• 検索結果がありません。

semi-symmetric tensor

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "semi-symmetric tensor"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

周期的リッチ準対称テンソルを持つケーラー超曲面 Kaehler hypersurfaces with cyclic Ricci

semi-symmetric tensor

数学専攻   横山 教史 YOKOYAMA Norifumi Let M be a Kaehler hypersurface in a complex space form M˜n+1(c) of the complex dimension n+ 1 with constant holomor- phic sectional curvaturec. Ifc > 0 , then ˜Mn+1(c) is the complex projective spacePn+1(c) with the Fubini-Study metric of constant holomorphic sectional curvature c. If c <0 , then ˜Mn+1(c) is the open unit ball Dn+1(c) in the complex Euclidean space Cn+1 with the Bergman metric of constant holomorphic sectional curvature c. If c = 0 , then ˜Mn+1(c) is Cn+1.

Let S and R be the Ricci tensor and the curvature tensor of M , respectively . P. J. Ryan [1] proved that if M has the Ricci semi-symmetric tensor, i.e. (R(X, Y)S)Z = 0 , then

(i) when c = 0 , A2 is a multiple of I;

(ii) when c = 0 , the non-zero eigenvalues of A2 are equal .

Moreover , the Ricci tensor S is called theparallel Ricci tensor if M satisfies the condition of ∇S = 0 . He also proved that∇S = 0 and M is Einstein are equivalent .

On the other hand , Nomizu and Smyth [3] classified the com- plex hypersurfaces with parallel Ricci tensor . They proved that if ∇S = 0 on M , then

(i) when c = 0 , M is totally geodesic ;

(ii) when c = 0 , either M is totally geodesic or M is locally the complex quadric in ˜Mn+1(c) , the latter case arising only when c >0 .

The Ricci tensor S is called the cyclic Ricci semi-symmetric

(2)

tensor if M satisfies the condition of S(R(X, Y)S)Z = 0 , i.e. , (R(X, Y)S)Z + (R(Y, Z)S)X + (R(Z, X)S)Y = 0 for any X ,Y and Z tangent to M .

The purpose of this paper is to classify Kaehler hypersurfaces with cyclic Ricci semi-symmetric tensor.

Theorem. Let M be a connected Kaehler hypersurface with cyclic Ricci semi-symmetric tensor in a complex space form M˜n+1(c) of constant holomorphic sectional curvature c . If c = 0, then M is Einstein .

The following Proposition will be used frequently in my paper . Proposition 1 IfR˜ and R denote the Riemannian curvature ten- sors of M˜ and M , respectively , then for any vector fields X ,Y ,Z and W on U(x)

(i) the ξ-component of R(X, Y˜ )W is given by

g((∇XA)Y (YA)X−s(X)J AY +s(Y)J AX, W)ξ; the expression for the Jξ-component of R(X, Y˜ )W is obtained on replacing A by JA and ξ by Jξ.

(ii) g(R(X, Y)Z, W) = g( ˜R(X, Y)Z, W) +{g(AX, Z)g(AY, W)

−g(AX, W)g(AY, Z)} +{g(J AX, Z)g(J AY, W)

−g(J AX, W)g(J AY, Z)} (Gauss equation) .

(3)

Proposition 2 If M˜ is of constant holomorphic sectional curva- ture c , then for any pair of vectors X and Y tangent to M at a point of U(x) , we have the equations

(i) (XA)Y (YA)X −s(X)J AY + s(Y)J AX = 0 (Codazzi equation) , (ii) S(X, Y) =2g(A2X, Y) + (n+1)c2 g(X, Y),

where S is the Ricci tensor of M .

Furthermore, we introduce some expression to use in this paper . Let A and J be the second f undamental f orm and Kaehler structure on ˜Mn+1(c) . Then for any vector fields X , Y and Z tangent to M on U(x) , we have

(1) AJ = −J A , (2) R(X, Y˜ )W = c

4{g(Y, W)X −g(X, W)Y +g(J Y, W)J X −g(J X, W)J Y +2g(X, J Y)J W},

(3) R(X, Y)W = ˜R(X, Y)W

+{g(AY, W)AX −g(AX, W)AY}

+{g(J AY, W)J AX−g(J AX, W)J AY}, (4) R(X, Y)W = c

4{g(Y, W)X −g(X, W)Y +g(J Y, W)J X −g(J X, W)J Y +2g(X, J Y)J W}

+g(AY, W)AX −g(AX, W)AY

+g(J AY, W)J AX−g(J AX, W)J AY ,

——— Gauss equation

(4)

(5) R(X, Y)Z + R(Y, Z)X +R(Z, X)Y = 0,

——— f irst Bianchi identity

(6) SX = n+ 1

2 cX 2A2X .

The author would like to express the will of great thanks for indications and cooperations of Professor Y. Matsuyama on writ- ing this paper .

参考文献

[1] S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry, vol II, Inter science Tracts No.15, John Wiley and Sons, New York(1963).

[2] Y. Matsuyama.,Minimal Submanifolds inSN and RN, Math.

Z. 175(1980), 275-282.

[3] K. Nomizu and B. Smyth., Differential geometry of complex hypersurfaces II, J. Math. Soc. Japan Vol. 20, No. 3(1968), 498-521.

[4] P. J. Ryan., A class of complex hypersurfaces, Colloquium Mathmaticum 26(1972), 177-182.

[5] B. Smyth., Differential geometry of complex hypersurfaces, Ann. of Math., 85(1967), 246-266.

Department of mathematics Chuo University

1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 112-8551, Japan

参照

関連したドキュメント

We show how they apply to the higher index theory for coverings and to flat foliated bundles, and prove an index theorem for C ∗ -dynamical systems associ- ated to actions of compact

To complete the proof of the lemma we need to obtain a similar estimate for the second integral on the RHS of (2.33).. Hence we need to concern ourselves with the second integral on

In view of the result by Amann and Kennard [AmK14, Theorem A] it suffices to show that the elliptic genus vanishes, when the torus fixed point set consists of two isolated fixed

We develop three concepts as applications of Theorem 1.1, where the dual objects pre- sented here give respectively a notion of unoriented Kantorovich duality, a notion of

The (strong) slope conjecture relates the degree of the col- ored Jones polynomial of a knot to certain essential surfaces in the knot complement.. We verify the slope conjecture

We construct some examples of special Lagrangian subman- ifolds and Lagrangian self-similar solutions in almost Calabi–Yau cones over toric Sasaki manifolds.. Toric Sasaki

In this section, we show that, if G is a shrinkable pasting scheme admissible in M (Definition 2.16) and M is nice enough (Definition 4.9), then the model category structure on Prop

If K is positive-definite at the point corresponding to an affine linear func- tion with zero set containing an edge E along which the boundary measure vanishes, then in