• 検索結果がありません。

International Transferability of the Japanese Production System : Japanese-affiliated Auto Plants in the U.S.A., the U.K., and Taiwan

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "International Transferability of the Japanese Production System : Japanese-affiliated Auto Plants in the U.S.A., the U.K., and Taiwan"

Copied!
21
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

International Transferability of the Japanese Production System : Japanese‑affiliated Auto Plants in the U.S.A., the U.K., and Taiwan

著者 KUMON Hiroshi

出版者 Institute of Comparative Economic Studies, Hosei University

journal or

publication title

Journal of International Economic Studies

volume 8

page range 59‑78

year 1994‑03

URL http://doi.org/10.15002/00002116

(2)

JoumaloflnternationalEconomicStudies(1994),No.8,59-78

o1994ThelnBtituteofComparativeEconomicStudies,HoseiUniversity

lnternationalTransferabilityoftheJapanese ProductionSystem:Japanese-affH1iated

AutoP1antsintheU8.A.,

theU.K、,andTaiwan

HiroShiKum⑪n

P7o/bsso7O/Eco7zomjcs

FhcnZtyO/SocjoJOgy,HOSeZU7zjuersjZy

Abstract

ThispaperaimstoexplaintheintemationaltransfbrabilityoftheJapaneseproduction systembasedonfieldresearch・Japanese-afYiliatedautoplantssucceedinapplyingthe JapanesesystemintheU.S、A、,theU.K、,andTaiwan,inspiteofhavingdifYbrentmanage- ria]envlronmentsfromJapan・Atthesametime,interestingresultsaregainedthrough usingourintemationalizationmodelfbrJapanesemultinationalenterprises・Thereisagap betweenarealapplicationpatternofthesystemandanexpectableapplicationpattern whichisassumablefi・omlocalmanagerialenvironments、AlthoughboththeUS.A・andthe U.K・havesimilarcharacteristicfbaturesintheirmanagerialenvironments,diffbringwhen comparedwithTaiwan,theplantslocatedinthetwodevelopedcountriesdisplayadiHbrent applicationpatternfiPomeachother・ItisnormalthattheAmericanplantsshowadifYbrent patternfromtheTaiwaneseplants・Interestingly,theBritishp]antsshowasimilarapplica‐

tionpatternwithTaiwaneseplantsonimportantitems.

l・Introduction

Themainpurposeofthispaperistoexplaintheinternationaltransfbrabilityof theJapaneseproductionsystem,basedonfieldresearchonJapanese-afYiliated autoplantsintheUS.A,,theU.K、,andTaiwan・IhadachancetovisitJapanese‐

afYiliatedautoplantsinthosethreecountries・RegardingtheUS.A・andTaiwan,I couldresearchallJapanese-afYIliatedplantsoperatingthere,butintheU.K、I

couldvisitonlytwoplants,whichhadstartedoperation・Icouldnotvisittheother

twoautoplantsintheU.K、,whichwerebothunderconstruction・Althoughlcan,t denythatfindingsontheincompletedtwoU.K、plantsmightpossiblydifYbrfrom

mypresentresults,aftervisitingthetwoplants,Iamsurethattheresultsac-

quiredrevealtherealsituationanyway・IhavealsovisitedmanyJapanese-afYili-

atedautoplantslocatedinCanada,Korea,Malaysia,andThailandasamemberof

theJapaneseMultinationalEnterprisesStudyGroup(refbrredtoasJMESGhere-

after)orindividually(').

ThereasonswhyIchosetheUSA.,theU.K、,andTaiwanfbrthispaperareas

fbllows・First,Japaneseautomakersputgreatimportanceonthesethreecountries andthemainautomakershavehadsubsidiariesthere、Second,thethreecountries

belongtoNorthAmerica,Europe,andAsia,andplantslocatedthererepresent

59

(3)

lntemationaITrans化rabilityoftheJapaneseProductio、System

moreorlessotherJapanese-afYiliatedplantsestablishedinneighboringcountries・

AsamatteroffbIct,IhavenoticedquitecommoncharacteristicsbetweenAmerican plantsandCanadianplantsandbetweenotherAsianplantsandTaiwaneseplants、

Ofcourse,thethreecountrieshavetheirindividualidentitiesandJapaneseplants therehavesomekindofuniqueness,however,thoseplantsgiveastandardof judgementfbrtherealstateofJapaneseplantslocatedinneighboringcountries、

TheJMESGcreatedatheoreticalmodelfbrthestudyofJapanesemultination‐

alswhichisnamedthe“Application-AdaptationDilemmaModel',、Japanesemanu‐

facturingfirmspossessauniqueproductionsystemwhichwecallthe“Japanese ProductionSystem"・Japaneseapplyitatlocalplants,becausetheyneedtheir manuflacturingsysteminordertoretaintheircompetitiveadvantageabroad、They candisplaytheiradvantageasJapaneseHrmsbyapplicationofthesystem・Onthe otherhand,theyshouldadaptthemselvestolocalmanagerialenvironments,They shouldemploylocalworkersandadapttolocalcustomsandmstitutions、However,

iftheyadapttolocalenvironmentscompletely,theywillloosetheiradvantage,

becausetheywillnotbedifYbrenth・omindigenouslocalfirms・Sowethoughtthat JapanesemultinationalsfHllintoadilemmawiththeapplicationoftheJapanese productionsystem,ononehand,andtheadaptation,ontheotherhandTheJapa-

neseproductionsystemoriginatedfiPomtheJapaneseculture,itshistolyandmana‐

gerialpractices・Itseemsthatitisnoteasytoapplyitatlocalplants、Supposethat localplantsbecomeakindofhybridmctorywhichmixesapplicationwithadapta‐

tioninsomeway,hybridismwillbedeterminedbysuchfHctorsas,thecorporate strategyandthecongenialityofthelocalenvironmentstotheJapanesesystem、

TheJMESG,sApplicationAdaptationDilemmaModelputsonanempiricalnum‐

beronthesedifY1erentfnctorsallowinganeasycomparison・

Followingthisintroduction,‘`IIProfileoftheTargetedP1ants',explainsthe characteroftheJapanese-afYiliatedautoplantsinthethreecountries,Regarding thescaleoftheplants,manufacturedcarmodels,andentryfbrms,boththeplants intheUS.A、andtheU.K,havemuchincommon,buttheplantsinTaiwanare difYbrentfromthem.

