2 if same integral closure in O V
(d)[Z ] Then:
G 1 ∼ O V
(d)[I s W s ] for some s.
Sing(G 1 ) = Sing(G 2 ).
Hironaka’s functions coincide.
Equivalence is stable by transformations.
Rees algebras and integral closure
R EES A LGEBRAS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n , G 2 = ⊕ n≥0 J n W n , ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] G 1 ∼ G 2 if same integral closure in O V
(d)[Z ] Then:
G 1 ∼ O V
(d)[I s W s ] for some s.
Sing(G 1 ) = Sing(G 2 ).
Hironaka’s functions coincide.
Equivalence is stable by transformations.
R EES A LGEBRAS AND INTEGRAL CLOSURE
G 1 = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n , G 2 = ⊕ n≥0 J n W n , ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] G 1 ∼ G 2 if same integral closure in O V
(d)[Z ] Then:
G 1 ∼ O V
(d)[I s W s ] for some s.
Sing(G 1 ) = Sing(G 2 ).
Hironaka’s functions coincide.
Equivalence is stable by transformations.
Multiplicity of Hypersurfaces
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
A smooth/k, V = Spec(A[Z ]) f = Z n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n ∈ A[Z ]
G = O V [fW n ], Sing(G) = F n = n-fold points of f.
Spec(A[Z ]) β // Spec(A)
Spec(A[Z ]/hf i)
OO 88 r r r r r r r r r r
β(F n )?
Multiplicity of Hypersurfaces
A smooth/k, V = Spec(A[Z ]) f = Z n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n ∈ A[Z ]
G = O V [fW n ], Sing(G) = F n = n-fold points of f.
Spec(A[Z ]) β // Spec(A)
Spec(A[Z ]/hf i)
OO 88 r r r r r r r r r r
β(F n )?
A smooth/k, V = Spec(A[Z ]) f = Z n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n ∈ A[Z ]
G = O V [fW n ], Sing(G) = F n = n-fold points of f.
Spec(A[Z ]) β // Spec(A)
Spec(A[Z ]/hf i)
OO 88 r r r r r r r r r r
β(F n )?
Multiplicity of Hypersurfaces
U NIVERSAL SETTING
(Z − Y 1 )(Z − Y 2 ) · · · (Z − Y n ) ∈ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ][Z ] F n (Z ) = Z n − s 1 Z n−1 + · · · + (−1) n s n ∈ k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ] k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ]/hF n (Z )i // A[Z ]/hZ n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n i
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ] //
OO
A
OO
s i // (−1) i a i .
U NIVERSAL SETTING
(Z − Y 1 )(Z − Y 2 ) · · · (Z − Y n ) ∈ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ][Z ] F n (Z ) = Z n − s 1 Z n−1 + · · · + (−1) n s n ∈ k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ] k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ]/hF n (Z )i // A[Z ]/hZ n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n i
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ] //
OO
A
OO
s i // (−1) i a i .
