Volume 2010, Article ID 596952,12pages doi:10.1155/2010/596952
Research Article
On Some Geometric Constants and the Fixed Point Property for Multivalued Nonexpansive Mappings
Jingxin Zhang
1and Yunan Cui
21Department of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
2Department of Mathematics, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Jingxin Zhang,zhjx [email protected] Received 30 July 2010; Accepted 5 October 2010
Academic Editor: L. G ´orniewicz
Copyrightq2010 J. Zhang and Y. Cui. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We show some geometric conditions on a Banach space X concerning the Jordan-von Neumann constant, Zb˘aganu constant, characteristic of separation noncompact convexity, and the coefficient R1, X, the weakly convergent sequence coefficient, which imply the existence of fixed points for multivalued nonexpansive mappings.
1. Introduction
Fixed point theory for multivalued mappings has many useful applications in Applied Sciences, in particular, in game theory and mathematical economics. Thus it is natural to try of extending the known fixed point results for single-valued mappings to the setting of multivalued mappings.
In 1969, Nadler 1 established the multivalued version of Banach’s contraction principle. One of the most celebrated results about multivalued mappings was given by Lim2in 1974. Using Edelstein’s method of asymptotic centers, he proved the existence of a fixed point for a multivalued nonexpansive self-mappingT :C → KCwhereCis a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space. Since then the metric fixed point theory of multivalued mappings has been rapidly developed. Some other classical fixed point theorems for single-valued mappings have been extended to multivalued mappings. However, many questions remain open, for instance, the possibility of extending the well-known Kirk’s theorem, that is, do Banach spaces with weak normal structure have the fixed point propertyFPP, in shortfor multivalued nonexpansive mappings?
Since weak normal structure is implied by different geometrical properties of Banach spaces, it is natural to study if those properties imply the FPP for multivalued mappings.
Dhompongsa et al.3,4introduced the Domnguez-Lorenzo conditionDLcondition, in short and property D which imply the FPP for multivalued nonexpansive mappings.
A possible approach to the above problem is to look for geometric conditions in a Banach space X which imply either theDLcondition or propertyD. In this setting the following results have been obtained.
1Dhompongsa et al. 3 proved that uniformly nonsquare Banach spaces with property WORTH satisfy theDLcondition.
2Dhompongsa et al.4showed that the condition
CNJX<1WCSX2
4 1.1
implies propertyD.
3Satit Saejung5proved that the conditionε0X<WCSXimplies propertyD.
4Gavira6showed that the condition
JX<1 1
R1, X 1.2
impliesDLcondition.
In 2007, Dom´ınguez Benavides and Gavira7have established FFP for multivalued nonexpansive mappings in terms of the modulus of squareness, universal infinite-dimension- al modulus, and Opia modulus. Attapol Kaewkhao8has established FFP for multivalued nonexpansive mappings in terms of the James constant, the Jordan-von Neumann Constants, weak orthogonality.
Besides, In 2010, Dom´ınguez Benavides and Gavira9have given a survey of this subject and presented the main known results and current research directions.
In this paper, in terms of the Jordan-von Neumann constant, Zb˘aganu constant,εβX and the coefficient R1, X, the weakly convergent sequence coefficient, we show some geometrical properties which imply the propertyDorDLcondition and so the FPP for multivalued nonexpansive mappings.
2. Preliminaries
LetXbe a Banach space andCbe a nonempty subset ofX; we denote all nonempty bounded closed subsets ofXbyCBXand all nonempty compact convex subsets ofXbyKCX.
A multivalued mappingT :C → CBXis said to be nonexpansive if the inequality H
Tx, Ty
≤x−y 2.1
holds for everyx, y∈C, whereH·,·is the Hausdorffdistance onCBX, that is, HA, B: max
sup
x∈A inf
y∈Bx−y,sup
y∈B inf
x∈Ax−y
, A, B∈CBX. 2.2
LetC ⊂ X be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset and{xn} ∈ X a bounded sequence; we use rC,{xn} and AC,{xn} to denote the asymptotic radius and the asymptotic center of{xn}inC, respectively, that is,
rC,{xn} inf
lim sup
n
xn−x:x∈C
, AC,{xn}
x∈C: lim sup
n
xn−x rC,{xn}
.
2.3
It is known thatAC,{xn}is a nonempty weakly compact convex asCis.