“IILAnAnalysisoftheRateofApplication,,showselementsoftheJapanese productionsystemanditsinternationalizationmodeLTheinternationalizationmodel isananalyticaltooltopointouttheapplicationsituationattargetedplants・The analysisshowsthattheJapaneseproductionsystemisapplicableinthethree countriesataratherhighleveland,inaddition,eachcountryhasadifYbrent applicationpatternAfterthat,Iwillexpresstherealsituationofapplicationby usingcontraststolocalmanagerialenvironments、Interestinglyenough,thereisa casewheretherealapplicationpatternisdifYbrentfromthepatternwhichis fbreseeablefi・omthemanagerialenvironments・BoththeU、SA・andtheU.K・have

(1)TheJMESG,fimdedbytheToyotaFoundation,conductedneldresearchonJapanese-afYIliated manufncturingp]antS(autoassembly,autoparts,homeelectronics,semiconductor)inNorthAmerica inl989・Wepublishedtheresu]tsofthestudyasAbo,TetsuoeZal.,Ame7jAanLiIhi7zJIVZhonteAi Sejsα〃Shjsmem:Ce"chjKlnjyono`meABjyo'10`Tejbjo,,ToyoKeizaiShinposha,1991,(AboaaZ,Hy6rja Ftuctol3y,TheOxfbrdUniversityPress,fbrthcominginl994).Thegrouphasconductedneldresearch onthesamekindofpIantsinKoreaandTaiwaninl992andinSingapore,Malaysia,andThailand inl993,fimdingfbrwhichwereprovidedbytheMonbushqThispaperisbasedonmyfieldresearch whichIconductedbothbymyselfandasamemberofthegrouplindividuallyvisitedJapanese‐

afY11iatedautoplantsintheUSA・inl988andl989,intheU.K・inl991andl992,andinTaiwan

inl990.

60

(4)

HiroshiKumon

manysimilaritiesbetweentheirmanagelialenvlronments・Taiwaneseenvironments,

however,aresimilartoJapanasanAsiancountry・TheAmericanplants,applica‐

tionpatterniscontrastivetotheTaiwaneseplants,whichisunderstandablefTom

theenvironmentalsituationHowever,theU.K・plantsdemonstratesimilarpat- ternswithTaiwaninsomecases、TheU.K・showsmuchmorenexibilityintaking

ontheJapanesesystemthantheUSA・

Finally,in‘`V・ConcludingRemarks'’1wouldliketogiveasummaryofthe

paper.

n.ProfileoftheTargetedAutoP1ants

Here,Iwouldliketoexaminetheplantsinthethreecountriesregardingtheir plantscale,productionmodels,andentryfbrms、Thedescriptionwillshowthat

therearesomesimilarcharacteristicsinthetheUS.A・andtheU.K・ButTaiwan‐

eseplantsarediffbrentfiQomthem(SeeTablesl’2,and3).

First,regardingplantscale,intheU・SA・andtheU.K、theplantsaresetupfbr highvolumeandequippedwithstate-ofLthe-artfncilitiesTheylookveryniceon theoutsideonthehugesiteandnoexpenseseemstohavebeensparedTaiwa、,on theotherhand,haslowvolumetypeplantsbuiltundercontrolledspendingCon‐

cretelyspeaking,Americanplantshaveanannualcapacityofmorethan200,OOO units,which,ingeneral,isconceivedasamassproductionplant・Autofirmswhich arenotabletosellthesamevolumeofcarsintheUS.Awentintojointventures withanAmericanpartneroraJapanesemanufblcturers・Only“AF”(seeTablel)

hasnotreached200,OOOunitsincapacity,butitsgoalis200,OOOunits

TheplantsintheU.K、,alsoplanover200,000unitsasagoalandoneplant

"BB,,,whichstartedoperationinl984,hasalreadyattained300,OOOunitsinca- pacity・ThetwonewerplantstargetlOO,OOOunitsfbrthefirstphase・PlantBGisa restructuredplant,whichproducestrucksandrecreationalvehicles,fbrminga jointventurewithanAmericanpartner,andisalowvolumetypeTheymanufac‐

tureonlyl,2,or3difYbrentmodels、BystrategicaUyrestrictingproductionmodels theyincreasethesalesofvariousmodelsofimportcarsfi・omJapan

Taiwaneseplantsarealowvolumetypewithvariousmodels・Plantcapacityis lessthanlOO,OOOunitsannually,tosaynothingof200,OOOunits,manufacturing variouskindsofproducts・Forexample,plant“TB",havingthelongesthistory there,producesfivedifYbrentkindsofbothpassengercarsandtrucks・

Asfbrentryfbrm,theU・SA、andtheU.K・aresimilar,but,again,Taiwanis diffbrentBothsoleentryandjointventureareseeninthetwodevelopedcoun- tries,butinTaiwantheonlyentryfbrmisjointventurewithalocalpartner・Asa ruleJapanesehavemanagmgauthorityoveraplanteveninthecaseofajoint venture,butthesituationisdifYbrentinTaiwan・LocalHrmshaveatendencyto controlplantsbythemselves、LocalpartnersmanageinthethreeplantsTB,TC,

andTD,TheJapanese,however,haveaninitiativeinmanagementinthecaseof TAandTF,whichstartedoperationafterl985・Inl985theTaiwanesegovernment changedtheautomobileindustrypolicyfromoneofprotectiontooneofincreasing importsbyreducingimporttari雌andstimulatingjointventureswithfbreign fIrms・Afterthat,evenlocalmanagersadoptedtheJapaneseproductionsystemt0

61

(5)

lntemationalTransfbrabilityoftheJapaneseProductionSystem

TablelJapaIlegeAutomakers,U、SA・ManufacturingOperations

…ト…|鯛琵|照鱸bl棚,|……|鰹wo

lJapanese

:二i:::I:::鶚

;二言:::|圏・…,

Ohio ACpl

ACp2 Ohio PassCar2 10,200 500(4.9)

PasSCar2

Truckl 5,870 20(03〕

TennesseelJune,l9831SoleEntryl45qOOO AB

PassCar2 TlPuckl JV.

(GM) 260,000 3,883 38(1.0)

AA11CalifbmialDec.,1984

mnlSen-19t

naE 1911

Sources:JapanAutomobileManumcturersAssociation,Inc・I993TソieMOtorI"dzJstlyO/

jtZpQ〃andothers.

Table2QJapaneseAutomakers,U、K・ManufacturingOperations

Sources:JapanAutomobileManuftlcturersAssociation,Inc・I993Z1ノieMororDzd"s”O/

JtZpmzandothers.

copewithinternationalcompetition・Ofcourse,plantTAandTFhavebeentrymg toputthesystemintopracticesincestart-upThoughTaiwanisverycloseto JapangeographicallyandhasalonghistolyofbusinesswithJapan,1ocalpartners didnotadmittoanadvantageinadoptionoftheJapanesesystembefbrel985・

WhentheJapanesewentintoTaiwan,theydidsoinacasualmanner,andbuilt ]owvolumetypeplants・Japanesecompameshavethepowertomanageaplant eveninthecaseofajointventureindevelopedcountries,but,inTaiwan,thereare twodifYerentcasesthatmanagementauthorityisheldbythelocalpartneroris passedtotheJapaneseside・ThedifTbrencedependsonthemarketscale,the characterofthelocalpartner,andgovernmentpolicy・Taiwaneseplantsstarted operationasaknocked-downtypebuiltonasmallscaleduetotherestricted

62

(6)

HiroshiKumon

Table3JapaneBeAutomakers,TaiwanManufacturingOperations

囮mploye・北患翻::7蝿)

-J

≦iL=i姜菫

Plant

辻蓋÷

TDDec.,1973

40,OOOlPass・Car214.380

87,OOOlTruck51

Pass,Carll 2PO9

'986145,OOOlP鞘fall

34(18)

TAiMay,1984

11(2.0)

198642,000 TFlMay,1989

Sources:Interviewsandothers.

market・Thentheyincreasedproductioncapacityandraisedthenumberoflocal parts・ThecapitalistsormanagersareChineseTheydonotliketorelyupon JapanesemanagersandchooseindependentmanagementinsteadWecanexpect

thesamekindofsitnationinotherAsiancountriesmoreorless.

llLAnAnalysisoftheRateofApplication

Asmentionedabove,boththeU・SA・andtheU.K、havemuchsimilaritieseach otherbutTaiwanisdifTbrentfromthemregardingthecharacterofplantsand managementauthority、HowdotheyapplytheJapaneseproductionsystemthere?