Multiplicity of Hypersurfaces
I NVARIANTS UNDER CHANGE OF VARIABLES
F n (Z ) = (Z − Y 1 )(Z − Y 2 ) · · · (Z − Y n ) ∈ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ][Z ] L = V (Y i − Y j , 1 ≤ i, j, ≤ n)
k[Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L = k [Y i − Y j ; 1 ≤ i, j, ≤ n]
S n acts linearly on k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ⊂ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] (k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ) S
n⊂ (k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ]) S
n(k[Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ) S
n= k [H 1 , . . . , H r ]
H j = H j (Y 1 , . . . , Y n ) homog of degree d j
H j = H j (s 1 , . . . , s n ) w. homog. of degree d j
I NVARIANTS UNDER CHANGE OF VARIABLES
F n (Z ) = (Z − Y 1 )(Z − Y 2 ) · · · (Z − Y n ) ∈ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ][Z ] L = V (Y i − Y j , 1 ≤ i, j, ≤ n)
k[Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L = k [Y i − Y j ; 1 ≤ i, j, ≤ n]
S n acts linearly on k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ⊂ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] (k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ) S
n⊂ (k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ]) S
n(k[Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ) S
n= k [H 1 , . . . , H r ]
H j = H j (Y 1 , . . . , Y n ) homog of degree d j
H j = H j (s 1 , . . . , s n ) w. homog. of degree d j
Multiplicity of Hypersurfaces
I NVARIANTS UNDER CHANGE OF VARIABLES
F n (Z ) = (Z − Y 1 )(Z − Y 2 ) · · · (Z − Y n ) ∈ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ][Z ] L = V (Y i − Y j , 1 ≤ i, j, ≤ n)
k[Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L = k [Y i − Y j ; 1 ≤ i, j, ≤ n]
S n acts linearly on k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ⊂ k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] (k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ) S
n⊂ (k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ]) S
n(k[Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] L ) S
n= k [H 1 , . . . , H r ]
H j = H j (Y 1 , . . . , Y n ) homog of degree d j
H j = H j (s 1 , . . . , s n ) w. homog. of degree d j
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ]/hF n (Z )i A[Z ]/hZ n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n i
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ]
OO
φ // (A, M)(loc., reg.)
OO
s i // (−1) i a i ∈ M i . φ(H j ) = H j (a 1 , . . . , a n ) = h j ∈ M d
ihh j i invariant by Z → uZ + a u ∈ U(A); a ∈ A.
p ∈ V (hh 1 , . . . , h n
ii) ⊂ Spec(A) iff B ⊗ k (p) is local.
∩{P ∈ Spec (A) : ν P (h i ) ≥ d i } = β(F n ) if n 6= 0 in k .
Multiplicity of Hypersurfaces
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ]/hF n (Z )i A[Z ]/hZ n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n i
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ]
OO
φ // (A, M)(loc., reg.)
OO
s i // (−1) i a i ∈ M i . φ(H j ) = H j (a 1 , . . . , a n ) = h j ∈ M d
ihh j i invariant by Z → uZ + a u ∈ U(A); a ∈ A.
p ∈ V (hh 1 , . . . , h n
ii) ⊂ Spec(A) iff B ⊗ k (p) is local.
∩{P ∈ Spec (A) : ν P (h i ) ≥ d i } = β(F n ) if n 6= 0 in k .
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ]/hF n (Z )i A[Z ]/hZ n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n i
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ]
OO
φ // (A, M)(loc., reg.)
OO
s i // (−1) i a i ∈ M i . φ(H j ) = H j (a 1 , . . . , a n ) = h j ∈ M d
ihh j i invariant by Z → uZ + a u ∈ U(A); a ∈ A.
p ∈ V (hh 1 , . . . , h n
ii) ⊂ Spec(A) iff B ⊗ k (p) is local.
∩{P ∈ Spec (A) : ν P (h i ) ≥ d i } = β(F n ) if n 6= 0 in k .
Multiplicity of Hypersurfaces
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ][Z ]/hF n (Z )i A[Z ]/hZ n + a 1 Z n−1 + · · · + a n i
k [s 1 , . . . , s n ]
OO
φ // (A, M)(loc., reg.)
OO
s i // (−1) i a i ∈ M i . φ(H j ) = H j (a 1 , . . . , a n ) = h j ∈ M d
ihh j i invariant by Z → uZ + a u ∈ U(A); a ∈ A.
p ∈ V (hh 1 , . . . , h n
ii) ⊂ Spec(A) iff B ⊗ k (p) is local.
∩{P ∈ Spec (A) : ν P (h i ) ≥ d i } = β(F n ) if n 6= 0 in k .
