• 検索結果がありません。

HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES OF FUNCTIONS PARAMETRICALLY DEFINED

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES OF FUNCTIONS PARAMETRICALLY DEFINED"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES OF FUNCTIONS PARAMETRICALLY DEFINED

By Ryuji KANEIWA

HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES OF FUNCTIONS PARAMETRICALLY DEFINED

By Ryuji Kaneiwa

Theorem. Let n be a positive integer. If x and y are C

n

-functions of t and

dxdt

0 in a certain interval, then

d

n

y dx

n

1

n 1

dx dt 2n 1

n

k 1 dky dtk

k 1 !

s1 s2 n 1

1s1 2s2 2n k 1

1

s1

2n s

1

2 !

dxdt s1 ddt2x2 s2

2!

s2

s

2

! 3!

s3

s

3

! is valid in the same interval.

We prepare several notations for the proof of Theorem. Set that P s N

0N

; # j N ; s j 0

0

, where N

0

0 N . We denote for k N

0

and s P,

M

k

s

j 1

j

k

s j , and for l, n N

0

,

P

l

n s P; M

0

s l, M

1

s n .

An element s of P

l

n represents a partition of n into l parts:

n

s1

1 1

s2

2 2 .

We denote x

j

d

j

x

dt

j

, y

k

d

k

y dt

k

and for s P,

ν s 1

s1

2 M

0

s s 1 !

2!

s2

s 2 ! 3!

s3

s 3 ! , ξ s x

s1

x

s2

. Thus we are able to rewrite the theorem to the following

(1) d

n

y

dx

n

1

n 1

x

2n 1

n

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

s Pn 12n k 1

ν s ξ s .

(2)

proof of (1). If n 1, then we have

s Pn 12n 2

ν s ξ s

s P00

ν s ξ s 1,

since s P

0

0 implies s j 0, for all j N . Accordingly, (1) becomes dy dx y x ,

if n 1. This is well known.

Suppose that (1) is folds for n 1 n 2 . That is (2) d

n 1

y

dx

n 1

1

n 2

x

2n 3

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

sPn 22n k 3

ν s ξ s . From (2), we have

(3) d

n

y dx

n

dt dx

d dt

d

n 1

y dx

n 1

x

1

1

n 1

2n 3 x

2n 2

x

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

sPn 2 2n k 3

ν s ξ s 1

n 2

x

2n 3

n 1

k 1

y

k 1

k 1 !

s Pn 22n k 3

ν s ξ s

1

n 2

x

2n 3

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

s Pn 22n k 3

ν s ξ s

1

n 1

x

2n 1

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

s Pn 22n k 3

2n 3 ν s ξ s x

n

k 2

y

k

k 1 !

sPn 22n k 2

k 1 ν s ξ s x

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

s Pn 22n k 3

ν s ξ s x .

(3)

We define s for s P

n 2

2n k 3 as the following

s m s 2 1 , if m 2,

s m , otherwise.

Then we have s P

n 1

2n k 1 , ξ s x ξ s and

ν s 2s 2

2n 2 s 1 2n 3 s 1 ν s .

So that (4)

sPn 22n k 3

2n 3 ν s ξ s x

u Pn 12n k 1

2n 3 2 u 2 ν u ξ u

2n 2 u 1 2n 3 u 1 .

We define s for s P

n 2

2n k 2 as the following

s m s 1 1 , if m 1,

s m , otherwise.

Then we have s P

n 1

2n k 1 , ξ s x ξ s and

ν s ν s

2n 2 s 1 .

If k 1 and u P

n 1

2n k 1 , then u 1 0. Hence (5)

sPn 22n k 2

k 1 ν s ξ s x

u Pn 12n k 1

k 1 ν u ξ u

2n 2 u 1 ,

if k 1.

Next we define s

j

for s P

n 2

2n k 3 . If j 1, we set s

1

s .

If s j 0 and j 1, we set as the following

s

j

m

s 1 1 , if m 1, s j 1 , if m j, s j 1 1 , if m j 1,

s m , otherwise.

(4)

We have s

j

P

n 1

2n k 1 ,

ν s 2s

1

2

2n 2 s

1

1 2n 3 s

1

1 ν s

1

and

ν s j 1 s

j

j 1

2n 2 s

j

1 s

j

j 1 ν s

j

, if s j 0 and j 1. Further we get

(6)

s Pn 22n k 3

ν s ξ s x

s Pn 22n k 3

ν s

s j 0

s j ξ s

j

u Pn 12n k 1

2 u 1 u 2 ν u ξ u

2n 2 u 1 2n 3 u 1

j 1,u j 1 0

j 1 u j 1 ν u ξ u

2n 2 u 1 .

From (3), (4), (5), and (6), we have d

n

y

dx

n

1

n 1

x

2n 1

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 1 2n k 1

2n 3 2 u 2 ν u ξ u

2n 2 u 1 2n 3 u 1

n

k 2

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 1 2n k 1

k 1 ν u ξ u 2n 2 u 1

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 12n k 1

2u 1 u 2

2n 2 u 1 2n 3 u 1

j 1

j 1 u j 1

2n 2 u 1 ν u ξ u

(5)

1

n 1

x

2n 1

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 1 2n k 1

2 u 2 ν u ξ u 2n 2 u 1

n

k 2

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 1 2n k 1

k 1 ν u ξ u 2n 2 u 1

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 12n k 1 j 1

j 1 u j 1

2n 2 u 1 ν u ξ u 1

n 1

x

2n 1

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 1 2n k 1 j 0

j 1 u j 1

2n 2 u 1 ν u ξ u

n

k 2

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 12n k 1

k 1 ν u ξ u 2n 2 u 1 1

n 1

x

2n 1

n 1

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 1 2n k 1

2n k 1 u 1

2n 2 u 1 ν u ξ u

n

k 2

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 12n k 1

k 1 ν u ξ u 2n 2 u 1 1

n 1

x

2n 1

n

k 1

y

k

k 1 !

u Pn 1 2n k 1

ν u ξ u . This completes the proof.

Remark. In the theorem, by set y t, we get the formula for inverse functions(see [1]).

Reference

[1] Kaneiwa, R., The Formula for Higher Order Derivatives of Inverse

Functions, The Review of Liberal Arts, No.131, 1-3 (2016), Otaru Uni-

versity of Commerce.

参照

関連したドキュメント

The torsion free generalized connection is determined and its coefficients are obtained under condition that the metric structure is parallel or recurrent.. The Einstein-Yang

We solve by the continuity method the corresponding complex elliptic kth Hessian equation, more difficult to solve than the Calabi-Yau equation k m, under the assumption that

Corollary. Let K be an n-dimensional local field.. his duality theorem of Galois cohomology groups with locally compact topologies for two-dimensional local fields).. Table

Now it makes sense to ask if the curve x(s) has a tangent at the limit point x 0 ; this is exactly the formulation of the gradient conjecture in the Riemannian case.. By the

Trujillo; Fractional integrals and derivatives and differential equations of fractional order in weighted spaces of continuous functions,

Abstract The representation theory (idempotents, quivers, Cartan invariants, and Loewy series) of the higher-order unital peak algebras is investigated.. On the way, we obtain

For a higher-order nonlinear impulsive ordinary differential equation, we present the con- cepts of Hyers–Ulam stability, generalized Hyers–Ulam stability,

In this paper, we obtain strong oscillation and non-oscillation conditions for a class of higher order differential equations in dependence on an integral behavior of its