TheJapaneseproductionsystemisfbrmedbythreepivotalelements・Thefirst isaworksiteorientedworkorganizationSpecificfbaturesarenexibleworkas‐

signments,workers,participationinworkandimprovementofit,anddetermina‐

tionofwageandpromotionbyseniorityandabilityJobtasksareassignedtoa teamheadedbyafbremanAjobisnotassignedtoaspecificworkerexclusively butreallocatedflexiblywithintheteam・Ofcourse,eachworker,sworkloadand speedaredeterminedprecisely,buttheyarereallocatedtootherworkersand elementtasksarereorganizablewithintheteam、workersareexpectedtobe multiskilled,perfbrmingvariouskindsofjobs、Thefbremanevaluateseachworker,s perfbrmanceandtheresultoftheperfbrmanceevaluationdetermineswagein- creaseaswellaspromotion.Thefbremansetaworkstandardwhichreflectsthe resultsofimprovementactivities・Workersarepromotedwithintheworkorganiza‐

tionwhilegettingawiderangeofskillsThesecondpivotalelementisarational productioncontrolthateliminateswastecompletely・Aplantkeepspartsandstock toaminimumlevel,andpartswhicharemanufacturedorstockedwithintheplant areprovidedinaccordancewithfinalassemblyrequirements、Theproductionin previousstagesandpartmanufblcturersarerequiredtosynchronizewithproduc‐

tioninthefmalassemblyprocess・Ordinaryworkersarerequiredtotakeresponsi‐

bilityfbrthequalityoftheproductsothattimeandmaterialsarenotwasted Workersparticipateinthe“kaizen,,,orimprovementactivitiestoeliminatewaste

63

(7)

lnternationalTransfbrabilityoftheJapaneseProductionSystem

andimprovethequalityoftheproduct・

Thethirdelementisparticipativemanagementinharmonywiththeworksite orientedworkorganizationManagersarerequiredtograspdirectlywhathas occurredattheworksitethroughongoingcommunication・AnopenstyleofTiceis neededintheareaofwhitecollarworkers、Thisallowsemployeeswhoareinter‐

estedinmanagementtargetstoconcentrateonrisinginmanagementthrougha participativesystem,whichincludessmallgroupactivities,meetingsatshops,and confbrencesbetweenmanagementandlaborunion・

TheJMESGcreatedaninternationalizationmodeloftheJapaneseproduction system(2),andarrangeditinto23items・WeevaluateeachelementonafWepoints scaletoshowanapplicationratio・Ifapracticeofanitematthelocalplantisthe sameasattheplantinJapan,wegivefivepointsConverselyifapracticeatthe localplantisthesameasanindigenousfIrm,wegiveitlpoint・Theevaluation systemallowsustorecognizetherateofapplicationatthelocalplantquantita- tivelyeventhoughitisnotstrictlypreciseThequantitativeanalysisnotonly makesitpossibletounderstandtheapplicationsituationofeachiteminquantity,

butitalsomakespossibletograsptheapplicationpatternbygroupingrelated items・WehavetwodifYbrentkindsofgroupingscalledthe“SixGroupsEvaluation,,

andthe“FourAspectsEvaluation',、RegardingthefIrstone,weclassifIedthe23 itemsintosixgroups:“I・WorkOrganization,,,``I1.ProductionControl,,,``111.Parts Procurements'',“1V・Participation,',“V・LaborRelations,,,and“V1.Parent-Subsid‐

iaryRelations"・Weconsidertheworkorganizationandtheproductioncontrolas thecoreofthesystem,andplacetheotherfburgroupsastheframeworkfbr makingthecoregroupsworkwell

Asfbrthe“FourAspectsEvaluation",wereclassifledspecifIcitemsoutofthe23 intofburaspectgroups・Thefburaspectsinclude``Human,',indicatinghumanitems,

``Material,,,indicatingmaterialitems,`Method',,showingthesystem-relateditems,

and``Result,',showingready-made-relateditems・Ofthat,“Method,'isdifYIcultto applyand“Result,,iseasytobringin、ThisclassifIcationallowsustoassessthe contentofthetechnologytransferbyanalyzingthecombinationpatternsofthe fburaspects・

Nowletusseetherateofapplicationfbrthethreecountries.AccordingtoTable 4:HybridRatiofbrThreeCountries,therateofapplicationisasfbllows:boththe US.A、andTaiwanare3、5,andtheU.K、is3.3.Theseratiosmeanthatallthree countrieshaveanapplicationofthesystematahighleveLTheresultsofthe researchstudyonautoassembly,autoparts,homeelectronics,andsemiconductors inNorthAmericainl989,fbundtheaveragerateofapplicationwas3.3.Separate industryaverageswere:autoassembly35,autoparts3,6,semiconductor3,2,and homeelectronics2,7(AboetaZ,1991).Weconcludedfi・omthel989studythatboth autoassemblyandpartswereanapplication-orientedtypeindustry,andthat homeelectronicswasadaptation-orientedThus,asfnrasviewingtheapplication situationfromtheaverageratio,Japaneseflrmsaremanagingtheirinternational plantsbyapplyingtheJapaneseproductionsystem、

Generallyspeaking,therearemanysimilaritiesintheenvironmentsofthe

(2)RegardingthestandardevaluationmodelIbrthe23itemsoftheJapaneseproductionsystem,see

AboemJ.,1991:33-5.

64

(8)

HiroshiKumon

RatiofOrThreeCountries Table4Hybrid

UnitedKingdom Taiwan UnitedSatesofAmerica

9句086444■■●●●●● 3533343

1川005000■●●●●●● 4543444

3.3 4.8 3.2 34 31 2.1 3.2 WorkOrganization

JobClassifIcation JobRotation

EducationandTraining RoleofSupervlsor WageSystem Promotion I.

●■Bロ●●已一■■一(⑭一死】一m二m)△幻犯一一戸.(叩)《牢一屋亜)

3.6 lLProductionControl 3.4 3.3

3.6 3.8 3.2 3.8

0000 ●■●0 2434

9099 ●●中●3422

ProductionEquipment QualityControl

Maintenance

OperationContro]

7.

8.

9.

10.

2.222 ●■■● 2》005 3.0 111.PartsProcurement 3.0

406 ●0● 233

380

●の●233

LocalContent Suppliers

ProcurementSystems

11.

12.

13.

9.080 曰●●●3巻434

8密005●●●● 3》443

9.746

●‐●●■ 3J244

Participation

SmallGroupActivities InfbrmationSharing Unity

1V.

14.

15.

16.