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
Elimination and differential operators
T AYLOR MORPHISM
Tay : A[Z ] → A[Z , T ] Z → Z + T Tay(f (Z )) = P
r ∈ N b r (X )T r ; ∆ r (f (X )) = b r (X )
p ∈ Spec(S[Z ]), if ν p (f (Z )) ≥ n, then ν p (∆ r (f (Z ))) ≥ n − r A[Z ][fW n ] ⊂ A[Z ][∆ n−1 (f )W 1 , . . . , ∆ 1 (f )W n−1 , fW n ]
Sing(A[Z ][fW n ]) = Sing(A[Z ][∆ k (f )W n−k , fW n ])
T AYLOR MORPHISM
Tay : A[Z ] → A[Z , T ] Z → Z + T Tay(f (Z )) = P
r ∈ N b r (X )T r ; ∆ r (f (X )) = b r (X )
p ∈ Spec(S[Z ]), if ν p (f (Z )) ≥ n, then ν p (∆ r (f (Z ))) ≥ n − r A[Z ][fW n ] ⊂ A[Z ][∆ n−1 (f )W 1 , . . . , ∆ 1 (f )W n−1 , fW n ]
Sing(A[Z ][fW n ]) = Sing(A[Z ][∆ k (f )W n−k , fW n ])
Elimination and differential operators
I NVARIANTS AND DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS
F n (Z ) = Q
(Z − Y i ) = Z n − s 1 Z n−1 + . . . s n ∈ k [s 1 , . . . , s n ] k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] k [s 1 , . . . , s n ]
∪ −→ S
n∪
k [Y i − Y j ] k[H 1 , . . . , H n
i]
k [Z − Y 1 , . . . , Z − Y n ] k [∆ r F n , F n ]
∪ −→ S
n∪
k [Y i − Y j ] k [H 1 , . . . , H n
i]
Each H i is weighted hom. on the ∆ r F n (weight n − r ).
I NVARIANTS AND DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS
F n (Z ) = Q
(Z − Y i ) = Z n − s 1 Z n−1 + . . . s n ∈ k [s 1 , . . . , s n ] k [Y 1 , . . . , Y n ] k [s 1 , . . . , s n ]
∪ −→ S
n∪
k [Y i − Y j ] k[H 1 , . . . , H n
i]
k [Z − Y 1 , . . . , Z − Y n ] k [∆ r F n , F n ]
∪ −→ S
n∪
k [Y i − Y j ] k [H 1 , . . . , H n
i]
Each H i is weighted hom. on the ∆ r F n (weight n − r ).
Elimination and differential operators
W EIGHTED P ULL - BACKS OF ALGEBRAS
Set k [Z − Y 1 , . . . , Z − Y n ] S
n= k [∆ r F n , F n ]. The weighted pull-back k [∆ r F n W n−r , F n W n ] is
A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ].
The weighted-Pull-Back ofk [H 1 W d
1, . . . , H s W d
s] is A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] ⊂ A[W ].
A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] ⊂ A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ] D EFINITION
A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] elimination alg. of A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ].
W EIGHTED P ULL - BACKS OF ALGEBRAS
Set k [Z − Y 1 , . . . , Z − Y n ] S
n= k [∆ r F n , F n ]. The weighted pull-back k [∆ r F n W n−r , F n W n ] is
A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ].
The weighted-Pull-Back ofk [H 1 W d
1, . . . , H s W d
s] is A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] ⊂ A[W ].
A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] ⊂ A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ] D EFINITION
A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] elimination alg. of A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ].
Elimination and differential operators
W EIGHTED P ULL - BACKS OF ALGEBRAS
Set k [Z − Y 1 , . . . , Z − Y n ] S
n= k [∆ r F n , F n ]. The weighted pull-back k [∆ r F n W n−r , F n W n ] is
A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ].
The weighted-Pull-Back ofk [H 1 W d
1, . . . , H s W d
s] is A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] ⊂ A[W ].
A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] ⊂ A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ] D EFINITION
A[h 1 W d
1, . . . , h s W d
s] elimination alg. of A[Z ][f n W n , ∆ r f n W n−r ].