Let{xn}and Cbe as above; then{xn}is called regular relative toC ifrC,{xn} rC,{xni}for all subsequence{xni}of {xn}; further,{xn} is called asymptotically uniform relative toCifAC,{xn} AC,{xni}for all subsequence{xni}of{xn}. In Banach spaces, we have the following results:
1 Goebel 10 and Lim 2 there always exists a subsequence of {xn} which is regular relative toC;
2 Kirk11ifCis separable, then{xn}contains a subsequence which is asymptoti- cally uniform relative toC.
IfDis a bounded subset ofX, the Chebyshev radius ofDrelative toCis defined by rCD inf
x∈Csup
y∈D
x−y. 2.4
In 2006, Dhompongsa et al.3introduced the Domnguez-Lorenzo condition DL condition, in shortin the following way.
Definition 2.1 see3. We say that a Banach spaceX satisfies the DL condition if there existsλ ∈ 0,1 such that for every weakly compact convex subsetC ofX and for every bounded sequence{xn}inCwhich is regular with respect toC,
rCAC,{xn}≤λrC,{xn}. 2.5
TheDLcondition implies weak normal structure3. We recll that a Banach spaceX is said to have a weak normal structurew-NSif for every weakly compact convex subsetC ofXwith diamC: sup{x−y:x, y∈C}>0 there existx∈Csuch that sup{x−y:y∈ C}<diamC.
The DL condition also implies the existence of fixed points for multivalued nonexpansive mappings.
Theorem 2.2see3. LetCbe a weakly compact convex subset of Banach spaceX; ifCsatisfies (DL) condition, then multivalued nonexpansive mappingT :C → KCChas a fixed point.
Definition 2.3see4. A Banach spaceXis said to have propertyDif there existsλ∈0,1 such that for every weakly compact convex subsetCofX and for every sequence{xn} ⊂C and for every{yn} ⊂AC,{xn}which are regular asymptotically uniform relative toC,
r C, yn
≤λrC,{xn}. 2.6
It was observed that propertyD is weaker than theDL condition and stronger than weak normal structure, and Dhompongsa et al.4proved that propertyDimplies the w-MFPP.
Theorem 2.4see4. LetCbe a weakly compact convex subset of Banach spaceX; ifCsatisfies property (D), then multivalued nonexpansive mappingT :C → KCChas a fixed point.
Before going to the results, let us recall some more definitions. LetXbe a Banach space.
The Benavides coefficientR1, Xis defined by Dom´ınguez Benavides [12] as
R1, X sup
lim inf
n→ ∞ {xnx}
, 2.7
where the supremum is taken over allx∈XwithX ≤1 and all weakly null sequence{xn}inBX
such that
Dxn: lim sup
n→ ∞ lim sup
m→ ∞ xn−xm ≤1. 2.8
Obviously, 1≤R1, X≤2.
The weakly convergent sequence coefficient WCSXis equivalently defined bysee 13
WCSX inf
limn /mxn−xm lim supnxn
, 2.9
where the infimum is taken over all weakly not strongly null sequences {xn} with limn /mxn−xmexisting.
The ultrapower of a Banach space has proved to be useful in many branches of mathematics. Many results can be seen more easily when treated in this setting.
First we recall some basic facts about ultrapowers. LetFbe a filter on an index setN and letXbe a Banach space. A sequencexninXconvergers toxwith respect toF, denoted by limFxn x, if for each neighborhoodUofx,{i∈I :xi∈U} ∈ F. A filterUonNis called an ultrafilter if it is maximal with respect to the set inclusion. An ultrafilter is called trivial if it is of the form{A⊂N, i0∈A}for some fixedi0∈N; otherwise, it is called nontrivial. Letl∞X denote the subspace of the product spaceΠi∈NXiequipped with the norm
xn: sup
n∈Nxn<∞. 2.10
LetUbe an ultrafilter onNand let NU
xn∈l∞X: lim
U xn 0
. 2.11
The ultrapower ofX, denoted byX, is the quotient space l∞X/NU equipped with the quotient norm. WritexnU to denote the elements of ultrapower. It follows from the definition of the quotient norm that
xnU lim
U xn. 2.12
Note that ifUis nontrivial, thenX can be embedded intoX isometrically. For more details see14.
3. Main Results
We first give some sufficient conditions which imply DL condition. The Jordan-von Neumann constantCNJXwas defined in 1937 by Clarkson15as
CNJX sup
⎧⎨
⎩
xy2x−y2 2
x2y2 : x, y∈X, xy/0
⎫⎬
⎭. 3.1
Theorem 3.1. LetX be a Banach space and Ca weakly compact convex subset ofX. Assume that {xn}is a bounded sequence inCwhich is regulary relative toC. Then
rCAC,{xn}≤ R1, X
2CNJX
R1, X 1 rC,{xn}. 3.2
Proof. Denoter rC,{xn}andA AC,{xn}. We can assume thatr >0. Since{xn} ⊂Cis bounded andCis a weakly compact set, by passing through a subsequence if necessary, we can also assume thatxnconverges weakly to some element inx∈Candd limn /mxn−xm exists. We note that since{xn}is regular,rC,{xn} rC,{yn}for any subsequence{yn}of {xn}. Observe that, since the norm is weak lower semicontinuity, we have
lim inf
n xn−x ≤lim inf
n lim inf
m xn−xm lim inf
n /m xn−xm d. 3.3 Letη >0; taking a subsequence if necessary, we can assume thatxn−x<dηfor alln.