3》4533 ●●●●巳9.0050 3.6

2州3922●6●●● 4-4443

V,LaborRelations

3.0 3.6 4.2 3.4

EmploymentPolicy EmploymentSecurity

Union Grievance

●■●■ 一”’口。(u二面)(叩】エ》(串叩叩》『ロロユョロロユ・□■((叩一(】

2.122 ●●■● 0550 2.2 3.5

3.8 33 3.3

Parent-SubsidiaryRelations RatioofJapaneseExpatriates DelegationofPower

StatusofLocalManager VI.

646 ●●c 122

■●● ■。□((叩夕(一(叩二m)(叩クニ(叩夕](叩一生】

3.5 3.5 3.3

TotalAverage

includes2plants,and

Canada.U・K

Note:U、SA・includes9plantswith2plantsin Taiwanincludes5plants.

U・SA・andtheU.K、,whereasTaiwanisdiffbrentfromthetwo・Thatistosay,

thereisanAnglo-Americansimilarityintheworkorganization,theproduction

control,partprocurements;thejobclassificationssystem,wagesbasedonthejob,

inflexibleworkassignments,cleardivisionoflaborbetweenmanufacturingwork-

ersandqualitycontrolworkers,andbetweenskilledworkersandunskilledwork‐

ers,andthepossibilityofimportantpartsprocurementswithinthecountryorfrom

neighboringcountries、Ontheotherhand,thereisnojobclassifIcationssystem

whichdeterminesworkassignmentsandwagesinTaiwan,Therewageisdeter‐

65

(9)

InternationalTran8化rabilityoFtheJapaneseProductionSystem

minedbyeducationalbackgroundandseniorityaswellasqualificationswithinthe

company・AlthoughTaiwanhasnothadacustomofhavingmulti-skilledworkers,

itispossibletoimplementthepracticeduetothenonexistenceofademarcation

systembasedonjobclassificationsortitlesButlcanseethatthekeyweakpoints

inTaiwanarethefaultofthesystematicproductionsystemandalackofself procurementofkeyparts・

Asmentionedabove,Anglo-Americansimilarityexistsclearlyintheworkorga‐

nization,productioncontroLandpartprocurements,butTaiwanisdiffbrent・Tai-

waneseworkorganizationissimilartoJapanbutdifYbrentfTomJapaninthefIeld

ofproductioncontrolandpartsprocurements、so,inregardstoenvironmental patterns,thesamefbaturesexistintheUS.A・andtheU.K、,butTaiwanhas

uniqueness、However,thereisaninterestingtrendintherealapplicationpattern Thatis,boththeU・SA、andTaiwanshowacontrastingpatterningeneral,butthe U.K・showsasubtletrend,whichisclosetoTaiwaninsomegroupsThereisa

discrepancybetweentheexpectableapplicationpatternfbreseeablefromthemana‐

gerialenvironmentsandtherealapplicationpattern

Regardinggroupswhichindicatealargegapofapplicationrateamongcoun- tries-suchasworkOrganization,partsprocurementsandparent-subsidiaryrela- tions-thereexistsaninterestmgdifYierencebetweentherealapplicationrateand

theexpectableapplicationpatternbasedonthemanagerialenvironments・The averagerateofworkorganizationindicatesa3、3pointfbrtheU・SA、Ontheother

hand,itindicatesa41pointsfbrtheU.K、and3.9fbrTaiwan,whichmeansan

extremelyhighrateofapplication・ThehighratesfbrtheU.K・andTaiwanare

becausetheU.K・plantsadopttheJapanese-styleworkorganizationveryflexibly andTaiwaneseplantsadoptthesystemeasilyduetoaninstitutionalsimilarityin thegrouplnaddition,boththeU.K・andTaiwanarecloseinpointsintheparent- subsidiarygroupTheU.K・has2.OpointsandTaiwanhas2、2points,showingthe attainmentoflocalizationofmanagement・TheUS.A・has3.5points,meaningthat Japaneseexpatriatesplayanimportantroleinplantmanagementandlocalplants

relyontheJapaneseparentfirmsinvarlousHelds・

AnexaminationofthepartsprocurementgroupalsopointsoutadifYbrence amongthecountrieswithboththeU.S、A,andTaiwanhaving30pointsandthe U.K・having20points・Japanesepartmakersmakeinroadsinlargenumbersinto

theUS.A・andTaiwan,sosomeofthemfbrmintimatetransactionrelationswith

assemblymakersthataresimilartothe“Keiretu',usedinJapan・Japaneseassem‐

blymakersmustconsiderthestrictlocalcontentruleonthepartoftheECand

thatnotmanypartmakersgomtotheU.K・orEurope,sothelocalizationof

procurementsgrowsthere

TherearenodistinguishablediHbrencesinthegroupsofproductioncontroland participationamongthecountries,butthereisasubtledifTbrenceinthelabor relationsgroup・AO3pointdiffbrenceexistsbetweeneachofthecountries・The

US.A、has4.2points,theU.K・has39pointsandTaiwanhas3、6points・Japanese

fIrmstakeacarefnlstanceagainstlaborpracticesintheUS.A・andtheU.K・due

toadversarialpracticesinthepastandchooseaprudentresponsetothem,though

experiencinganexcessivereactionsometimesJapanesemakeaprudentchoiceof sitelocation,arecarefUUyinconsideringworkethic,arecautiousintheselection

ofemployees,etc・Ontheotherhand,theydonotemphasizetheJapanesestylein

66

(10)

HiroshiKumon

Taiwan、Asstatedabove,beingdifYbrentfromtheimageattainedoutoftheenvi‐

ronmentsfbrthethreecountries,thesameapplicationpatternisrecordedbythe U.K、andTaiwanasfbrtheworkorganizationandtheparent-subsidiaryrelations Buttheaveragepointsfbrlaborrelationswhichconstituteaframeworkfbrapply- ingthecorepartsofthesystem,suchasworkorganizationandproductioncontrol isratedatthehighestintheU、SA.,secondintheU.K,andthethird,andlowest,

inTaiwan・ThisimpliesthatJapaneseHrmspaycarefUlattentioninapplyingthe coreelementsofJapaneselaborpracticesintheU.SA・andtheU.K・

Next,letusseetheothersideoftheapplicationbyfbcusingontheFourAspects Evaluation(seeTable5).Comparing“Methods,,,whicharedifYIculttoputinto efIbctindiffbrentenvironments,with“Result8,,,whichareeasytoputintoefYbct,

theU、SA・hasadifYbrencefromtheothertwocountries・Namely,theU・SA・has 3.5pointsfbrthemethodsand3、4pointsfbrtheresults,meaningthatahighrate ofapplicationinthemethodsneedsahighrateofapplicationintheresults・Con- trarytothis,thereisagapintheapplicationratesbetweenthemethodsand resultsinthecaseoftheothertwocountries・TheU.K・records38pointsfbrthe methodsandL9pointsfbrtheresultswhileTaiwanindicates3、8pointsfbrthe methodsand2,6pointsfbrtheresults・Twocountriesapplythemethods,thatare difficulttoputmtoeffbct,atahighlevelwithoutrelyingonthesamehighrateof applicationonthepartoftheresultslnotherwords,ahighapplicationlevelofthe methodsispossiblewithalowapplicationleveloftheresults・

Breakingdownthefburaspects,both``Humanmethods,,and“Humanresults,,

recordthesamea6pointsintheU・SA・However,boththeU.K・andTaiwanrecord higherpointsinthe“Humanmethods”andshowlowerpointsin“Humanresults”

thantheU・SA・AsfbrtheU.K,,“Humanmethods,,is4.0and“Humanresults',is 1.8.InthecaseofTaiwan,``Humanmethods,'is3.9and“Humanresults”is2.L

Iseethesametrendregardingthe`Materials,,category,eventhoughitisnotas clearaswiththe“Human,,categCry・Thatis,althoughtheUS.A・records3、3in

Table5FourAspectsEvaluationofHybridRatiofbrThreeCountries

Material Human

Methods ResultsMethodsResults MethodsResults

496 ●●● 312

300 ●●● 323

3.5 3.8

3.8 US.A、

U、K・

Taiwan

325 ●CD 333

609 343

3.6 1.8 2.1

Sources:CalculationbytheJMESGandauthor・

Notes:(1)HumanMethodsincludeJobClassifIcation,JobRotation,EducationandTrain‐

ing,Supervisor,WageSystem,Promotion,SmallGroupActivities,Infbrmation Sharing,Unity,EmploymentSecurity,andGrievance.