O UTLINE
1 I NTRODUCTION .
Multiplicity and the τ -invariant Local presentation
Strategy in characteristic zero Strategy in positive characteristic
2 R EES A LGEBRAS
Rees algebras and main invariants Resolution of Rees algebras Rees algebras and integral closure
3 E LIMINATION
Multiplicity of hypersurfaces Elimination and differentials
Absolute and relative differential structure
4 T HE MONOMIAL CASE .
Stage B’
Elimination: Absolute and relative differential structure
β d,d−τ : V (d) −→ V (d−τ) smooth τ ≤ d Diff β r
d,d−τ
sheaf of relative differential operators.
D EFINITION
G = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] is a relative Diff-algebra if Diff β r
d,d−τ
(I n ) ⊂ I n−r . Properties:
There is a smallest extension G ⊂ G β
d,d−τ(G), where G β
d,d−τ(G) is a relative (or absolute) Diff-algebra.
Sing(G) = Sing(G β
d,d−τ(G)).
G β
d,d−τcompatible with integral closure.
β d,d−τ : V (d) −→ V (d−τ) smooth τ ≤ d Diff β r
d,d−τ
sheaf of relative differential operators.
D EFINITION
G = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] is a relative Diff-algebra if Diff β r
d,d−τ
(I n ) ⊂ I n−r . Properties:
There is a smallest extension G ⊂ G β
d,d−τ(G), where G β
d,d−τ(G) is a relative (or absolute) Diff-algebra.
Sing(G) = Sing(G β
d,d−τ(G)).
G β
d,d−τcompatible with integral closure.
Elimination: Absolute and relative differential structure
β d,d−τ : V (d) −→ V (d−τ) smooth τ ≤ d Diff β r
d,d−τ
sheaf of relative differential operators.
D EFINITION
G = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] is a relative Diff-algebra if Diff β r
d,d−τ
(I n ) ⊂ I n−r . Properties:
There is a smallest extension G ⊂ G β
d,d−τ(G), where G β
d,d−τ(G) is a relative (or absolute) Diff-algebra.
Sing(G) = Sing(G β
d,d−τ(G)).
G β
d,d−τcompatible with integral closure.
β d,d−τ : V (d) −→ V (d−τ) smooth τ ≤ d Diff β r
d,d−τ
sheaf of relative differential operators.
D EFINITION
G = ⊕ n≥0 I n W n ⊂ O V
(d)[W ] is a relative Diff-algebra if Diff β r
d,d−τ
(I n ) ⊂ I n−r . Properties:
There is a smallest extension G ⊂ G β
d,d−τ(G), where G β
d,d−τ(G) is a relative (or absolute) Diff-algebra.
Sing(G) = Sing(G β
d,d−τ(G)).
G β
d,d−τcompatible with integral closure.
Elimination: Absolute and relative differential structure
R ELATIVE DIFFERENTIALS AND E LIMINATION
Given G and V (d) −→ β V (d−1) smooth and generic.
Assume,
G = O V
(d)[f n W n , ∆ α (f n )W n−α ] 1≤α≤n
then G is a relative Diff-algebra and there is an elimination algebra,
R G,β ⊂ O V
(d−1)[W ].
V smooth | k G = ⊕I k W k ⊂ O V [W ] ord : Sing(G) → Q Assume: ord(x ) = 1 for any x ∈ Sing(G).
At each x ∈ Sing(G) : C G,x ⊂ T V ,x
Linear subspace L G,x ⊂ C G,x
D EFINITION (H IRONAKA ) τ (x )= codim L G,x in T V,x . D EFINITION
G is of codimensional type ≥ e if τ (x ) ≥ e for all x ∈ Sing(G)
Elimination: Absolute and relative differential structure
V smooth | k G = ⊕I k W k ⊂ O V [W ] ord : Sing(G) → Q Assume: ord(x ) = 1 for any x ∈ Sing(G).