Letz∈A. Then we have lim supnxn−z randx−z ≤lim infnxn−z ≤r. Denote R R1, X; by definition, we have
R≥lim inf
n
xn−x
dη z−x r
lim inf
n
xn−x
dη −x−z r
. 3.4
On the other hand, observe that the convexity ofCimpliesR−1/R1x 2/R 1z∈C; since the norm is weak lower semicontinuity, we have
lim inf
n
1
rxn−z 1 R
xn−x
dη −x−z r
lim inf
n
1
r 1
R dη
xn−
1 R
dη 1 Rr
x−
1 r − 1
Rr
z
≥
1 r − 1
Rr
x 2 Rrz−
1 r 1
Rr
z
1 r 1
Rr
R−1 R1x 2
R1z−z
≥ 1
r 1 Rr
rCA, lim inf
n
1
rxn−z− 1 R
xn−x
dη −x−z r
lim inf
n
1
r − 1 R
dη
xn−x− 1
r 1 Rr
z−x
≥ 1
r 1 Rr
z−x ≥ 1
r 1 Rr
rCA.
3.5
In the ultrapowerX ofX, we consider
u 1
r{xn−z}U ∈SX, v 1 R
xn−x
dη −x−z r
U∈BX. 3.6
Using the above estimates, we obtain uv lim
U
1
rxn−z 1 R
xn−x
dη −x−z r
≥ 1
r 1 Rr
rCA, u−v lim
U
1
rxn−z− 1 R
xn−x
dη −x−z r
≥ 1
r 1 Rr
rCA.
3.7
Therefore, we have
CNJ
X
≥ uv 2u−v 2 2
u2v 2
≥ 21/r1/Rr2rCA2 211
1 2
1 r 1
Rr 2
rCA2.
3.8
Since Jordan-von Neumann constantCNJX ofXequals toCNJXofX, we obtain
CNJX≥ 1 2
1 r 1
Rr 2
rCA2. 3.9
Hence we deduce the desired inequality.
By Theorems2.2and3.1, we have the following result.
Corollary 3.2. LetCbe a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a Banach space X such that CNJX< 1/R1, X 12/2 andT :C → KCCa nonexpansive mapping. ThenT has a fixed point.
Proof. sinceR1, X ≥ 1, ifCNJX < 1/R1, X 12/2, then we haveCNJX < 2 which implies thatXis uniformly nonsquare; henceX is reflexive. Thus by Theorems2.2and3.1, the result follows.
Remark 3.3. Note that JX2/2 ≤ CNJX; it is easy to see that Theorem 3.1 includes 6, Theorem 3andCorollary 3.2includes6, Corollary 2.
To characterize Hilbert space, Zb˘aganu defined the following Zb˘aganu constant:see 16
CZX supxyx−y
x2y2 : x, y∈X, xy>0
. 3.10
We first give the following tool.
Proposition 3.4. CZX CZX.
Proof. Clearly,CZX≤CZX. To show CZX ≤CZX, supposex, y∈X are not all zero.
Without loss of generality, we assumex a >0.
Let us chooseη∈0, a. Sincex limUxn aand
c: xy xy x2y 2 lim
U
xnynxn−yn xn2yn2 : lim
U cn, 3.11
the setA: {n∈N: |cn−c|< η and|xn −a|< η}belongs toU. In particular, noticing that xn/0 forn∈A, there existsnsuch that
xy xy
x 2y2 < xnynxn−yn xn2yn2 η
≤CZX η.
3.12
Hence, the inequalityCZX ≤CZXfollows from the arbitrariness ofη.
Theorem 3.5. LetX be a Banach space and Ca weakly compact convex subset ofX. Assume that {xn}is a bounded sequence inCwhich is regulary relative toC. Then
rCAC,{xn}≤ R1, X
2CZX
R1, X 1 rC,{xn}. 3.13
Proof. Letu, vbe as inTheorem 3.1. Then
uv ≥ 1
r 1 Rr
rCA, u−v ≥ 1
r 1 Rr
rCA. 3.14
Therefore, by the definition of Zb˘aganu constant, we have
CZ
X
≥ utvu−tv u2v 2
≥ 1 2
1 r 1
Rr 2
rCA2.