(2)HumanResultsincludeRatioofJapaneseExpatriatesandStatusofLocalMan‐

agers.

(3)MaterialMethodsincludeQualityControl,MaintenanceandProcurementSys‐

tems.

(4)MaterialResultsincludeProductionEquipment,LocalContentandSuppliers.

(5)MethodsincludebothHumanandManterialMethods.

(6)ResultsincludebothHumanandMaterialResults.

67

(11)

lntemationalTransfbrabilityoftheJapaneseProductionSystem

both“Materialmethods”and``Materialresults,,,theU.K・andTaiwanshowhigher

pointsinthemethodsthanintheresults,WhentheplantsintheUS.A、applythe systematahighlevel,theyneedtobringtheresultstothesamelevelfbrthe materialcategoryaswellasthehumancategoly、ButintheU.K・andTaiwan,itis possibletoapplythesystematahighlevelwithoutthesamehighlevelofapplica‐

tionoftheresults.

1V・ApplicationSituationoftheJapaneseProductionSystem

Japanese-affiliatedautoplantsinthethreecountriesshowanapplicationorien-

tationofthesystem,buttheyhavedifYbrenttypesofpatterns・Generallyspeaking,

theapplicationpatternindicatesacontrastbetweentheU・SA・andTaiwanThe

U.K、showsthesamepatternasTaiwanThefblIowingisaconcreteexplanationof

arealapplicationsituationunderthesixgroupsclassification.

1.WorkOrganization

Theaveragerateofapplicationintheworkorganizationgroupisa3fbrthe

U、SA.,4.1fbrtheU.K・and3.9fbrTaiwan、Thoughallthreecountriesexpressan

applicationorientation,itisacharacteristicfbaturethatboththeU.K、andTaiwan displayanespeciallyhighratinginthisgroup・Asstatedearlier,oneofthebasic constituentsofthesystemisaworksiteorientedworkorganizationWehave identifIedsixitemsaspartsofthegroup:jobclassification,jobrotation,education

andtraining,roleofsupervisor,wagesystem,andpromotionLookingatthelocal

environmentsofthethreecountries,itisimpossibletodenyanexistenceofsimi‐

laritybetweentheU・SA、andtheUK、Thejobdeterminesworkcontentandwage,

andthejobladderconstitutesthepromotionrouteWorkcontentorpositionis

fIxedduetojobcontracts,Animprovementintheworkflowisataskfbrindustrial engineersandworkersdonottakepartinit・Eventhoughthereisadiffbrence

betweentheUSA・andtheU・Kinthewaythejobiscontrolledbytheunion (TollidayandZeitlin,1987),theyhavemuchincommonmtheirworkOrganization,

especiallywhencomparedwithAsianJapanandTaiwan

Contrarytothis,undertheJapanesesystem,aconceptofjobwhichplaysan

integralroleintheworkorganizationintheabovetwodevelopedcountriesdoes

notexishWagesystem,work,andpromotionarenotconnectedbytheintegraljob

concept,Educationalbackground,lengthofserviceandjobqualificationswithin thecompanyserveaspivotalelementswhichfbrmanemployee,sorderwithinthe company・Wageisdeterminedbyeducationalbackground,seniorityandability・

Workscopeisprescribedwidely,andjobrotationisimplementedsystematically、

Promotionfbllowswithinbothpositionandcompanyqualifications・Workersare expectedtobemultiskilledandtotakepartin``kaizen,,orimprovementactivities AccordingtoourfIeldresearch,traditionalworkorganizationinTaiwanissimilar

toJapananddifYbrentfromtheAnglo-Americantype・ThereisaqualifIcation systemonlyefYbctivewithinthecompanyanddoesnotexistasanintegraljob conceptwhichdeterminesworkscope,wageandpromotionladder・Thecompany qualiHcationisdeterminedbyeducationalbackground,lengthofserviceandper‐

68

(12)

HiroshiKumon

fbrmanceevaluationButperfbrmanceevaluationshavebeendonebythefbremen undervaguestandards、Therehasnotbeenajobrotationsystemnorhaveworkers expectedtobemultiskilledAccordingly,traditionalTaiwaneseworkorganization issimilartoJapaninthateducationalbackground,lengthofserviceandcompany qualifIcationsranktheemployees、

SoboththeUS.A・andtheU.K、havemuchincommonwiththetraditionallocal

workorganization,whereasTaiwanhasmuchincommonwithJapan,Howabout therealapplicationpattern?

WepresumedthatJapanesefirmswouldhavediffIcultyinapplyingtheirsys- temintheU・SA・andtheU.K、andnodifYIcultyinTaiwan・Inreality,theyapply thesystemsuccessfnllyinallthreecountriesJapaneseflrmsrealizetheirunique workorganizationinanaIienenvironment・Sotheratingpointsoftheworkorga‐

nizationarehighinthethreecountries、However,theU8.A.isdifYbrentfTomthe othertwocountries・Theaveragepointsintheworkorganizationisa3fbrthe U.S、A、,4.1fbrtheU.K、,and3.9fbrTaiwanThepointsoftheU、SA、arelower thantheothertwo・TheUS.A・scoressignificantlylowerpointsthantheothertwo countriesinsuchitemsasjobrotation,roleofsupervisor,andpromotion

Atfirst,letusexaminethejobclassifIcationswhichshowalmostthesame pointsfOrthethreecountries・SimplifIcationofthejobclassifIcationsisaprecondi‐

tionfbrimplementingtheJapanese-styleworkorganizationintheU・SA・andthe U.K・I、fact,theyrealizethesimplificationofit・ThoughtraditionalAmericanauto plantshavenearlylOOjobsincludingboththeskilledandtheunskilled,Japanese plantschangedtheminto2categories,productionandmaintenance、IntheU.K、,