At each x ∈ Sing(G) : C G,x ⊂ T V ,x
Linear subspace L G,x ⊂ C G,x
D EFINITION (H IRONAKA ) τ (x )= codim L G,x in T V,x . D EFINITION
G is of codimensional type ≥ e if τ (x ) ≥ e for all x ∈ Sing(G)
V smooth | k G = ⊕I k W k ⊂ O V [W ] ord : Sing(G) → Q Assume: ord(x ) = 1 for any x ∈ Sing(G).
At each x ∈ Sing(G) : C G,x ⊂ T V ,x
Linear subspace L G,x ⊂ C G,x
D EFINITION (H IRONAKA ) τ (x )= codim L G,x in T V,x . D EFINITION
G is of codimensional type ≥ e if τ (x ) ≥ e for all x ∈ Sing(G)
Elimination: Absolute and relative differential structure
V (d) smooth | k G = ⊕I k W k ⊂ O V
(d)Assume ord(x) = 1, and G is of codimensional type ≥ τ . T HEOREM
If G is rel. Diff-alg. for β d,d−τ : V (d) → V (d−τ) generic, then:
(Local Presentation)
G ∼ O V
(d)[f n
iW n
i, ∆ α
if n
iW n
i−|α
i| ] β d,d−e ∗ (G (d−τ) ).
L OCAL PRESENTATION
(V (d) , x) −→ β (V (d−τ) , x τ ) a composition of smooth morphisms (V (d) , x ) −→ (V (d−1) , x 1 ) −→ . . . −→ (V (d−τ) , x τ ) A local presentation of X (at x ) is defined by
(1) Positive integers 0 ≤ e 1 ≤ e 2 ≤ · · · ≤ e τ . (2) Monic polynomials,
f 1 (p
e1) (z 1 ) = z 1 p
e1+ a (1) 1 z 1 p
e1−1 + · · · + a (1) p
e1∈ O V
(d−1)[z 1 ] .. .
f τ (p
eτ) (z τ ) = z τ p
eτ+ a (τ) 1 z τ p
eτ−1 + · · · + a (τ) p
eτ∈ O V
(d−τ)[z τ ].
(3) I (s) : an ideal in O V
(d−τ)and a positive integer s.
F b =
τ
\
i=1
{x ∈ V (d) | ν x f i (p
ei)
≥ p e
i}∩{x ∈ V (d) | ν x (β ∗ (I (s) )) ≥ s}
Elimination: Absolute and relative differential structure
V (d) smooth | k G = ⊕I k W k ⊂ O V
(d)Assume ord(x) = 1, and G is of codimensional type ≥ e.
T HEOREM
If G is rel. Diff-alg. for β d,d−τ : V (d) → V (d−τ) generic, then:
(Local Presentation)
G ∼ O V
(d)[f n
iW n
i, ∆ α
if n
iW n
i−|α
i| ] β d,d−τ ∗ (G (d−τ) ) G (d−τ) ⊂ O V
(d−e)[W ] (Elimination algebra).
Sing(G) = β d,d−τ (Sing(G)) ⊂ Sing(G (d−τ) )
The natural restriction ord : Sing(G (d−τ) ) → Q to Sing(G) is
independent of β d,d−τ .
V (d) smooth | k G = ⊕I k W k ⊂ O V
(d)Assume ord(x) = 1, and G is of codimensional type ≥ e.
T HEOREM
If G is rel. Diff-alg. for β d,d−τ : V (d) → V (d−τ) generic, then:
(Local Presentation)
G ∼ O V
(d)[f n
iW n
i, ∆ α
if n
iW n
i−|α
i| ] β d,d−τ ∗ (G (d−τ) ) G (d−τ) ⊂ O V
(d−e)[W ] (Elimination algebra).
Sing(G) = β d,d−τ (Sing(G)) ⊂ Sing(G (d−τ) )
The natural restriction ord : Sing(G (d−τ) ) → Q to Sing(G) is
independent of β d,d−τ .
Elimination: Absolute and relative differential structure