3.15
Since Zb˘aganu constantCZX ofXequals toCZXofX, we obtain
CZX≥ 1 2
1 r 1
Rr 2
rCA2. 3.16
Hence we deduce the desired inequality.
UsingTheorem 2.2, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 3.6. LetCbe a nonempty weakly compact convex subset of a Banach spaceX such that CZX <11/R1, X2/2 and letT : C → KCCbe a nonexpansive mapping. ThenT has a fixed point.
In the following, we present some properties concerning geometrical constants of Banach spaces which also imply the propertyD.
Theorem 3.7. LetXbe a Banach space. IfCZX<WCSX; thenXhas property (D).
Proof. LetC be a weakly compact convex subset ofX; suppose that{xn} ⊂ Cand{yn} ⊂ AC,{xn}are regular and asymptotically uniform relative toC. Passing to a subsequence of {yn}, still denoted by{yn}, we may assume thatyn−→w y0∈Candd limn /myn−ymexists.
Letr rC,{xn}. Again passing to a subsequence of{xn}, still denoted by{xn}, we assume in addition that
nlim→ ∞xn−y2n lim
n→ ∞xn−y2n1 lim
n→ ∞
xn− 1
2
y2ny2n1
r. 3.17
Let us consider an ultrapowerX ofX. Put
u 1
r xn−y2n
U, v 1
r xn−y2n1
U; 3.18
then we know thatu∈SX,v∈SX. We see that uv lim
U
xn−y2n
r xn−y2n1
r
2, 3.19 u−v lim
U
xn−y2n
r − xn−y2n1
r
lim
U
y2n−y2n1
r
d
r. 3.20
Thus, By the definition of Zb˘aganu constant, we have CZ
X
≥ uv u−v u 2v2 ≥ d
r. 3.21
Since the Zb˘aganu constants ofXand ofXare the same, we obtainCZX≥d/r. Now we estimatedas follows:
d lim
n /myn−ym lim
n /myn−y0
−
ym−y0
≥WCSXlim sup
n
yn−y0
≥WCSXr C, yn
.
3.22
HencerC,{yn} ≤ CZX/WCSXrC,{xn}and the assertion follows by the definition of propertyD.
Using Theorems2.4and3.7, we obtain the follwing corollary.
Corollary 3.8. LetCbe a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a reflexive Banach spaceXsuch thatCZX < WCSXand letT : C → KCCbe a nonexpansive mapping. ThenT has a fixed point.
The separation measure of noncompactness is defined by
βB sup ε: there exists a sequence{xn}inBsuch that sep{xn}≥ε
3.23 for any bounded subsetBof a Banach spaceX, where
sep{xn} inf{xn−xm: n /m}. 3.24 The modulus of noncompact convexity associated toβis defined in the following way:
ΔX,βε inf 1−d0, A: A⊂BX is convex, βA≥ε
. 3.25
The characteristic of noncompact convexity of X associated with the measure of noncompactnessβis defined by
εβX sup ε≥0 : ΔX,βε 0
. 3.26
WhenX is a reflexive Banach space, we have the following alternative expression for the modulus of noncompact convexity associated withβ,
εβX inf
1− x: {xn} ⊂BX, x w−lim
n xn, sep{xn}≥ε
. 3.27
It is known that X is NUC if and only ifεβX 0. The above-mentioned definitions and properties can be found in17.
Theorem 3.9. LetXbe a reflexive Banach space. IfεβX<WCSX, thenXhas property (D).
Proof. LetC be a weakly compact convex subset of X; suppose that{xn} ⊂ Cand {yj} ⊂ AC,{xn}are regular and asymptotically uniform relative toC. Passing to a subsequence of {yj}, still denoted by{yj}, we may assume thatyj −→w y0∈Candd limk /lyk−ylexists.
Letr rC,{xn}.
Since{y0, yj} ⊂AC,{xn}, we have lim sup
n
xn−y0 r, lim sup
n
xn−yj r, ∀j ∈N. 3.28 So for anyη≥0, there existsN∈Nsuch thatxN−y0 ≥r−ηandxN−yi ≤rη, for all j∈N.
Without loss of generality, we suppose thatyk−yl ≥ d−η for allk /l. Now we consider sequence{xN−yj/rη} ⊂BX; notice that
β
xN−yj
rη
≥ d−η
rη, xN−yj
rη
−→w xN−y0
rη . 3.29
By the definition ofΔX,β·, we have ΔX,β
d−η rη
≤1−
xN−y0
rη
≤1−r−η
rη. 3.30
Since the last inequality is true for anyη > 0, we obtainΔX,βd/r 0; thusεβX ≥ d/r.