JapaneseplantsalsohavetwocategoriesfbrworkersOntheotherhand,theydo notneedtochangethejobclassifIcationsysteminTaiwan,becausesuchasystem hasneverexisted,Inthisway,JapanesefIrmssucceedinmakingpreconditionsin ordertosettheirownflexibleworkorganizationinthethreecountries,eventhough theprocesswasdifTbrent,byrefbrmingthetraditionaljobclassifIcationsinthe U、SA・andtheU.K、andbyadaptingthemselvestothetraditionalcustomsin Taiwan・Asaresult,jobclassificationgetshighratingpointsof48intheU.S、A・

and50intheothertwocountries,whichmeanshavingvirtuallythesamesystem asJapan

Likethis,otheritemsshowhighratingpointsofoveraTheAmericanplants displaylowerpointsthantheothers・Ofthose,theitemofwageisaverylow21 fbrtheU.S、A、WhereastheU.K・is4.OpointsandTaiwanis44points,which meanstheyareveryclosetoJapanThemostimportantdifYbrencebetweenthe US.A、andothersiswhetherornottheyintroduceperfbrmanceevaluationasa decidingfactorofwage・IntheUS.,wageisdeterminedbysimplifiedjobclassifIca‐

tionswithanhourlyrate・Theydonotuseperfbrmanceevaluationsasadetermi‐

nantofwageOntheotherhand,inthecaseofBritishplants,allemployeesare treatedasthesalariedandperfbrmanceevaluationwasadoptedasadeterminant ofwageleveLAlsoinTaiwan,perfbrmanceevaluationwasadoptedasinJapanSo boththeU.K・andTaiwanusethemeritsystemwhichreflectstheworkers,atti- tudeorresult,sotheirratingpointsarehigherthanthoseoftheU、S

TheJapanesesystemrequiresworkerstobemultiskilled,toberesponsiblefbr qualitycontrolandpartiallymaintenance,andtoparticipateinkaizenactivities Becausetheyarerequirednotonlytodoassignedtasksbutalsotoperfbrmawide

69

(13)

lnternationalTrans化rabilityoftheJapane8eProductionSystem

rangeoftasks,andbecausetheyareexpectedtohaveahighmorale,totakecareof

otherteammembers,tasks,andtokeepconcentrationandjudgementontasks,

suchworkersdeservetobetreatedequallywithwhite-collarworkersregarding theirwagesystem、PlantsintheU.K、andTaiwanimplementthewagesystemin

ordertoraiseupexpectableworkers

Britishplantsdisplaythehighestratingof4pointsregardingsuchitemsasjob rotation,roleofsupervisor,andpromotion・ThesecondhighestratingisTaiwan andthencomestheU・SIntheBritishplants,managersaskworkerstodojob

rotationsystematically,sothatworkersareabletoperfbrmawiderangeofdifYbr‐

enttasks・Thefbremanperfbrmsbothworkers,managementandproductioncon‐

trolandmeetskaizenactivitiesaggressively・Regardingpromotion,thereisno limitofupwardpromotionwithinthecompanyandrecommendationbyadirect supervlsorisnecessalyasthefirststep・Therefbreallthreeitemsrate4pointsin theU.K,Inothercountries,JapaneseplantsimplementtheirownsystemBut

thereisadisparityinoperatinglevelsamongplants,sotheratingsarealittle

lowerthantheU.K、

2.ProductionCOntrolandPartsProcurement

Herel'dliketoexplamanapplicationofJapanese-styleproductioncontrolwhich

eliminateswastecompletelyandputsgreatimportanceonquality・Theaverage

pointsfbrtheproductioncontrolgroupsis3、4fbrtheUS.A・’3.3fbrtheU.K・and

a6fbrTaiwan・Theyshowabasicapplicationorientationandhavenodistinguish‐

ingdiffbrencesamongthem・Thegroupisfbrmedbyfburitems;productionequip‐

ment,qualitycontrol,maintenance,andoperationcontroLOfthat,accordingto ourfburaspectsevaluationmodel,onlytheproductionequipmentitembelongsto

"Materialresults',whichmeans`ready-made,andeasytobringin・Theotherthree itemsbelongto“Materialmethods,,,whicharea8sessableatanappliedlevelofthe

system・

Concerninglocalenvlronmentalconditionsfbrproductioncontrol,asexpected,

boththeU・SA、andtheU.K・havemanysimilarities、TaiwanisdifYbrentfrom

them,becausethereexistsadifYbrenceinthebasicmanufncturingcapabilities betweendevelopedcountriesandnewlyindustrializedcountries,Ofcourse,thereis adiflbrencebetweentheUS.A・andtheU.K・TheU.S、A、isthebirthplaceof TaylorismandFordism,whereastheU.K・haslaggedbehindintheadoptionof

American-stylemassproduction、Thisdiffbrenceshouldnotbefbrgotten,however,

evenwhenconsideringit,thetwocountrieshavecommonenvironmentsincom- pariBonwithTaiwanQualitycontrolandmaintenancehaveconstitutedspecial‐

izedjobsandhavekeptdemarcationagainstproductionjobsTherefbretherehas beenanestablishedproductionsystemwithaninflexible,stifTstyleinthedevel- opedcountriesBut,inTaiwan,theyhaveaweakmanufacturingfbundationdueto lateindustrialization、Theycannotprovideallthenecessaryparts・Also,mainte- nanceworkershavenotbeenpromotedsufficientlyandordinaryworkersdonot havethenecessaryqualityconsciousnesstocompetewiththeworldmarket・So regardingproductioncontrol,itispossibletonotethattheU8.A・hasestablisheda

massproductionsyStemandtheU.K・hasestablishedamanumcturingsystem basedonskilledworkers,butTaiwanhasweakmanufncturingcapabilities,espe‐

70

(14)

HiroshiKumon

ciallyintheautomobileindustry・

Howabouttherealapplicationpattern?Asfbrproductionequipment,whilethe ratingis2・OfbrtheU.K、,whichmeansadaptive,contrastingly,theUS.A、is3.9 andTaiwanis36,whichmeanstheyhaveapplicationorientation・Inthecaseof

theU.K、,becausearestructuredplanttakesadvantageofusingoldequipment,the ratingpointsbecomeslow・Regardingqualitycontrol,maintenance,andoperation

control,thehighestrankedistheU.K、,thesecondisTaiwanandthencomesthe

U・SAIntheU.K、,fbremenandworkersusetheJapanese-stylequalitycontrol andoperationcontrolHexibly・Concerningqualitycontrol,Britishplantsimple‐

menttheJapanesewayof"built-upqualitywithinthemanufacturingprocess,',in whichordinaryworkershaveresponsibilityfbrquality・Surprisingly,whereasthe brotherplantintheUS.A、takesaftertheAmericansystemthatallocatesspecial workerstocheckquality,theBritishplant,havingthesameparentcompany,

implementstheJapanesesystemthoroughly・Also,concerningoperationcontrol,

fbremensetaworkstandardandtakepartinlinebalancing・Britishplantsare

prominentintakingontheJapanesesystemflexibly・Inthecaseoftheothertwo

countries,aJapanese-stylequalitycontrolhasbeenadoptedThereasonwhythe

ratingfbrmaintenanceislessthan3points,notashighasothers,isthatskilled

workersarehiredseparatelyfi・omordinaryworkersandtheycannotperfbrm

preventivemaintenanceyet・Asstatedabove,aJapanese-styleproductioncontrol

systemisapplicableevenintheU・SAandtheUK.,wherethejobdemarcation

systemisdeeplyrooted、

Regardingpartsprocurement,thereisanenvironmentalsimilaritybetweenthe twodevelopedcountriesandTaiwanisdifYbrent,sinceitisjustnewlyindustrial- izedltispossibletoprocurepartsindevelopedcountries,butTaiwanesepart makerscannotprovidekeypartsyet・Settingasidethemanufncturingofparts,

developedcountrieshaveestablishedprocurementsystemswhicharediffbrentfrom

theJapaneseJITsystem・TherefbreadoptionoftheJapanesesystemisnoteasy・

Inreality,partsprocurement,sratingpointsasagrouparenotashighasother groups・BoththeU.S、A、andTaiwanare3・OandtheU.K、isanespeciallylow22.,

whereallthreeitemsreceivedabout2pointsTheratingofthisgroupdependson

thelocalgovernmentpolicyandanadvancefi・omtheJapanesepartmakers・Re‐

gardingtheU.K、,wherethepointsshowanadaptivestance,theECrequestsa higherrateoflocalcontentthantheothers,soJapanesefirmsmustadapttoit・In

addition,althoughmanyJapanesepartmakersgointotheUS.A・andTaiwan,

theydon,tadvanceintoEuropeinlargenumbers・ThelowratingpointsintheU.K、

reflectthispassiveattitudeofthepartmakers・Ontheotherhand,intheU・SA、

andTaiwan,assemblyplantsprocurepartsfromJapanese-afHliatedmakersand partiallyimplementJITprocurementpracticeSothescoresareover3pointsin

eachofthetwocountries・

Inthisway,thisitem,sgroupdisplaysrelativelyfbwerpointsthantheothers,

becausethesepointsaremfluencedbylocalgovernmentpolicyandtheadvance- mentpolicybythepartmakers.

3.ParticipationandLaborRelationg

Regardingtheparticipationandlaborrelations,therearesimilarlocalenviron-

71

(15)

lnternationalTranslbrabilityoftheJapaneseProductionSystem

mentsintheU・SandtheU.K・butTaiwanisdifTbrentfromthem、Duetothe traditionofaclasssocietyintheU.K、andthetraditionoftheimmigrantsocietyas wellasafbllowingfbrBritishmstitutionsonthepartoftheU・SA.,relations betweenmanagementandlaborhavebeenadversariaLWorkershavebeendis‐

criminatedagainstinthewagesystemandinworkingconditions・Becausesucha relationshipofoppositionhasbeencontinued,aconsciousnessof"themversusus,,

hasbeenprominentandtherehasbeennoroomfbraparticipativeconsciousness todevelopamongworkers、Contrarytothis,inJapan,managershaveputgreat importanceonhavingharmoniousrelationswithworkerssincetheendofWorld WarlLJapanesecompanieshaveestablishedfirmpracticestomakemanagement- 1aborrelationsstableandinteractive:Thosepracticesincludeworkers,participa- tioninworkingthroughsmallgroupactivities,theparticipationofmanagementin meetingsontheshopfloorandthroughaconsultationsystembetweenmanage‐

mentandtheunion

TherearenonoteworthydifYbrencesregardingparticipationgroupsamongthe threecountries;3.9fbrtheUS.A、,3.8fbrtheU.K、,and3.9fbrTaiwan,displaying anapplicationorientationatahighleveLJapaneselocalplantstrytoinitiate variouskindsofparticipativemeasures:smallgroupactivities,meetings,open‐

styleoffIces,cafbteriasfbrallemployees,socialgatherings,unifbrms,etc・Itseems thatJapanesemanagershavebeentakingamoreactivestancetowardsstimulat- ingparticipationintheU・SA・andtheU.K・thaninTaiwan・Itispossibleto assumethatthereasonfbrthisisthatJapanesemanagersareafraidthatthe workers,traditionaladversarialattitudeagainstmanagementmayappear・One notableitemissmallgroupactivitiesAlthoughallthreecountriesimplement them,theUS.A・revealsthelowestrateofparticipationamongtheworkersat about30%・SotheratingfbrtheUS.A、isaverylow2、7,whereastheothertwo countriesare4.0.AsmallnumberofAmericansareinterestedintheactivities,

but,unlikeJapan,itseemstobedifYicultfbrallofthemtoparticipate・

Itisveryinterestmgthatthelaborrelationsgroupdisplaysacontrastingrating totheworkorganizationgroupBasedonthetraditionallocalenvironments,both theUS.A、andtheU.K・havemuchincommonintheirworkOrganization,partici‐

pation,andlaborrelations・Conversely,TaiwanisdifYbrenthomthemandsimilar toJapan、Asstatedabove,realapplicationpatternsarediffbrenthomenvlronmen- talsimilarity、Regardingworkorganization,therateofapplicationfbrtheUS.A、

isrelativelylowata3,buttheothertwocountriesarerelativelyhigh;theU.K・is 4.1andTaiwanisa9、However,inthecaseoflaborrelations,theratingsare reversed;theU・SA、isthehighestat42,thesecondistheU.K・at3.9,andthelast isTaiwanata6・Sothethreecountriesscorehighpoints,whichmeansthesystem isapplicable,inonesense・Atthesametime,interestinglyenough,theorderof eachcountry,sapplicationrateisalsohighestintheU.SA、,secondintheU.K、and lowestinTaiwanBecausemanagerialenvironmentsarenotsupportivetothe JapanesesystemintheUS.A・andtheU.K、,theplantsinthetwocountriesput greatimportanceonthelaborrelationswhichconstituteaframeworkfbrsmooth workingconditionsfbrtheworkOrganizationandproductioncontroLAsaresult,

Japanesecompaniessucceedinapplyingharmoniouslaborrelations、Japanese- stylelaborrelationsaresupportedbyworkersduetoegalitarianmeasuresfbrall employeesandcooperativelaborrelations.

72

(16)

HiroshiKumon

Nowletusseehowlaborrelationsaretakencareofitembyitem・Theratings fbrtheemploymentpolicyare43pointsfbrtheU.S,A・'4.OfbrtheU.K、,and3.Ofbr TaiwanSothetwodevelopedcountriesgethigherpoints,becauseJapaneseplants therechoseruralareasassitelocationsverycarefnlly,theyconsideredthework ethicandthelowturnoverrateandtheyhiredworkersprudentlythroughvarious selectionsteps、Contrarytothis,Japaneseplantsdidnotthoroughlyimplement

theirwayinTaiwan,partiallybecauselocalpartnershavetheinitiativeinman‐

agemenL

Regardingjobsecurity,JapanesefIrmsintheU.S・andtheU・Kattachgreat

importancetolongtermemployment・Whenproductionvolumedecreaseddueto

badsaleconditions,theydidnotresorttolay-ofYS・Thepolicyoflongtermemploy-

mentisconsistentwiththesimplifIcationofjobclassiHcationlogic、Thatistosay,

becauseoneofthefnnctionsoflargenumbersofjobclassificationsinAmericahas

beenrecognizedtoservetokeepemploymentasafimctionofthelaborunion,

JapaneseplantsmustshowtheycansecurejobsundersimplifIedjobclassification・

SothejobsecurityitemfbrtheUSis4.9pointsand50pointsfbrtheUK.,which arebothveryhigh、Japaneseplantsputgreatimportanceonjobsecurityeven underagreatburdeninordertohavestablelaborrelationsandalsotohavea comparativeadvantageagainstlocalindigenousfirmsthatoccasionallyresortto

lay-ofY白.Interestinglyenough,bothjobclassificationandjobsecurityarealmost thesamehighratingsintheUSandtheU.K・Icanseealogicalconsistencyin

thewaythesetwoitemscanapplytotheJapanesesystemindifTbrentmanagerial environments・Ofcourse,Taiwaneseplantsputgreatimportanceonjobsecurityas apolicy・Butoneplantwherethelocalpartnerhasaninitiativeinmanagementis notparticularaboutit,Therefbretheaveragepointsareonly3.6.