Now we estimatedas follows:
d lim
k /lyk−yl lim
k /lyk−y0
−
yl−y0
≥WCSXlim sup
n
yn−y0
≥WCSXr C, yn
.
3.31
Hence,
r C, yn
≤ εβX
WCSXrC,{xn}. 3.32
Remark 3.10. Since εβX ≤ ε0X,Theorem 3.9 implies the 5, Theorem 3. Furthermore, it is easy to seeCNJX ≥ 1 ε0X2/4 ≥ 1 εβX2/4; thenTheorem 3.9also includes 4, Theorem 3.7.
ByTheorem 3.9, we obtain the following Corollary.
Corollary 3.11. LetCbe a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a reflexive Banach spaceX such thatεβX<WCSXand letT:C → KCCbe a nonexpansive mapping. ThenT has a fixed point.
Noticing WCSX ≥ 1, obviously,Corollary 3.11 extends the following well-known result.
Theorem 3.12see18, Theorem 3.5. LetCbe a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a reflexive Banach spaceXsuch thatεβX<1 and letT :C → KCCbe a nonexpansive mapping.
ThenT has a fixed point.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for providing some suggestions to improve the manuscript. This work was supported by China Natural Science Fund under grant 10571037.
References
1 S. B. Nadler Jr., “Multi-valued contraction mappings,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 30, pp. 475–
488, 1969.
2 T. C. Lim, “A fixed point theorem for multivalued nonexpansive mappings in a uniformly convex Banach space,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 80, pp. 1123–1126, 1974.
3 S. Dhompongsa, A. Kaewcharoen, and A. Kaewkhao, “The Dom´ınguez-Lorenzo condition and multivalued nonexpansive mappings,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 64, no.
5, pp. 958–970, 2006.
4 S. Dhompongsa, T. Dom´ınguez Benavides, A. Kaewcharoen, A. Kaewkhao, and B. Panyanak, “The Jordan-von Neumann constants and fixed points for multivalued nonexpansive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 320, no. 2, pp. 916–927, 2006.
5 S. Saejung, “Remarks on sufficient conditions for fixed points of multivalued nonexpansive mappings,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1649–1653, 2007.
6 B. Gavira, “Some geometric conditions which imply the fixed point property for multivalued nonexpansive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 339, no. 1, pp. 680–
690, 2008.
7 T. Dom´ınguez Benavides and B. Gavira, “The fixed point property for multivalued nonexpansive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 1471–1483, 2007.
8 A. Kaewkhao, “The James constant, the Jordan-von Neumann constant, weak orthogonality, and fixed points for multivalued mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 333, no. 2, pp.
950–958, 2007.
9 T. Dom´ınguez Benavides and B. Gavira, “Does Kirk’s theorem hold for multivalued nonexpansive mappings?” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 546761, 20 pages, 2010.
10 K. Goebel, “On a fixed point theorem for multivalued nonexpansive mappings,” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, vol. 29, pp. 69–72, 1975.
11 W. A. Kirk, “Nonexpansive mappings in product spaces, set-valued mappings and k-uniform rotundity,” in Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications, vol. 45 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., pp. 51–64, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, USA, 1986.
12 T. Dominguez Benavides, “A geometrical coefficient implying the fixed point property and stability results,” Houston Journal of Mathematics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 835–849, 1996.
13 B. Sims and M. A. Smyth, “On some Banach space properties sufficient for weak normal structure and their permanence properties,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 351, no. 2, pp.
497–513, 1999.
14 B. Sims, “Ultra”-Techniques in Banach Space Theory, vol. 60 of Queen’s Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, 1982.
15 J. A. Clarkson, “The von Neumann-Jordan constant for the Lebesgue spaces,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 114–115, 1937.
16 G. Zb˘aganu, “An inequality of M. R˘adulescu and S. R˘adulescu which characterizes the inner product spaces,” Revue Roumaine de Math´ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ees, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 253–257, 2002.
17 J. M. Ayerbe Toledano, T. Dom´ınguez Benavides, and G. L ´opez Acedo, Measures of Noncompactness in Metric Fixed Point Theory, vol. 99 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Birkh¨auser, Basel, Switzerland, 1997.
18 T. Dom´ınguez Benavides and P. Lorenzo Ram´ırez, “Asymptotic centers and fixed points for multivalued nonexpansive mappings,” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sk lodowska. Sectio A, vol.
58, pp. 37–45, 2004.