Japaneseplantstakeaprudentstancetolaborunions,ofcourselnthedevel‐

opedcountries,laborunionsareorganizedbyindustryoroccupation,butinJapan andTaiwan,theyareorganizedwithinthecompany・JapanesefIrmsarevery sensitivetounionizationanditsstanceagainstmanagement・IntheUS.,themain trendofJapaneseplantsistorejectlaborunions、Whetherornotaunionexistat plantdependsontheentryfbrm・Inthecaseofsoleentry,theyrejectunionization,

andinthecaseofjointventurewithoneoftheBigThree,theyallowit・Inthe U.K、,twoplantshavelaborunions・InTaiwan,thoughunionswereorganizedafter theliftingofmartiallaw,troublesbetweenmanagementandlaborareveryfbw,In

thisway,Japanese-afYYliatedplantsputgreatimportanceonsuchitemsaspartici‐

pationandlaborunionsinthedevelopedcountries,seemingtosometimeshave excessiveconcernfbrthernAsaresult,theratingpointsbecomevelyhighOnthe otherhand,inTaiwan,theydonotworryaboutparticipationandlaborunionsas theydointhedevelopedcountries,duetotheinstitutionalsimilaritywithJapan Theydonotneedtodoso,becauseoflesstroublewithlaborunions.

4.Parent-SubsidiaryRelations

Herelwouldliketoexplaintherelationshipbetweenparentcompaniesand localsubsidiaries、SuchitemsastheratioofJapaneseexpatriates,thedelegation ofpower,andthestatusoflocalmanagersarethesubjectsthatareincludedinthis category・Generallyspeaking,parent-subsidiaIyrelationsareinHuencedbylocal

73

(17)

InternationalTransfbrabilityoftheJapaneseProductionSystem

managerialenvironmentsandanadvancestrategybytheparentcompany・The Japaneseparentcompanyhasstrongintentionstokeepintimaterelationssothat theycancontrolsubsidiary・TheydispatchmanyJapaneseintotheplantsindevel‐

opedcountries,becausetheirestablishedsystemsaredifYbrentfiPomJapanCon‐

trarytothis,plantmanagementwillbepossiblethroughfbwerJapaneseexpatri‐

atesinTaiwan,duetoitsenvironmentalsimilaritywithJapan・Almostthesame expectationwillbepossibleaccordmgtoanadvancestrategyandtherateofshare holdingslntheU・SA・andtheU.K、,』apanesecompaniesbuiltlargescaleplants withstate-ofLthe-artfncilitiesbyinvestingalargeamountofmoneyandJapanese managerstookaninitiativeinmanagementwhethertheentryfbrmwassoleentry orjointventure・Ontheotherhand,inTaiwan,alllocalplantsarejointventures withlocalfIrms,SoitispossibletopresumethatAmericanandBritishplantswill displaythesamehighratings,whereasTaiwaneseplantswilldiffbrwithonlylow ratings

However,inreality,onlyAmericanplantsreceivehighratingpointaBritish andTaiwaneseplantsreceivelowpoints、Namely,theratingpointsofthisgroup areasfbllows:theU・SA、is3.5,theU.K・is2.0,andTaiwanis2、2.American plantsshowtheyareanapplicationtype,butBritishandTaiwaneseplantsarean adaptivetypeHereagainlcanseecharacteristicfbatureoftheBritishplants whichareadaptabletotheJapanesesysteminsomedepth,likewiseofthework orgamzation・

Intheratingsbycountry,theU・SA・scoresover3pointsineachofthethree items:theratioofJapaneseexpatriatesis3.8,thedelegationofpowerisa3,and thestatusoflocalmanagersis3・aContrarytothis,bothBritishandTaiwanese plantsscorelpointintheratioofJapaneseexpatriates;theU.K・isL5and Taiwanis1.6.Thetwocountriesgoupto2pointsinsuchitemsasthedelegation ofpowerandthestatusoflocalmanager(seeTable4).Itispossibletoassumethat theJapanesesystemisintroducedontheinitiativeofJapanesemanagers,Asa matteroffblct,astandardpracticeofplantmanagementistodispatchmanyJapa‐

nese(seeTablel).OnlyplantABthoroughlyentrustsmanagementtolocalmanag‐

ers,Ontheotherhand,regardingtheU.K、,thepointsindicatethatlocalmanagers hadaninitiativeintheadoptionoftheJapanesesystem、Thisimageiscorrectin thepresentsituation、Butlshouldconsideranotherside・Twoplantswereoperat‐

ingwhenlvisitedtheU.K・Ofthose,theparentcompanyoftheplantBBwhich producespassengercarshadapolicyoflocalizationofmanagement・Thebrother plantintheUS.A、has0.3%Japaneseexpatriates,whichisanextremelylowrate;

andtheBritishplanthas1.1%Japaneseexpatriates,whichisalsoalowrate・The otheroneplantoperatingintheU.K、isajointventureandtheparentcompany hasnoroomtoinvestmuchthere・Evenwhenconsidermgsuchaspecialsituation,

itissurprisingtorealizethelocalizationofmanagementisatsuchahighlevelin

theU.K、

A1soinTaiwan,theJapanesesystemisapplicablethroughthemitiativeoflocal managers・Asmentionedearlier,threeoutofthefiveplantsleavemanagement powertolocalpartnersinTaiwan、Japanesehavethemanagementpowerinthe othertwoplants・Inspiteofthissituation,theapplicationrateisvelyhighin Taiwan、SoanapplicationoftheJapanesesystemispossiblethroughalocal partner,sinitiativeinTaiwan・LocalmanagersunderstandandmastertheJapa‐

74

参照

関連したドキュメント

Standard domino tableaux have already been considered by many authors [33], [6], [34], [8], [1], but, to the best of our knowledge, the expression of the

Moreover, to obtain the time-decay rate in L q norm of solutions in Theorem 1.1, we first find the Green’s matrix for the linear system using the Fourier transform and then obtain

In this section we prove that the functional J defined in (1.5), where g and its primitive G satisfy the conditions in (A1)–(A5), satisfies the (PS) c condition provided that c 6=

Considering singular terms at 0 and permitting p 6= 2, Loc and Schmitt [17] used the lower and upper solution method to show existence of solution for (1.1) with the nonlinearity of

Indeed, under the hypotheses from Example 8.3, we obtain (via the mountain pass theorem) the existence of a nontrivial solution for the problem (1.2), (1.3), while Example 8.4

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

In [3] the authors review some results concerning the existence, uniqueness and regularity of reproductive and time periodic solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and some

In order to be able to apply the Cartan–K¨ ahler theorem to prove existence of solutions in the real-analytic category, one needs a stronger result than Proposition 2.3; one needs